Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 23(1): 136-41, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22221479

RESUMEN

Extrahepatic mesocaval shunts were successfully created in three patients with refractory variceal hemorrhage, complete portal vein or superior mesenteric vein occlusion, and contraindications to shunt surgery. The use of intravascular ultrasound guidance and covered stents allowed safe and effective transvenous shunt creation without the necessity of percutaneous transabdominal mesenteric venous puncture.


Asunto(s)
Endosonografía , Venas Mesentéricas/cirugía , Derivación Portocava Quirúrgica , Vena Porta/cirugía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Várices/cirugía , Trombosis de la Vena/cirugía , Adolescente , Descompresión Quirúrgica , Femenino , Hepatitis B Crónica/complicaciones , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Venas Mesentéricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/cirugía , Vena Porta/diagnóstico por imagen , Esplenectomía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Várices/diagnóstico por imagen , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen
2.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 23(4): 488-94, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22464713

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility and efficacy of applying an established innovation process to an active academic interventional radiology (IR) practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Stanford Biodesign Medical Technology Innovation Process was used as the innovation template. Over a 4-month period, seven IR faculty and four IR fellow physicians recorded observations. These observations were converted into need statements. One particular need relating to gastrostomy tubes was diligently screened and was the subject of a single formal brainstorming session. RESULTS: Investigators collected 82 observations, 34 by faculty and 48 by fellows. The categories that generated the most observations were enteral feeding (n = 9, 11%), biopsy (n = 8, 10%), chest tubes (n = 6, 7%), chemoembolization and radioembolization (n = 6, 7%), and biliary interventions (n = 5, 6%). The output from the screening on the gastrostomy tube need was a specification sheet that served as a guidance document for the subsequent brainstorming session. The brainstorming session produced 10 concepts under three separate categories. CONCLUSIONS: This formalized innovation process generated numerous observations and ultimately 10 concepts to potentially to solve a significant clinical need, suggesting that a structured process can help guide an IR practice interested in medical innovation.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de Necesidades/organización & administración , Innovación Organizacional , Radiología Intervencionista/métodos , Radiología Intervencionista/tendencias , California
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA