RESUMEN
Undetectable measurable residual disease (uMRD) is achievable in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with the BCL2-inhibitor venetoclax alone or combined with the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib. This phase 2, multicenter, MRD-driven study was designed to discontinue treatment upon reaching uMRD4 (<10-4) in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL receiving venetoclax monotherapy or after the addition of ibrutinib. Primary end point of the study was proportion of uMRD4 with venetoclax ± ibrutinib. Secondary end points were overall response rate, partial response, complete response, progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, and safety of venetoclax ± ibrutinib. Patients with uMRD4 at Cycle 12 Day 1 discontinued venetoclax. MRD+ patients added ibrutinib and continued both drugs up to Cycle 24 Day 28/uMRD4/progression/toxicity. After Cycle 24 Day 28, MRD+ patients continued ibrutinib. Thirty-eight patients (29% with TP53 aberrations; 79% with unmutated IGHV) started venetoclax. Overall response rate with venetoclax was 36 (95%) of 38 patients (20 complete; 16 partial response). Seventeen patients (45%) with uMRD4 at Cycle 12 Day 1 discontinued venetoclax. Nineteen (55%) MRD+ subjects added ibrutinib. After a median of 7 months (range, 3-10 months) of combined treatment, 16 (84%) of 19 achieved uMRD4, thus stopping both drugs. Two MRD+ patients at Cycle 24 Day 28 continued ibrutinib until progression/toxicity. After a median follow-up of 36.5 months, median progression-free survival was not reached; 10 patients progressed (4 restarted venetoclax, 3 without treatment need, 2 developed Richter transformation, and 1 dropped out). Seven (22%) of 32 patients remain uMRD4 after 3 years of follow-up. Neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse event; no grade 5 events occurred on study. This sequential MRD-guided approach led to uMRD4 in 33 (87%) of 38 patients, with venetoclax monotherapy or combined with ibrutinib, delivering treatment combination only in a fraction, and ultimately identifying the few patients benefiting from continuous therapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT04754035.
Asunto(s)
Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Humanos , Neoplasia Residual/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con PuentesRESUMEN
The GIMEMA phase II LLC1518 VERITAS trial investigated the efficacy and safety of front-line, fixed-duration venetoclax and rituximab (VenR) in combination in young (≤65 years), fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and unmutated IGHV and/or TP53 disruption. Treatment consisted of the venetoclax ramp-up, six monthly courses of the VenR combination, followed by six monthly courses of venetoclax as a single agent. A centralized assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) was performed by allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction assay on the peripheral blood and bone marrow at the end of treatment (EOT) and during the follow-up. The primary endpoint was the complete remission rate at the EOT. Seventy-five patients were enrolled; the median age was 54 years (range, 38-65), 96% had unmutated IGHV, 12% had TP53 disruption, and 4% had mutated IGHV with TP53 disruption. The overall response rate at the EOT was 94.7%, with a complete remission rate of 76%. MRD was undetectable in the peripheral blood of 69.3% of patients and in the bone marrow of 58.7% of patients. The 12-month MRD-free survival in the 52 patients with undetectable MRD in the peripheral blood at the EOT was 73.1%. After a median follow-up of 20.8 months, no cases of disease progression were observed. Three patients had died, two due to COVID-19 and one due to tumor lysis syndrome. The first report of the VERITAS study shows that front-line VenR was associated with a high rate of complete remissions and durable response with undetectable MRD in young patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and unfavorable genetic characteristics. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03455517.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/diagnóstico , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/genética , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Neoplasia Residual/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Marginal zone lymphomas (MZLs) are indolent nonfollicular B-cell lymphomas (INFLs) and have heterogeneous clinical behavior. Recently, time to progression of disease at 24 months (POD24) was identified to stratify overall survival (OS) in follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma and in INFL. Here, we examined the ability of POD24 to predict subsequent OS in a large, international cohort of MZL as part of the NF10 prospective international registry headed by Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL). POD24 was only calculated for MZL patients requiring immediate therapy and was defined as experiencing lymphoma progression within 24 months from diagnosis. Among the 1325 patients enrolled in the NF10 study, we identified 321 patients with MZL for whom immediate therapy was planned right after lymphoma diagnosis. Overall, POD24 was confirmed in 59 patients (18%). Three-year OS for patients with POD24 was 53% with a hazard ratio of 19.5 (95% confidence interval, 8.4-45) compared with patients without POD24 (3-year OS, 95%). Association of POD24 with OS was confirmed for the subgroup of splenic and extranodal MZLs. Assessment of POD24 stratifies subsequent outcome in MZL and identifies a high-risk population. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02904577.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/mortalidad , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
We analyzed 160 young Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) patients with a median age of 49 years (range 23-55 years), diagnosed between January 2000 and January 2019 in 14 Italian centers. At diagnosis, 70% of patients were asymptomatic. With a median follow-up of 5.6 years, 57% have been treated. As initial therapy 79% of patients received chemo-immunotherapy, 13% a chemo-free induction and 8% chemotherapy only. At relapse or progression, 6% underwent an autologous stem cell transplantation. Overall, 19% of patients received ibrutinib during the course of the disease. According to IPSSWM, 63% were classified as low risk, 27% as intermediate risk and 10% as high risk. Five-year OS was shorter in high-risk as compared with low or intermediate risk patients (92.9% vs 100% P = .002). According to revised IPSSWM, 92% were classified as very low or low risk and 8% as intermediate risk, with a shorter 5-year OS in the latter group (87.5% vs 100%, P = .028). The OS of young WM patients was not significantly reduced as compared with age-matched, sex-matched and calendar year-matched general population. Early diagnosis, absence of high-risk features in symptomatic patients and high efficacy of modern treatments are the main determinants of the excellent outcome of young WM patients.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Células Madre , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Autoinjertos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piperidinas , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/mortalidad , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/terapiaRESUMEN
Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) is usually associated with a serum IgM paraprotein, corresponding to Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM). Cases presenting with IgG or IgA, or without a monoclonal protein are extremely rare. We analyzed clinical characteristics, frontline treatment, and the outcome of 45 patients with non-IgM LPL, and compared them with a control group of WM patients. The median age was similar, with significantly higher prevalence of females in non-IgM LPL, than in WM patients (60% vs 39%, P = .016). Patients with non-IgM LPL more frequently presented with lymphadenopathies (53% vs 15%, P < .001), splenomegaly (22% vs 8%, P = .015) or extranodal involvement (20% vs 8%, P = .05). In non-IgM LPL a serum monoclonal protein and bone marrow infiltration were less common than in WM patients (69% and 84% of cases respectively, P < .001 for both comparisons). The MYD88 (L265P) mutation was found in 8/19 patients using allele-specific polymerase chain reaction. A CXCR4 mutation was found in 4/17 cases using Sanger. In 16 patients we performed targeted next-generation sequencing of genes MYD88, CXCR4, ARID1-A, KMT2D, NOTCH2, TP53, PRDM1, CD79B, TRAF3, MYBBP1A, TNFAIP3. Seven patients (44%) had a MYD88 mutation (S219C in one), four (25%) a CXCR4 mutation, three (19%) a KMT2D mutation, one (6%) a TP53 mutation and one (6%) a TRAF3 mutation. With a median follow-up of 55.7 months, 36 non-IgM LPL patients (80%) were treated. Non-IgM LPL patients received more frequently anthracycline-containing regimens, as compared with WM patients, who mainly received alkylating-based therapies. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 84%, similar to that of WM patients.
Asunto(s)
Paraproteínas/análisis , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antraciclinas/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Médula Ósea/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Factor 88 de Diferenciación Mieloide/genética , Proteínas de Neoplasias/genética , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Receptores CXCR4/genética , Distribución por Sexo , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/sangre , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/tratamiento farmacológico , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/genéticaAsunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
P110-γ and -δ act in lymphocytes chemotaxis, presenting distinct, nonredundant roles in B- and T-cell migration and adhesion to stromal cells. Moreover, phosphoinositide-3-kinase-γ inhibition contributes to regulate macrophage polarization inhibiting cancer growth. Duvelisib (IPI-145) is an oral first-in-class, dual phosphoinositide-3-kinase inhibitor targeting p110-δ/γ exerting its activity in preclinical studies across different prognostic groups. In a large Phase III study, duvelisib showed superior progression-free survival and overall response rate compared with ofatumumab, thus leading to its approval for relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Immune-related effects are the main reason for treatment suspension, thus affecting survival benefit. Nevertheless, the correct management of adverse events, eventually including dose modification, allows patients to remain on treatment. In conclusion, duvelisib represents a promising treatment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and a salvage therapy after ibrutinib.
