The Rise of Patients Declining Rectal Cancer Surgery in the Era of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy.

BACKGROUND: The treatment landscape for rectal cancer is rapidly evolving, particularly with the increasing use of neoadjuvant therapies. Still, up to 50% of patients with stage II-III disease require surgical resection post-neoadjuvant therapy to achieve the best oncologic outcomes. Many patients, however, hope to avoid surgery. This study aimed to assess trends and factors associated with declining recommended oncologic resection after systemic therapy nationally and in our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis using the National Cancer Database from 2009 to 2021 and an institutional cohort at an academic center between 2009 and 2022 including adults with stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and were suitable for surgery. RESULTS: Of 96,997 patients nationally, the rate of declining surgery increased from 2.3% in 2009 to 6.3% in 2021, a trend mirrored in our institutional cohort of 365 patients (0% in 2009/2010 to approximately 6-12% in 2021/2022). Locally, patients who declined surgery had higher rates of tobacco use, temporary loss to follow-up during therapy, and a more robust, albeit incomplete, tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy compared with controls who underwent surgery. Despite a stoma being the most cited reason for declining surgery, 30.4% of patients who declined oncologic resection died with a stoma. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore a notable trend of patients declining oncologic resections following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. By shedding light on the outcomes of patients who opt against surgery, we address a critical gap in the literature essential for informing patients about potential risks.

Systematic Review of Surgical Care in the Incarcerated Population: Identifying Knowledge Gaps for Future Research.

Objective: This study, examining literature up to December 2023, aims to comprehensively assess surgical care for incarcerated individuals, identifying crucial knowledge gaps for informing future health services research and interventions. Background: The US prison system detains around 2 million individuals, mainly young, indigent males from ethnic and racial minorities. The constitutional right to healthcare does not protect this population from unique health challenges and disparities. The scarcity of literature on surgical care necessitates a systematic review to stimulate research, improve care quality, and address health issues within this marginalized community. Methods: A systematic review, pre-registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023454782), involved searches in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Original research on surgical care for incarcerated individuals was included, excluding case reports/series (<10 patients), abstracts, and studies involving prisoners of war, plastic surgeries for recidivism reduction, transplants using organs from incarcerated individuals, and nonconsensual surgical sterilization. Results: Out of 8209 studies screened, 118 met inclusion criteria, with 17 studies from 16 distinct cohorts reporting on surgical care. Predominantly focusing on orthopedic surgeries, supplemented by studies in emergency general, burns, ophthalmology, and kidney transplantation, the review identified delayed hospital presentations, a high incidence of complex cases, and low postoperative follow-up rates. Notable complications, such as nonfusion and postarthroplasty infections, were more prevalent in incarcerated individuals compared with nonincarcerated individuals. Trauma-related mortality rates were similar, despite lower intraabdominal injuries following penetrating abdominal injuries in incarcerated patients. Conclusion: While some evidence suggests inferior surgical care in incarcerated patients, the limited quality of available studies underscores the urgency of addressing knowledge gaps through future research. This is crucial for patients, clinicians, and policymakers aiming to enhance care quality for a population at risk of surgical complications during incarceration and postrelease.

Comparative analysis of short-term outcomes after semielective and elective surgery for sigmoid volvulus.

BACKGROUND: Data to guide surgical timing after colonic decompression for sigmoid volvulus are limited. Thus, we compared the postoperative outcomes of patients with sigmoid volvulus who underwent semielective (during index hospitalization after decompression) and elective surgery (subsequent elective hospitalization). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 100% Medicare Provider Analysis and Review Files from 2016 to 2019, including Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years who were urgently/emergently admitted for their index episode of volvulus and underwent colonic decompression followed by surgery. RESULTS: The mean age of 2,053 patients was 78 (standard deviation 8 years); 7% had elective surgery and 93% had semielective surgery (including 12.5% on the same day as decompression). In a bivariate analysis, elective surgery was associated with greater rates of minimally invasive surgery (32.8% vs 12.6%, P < .001), lower rates of ostomy formation (2.9% vs 36.0%, P < .001), and greater rates of discharge home (89.8% vs 47.4%, P < .001) with similar cumulative length of stay (8 vs 9 days, not significant) compared with semielective surgery. In a multivariable logistic regression, elective surgery was associated with reduced odds of morbidity (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.74) and similar odds of mortality (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-1.25) compared with semielective surgery, which remained consistent after excluding patients with surgery on the same day as decompression. CONCLUSIONS: After colonic decompression for sigmoid volvulus, elective surgery appears safe and is associated with favorable outcomes compared with semielective surgery. With the potential severe consequences of volvulus recurrence, these findings underscore the need for algorithms to predict recurrence risk to help guide careful patient selection for elective surgery.

Mismatch Repair and Microsatellite Testing for Individuals With Colorectal Cancer.

This cohort study examines the institution-level and patient-level factors associated with mismatch repair and microsatellite testing for individuals with colorectal cancer.

RNA sequencing of transformed lymphoblastoid cells from siblings discordant for autism spectrum disorders reveals transcriptomic and functional alterations: Evidence for sex-specific effects.

Genome-wide expression studies of samples derived from individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and their unaffected siblings have been widely used to shed light on transcriptomic differences associated with this condition. Females have historically been under-represented in ASD genomic studies. Emerging evidence from studies of structural genetic variants and peripheral biomarkers suggest that sex-differences may exist in the biological correlates of ASD. Relatively few studies have explicitly examined whether sex-differences exist in the transcriptomic signature of ASD. The present study quantified genome-wide expression values by performing RNA sequencing on transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines and identified transcripts differentially expressed between same-sex, proximal-aged sibling pairs. We found that performing separate analyses for each sex improved our ability to detect ASD-related transcriptomic differences; we observed a larger number of dysregulated genes within our smaller set of female samples (n = 12 sibling pairs), as compared with the set of male samples (n = 24 sibling pairs), with small, but statistically significant overlap between the sexes. Permutation-based gene-set analyses and weighted gene co-expression network analyses also supported the idea that the transcriptomic signature of ASD may differ between males and females. We discuss our findings in the context of the relevant literature, underscoring the need for future ASD studies to explicitly account for differences between the sexes. Autism Res 2017, 10: 439-455. © 2016 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.