Investigation of the intraoperative cortical responses to spinal motor mapping in a patient with chronic pain.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) surgery for chronic pain is shown to provide effective guidance during device placement. Electromyography (EMG) is used to determine the laterality of the paddle. In some SCS cases, laterality cannot be obtained via EMG due to patient physiology. Electroencephalography (EEG) is already used in IONM to monitor cortical responses. Here, we show proof-of-concept of assessing the responses of epidurally evoked EMGs simultaneously with EEGs to determine laterality during IONM using a high-resolution (HR) SCS paddle. An 8-column HR-SCS paddle was acutely placed at T9-T10 interspace in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. EMG signals from 18 muscle groups were recorded simultaneously with 60-channel EEG signals at various stimulation amplitudes (0-10 mA). Particular attention was paid to regions associated with pain including the somatosensory cortex (S1), prefrontal cortex (PFC), and motor cortex (M1). When left and right lateral contacts were stimulated at low amplitudes (1-2 mA), significant changes were seen in θ, α, and ß powers in the contralateral PFC but not in M1 or S1. There was a significant correlation between M1 and contralateral contacts in α power. At higher currents (7-8 mA), right-sided contacts resulted in α power change. We found significant differences in α, θ, and ß powers in PFC for contralateral stimulation of the lateral SCS contacts at low amplitudes and in α power at higher amplitudes. The changes in PFC suggest the potential of EEG for understanding a cortical mechanism of action of SCS and provide insight into the pathophysiology of chronic pain.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Here, we present proof of concept of assessing the responses of epidurally evoked electromyography simultaneously with scalp electroencephalography to determine whether both laterality and insights into pain mechanisms can be elucidated. With stimulation, significant changes were seen in θ, α, and ß band power in the contralateral prefrontal cortex and in α power in the motor cortex. We provide insight into the mechanism of action of SCS in preventing pain in this patient.

Age as an Independent Predictor of Adult Spinal Cord Stimulation Pain Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an efficacious chronic pain treatment most commonly used in middle-aged patients. Results from previous studies that investigated SCS' effects in older patient populations have been equivocal. We examine whether SCS outcomes correlate with age. METHODS: We retrospectively examined prospectively collected outcomes from 189 patients who underwent SCS at Albany Medical Center between 2012 and 2020. The patients completed the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The mean percent change in each outcome was determined and compared via a regression analysis to determine relationships between patient age and each respective outcome metrics. Demographics were compared between patients aged under 65 versus those aged 65 and older via χ2 tests. RESULTS: All subjects demonstrated the expected improvement on NRS, BDI, PCS, and MPQ from baseline to 1-year follow-up, with several demonstrating statistically significant changes: NRS-worst pain (18.66%, p < 0.001), NRS-least pain (26.9%, p < 0.001), NRS-average pain (26.9%, p < 0.01), NRS-current pain (26.4%, p < 0.001), ODI (19.6%, p < 0.001), PCS (29.8%, p < 0.001), and MPQ (29.4%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between patients aged under 65 versus those aged 65 and older based on lead type (p = 0.454). Six patients (3.1%) had lead migration, one of whom was 65 or older. Regression analysis revealed improvements in MPQ-sensory and MPQ-affective scores as age increased (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.09; p = 0.046, R2 = 0.05, respectively). Age did not correlate with NRS, ODI, BDI, or PCS. Diagnosis, spinal level of SCS, and lead type were not found to influence any respective outcome measure based on covariate analysis. CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest study where age was correlated to specific pain, depression, and disability outcomes following SCS. We provide evidence that SCS outcomes are equivalent, or better, in older patients following SCS. Based on these findings, SCS is a viable option for treatment of chronic pain in elderly patient populations.

Association of Outcomes of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain and Psoas Measurements Based on Size of Iliopsoas Muscles.

