Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 75
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(6): 605-611, 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38290053

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bacterial contamination of implants has been linked to biofilm formation and subsequent infection, capsular contracture, and breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Reducing contamination during implant insertion should therefore reduce biofilm formation disease sequelae. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare levels of contamination between preventative techniques. METHODS: A model to simulate the passage of implants through a skin incision was designed that utilized a sterile textured polyvinyl plastic sheet contaminated with Staphylococcus epidermidis. In the first stage of the polyvinyl contamination model, implants were subject to infection-mitigation techniques and passed through the incision, then placed onto horse blood agar plates and incubated for 24 hours. In the second stage of the study the same contamination was applied to human abdominal wall specimens. A 5 cm incision was made through skin and fat, then implants were passed through and levels of contamination were measured as described. RESULTS: Smooth implants grew a mean of 95 colony-forming units (CFUs; approximately 1 CFU/cm2) and textured implants grew 86 CFUs (also approximately 1 CFU/cm2). CFU counts were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U-test which showed no significant difference between implant types (P < .05); independent-sample t-tests showed a significant difference. The dependent-variable techniques were then compared as groups by one-way analysis of variance, which also showed a significant reduction compared with the control group (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: This in vitro study has shown the effectiveness of antiseptic rinse and skin/implant barrier techniques for reducing bacterial contamination of breast implants at the time of insertion.


Asunto(s)
Biopelículas , Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Staphylococcus epidermidis , Implantes de Mama/microbiología , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Humanos , Staphylococcus epidermidis/aislamiento & purificación , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantación de Mama/instrumentación , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Femenino , Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana
2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(5)2023 Mar 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36902413

RESUMEN

Staphylococcus aureus biofilms are resistant to both antibiotics and disinfectants. As Staphylococci cell walls are an important defence mechanism, we sought to examine changes to the bacterial cell wall under different growth conditions. Cell walls of S. aureus grown as 3-day hydrated biofilm, 12-day hydrated biofilm, and 12-day dry surface biofilm (DSB) were compared to cell walls of planktonic organisms. Additionally, proteomic analysis using high-throughput tandem mass tag-based mass spectrometry was performed. Proteins involved in cell wall synthesis in biofilms were upregulated in comparison to planktonic growth. Bacterial cell wall width (measured by transmission electron microscopy) and peptidoglycan production (detected using a silkworm larva plasma system) increased with biofilm culture duration (p < 0.001) and dehydration (p = 0.002). Similarly, disinfectant tolerance was greatest in DSB, followed by 12-day hydrated biofilm and then 3-day biofilm, and it was least in the planktonic bacteria--suggesting that changes to the cell wall may be a key factor for S. aureus biofilm biocide resistance. Our findings shed light on possible new targets to combat biofilm-related infections and hospital dry surface biofilms.


Asunto(s)
Desinfectantes , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus , Cloro , Agua , Proteómica , Antibacterianos , Biopelículas , Pared Celular
3.
Aesthet Surg J ; 43(3): 308-314, 2023 02 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36242549

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation remains the commonest cosmetic surgical procedure worldwide, in spite of recent regulatory action. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate women with breast implants attending a breast implant assessment clinic and to capture clinical and implant data in women presenting to the service. METHODS: Patients were enrolled prospectively between January 2018 and December 2021. Clinical, implant, and practitioner data were recorded. Patients reported satisfaction on size, shape, and overall outcome as well as the presence or pain. Radiological evaluation, where indicated, was performed and data were included on these findings. RESULTS: A total of 603 patients were assessed. Their mean age was 42.7 years and mean age at implantation was 29.1 years. The most common complications were capsular contracture followed by pain, waterfall deformity, and double bubble, with rupture/contracture rates increasing after the 10-year mark. The risk of double bubble was significantly lower if patients were operated on by certified practitioners (odds ratio = 0.49, P = 0.011). There was almost universally poor awareness of the risks of breast implants in patients presenting for evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown benefit in a breast implant assessment clinic to gather information on adverse events and patient-reported outcomes following breast implant surgery. Having appropriately trained and certified practitioners perform cosmetic augmentation significantly lowers the risk of implant malposition and deformity. Any adverse event occurring within 5 years of initial surgery should be flagged as a mandatory reportable clinical indicator and trigger further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Contractura , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Geles de Silicona/efectos adversos , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Contractura Capsular en Implantes/etiología , Contractura/complicaciones , Contractura/cirugía , Dolor/etiología
4.
Aesthet Surg J ; 43(6): NP438-NP448, 2023 05 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36759325

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of delayed-onset tissue nodules (DTNs) due to hyaluronic acid (HA) injections is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To formulate a rational theory for DTN development and their avoidance and treatment. METHODS: A multidisciplinary and multicountry DTN consensus panel was established, with 20 questions posed and consensus sought. Consensus was set at 75% agreement. RESULTS: Consensus was reached in 16 of 20 questions regarding the pathogenesis of DTNs, forming the basis for a classification and treatment guide. CONCLUSIONS: The group believes that filler, pathogens, and inflammation are all involved in DTNs and that DTNs most likely are infection initiated with a variable immune response. Injected filler may incorporate surface bacteria, either a commensal or a true pathogen, if the skin barrier is altered. The initially high molecular weight HA filler is degraded to low molecular weight HA (LMWHA) at the edge of the filler. Commensals positioned within the filler bolus may be well tolerated until the filler is degraded and the commensal becomes visible to the immune system. LMWHA is particularly inflammatory in the presence of any local bacteria. Commensals may still be tolerated unless the immune system is generally heightened by viremia or vaccination. Systemic pathogenic bacteremia may also interact with the filler peripheral LMWHA, activating Toll-like receptors that induce DTN formation. Given this scenario, attention to practitioner and patient hygiene and early systemic infection treatment deserve attention. Classification and treatment systems were devised by considering each of the 3 factors-filler, inflammation, and infection-separately.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Cosméticas , Rellenos Dérmicos , Humanos , Ácido Hialurónico/efectos adversos , Inyecciones , Técnicas Cosméticas/efectos adversos , Inflamación/etiología , Rellenos Dérmicos/efectos adversos
5.
Aesthet Surg J ; 40(6): 619-625, 2020 05 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31501857

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Specific antimicrobial breast pocket irrigations have been proven over the past 20 years to reduce the incidence of capsular contracture by a factor of 10, and the emergence of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) and its link to bacteria/technique has created renewed interest in different antimicrobial breast pocket preparation agents. Our previous studies have identified that both Betadine-containing and non-Betadine-containing antimicrobial irrigations provide excellent broad-spectrum bacterial coverage. The current science of BIA-ALCL has implicated the Gram-negative microbiome as a key in pathogenesis. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to revisit the antimicrobial effectiveness of clinically utilized Betadine and non-Betadine solutions, along with other antimicrobial agents that have not yet been tested, against multiple organisms, including additional common Gram-negative bacteria associated with chronic breast implant infections/inflammation. METHODS: Current and new antimicrobial breast irrigations were tested via standard techniques for bactericidal activity against multiple Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains. Test results are detailed and clinical recommendations for current antimicrobial irrigations are provided. RESULTS: Betadine-containing irrigations were found to be superior according to the testing performed. CONCLUSIONS: There are quite few misconceptions with regard to antimicrobial breast pocket irrigation. These are discussed and final evidence-based recommendations for practice are given.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Mama , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Humanos , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/epidemiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología
6.
Aesthet Surg J ; 40(8): 838-846, 2020 07 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31738381

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is an emerging cancer that has been linked to the use of textured devices. The recent increase in number and frequency of cases has led to worldwide regulatory action. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to longitudinally study BIA-ALCL in Australia since the index case was first reported in 2007. METHODS: Confirmed historical cases were collected and then prospectively analyzed from October 2015 to May 2019. Clinical and implant exposure data were determined and compared with company sales data for 4 devices to generate implant-specific risk. RESULTS: A total 104 cases of BIA-ALCL were diagnosed in Australia with exposure to 149 unique breast implants. The mean age of patients was 48.2 years (range, 22.4-78.5 years). They had an average time from implantation to diagnosis of 6.8 years. A total 51.7% of implants utilized in this cohort were Allergan Biocell devices. The indication for implant usage was for primary cosmetic augmentation in 70%, post-breast cancer reconstruction in 23%, and following weight loss/pregnancy in 7%. The majority of women presented with early (stage 1) disease (87.5%). The risk for developing BIA-ALCL ranged from 1 in 1947 sales (95% confidence interval = 1199-3406) for Silimed Polyurethane devices to 1 in 36,730 (95% confidence interval = 12,568-178,107) for Siltex imprinted textured devices. CONCLUSIONS: Implants with higher surface area/texture seem to be more associated with BIA-ALCL in Australia. Recent regulatory action to suspend, cancel, or recall some of these higher risk devices is supported by these findings.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Adulto , Anciano , Australia/epidemiología , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/epidemiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
8.
Aesthet Surg J ; 39(Suppl_1): S55-S65, 2019 01 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30715170

RESUMEN

Since their introduction into the market, breast implants have been the subject of many controversies. It is timely to examine the forces that have shaped the breast implant industry to make it what it is today. This review will concentrate more on the use of implants in aesthetic surgery rather than their use in breast reconstruction, but some of the factors have relevance to both indications.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantación de Mama/historia , Implantes de Mama/historia , Femenino , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos
10.
Aesthet Surg J ; 43(11): 1269-1272, 2023 Oct 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37366560
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA