RESUMEN
Thrombotic complications are common in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia with important consequences on the diagnostic and therapeutic management. We report a consecutive series of five patients on long-term oral anticoagulation therapy who presented to our hospital for severe COVID-19 pneumonia associated with segmental acute pulmonary embolism despite adherence to therapy and with an adequate anticoagulant range at the time of the event. Four patients were receiving a direct oral anticoagulant (two with edoxaban, one with rivaroxaban and one with apixaban) and one patient a vitamin K antagonist. No significant thrombotic risk factors, active cancer, or detectable venous thromboembolism were present. In all cases, elevated d-dimer and fibrinogen levels with a parallel rise in markers of inflammation were documented. The combination of these findings seems to support the hypothesis that considers the local vascular damage determined by severe viral infection as the main trigger of thrombi detected in the lungs, rather than emboli from peripheral veins.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Embolia Pulmonar , Tromboembolia Venosa , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/complicaciones , Humanos , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Tromboembolia Venosa/inducido químicamente , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The long noncoding RNA LIPCAR (Long Intergenic noncoding RNA Predicting CARdiac remodeling) has emerged as a promising biomarker in cardiac disease and cardiac remodeling. To determine whether LIPCAR levels help for a molecular phenotyping of chronic heart failure (HF) patients, this study assessed the association of LIPCAR with severity of the disease and its progression, and with risk of death or hospitalization in HF patients. METHODS: LIPCAR was measured in plasma of 967 HF patients with symptomatic heart failure participating in the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Insufficienza Cardiaca - Heart Failure (GISSI-HF) biohumoral sub-study. RESULTS: Plasma levels of LIPCAR were significantly associated with functional impairment as assessed by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, kidney function as reflected by estimated glomerular filtration rate, and creatinine, hemoglobin and mitral insufficiency. In females, these associations were more marked as compared to males. LIPCAR plasma levels were significantly related to the two cardiac markers, N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, but not to inflammatory markers such as high sensitivity C-reactive protein and pentraxin-3, nor to patient reported outcomes such as depression and quality of life. HF patients with high LIPCAR levels univariately showed significantly higher incidence of cardiovascular hospitalizations but not of death; after adjusting for covariates, no significant effects of LIPCAR were found for cardiovascular hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: The circulating long noncoding RNA LIPCAR was increased in HF patients with higher NYHA class, impaired kidney function, and lower hemoglobin, which are indicators of patients' overall state.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , ARN Largo no Codificante , Biomarcadores , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Calidad de Vida , Remodelación VentricularRESUMEN
RATIONALE: In the exploratory Phase II STEM-AMI (Stem Cells Mobilization in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial, we reported that early administration of G-CSF (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor), in patients with anterior ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after successful percutaneous coronary intervention, had the potential to significantly attenuate LV adverse remodeling in the long-term. OBJECTIVE: The STEM-AMI OUTCOME CMR (Stem Cells Mobilization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Outcome Cardiac Magnetic Resonance) Substudy was adequately powered to evaluate, in a population showing LV ejection fraction ≤45% after percutaneous coronary intervention for extensive ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, the effects of early administration of G-CSF in terms of LV remodeling and function, infarct size assessed by late gadolinium enhancement, and myocardial strain. METHODS AND RESULTS: Within the Italian, multicenter, prospective, randomized, Phase III STEM-AMI OUTCOME trial, 161 ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients were enrolled in the CMR Substudy and assigned to standard of care (SOC) plus G-CSF or SOC alone. In 119 patients (61 G-CSF and 58 SOC, respectively), CMR was available at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Paired imaging data were independently analyzed by 2 blinded experts in a core CMR lab. The 2 groups were similar for clinical characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, and pharmacological treatment, except for a trend towards a larger infarct size and longer symptom-to-balloon time in G-CSF patients. ANCOVA showed that the improvement of LV ejection fraction from baseline to 6 months was 5.1% higher in G-CSF patients versus SOC (P=0.01); concurrently, there was a significant between-group difference of 6.7 mL/m2 in the change of indexed LV end-systolic volume in favor of G-CSF group (P=0.02). Indexed late gadolinium enhancement significantly decreased in G-CSF group only (P=0.04). Moreover, over time improvement of global longitudinal strain was 2.4% higher in G-CSF patients versus SOC (P=0.04). Global circumferential strain significantly improved in G-CSF group only (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Early administration of G-CSF exerted a beneficial effect on top of SOC in patients with LV dysfunction after extensive ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction in terms of global systolic function, adverse remodeling, scar size, and myocardial strain. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01969890.
Asunto(s)
Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Femenino , Ventrículos Cardíacos/efectos de los fármacos , Ventrículos Cardíacos/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Contracción Miocárdica/efectos de los fármacos , Tamaño de los Órganos , Estudios Prospectivos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/patología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Método Simple Ciego , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Remodelación Ventricular/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Most of the drugs associations that have been used to treat patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection increase the risk of prolongation of the corrected QT interval (QTc). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of an association therapy of hydroxychloroquine (HY) plus ritonavir/darunavir (RD) or azithromycin (AZ) on QTc intervals. METHODS: At the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic patients admitted to our hospital were treated with the empiric association of HY/RD; one week later the therapeutic protocol was modified with the combination of HY/AZ. Patients underwent an ECG at baseline, then 3 and 7 days after starting therapy. We prospectively enrolled 113 patients (61 in the HY/RD group-52 in the HY/AZ group). RESULTS: A significant increase in median QTc was reported after seven days of therapy in both groups: from 438 to 452 ms in HY/RD patients; from 433 to 440 ms in HY/AZ patients (p = 0.001 for both). 23 patients (21.2%) had a QTc > 500 ms at 7 days. The risk of developing a QTc > 500 ms was greater in patients with prolonged baseline QTc values (≥ 440 ms for female and ≥ 460 ms for male patients) (OR 7.10 (95% IC 1.88-26.81); p = 0.004) and in patients with an increase in the QTc > 40 ms 3 days after onset of treatment (OR 30.15 (95% IC 6.96-130.55); p = 0.001). One patient per group suffered a malignant ventricular arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: Hydroxychloroquine with both ritonavir/darunavir or azithromycin therapy significantly increased the QTc-interval at 7 days. The risk of developing malignant arrhythmias remained relatively low when these drugs were administered for a limited period of time.
Asunto(s)
Azitromicina/efectos adversos , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Darunavir/efectos adversos , Electrocardiografía/efectos de los fármacos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Síndrome de QT Prolongado/inducido químicamente , Ritonavir/efectos adversos , Anciano , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Darunavir/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Síndrome de QT Prolongado/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ritonavir/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization and improve symptoms in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction compared with enalapril. After 7 years since the publication of the results of PARADIGM-HF, further insight has been gained with potential new indications. Two prospective randomized multicentre studies (PIONEER-HF and TRANSITION) in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF) have shown an improved clinical outcome and biomarker profile as compared with enalapril, and good tolerability, safety, and feasibility of initiating in-hospital administration of S/V. Furthermore, some studies have highlighted the favourable effects of S/V in attenuating adverse myocardial remodelling, supporting an early benefit after treatment. Observational data from non-randomized studies in AHF report that in-hospital and pre-discharge prescription of evidence-based drugs associated with better survival still remain suboptimal. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has also negatively impacted on outpatient activities. Therefore, hospitalization, a real crossroad in the history of heart failure, must become a management and therapeutic opportunity for our patients. The objective of this ANMCO position paper is to encourage and facilitate early S/V administration in stabilized patients during hospitalization after an AHF episode, with the aim of improving care efficiency and clinical outcome.
RESUMEN
Atherosclerosis often affects the coronary arterial tree. Frequently the disease does not translate in significant narrowing of the vessels, thus determining only a non-obstructive disease. This condition that is described as non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NobsCAD) should be distinguished from the absence of disease (i.e. smooth coronary arteries) as it carries a specific prognostic value. The detection and reporting of NobsCAD should prompt preventive measures that can be individualized upon the degree of the underlying burden of disease. The accompanying clinical condition, the other cardiovascular risk factors present, and the description of the severity and extent of NobsCAD should provide the framework for an individualized treatment that should also consider the best available scientific evidence and guidelines. The description of NobsCAD represents important information to be collected whenever a coronary angiogram (both invasive and non-invasive) is performed. Treating the patient according to the presence and extent of NobsCAD offers prognostic benefits well beyond those offered by considering only the traditional cardiovascular risk factors. In order to reach this goal, NobsCAD should not be confused with the absence of coronary atherosclerosis or even ignored when detected as if it was a trivial information to provide.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is poor knowledge on characteristics, comorbidities and laboratory measures associated with risk for adverse outcomes and in-hospital mortality in European Countries. We aimed at identifying baseline characteristics predisposing COVID-19 patients to in-hospital death. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective observational study on 3894 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalized from February 19th to May 23rd, 2020 and recruited in 30 clinical centres distributed throughout Italy. Machine learning (random forest)-based and Cox survival analysis. 61.7% of participants were men (median age 67 years), followed up for a median of 13 days. In-hospital mortality exhibited a geographical gradient, Northern Italian regions featuring more than twofold higher death rates as compared to Central/Southern areas (15.6% vs 6.4%, respectively). Machine learning analysis revealed that the most important features in death classification were impaired renal function, elevated C reactive protein and advanced age. These findings were confirmed by multivariable Cox survival analysis (hazard ratio (HR): 8.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.6-14.7 for age ≥85 vs 18-44 y); HR = 4.7; 2.9-7.7 for estimated glomerular filtration rate levels <15 vs ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2; HR = 2.3; 1.5-3.6 for C-reactive protein levels ≥10 vs ≤ 3 mg/L). No relation was found with obesity, tobacco use, cardiovascular disease and related-comorbidities. The associations between these variables and mortality were substantially homogenous across all sub-groups analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired renal function, elevated C-reactive protein and advanced age were major predictors of in-hospital death in a large cohort of unselected patients with COVID-19, admitted to 30 different clinical centres all over Italy.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Aprendizaje Automático , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , COVID-19 , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is controversy about the outcome of patients with acute myocarditis (AM), and data are lacking on how patients admitted with suspected AM are managed. We report characteristics, in-hospital management, and long-term outcome of patients with AM based on a retrospective multicenter registry from 19 Italian hospitals. METHODS: A total of 684 patients with suspected AM and recent onset of symptoms (<30 days) were screened between May 2001 and February 2017. Patients >70 years of age and those >50 years of age without coronary angiography were excluded. The final study population comprised 443 patients (median age, 34 years; 19.4% female) with AM diagnosed by either endomyocardial biopsy or increased troponin plus edema and late gadolinium enhancement at cardiac magnetic resonance. RESULTS: At presentation, 118 patients (26.6%) had left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, sustained ventricular arrhythmias, or a low cardiac output syndrome, whereas 325 (73.4%) had no such complications. Endomyocardial biopsy was performed in 56 of 443 (12.6%), and a baseline cardiac magnetic resonance was performed in 415 of 443 (93.7%). Cardiac mortality plus heart transplantation rates at 1 and 5 years were 3.0% and 4.1%. Cardiac mortality plus heart transplantation rates were 11.3% and 14.7% in patients with complicated presentation and 0% in uncomplicated cases (log-rank P<0.0001). Major AM-related cardiac events after the acute phase (postdischarge death and heart transplantation, sustained ventricular arrhythmias treated with electric shock or ablation, symptomatic heart failure needing device implantation) occurred in 2.8% at the 5-year follow-up, with a higher incidence in patients with complicated forms (10.8% versus 0% in uncomplicated AM; log-rank P<0.0001). ß-Adrenoceptor blockers were the most frequently used medications both in complicated (61.9%) and in uncomplicated forms (53.8%; P=0.18). After a median time of 196 days, 200 patients had follow-up cardiac magnetic resonance, and 8 of 55 (14.5%) with complications at presentation had left ventricular ejection fraction <50% compared with 1 of 145 (0.7%) of those with uncomplicated presentation. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary study, overall serious adverse events after AM were lower than previously reported. However, patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, ventricular arrhythmias, or low cardiac output syndrome at presentation were at higher risk compared with uncomplicated cases that had a benign prognosis and low risk of subsequent left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Asunto(s)
Miocarditis , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Biopsia , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Trasplante de Corazón , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Italia , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Miocarditis/diagnóstico , Miocarditis/mortalidad , Miocarditis/fisiopatología , Miocarditis/terapia , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Volumen Sistólico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Troponina/sangre , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
It is now 4 years since the introduction of the new direct oral anticoagulants into clinical practice. Therefore, the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO) has deemed necessary to update the previous position paper on the prevention of thrombo-embolic complications in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, which was published in 2013. All available scientific evidence has been reviewed, focusing on data derived from both clinical trials and observational registries. In addition, all issues relevant to the practical clinical management of oral anticoagulation with the new direct inhibitors have been considered. Specific clinical pathways for optimal use of oral anticoagulation with the new directly acting agents are also developed and proposed for clinical implementation. Special attention is finally paid to the development of clinical algorithms for medium and long-term follow-up of patients treated with new oral direct anticoagulants.