INTRODUCTION: Patients experience variable long-term improvement in chronic back pain despite successful spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trials. Iliopsoas (IP) size has been shown to differ between patients with low back pain and healthy controls. In this study, we examine whether the IP muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) is associated with SCS outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined patients for whom we had lumbar MRIs 6.3 years prior to SCS and baseline and one-year outcome data. Percent change from baseline to one year was calculated for Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Correlations between IP muscle CSA, ratio of iliopsoas muscle size to the vertebral body area (P/VBA), and the ratio of iliopsoas muscle size to BMI (P/BMI) were examined. Sex differences were considered. RESULTS: A total of 73 subjects were included in this study, including 30 females and 43 males. Males had significantly larger IP (males 15.70 ± 0.58, females 9.72 ± 0.43; p < 0.001), P/VBA (males 1.00 ± 0.04, females 0.76 ± 0.03; p < 0.001), and P/BMI ratio (males 0.51 ± 0.02, females 0.32 ± 0.01; p < 0.001) than females. In females, P/VBA predicted NRS worst pain scores (ß = 0.82, p = 0.004, r2 = 0.55) and BDI (ß = 0.59, p = 0.02, r2 = 0.24). In males, P/BMI was a significant predictor of BDI outcome scores (ß = 0.45, p = 0.03, r2 = 0.16). Males who had more muscle mass measured by iliopsoas size had more depression as measured using BDI (p = 0.03, r = 0.61). Females with less muscle mass measured by P/VBA also experienced more depression (p = 0.02, r = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that psoas measurements correlated with various pain outcomes specifically. P/VBA was most predictive in females and P/BMI in males. Depression correlated with P/BMI, reinforcing the complex relationship between depression and constant chronic pain. Tertile analyses further showed a relationship between iliopsoas CSA and depression in males and females. We provide preliminary data of sex-specific psoas measurements as a risk factor for worse SCS outcomes.

Effect of Device Configuration and Patient's Body Composition on the RF Heating and Nonsusceptibility Artifact of Deep Brain Stimulation Implants During MRI at 1.5T and 3T.

BACKGROUND: Patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) implants have limited access to MRI due to safety concerns associated with RF-induced heating. Currently, MRI in these patients is allowed in 1.5T horizontal bore scanners utilizing pulse sequences with reduced power. However, the use of 3T MRI in such patients is increasingly reported based on limited safety assessments. Here we present the results of comprehensive RF heating measurements for two commercially available DBS systems during MRI at 1.5T and 3T. PURPOSE: To assess the effect of imaging landmark, DBS lead configuration, and patient's body composition on RF heating of DBS leads during MRI at 1.5T and 3T. STUDY TYPE: Phantom and ex vivo study. POPULATION/SUBJECTS/PHANTOM/SPECIMEN/ANIMAL MODEL: Gel phantoms and cadaver brain. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T and 3T, T1 -weighted turbo spin echo. ASSESSMENT: RF heating was measured at the tips of DBS leads implanted in brain-mimicking gel. Image artifact was assessed in a cadaver brain implanted with an isolated DBS lead. STATISTICAL TESTS: Descriptive. RESULTS: We observed substantial fluctuation in RF heating, mainly affected by phantom composition and DBS lead configuration, ranging from 0.14°C to 23.73°C at 1.5T, and from 0.10°C to 7.39°C at 3T. The presence of subcutaneous fat substantially altered RF heating at the electrode tips (3.06°C < ∆T < 19.05° C). Introducing concentric loops in the extracranial portion of the lead at the surgical burr hole reduced RF heating by up to 89% at 1.5T and up to 98% at 3T compared to worst-case heating scenarios. DATA CONCLUSION: Device configuration and patient's body composition substantially altered the RF heating of DBS leads during MRI. Interestingly, certain lead trajectories consistently reduced RF heating and image artifact. Level of Evidence 1 Technical Efficacy Stage 1 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2021;53:599-610.

Treatment Strategies for Generator Pocket Pain.

OBJECTIVE: Generator site pain is a relatively common phenomenon in patients undergoing spinal cord stimulation (SCS) that complicates management and effective pain relief. This pain may be managed conservatively, with repositioning of the battery and, in some cases, with explant. Here we explore our experience with management of generator site pain ("pocket pain") in a large single-center study. METHODS: All SCS permanent implants and implantable pulse generator (IPG) placements over 9 years were reviewed. Of 785 cases, we identified 43 patients with pocket pain (5.5%). Demographics and treatments of the pocket pain cohort were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age (± SEM) of the pocket pain cohort was 46.86 ± 1.06, and there were 10/33 males/females. Females were overrepresented in pocket pain cohort (76.7%) when compared with the total SCS cohort (59.0%) (X2 = 5.93, P = 0.015). Diagnosis included failed back surgery syndrome (51.2%), complex regional pain syndrome (23.3%), and chronic neuropathic pain (25.5%). No patients improved with conservative therapy. All patients either went on to revision (n = 23) or explant (n = 20). Time from initial surgery to development of pocket pain was 7.5 months (range: 0.3-88) and from pocket pain to revision surgery was 4.5 months (range: 0.4-26). In addition, significantly more pocket pain patients (65.1%) had workers' compensation (WC) insurance compared with patients without pocket pain (24.9%) (X2 = 33.3, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In our institutional experience, pocket pain was inadequately managed with conservative treatments. Being female and having SCS filed under WC increased risk of pocket pain. Future work will explore the nuances in device placement based on body shape and manual activity responsibilities.

Spinal Cord Stimulation to Treat Low Back Pain in Patients With and Without Previous Spine Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients with no history of previous spine surgery. Using our prospectively collected database, we evaluate improvements in patients with and without previous spine surgery one-year post SCS implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects completed outcome metrics pre-operatively and one-year post-implantation including Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). RESULTS: We enrolled 134 patients; 82 patients had previous spine surgery and 52 patients did not. At one-year post-SCS implantation, patients with previous spine surgery showed improvements in worst pain experienced, least pain experienced, average pain experienced, pain felt currently, MPQ, MPQ sensory, MPQ affective, PCS, PCS helplessness, PCS rumination, PCS magnification, ODI, and BDI scores (p < 0.001, p = 0.005, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.03, p = 0.01, p = 0.02, p < 0.001, p = 0.05, p < 0.001, p = 0.017, respectively). Likewise, patients without previous spine surgery showed improvements in worst pain experienced, least pain experienced, average pain experienced, pain felt currently, MPQ, MPQ sensory, PCS, PCS helplessness, PCS rumination, PCS magnification, ODI, and BDI scores (p < 0.001, p = 0.005, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.008, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Patients without previous spine surgery showed greater improvements for average pain PCS helplessness (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with and without previous spine surgery showed similar improvements in pain intensity, pain quality, feelings of rumination and magnification, functional disability, and depression severity. SCS can improve CLBP regardless of whether patients have had previous spine surgery.

Pain and Interoceptive Awareness Outcomes of Chronic Pain Patients With Spinal Cord Stimulation.

OBJECTIVES: Meditation has been shown to improve outcomes for chronic pain by increasing patients' awareness of their own bodies. Some patients have an innate ability to leverage their mind-body connection, and this interoceptive awareness may aid them in garnering pain relief. We explored whether spinal cord stimulation (SCS) patients with greater innate awareness had better outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We contacted 30 thoracic SCS patients with baseline and postoperative pain, psychological, and disability outcomes to complete the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) survey. MAIA distinguishes between beneficial and maladaptive aspects of the perception of body sensations via six positive subscales (noticing, attention regulation, emotional awareness, self-regulation, body listening, and trusting) and two negative subscales (not distracting, not worrying). MAIA subscales and positive/negative groups were correlated with percentage change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). RESULTS: Patients included 14 males/16 females with a mean age of 58. At a mean follow-up of 14.13 months (range 6-26), NRS, ODI, BDI, PCS, and MPQ showed improvements. Positive traits correlated with improvements in pain (MAIA-self regulation with NRS-worst [p = 0.018], NRS-least [p = 0.042], NRS-average [p = 0.006], NRS-current [p = 0.001]; MAIA-body listening with MPQ-total [p = 0.016] and MPQ-sensory [p = 0.026]). Improvement in PCS-total was associated with higher scores in noticing (p = 0.002), attention regulation (p = 0.017), emotional awareness (p = 0.039), and trusting (p = 0.047). PCS-rumination correlated with MAIA-positive total (p = 0.012). In contrast, better attention regulation signified less improvement in ODI (p = 0.043) and MPQ affective (p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Higher interoceptive awareness in SCS patients correlated with greater improvement following the procedure, particularly with regards to pain relief and pain catastrophizing. These findings suggest that patients with better mind-body connections may achieve greater pain relief following SCS in this patient population, thereby aiding providers in determining who may benefit from this intervention.

Correlation Between Aspects of Perceived Patient Loneliness and Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Loneliness as a whole has been characterized as a health-related risk factor and is associated with worse outcomes after cardiac procedures. Evidence suggests that chronic pain patients are particularly vulnerable to feeling lonely. We examined the relationship between different aspects of loneliness and one-year postoperative outcomes after spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for chronic pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We contacted 69 patients with thoracic SCS who had participated in our prospective outcomes database with one-year follow-up to complete the validated, abbreviated UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-3). We examined responses on question 9 of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), question 12 of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and UCLA-3 due to their relevance to different aspects of loneliness. We conducted regression analyses to determine the relationship between aspects of loneliness and pain outcomes. RESULTS: We identified that loss of interest in people, companionship, and feeling excluded were associated with pain outcomes. Loss of interest in people was associated with improvement in pain (NRS worst p = 0.021, r = 0.32, NRS least p = 0.004, r = 0.4; NRS right now p = 0.016, r = 0.33). Companionship and feeling excluded were also associated with pain. We examined the interface between depression and total loneliness and found that while both were related to each other, depression was not associated with pain outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates an association between loss of interest in people, companionship, and feeling excluded and worse postoperative pain outcomes after receiving SCS. It identifies aspects of loneliness as important factors to consider when predicting the outcomes of SCS therapy for chronic pain control.

Evaluating the role of 1.5T quantitative susceptibility mapping for subthalamic nucleus targeting in deep brain stimulation surgery.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) has been shown to be valuable in direct targeting for subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS, given its higher quality of contrast between the STN border and adjacent anatomical structures. The objective is to demonstrate the feasibility of using 1.5T QSM for direct targeting in STN DBS planning. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eleven patients underwent MRI acquisitions using a 1.5T scanner, including multi-echo gradient echo sequences for generating QSM images. 22 STN targets were planned with direct targeting method using QSM images by one stereotactic neurosurgeon and indirect targeting method using standard protocol by a second stereotactic neurosurgeon. The two physicians were blinded to each other's results. RESULTS: The mean coordinates for the STN using direct targeting relative to the mid-commissural point (MCP) was 11.41±2.43mm lateral, 2.48±0.53mm posterior and 4.45±0.95mm inferior. The mean coordinates for the STN using indirect targeting was 11.79±2.51mm lateral, 2.55±0.54mm posterior, and 4.84±1.03mm inferior. The mean (±SEM) radial error between the direct and indirect target was 0.67±0.14mm. In cases where DBS electrodes were implanted, the radial difference between the indirect and actual target (1.19±0.30mm) was statistically equivalent to the radial difference between the direct and actual target (1.0±0.27mm). CONCLUSIONS: Direct targeting of the STN for DBS implantation using 1.5T QSM was found to be statistically equivalent to standard protocol surgery planning. This may offer a simpler, more intuitive alternative for DBS surgery planning at centers with 1.5T MRIs.

Craniofacial Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: Analysis of a Single Institution Series.

OBJECTIVE: Objective real-world experience with peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is limited. Furthermore, the lack of robust outcome metrics, long-term follow-up and data comparing responders and nonresponders limit the refinement of selection criteria to better identify patients likely to benefit from PNS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 22 patients with craniofacial pain treated with PNS, and responders were classified as having ≥50% postoperative improvement in the numeric rating scale (NRS). In a subset of patients (n = 11), detailed prospective outcomes metrics were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively, including NRS, Beck Depression Index (BDI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). RESULTS: About 59.1% (13 of 22) of subjects were classified as responders at a mean follow-up of 37.5 ± 5.27 months. Diagnoses included migraine (n = 6), occipital neuralgia (n = 9), trigeminal neuropathic pain (TNP; n = 6), and central poststroke pain (n = 1). Within the TNP subgroup, responders were more likely to have undergone two or more trigeminal neuralgia procedures prior to PNS (p < 0.05). In the 11 patients with comprehensive preoperative and postoperative outcome data, we noted significant improvement in NRS (p = 0.0005), BDI (p = 0.04), PCS (p = 0.01), as well as components of PCS (helplessness and magnification, p = 0.02) and MPQ (affective, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The present study adds to the PNS literature by providing long-term data and multiple outcome metrics in a subset of patients. We suggest that BDI, PCS, and MPQ may provide more insight into meaningful response over time. Evaluating functional and quality of life outcomes in patients with craniofacial pain may be more informative than assessing benefit solely based on pain intensity and responder rates.

Correlations Between Family History of Psychiatric Illnesses and Outcomes of Spinal Cord Stimulation.

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established procedure for chronic neuropathic pain. Research has established patients with personal psychiatric history do not fare as well as their correspondents following SCS surgery. We explored whether a documented psychiatric family history (PFH) correlated with worse outcomes following SCS surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our single-center, prospectively collected database of patients who received permanent SCS implants over the past eight years. Subjects were separated into those with documented PFH and those without. Subjects completed validated scales at preoperative, 6 ± 2 postoperative, and 12 ± 3 months postoperative visits. The percent change in scores from preoperative to postoperative timepoints was compared between subjects with PFH vs. controls. RESULTS: SCS subjects reporting a PFH demonstrated significantly worse 6-month outcomes on Pain Catastrophizing Scale-rumination subscale (p = 0.02), numeric rating scale (NRS) scores on "pain at its least" (p = 0.04) and NRS "pain right now" (p = 0.02). This group also endorsed greater disability as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) throughout the follow-up period (p = 0.04 at 6 ± 2 months, p = 0.001 at 12 ± 3 months). CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with PFH may experience less improvement in disability following SCS as compared to subjects without PFH. They may take longer to achieve the same outcomes, including pain relief and decrease in pain rumination. Our findings show that improvements in the PFH cohort are equivalent to that of the no PFH cohort on all measures except ODI at 12-month follow-up. Thus obtaining a detailed PFH prior to performing SCS is important in order to implement pre-operative coping training for PFH patients, rather than exclusion from SCS.

Early Experience With New Generation Deep Brain Stimulation Leads in Parkinson's Disease and Essential Tremor Patients.