Asunto(s)
Isoquinolinas/administración & dosificación , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de las Quinasa Fosfoinosítidos-3/administración & dosificación , Purinas/administración & dosificación , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasa Clase I/antagonistas & inhibidores , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasa Clase I/genética , Evaluación de Medicamentos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/clasificación , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Isoquinolinas/efectos adversos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/genética , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas/genética , Inhibidores de las Quinasa Fosfoinosítidos-3/efectos adversos , Piperidinas , Pronóstico , Purinas/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Terapia Recuperativa/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Ibrutinib represents a revolution in chronic lymphocytic leukemia treatment scenario providing results never seen before and offering an effective therapy even in high-risk patients with really poor outcome after chemoimmunotherapy. Thanks to longer updates, on one hand, ibrutinib has confirmed its efficacy continuing to show clinical benefits over time; on the other hand, resistance mechanisms are slowly emerging. Moreover, clinicians should be aware of ibrutinib-related side effects, paying attention to screen patients that could benefit more from the drug and try to prevent adverse events. While ibrutinib approval indication is expanding, high treatment costs will shortly require a selection of those who can really draw advantage from Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibition and those who could continue to be treated with chemoimmunotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Agammaglobulinemia Tirosina Quinasa , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/genética , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/patología , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas/genéticaAsunto(s)
Hepatitis B Crónica , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Virus de la Hepatitis B/fisiología , Hepatitis B Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/complicaciones , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Activación ViralAsunto(s)
Inmunoglobulina M/inmunología , Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/terapia , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada/inmunología , Mieloma Múltiple/inmunología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inmunología , Pronóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/inmunologíaAsunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fibrilación Atrial/etiología , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/complicaciones , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/fisiopatología , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Concern has emerged about the prevalence of second cancers among patients with hairy cell leukemia (HCL) treated with purine analogs. We investigated 513 patients with HCL treated with cladribine over the last 30 years at 18 Italian centers and calculated their standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). We identified 24 patients with a second cancer diagnosed at a median time from treatment with cladribine of 59.9 months (range: 9.2-169.7 months). All patients with solid neoplasms presented with a limited-stage disease, except four cases of locally advanced cancer; multiple myeloma patients had a smoldering disease, while lymphoma patients had stage Ie and stage IV diseases. Response to therapy was complete in 19 cases; 1 patient is still receiving treatment for a relapsing bladder disease, while 2 patients progressed during treatment and died. These two patients died from unrelated causes: one from infection and one due to surgery complications. The median OS from HCL was 98.5 months (range: 38.4-409.2 months), while the median OS from second cancer was 27.6 months (range: 1-117.8 months). The SIR was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.54-1.30) for males and 1.13 (95% CI: 0.36-2.73) for females: no statistically significant differences were highlighted. We were not able to demonstrate an excess of second cancer or a significant association with the specific studied neoplasm.
RESUMEN
Background: Marginal zone lymphomas (MZL), comprised of three unique but related subtypes, lack a unifying prognostic score applicable to all the patients in need for systemic chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. Methods: Patients from the prospective NF10 study (NCT02904577) with newly diagnosed MZL and receiving frontline systemic therapy at diagnosis or after observation were used to train a prognostic model. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) from start of treatment. The model was externally validated in a pooled analysis of two independent cohorts from the University of Iowa and Mayo Clinic Molecular Epidemiology Resource and the University of Miami. Findings: We identified 501 eligible patients. After multivariable modeling, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) above upper normal limit, hemoglobin <12 g/dL, absolute lymphocyte count <1 × 109/L, platelets <100 × 109/L, and MZL subtype (nodal or disseminated) were independently associated with inferior PFS. The proposed MZL International Prognostic index (MZL-IPI) combined these 5 factors, and we defined low (LRG, 0 factors, 27%), intermediate (IRG, 1-2 factors, 57%) and high (HRG, 3+ factors, 16%) risk groups with 5-y PFS of 85%, 66%, and 37%, respectively (c-Harrell = 0.64). Compared to the LRG, the IRG (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 2.30, 95% CI 1.39-3.80) and HRG (HR = 5.41, 95% CI 3.12-9.38) had inferior PFS. Applying the MZL-IPI to the pooled US cohort (N = 353), 94 (27%), 192 (54%), and 67 (19%) patients were classified as LRG, IRG, and HRG, respectively, and the model was validated for PFS (log-rank test p = 0.0018; c-Harrell = 0.578, 95% CI 0.54-0.62). The MZL-IPI was also prognostic for OS in both the training and the external validation sets. Interpretation: MZL-IPI is a new prognostic score for use in all patients with MZL considered for systemic treatment. Funding: The MER was supported by P50 CA97274 and U01 CA195568.