RESUMEN
Changing demographics and an increasing burden of multiple chronic comorbidities in Western countries dictate refocusing of heart failure (HF) services from acute in-hospital care to better support the long inter-critical out-of- hospital phases of HF. In Italy, as well as in other countries, needs of the HF population are not adequately addressed by current HF outpatient services, as documented by differences in age, gender, comorbidities and recommended therapies between patients discharged for acute hospitalized HF and those followed-up at HF clinics. The Italian Working Group on Heart Failure has drafted a guidance document for the organisation of a national HF care network. Aims of the document are to describe tasks and requirements of the different health system points of contact for HF patients, and to define how diagnosis, management and care processes should be documented and shared among health-care professionals. The document classifies HF outpatient clinics in three groups: (i) community HF clinics, devoted to management of stable patients in strict liaison with primary care, periodic re-evaluation of emerging clinical needs and prompt treatment of impending destabilizations, (ii) hospital HF clinics, that target both new onset and chronic HF patients for diagnostic assessment, treatment planning and early post-discharge follow-up. They act as main referral for general internal medicine units and community clinics, and (iii) advanced HF clinics, directed at patients with severe disease or persistent clinical instability, candidates to advanced treatment options such as heart transplant or mechanical circulatory support. Those different types of HF clinics are integrated in a dedicated network for management of HF patients on a regional basis, according to geographic features. By sharing predefined protocols and communication systems, these HF networks integrate multi-professional providers to ensure continuity of care and patient empowerment. In conclusion, This guidance document details roles and interactions of cardiology specialists, so as to best exploit the added value of their input in the care of HF patients and is intended to promote a more efficient and effective organization of HF services.
RESUMEN
Biomarkers have dramatically impacted the way heart failure (HF) patients are evaluated and managed. A biomarker is a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biological or pathogenic processes, or pharmacological responses to a therapeutic intervention. Natriuretic peptides [B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP] are the gold standard biomarkers in determining the diagnosis and prognosis of HF, and a natriuretic peptide-guided HF management looks promising. In the last few years, an array of additional biomarkers has emerged, each reflecting different pathophysiological processes in the development and progression of HF: myocardial insult, inflammation, fibrosis, and remodelling, but their role in the clinical care of the patient is still partially defined and more studies are needed before to be well validated. Moreover, several new biomarkers have the potential to identify patients with early renal dysfunction and appear to have promise to help the management cardio-renal syndrome. With different biomarkers reflecting HF presence, the various pathways involved in its progression, as well as identifying unique treatment options for HF management, a closer cardiologist-laboratory link, with a multi-biomarker approach to the HF patient, is not far ahead, allowing the unique opportunity for specifically tailoring care to the individual pathological phenotype.
RESUMEN
Chest pain is a common general practice presentation that requires careful diagnostic assessment because of its diverse and potentially serious causes. However, the evaluation of acute chest pain remains challenging, despite many new insights over the past two decades. The percentage of patients presenting to the emergency departments because of acute chest pain appears to be increasing. Nowadays, there are two essential chest pain-related issues: (i) the missed diagnoses of acute coronary syndromes with a poor short-term prognosis; and (ii) the increasing percentage of hospitalizations of low-risk cases. It is well known that hospitalization of a low-risk chest pain patient can lead to unnecessary tests and procedures, with an increasing trend of complications and burden of costs. Therefore, the significantly reduced financial resources of healthcare systems induce physicians and administrators to improve the efficiency of care protocols for patients with acute chest pain. Despite the efforts of the Scientific Societies in producing statements on this topic, in Italy there is still a significant difference between emergency physicians and cardiologists in managing patients with chest pain. For this reason, the aim of the present consensus document is double: first, to review the evidence-based efficacy and utility of various diagnostic tools, and, second, to delineate the critical pathways (describing key steps) that need to be implemented in order to standardize the management of chest pain patients, making a correct diagnosis and treatment as uniform as possible across the entire country.
RESUMEN
The hospital discharge is often poorly standardized and affected by discontinuity and fragmentation of care, putting patients at high risk of both post-discharge adverse events and early readmission. The present ANMCO document reviews the modifiable components of the hospital discharge process related to adverse events or re-hospitalizations and suggests the optimal methods for redesigning the whole discharge process. The key principles for proper hospital discharge or transfer of care acknowledge that the hospital discharge: ⢠is not an isolated event, but a process that has to be planned as soon as possible after the admission, ensuring that the patient and the caregiver understand and contribute to the planned decisions, as equal partners; ⢠is facilitated by a comprehensive systemic approach that begins with a multidimensional evaluation process; ⢠must be organized by an operator who is responsible for the coordination of all phases of the hospital patient journey, involving afterward the general practitioner and transferring to them the information and responsibility at discharge; ⢠is the result of an integrated multidisciplinary team approach; ⢠appropriately uses the transitional and intermediate care services; ⢠is carried out in an organized system of care and continuum of services; and ⢠programs the passage of information to after-discharge services.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Half of patients with acute heart failure syndromes (AHFS) have preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (PLVEF). In this setting, the role of minor myocardial damage (MMD), as identified by cardiac troponin T (cTnT), remains to be established. AIM: To evaluate the prevalence and long-term prognostic significance of cTnT elevations in patients with AHFS and PLVEF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter, collaborative study included 500 patients hospitalized for AHFS with PLVEF (ejection fraction ≥40%) between October 2000 and December 2006. Blood samples were collected within 12 hours after admission and were assayed for cTnT. MMD was defined as a cTnT value of ≥0.020 ng/mL. RESULTS: Mean age was 73 ± 12 years, 47% were female, 38% had an ischemic etiology, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class was 2.2 ± 0.7. Mean cTnT value was 0.149 ± 0.484 ng/mL, and cTnT was directly correlated with serum creatinine (Spearman's Rho = 0.35, P < .001) and NYHA class (0.25, P < .001). MMD was diagnosed in 220 patients (44%). Patients with MMD showed lower left ventricular ejection fraction (P < .05), higher serum creatinine (P < .001), higher prevalence of ischemic etiology and diabetes mellitus, a worse NYHA class (P < .001), and higher natriuretic peptide levels (P < .001) as compared with patients without MMD. At 6-month follow-up, overall event-free survival was 55% and 75% in patients with and without MMD (P < .001), respectively. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, only NYHA class (HR = 1.50; P = .002) and MMD (HR = 1.81; P = .001) were identified as predictors of events. CONCLUSIONS: Increased cTnT levels were detected in approximately 50% of patients with AHFS with preserved systolic function, and were found to correlate with clinical measures of disease severity. The presence of MMD was associated with a worse long-term outcome, lending support to cTnT-based risk stratification in the setting of AHFS.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Miocardio/metabolismo , Miocardio/patología , Sístole/fisiología , Troponina T/metabolismo , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/metabolismo , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Argentina/epidemiología , Conducta Cooperativa , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/metabolismo , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome , Tiempo , Troponina T/biosíntesis , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
In the year 2006 the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO) promoted a Consensus Conference among professional Scientific Societies in order to redefine the role and core responsibilities of each health professionals involved in heart failure management in a novel integrated network. Five years later, a questionnaire has been proposed to each Italian Regional President of the Association, in order to assess the implementation of the proposed management strategies in the different clinical scenarios of the Italian Regions. Although the Document utilization is not homogeneous through Italy, it is still considered a valuable tool of work.
Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Conferencias de Consenso como Asunto , Humanos , Italia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Myocardial dysfunction and heart failure (HF), frequently described as cardiotoxicity, are the most concerning cardiovascular complications of cancer therapies, causing an increase in morbidity and mortality, even due to early discontinuation of antineoplastic drugs. Research efforts have been done to prevent and treat this phenomenon, in particular through early administration of drugs inducing renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade. Sacubitril/valsartan, a combination of an angiotensin receptor blocker and a neprilysin inhibitor pro-drug, has recently represented a game changer in the scenario of treatment of HF with reduced ejection fraction. However, patients with HF induced by cancer therapy were a priori excluded from the approval study. Therefore, safety and efficacy of this drug in this special population require further investigation. Available evidence, even though only derived from case reports or observational studies, seems to confirm the promising role of this new pharmacological strategy, paving the way for the use of sacubitril/valsartan in cardio-oncology. Prevention and treatment of HF in these highly vulnerable patients is a special need to allow full oncologic treatment and improve overall survival, highlighting the need for ad hoc prospective studies.
Asunto(s)
Neprilisina , Tetrazoles , Aminobutiratos , Compuestos de Bifenilo , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Tetrazoles/efectos adversos , ValsartánRESUMEN
AIMS: To assess adherence to guideline recommendations among a large network of Italian cardiology sites in the management of acute and chronic heart failure (HF) and to evaluate if an ad-hoc educational intervention can improve their performance on several pharmacological and non-pharmacological indicators. METHODS AND RESULTS: BLITZ-HF was a cross-sectional study based on a web-based recording system with pop-up reminders on guideline recommendations used during two 3-month enrolment periods carried out 3 months apart (Phase 1 and 3), interspersed by face-to-face macro-regional benchmark analyses and educational meetings (Phase 2). Overall, 7218 patients with acute and chronic HF were enrolled at 106 cardiology sites. During the enrolment phases, 3920 and 3298 patients were included, respectively, 84% with chronic HF and 16% with acute HF in Phase 1, and 74% with chronic HF and 26% with acute HF in Phase 3. At baseline, adherence to guideline recommendations was already overall high for most indicators. Among acute HF patients, an improvement was obtained in three out of eight indicators, with a significant rise in echocardiographic evaluation. Among chronic HF patients with HF and preserved or mid-range ejection fraction, performance increased in two out of three indicators: creatinine and echocardiographic evaluations. An overall performance improvement was observed in six out of nine indicators in ambulatory HF with reduced ejection fraction patients with a significant increase in angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor prescription rates. CONCLUSIONS: Within a context of an already elevated level of adherence to HF guideline recommendations, a structured multifaceted educational intervention could be useful to improve performance on specific indicators. Extending this approach to other non-cardiology healthcare professionals, who usually manage patients with HF, should be considered.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios TransversalesRESUMEN
Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome with a severe prognosis, despite therapeutic progress. The management of the advanced stages of the syndrome is particularly complex in patients who are referred to palliative care as well as in those who are candidates for cardiac replacement therapy. For the latter group, a prompt recognition of the transition to the advanced stage as well as an early referral to the centers for cardiac replacement therapy are essential elements to ensure that patients follow the most appropriate diagnostic-therapeutic pathway. The aim of this document is to focus on the main diagnostic and therapeutic aspects related to the advanced stages of heart failure and, in particular, on the management of patients who are candidates for cardiac replacement therapy.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Trasplante de Corazón , Corazón Auxiliar , Cardiotónicos/uso terapéutico , Vías Clínicas , Humanos , Cuidados PaliativosRESUMEN
The triple therapy (angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) certificated by the 2012 guidelines for symptomatic patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, reaffirmed in the following document of 2016 with the introduction of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI), has not yet reached an adequate implementation in clinical practice (where the majority of patients is only treated with the double treatment of ACE-inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers and beta-blockers). Among the reasons for this general failure, we should consider the enrollment of unselected cases from the real world, without exclusion criteria for age, comorbidity and stage of the disease, the therapeutic inertia of many cardiologists and not least the clinical and organizational complexity of the conventional scheme of implementation of therapy indicated by the guidelines. Not only the prescription of triple therapy is inadequate, but also the "target doses" defined by the large randomized controlled trials should be considered unrealistic in the majority of patients, who often achieve a therapeutic effect at lower doses, generally better tolerated ("target effect"). The new guidelines forthcoming will certify a further step forward with the quadruple therapy (sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, ARNI, beta-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists), underlining how a fourfold intervention with different pharmacological mechanisms is able to determine the greatest benefits in patients with systolic heart failure. The discussion is open on the possibility of simplifying and speeding up the conventional implementation scheme of treatment, exploiting the ability of all these pharmacological principles to exert a significant and rapid favorable effect on prognosis already at a low dose in the first 4-8 weeks of treatment.