BACKGROUND: Newer generation deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems have recently become available in the United States. Data on real-life experience are limited. We present our initial experience incorporating newer generation DBS with Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET) patients. Newer systems allow for smart energy delivery and more intuitive programming and hardware modifications including constant current and directional segmented contacts. METHODS: We compared six-month outcomes between 42 newer generation and legacy leads implanted in 28 patients. Two cohorts each included 7 PD patients with bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation and 7 ET patients with unilateral ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) stimulation of the thalamus. All directional leads included 6172 Infinity 8-Channel Directional leads and Infinity internal pulse generators (Abbott Neuromodulation, Plano, TX, USA) and nondirectional leads included lead 3389 with Activa SC for VIM and PC for STN (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). RESULTS: Six-month outcomes for medication reduction and motor score improvements between new and legacy DBS systems in PD and ET patients were similar. Directionality was employed in 1/3 of patients. Therapeutic window (difference between amplitude when initial symptom relief was obtained and when intolerable side effects appeared with the contact being used) was significantly greater in new DBS systems in both PD (p = 0.005) and ET (p = 0.035) patients. The windows for new and legacy systems were 3.60 V ± 0.42 and 2.00 V ± 0.32 for STN and 3.06 V ± 0.44 and 1.85 V ± 0.28 for VIM, respectively. DISCUSSION: The therapeutic window of newer systems, whether or not directionality was used, was significantly greater than that of the legacy system, which suggests increased benefit and programming options. Improvements in hardware and programming interfaces in the newer systems may also contribute to wider therapeutic windows. We expect that as we alter workflow associated with newer technology, more patients will use directionality, and amplitudes will become lower.

Use of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess How Motor Phenotypes of Parkinson's Disease Respond to Deep Brain Stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-accepted treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Motor phenotypes include tremor-dominant (TD), akinesia-rigidity (AR), and postural instability gait disorder (PIGD). The mechanism of action in how DBS modulates motor symptom relief remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to determine whether the functional activity varies in response to DBS depending on PD phenotypes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects underwent an fMRI scan with DBS cycling ON and OFF. The effects of DBS cycling on BOLD activation in each phenotype were documented through voxel-wise analysis. For each region of interest, ANOVAs were performed using T-values and covariate analyses were conducted. Further, a correlation analysis was performed comparing stimulation settings to T-values. Lastly, T-values of subjects with motor improvement were compared to those who worsened. RESULTS: As a group, BOLD activation with DBS-ON resulted in activation in the motor thalamus (p < 0.01) and globus pallidus externa (p < 0.01). AR patients had more activation in the supplementary motor area (SMA) compared to PIGD (p < 0.01) and TD cohorts (p < 0.01). Further, the AR cohort had more activation in primary motor cortex (MI) compared to the TD cohort (p = 0.02). Implanted nuclei (p = 0.01) and phenotype (p = <0.01) affected activity in MI and phenotype alone affected SMA activity (p = <0.01). A positive correlation was seen between thalamic activation and pulse-width (p = 0.03) and between caudate and total electrical energy delivered (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that DBS modulates network activity differently based on patient motor phenotype. Improved understanding of these differences may further our knowledge about the mechanisms of DBS action on PD motor symptoms and to optimize treatment.

Functional MRI Safety and Artifacts during Deep Brain Stimulation: Experience in 102 Patients.

BackgroundWith growing numbers of patients receiving deep brain stimulation (DBS), radiologists are encountering these neuromodulation devices at an increasing rate. Current MRI safety guidelines, however, limit MRI access in these patients.PurposeTo describe an MRI (1.5 T and 3 T) experience and safety profile in a large cohort of participants with active DBS systems and characterize the hardware-related artifacts on images from functional MRI.Materials and MethodsIn this prospective study, study participants receiving active DBS underwent 1.5- or 3-T MRI (T1-weighted imaging and gradient-recalled echo [GRE]-echo-planar imaging [EPI]) between June 2017 and October 2018. Short- and long-term adverse events were tracked. The authors quantified DBS hardware-related artifacts on images from GRE-EPI (functional MRI) at the cranial coil wire and electrode contacts. Segmented artifacts were then transformed into standard space to define the brain areas affected by signal loss. Two-sample t tests were used to assess the difference in artifact size between 1.5- and 3-T MRI.ResultsA total of 102 participants (mean age ± standard deviation, 60 years ± 11; 65 men) were evaluated. No MRI-related short- and long-term adverse events or acute changes were observed. DBS artifacts were most prominent near the electrode contacts and over the frontoparietal cortical area where the redundancy of the extension wire is placed subcutaneously. The mean electrode contact artifact diameter was 9.3 mm ± 1.6, and 1.9% ± 0.8 of the brain was obscured by the coil artifact. The coil artifacts were larger at 3 T than at 1.5 T, obscuring 2.1% ± 0.7 and 1.4% ± 0.7 of intracranial volume, respectively (P < .001). The superficial frontoparietal cortex and deep structures neighboring the electrode contacts were most commonly obscured.ConclusionWith a priori local safety testing, patients receiving deep brain stimulation may safely undergo 1.5- and 3-T MRI. Deep brain stimulation hardware-related artifacts only affect a small proportion of the brain.© RSNA, 2019Online supplemental material is available for this article.See also the editorial by Martin in this issue.

On the (Non-)equivalency of monopolar and bipolar settings for deep brain stimulation fMRI studies of Parkinson's disease patients.

BACKGROUND: The majority of Parkinson's disease patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) use a monopolar configuration, which presents challenges for EEG and MRI studies. The literature reports algorithms to convert monopolar to bipolar settings. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To assess brain responses of Parkinson's disease patients implanted with DBS during fMRI studies using their clinical and presumed equivalent settings using a published conversion recipe. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: Thirteen DBS patients. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T and 3T, fMRI using gradient echo-planar imaging. ASSESSMENT: Patients underwent 30/30sec ON/OFF DBS fMRI scans using monopolar and bipolar settings. To convert to a bipolar setting, the negative contact used for the monopolar configuration remained constant and the adjacent dorsal contact was rendered positive, while increasing the voltage by 30%. fMRI activation/deactivation maps and motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) scores were compared for patients in both configurations. STATISTICAL TESTS: T-tests were used to compare UPDRS scores and volumes of tissue activated (VTA) diameters in monopolar and bipolar configurations. RESULTS: The patterns of fMRI activation in the monopolar and bipolar configurations were generally different. The thalamus, pallidum, and visual cortices exhibited higher activation using the patient's clinical settings than the presumed equivalent settings. VTA diameters were lower (7 mm vs. 6.3 mm, P = 0.047) and UPDRS scores were generally higher in the bipolar (33.2 ± 16) than in the monopolar configuration (28.3 ± 17.4), without reaching statistical significance (P > 0.05). DATA CONCLUSION: Monopolar and bipolar configurations result in different patterns of brain activation while using a previously published monopolar-bipolar conversion algorithm. Clinical benefits may be achieved with varying patterns of brain responses. Blind conversion from one to the other should be avoided for purposes of understanding the mechanisms of DBS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.

Duloxetine Improves Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes for Chronic Pain.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to be effective in treating chronic pain in patients with varying etiologies. However, the impact of pharmacological treatment on augmenting response to SCS has not been previously studied. METHODS: We enrolled 108 patients who had undergone SCS surgery and documented their pain preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Global Impression of Change (GIC). Pain outcomes were compared between patients receiving SCS alone and in addition to duloxetine. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, patients receiving duloxetine and SCS (n = 41) had better pain relief in the affective component of MPQ (p < 0.05) than those receiving SCS alone (n = 71). Patients on duloxetine with SCS also were significantly more willing to receive SCS again (p < 0.01). This willingness appeared to be duloxetine dose dependent (p < 0.05). Patients receiving pregabalin or gabapentin with SCS did not have significantly more pain relief than patients receiving SCS alone. CONCLUSION: This study shows the combination therapy to be an effective strategy to provide more holistic pain relief and further improve the quality of life of SCS patients.

