Molecular detection and characterization of foodborne bacteria: Recent progresses and remaining challenges.

The global food demand is expected to increase in the coming years, along with challenges around climate change and food security. Concomitantly, food safety risks, particularly those related to bacterial pathogens, may also increase. Thus, the food sector needs to innovate to rise to this challenge. Here, we discuss recent advancements in molecular techniques that can be deployed within various foodborne bacteria surveillance systems across food settings. To start with, we provide updates on nucleic acid-based detection, with a focus on polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technologies and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). These include descriptions of novel genetic markers for several foodborne bacteria and progresses in multiplex PCR and droplet digital PCR. The next section provides an overview of the development of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins systems, such as CRISPR-Cas9, CRISPR-Cas12a, and CRISPR-Cas13a, as tools for enhanced sensitive and specific detection of foodborne pathogens. The final section describes utilizations of whole genome sequencing for accurate characterization of foodborne bacteria, ranging from epidemiological surveillance to model-based predictions of bacterial phenotypic traits through genome-wide association studies or machine learning.

Isolation and characterization of head and neck cancer-derived peritumoral and cancer-associated fibroblasts.

Introduction: Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are characterized by strong cellular and molecular heterogeneity and treatment resistance entailing poor survival. Besides cell-intrinsic properties, carcinoma cells receive important cues from non-malignant cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME). Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are a major component of the TME that impact on the molecular make-up of malignant cells and have a decisive function in tumor progression. However, the potential functionality of fibroblasts within tumor-adjacent, macroscopically normal tissue remains poorly explored. Methods: Here, we isolated primary peritumoral fibroblasts (PtFs) from macroscopically normal tissue in vicinity of primary human papillomavirus-negative and -positive oropharyngeal HNSCC and compared their phenotype and functionality with matched CAFs (n = 5 pairs) and with human oral fibroblasts (hOFs). Results: Expression patterns of CD90, CD73, CD105, smooth muscle actin, Vimentin, and S100A4 were comparable in PtFs, CAFs, and hOFs. Cell proliferation and doubling times of CAFs and PtFs were heterogeneous across patients (n =2 PtF>CAF; n = 1 CAF>PtF; n = 2 CAF=PtF) and reflected inferior growth than hOFs. Furthermore, PtFs displayed an reduced heterogeneity in cell size compared to matched CAFs, which were characterized by the presence of single large cells. Overall, conditioned supernatants from CAFs had more frequently growth-promoting effects on a panel of carcinoma cell lines of the upper aerodigestive tract carcinoma cell lines (Cal27, Cal33, FaDu, and Kyse30), whereas significant differences in migration-inducing effects demonstrated a higher potential of PtFs. Except for Kyse30, CAFs were significantly superior to hOFs in promoting proliferation, while PtFs induced stronger migration than hOFs in all carcinoma lines tested. Analysis of soluble factors demonstrated significantly increased VEGF-A production in CAFs (except in pat.8), and significantly increased PDGF-BB production in PtFs of two patients. Tube formation assays confirmed a significantly enhanced angiogenic potential of conditioned supernatants from CAFs compared to hOFs on human umbilical vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs) in vitro. Discussion: Hence, matched CAFs and PtFs present in HNSCC patients are heterogeneous in their proliferation-, migration-, and angiogenesis-promoting capacity. Despite this heterogeneity, CAFs induced stronger carcinoma cell proliferation and HUVEC tube formation overall, whereas PtFs promoted migration of tumor cells more strongly.