RESUMEN
Ibrutinib revolutionized the CLL treatment approach and prognosis demonstrating its efficacy and safety even at extended follow-up. During the last few years, several next-generation inhibitors have been developed to overcome the occurrence of toxicity or resistance in patients on continuous treatment. In a head-to-head comparison of two phase III trials, both acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib demonstrated a lower incidence of adverse events in respect to ibrutinib. Nevertheless, resistance mutations remain a concern with continuous therapy and were demonstrated with both first- and next-generation covalent inhibitors. Reversible inhibitors showed efficacy independently of previous treatment and the presence of BTK mutations. Other strategies are currently under development in CLL, especially for high-risk patients, and include BTK inhibitor combinations with BCl2 inhibitors with or without anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. Finally, new mechanisms for BTK inhibition are under investigations in patients progressing with both covalent and non-covalent BTK and BCl2 inhibitors. Here we summarize and discuss results from main experiences on irreversible and reversable BTK inhibitors in CLL.
RESUMEN
The importance of coexisting conditions in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) outcome has been increasingly recognized over the past years. The role of comorbidities to predict patients' vulnerability toward immunochemotherapy has been well establish, especially since some of the tools commonly used to evaluate patients' fitness were employed to determine treatment eligibility in randomized trials. Nevertheless, is it still unclear how much fitness weights on treatment outcome with targeted agents and which assessment should be preferred. There are key differences in the toxicity profile between novel agents that are getting much more evident in retrospective, real-life experiences, rather than clinical trials. Therefore, an individual patient's comorbid medical conditions may be a deciding factor in therapy selection. Here, we analyze main evidence in literature on the predicting value of comorbidity assessment on outcome and management of CLL patients receiving novel agents.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: The question of which parameters may be informative on venetoclax outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is still unclear. Furthermore, the choice to treat with venetoclax can be challenging in patients with baseline characteristics or comorbidities that may potentially favor some specific adverse events. Objectives: This study was aimed to evaluate whether age, fitness status, patients'/disease characteristics, or concomitant medications may predict outcomes in CLL patients receiving venetoclax. Design: Retrospective observational study. Methods: Impact of age, presence of Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) >6 or severe organ impairment (CIRS3+), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status (ECOG-PS), renal function, and concomitant medications were retrospectively analyzed on treatment management (definitive discontinuation due to toxicity, discontinuation due to toxicity, Tox-DTD; permanent dose reduction, PDR) and survival [progression free survival (PFS), event free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS)] in unselected patients receiving venetoclax monotherapy in common practice. Results: A total of 221 relapsed/refractory patients were included. Tox-DTD and PDR were reported in 5.9% and 21.7%, respectively, and were not influenced by any fitness parameter, age, number or type of concomitant medication, baseline neutropenia, or impaired renal function. None of these factors were associated with tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) development. Age and coexisting conditions had no influence on PFS and EFS. At univariate analysis, OS was significantly shorter only in patients with ECOG-PS >1 (p < 0.0001) and elderly (⩾65 years) with CIRS >6 (p = 0.014) or CIRS3+ (p = 0.031). ECOG-PS >1 retained an independent role only for EFS and OS. While Tox-DTD affected all survival outcomes, no differences in PFS were reported among patients permanently reducing dose or interrupting venetoclax for > 7 days. Conclusion: Clinical outcome with venetoclax is not influenced by comorbidities, patients' clinical characteristics, or concomitant medications. Differently from other targeted therapies, this demonstrates that, except ECOG-PS, none of the parameters generally considered for treatment choice, including baseline neutropenia or impaired renal function, should rule the decision process with this agent. Anyway, if clinically needed, a correct drug management does not compromise treatment efficacy and may avoid toxicity-driven discontinuations. Plain Language Summary: Chapter 1: Why was this study done? Chapter 2: Which are the main findings of the study? Chapter 3: How these findings may impact on clinical practice? Coexisting conditions and concomitant medications do not affect venetoclax management and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia ⢠The question of which parameters may be informative on venetoclax outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia is still unclear. Furthermore, the choice to treat with venetoclax can be challenging in patients with baseline characteristics or comorbidities that may potentially favor some specific adverse events (e.g. compromised renal function or baseline neutropenia).⢠In our large series of patients treated outside of clinical trials, we demonstrated that neither age, fitness, comorbidities nor concomitant medications impact on venetoclax management and survival. Importantly, patients presenting with baseline neutropenia or impaired renal function did not have a higher rate of dose reductions or toxicity-driven discontinuations, thus further underlining that venetoclax may be safely administered even in those categories with no preclusions.⢠Differently from other targeted agents, our data demonstrate that none of the baseline factors commonly considered in treatment decision process retains a role with venetoclax. Finally, permanent dose reductions and temporary interruptions did not adversely impact PFS suggesting that, if clinically needed, a correct drug management should be adopted with no risk of compromising venetoclax efficacy.