EKG-based detection of deep brain stimulation in fMRI studies.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of synchronization errors between the assumed functional MRI paradigm timing and the deep brain stimulation (DBS) on/off cycling using a custom electrocardiogram-based triggering system METHODS: A detector for measuring and predicting the on/off state of cycling deep brain stimulation was developed and tested in six patients in office visits. Three-electrode electrocardiogram measurements, amplified by a commercial bio-amplifier, were used as input for a custom electronics box (e-box). The e-box transformed the deep brain stimulation waveforms into transistor-transistor logic pulses, recorded their timing, and propagated it in time. The e-box was used to trigger task-based deep brain stimulation functional MRI scans in 5 additional subjects; the impact of timing accuracy on t-test values was investigated in a simulation study using the functional MRI data. RESULTS: Following locking to each patient's individual waveform, the e-box was shown to predict stimulation onset with an average absolute error of 112 ± 148 ms, 30 min after disconnecting from the patients. The subsecond accuracy of the e-box in predicting timing onset is more than adequate for our slow varying, 30-/30-s on/off stimulation paradigm. Conversely, the experimental deep brain stimulation onset prediction accuracy in the absence of the e-box, which could be off by as much as 4 to 6 s, could significantly decrease activation strength. CONCLUSIONS: Using this detector, stimulation can be accurately synchronized to functional MRI acquisitions, without adding any additional hardware in the MRI environment. Magn Reson Med 79:2432-2439, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

King's Parkinson's Disease Pain Scale for Assessment of Pain Relief Following Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Pain is a prevalent and debilitating nonmotor symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) that is often inadequately managed. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been shown to relieve pain in PD but an effective method of identifying which types of PD pain respond to DBS has not been established. We examine the effects of DBS on different types of PD pain using the King's Parkinson's disease pain scale (KPDPS), the only validated scale of PD pain. METHODS: We prospectively followed 18 PD patients undergoing subthalamic nucleus (STN) or Globus pallidus interna (GPi) DBS. Subjects completed the KPDPS, low back disability index (LBDI), and McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), preoperatively and at six months postoperatively. Subjects underwent the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale-III (UPDRS-III) with preoperative scores ON medication and postoperative scores ON medication/DBS stimulation. RESULTS: Of the 18 patients, a total of 12 subjects had STN DBS and 6 had GPi DBS. As a group, subjects showed improvement in total KPDPS score at six-month postoperative follow-up (p = 0.004). Fluctuation and nocturnal pain were most significantly improved (p = 0.006, 0.01, respectively). Significant improvements were found in fluctuation-related pain domain following GPi DBS. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, we are the first group to employ KPDPS to monitor pain relief following DBS in PD patients. We demonstrate that fluctuation-related pain and nocturnal pain significantly improve with DBS. Use of the KPDPS in the future will allow better understanding of how STN and GPi DBS treat PD pain over time.

The Evolution of Surgical Technique in Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Scoping Review.

Since the advent of spinal cord stimulation (SCS), its operative technique has consistently advanced. We performed a scoping review of the literature regarding SCS operative techniques to highlight key advancements. To review, summarize, and highlight key changes in SCS implantation techniques since their inception. The authors performed a MEDLINE search inclusive of articles from 1967 to June 2023 including human and modeling studies written in English examining the role of trialing, intraoperative neuromonitoring, and surgical adaptations. Using the Rayyan platform, two reviewers performed a blinded title screen. Of the 960 articles, 197 were included in the title screen, 107 were included in the abstract review, and ultimately 69 articles met inclusion criteria. We examined the utility of trialing and found that historical controls showed significant efficacy, whereas recent results are more equivocal. We discuss the significant improvement in outcomes with intraoperative neuromonitoring for asleep SCS placement. We highlight technique improvements that led to significant reductions in infection, lead migration, and inadequate pain relief. Physicians implanting SCS systems for chronic pain management must continually refine their surgical techniques to keep up with this rapidly evolving therapy. In addition, through collaborative efforts of neuromodulators and industry, SCS is safer and more effective for patients suffering from chronic pain.