Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
BJU Int ; 131 Suppl 4: 36-42, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37099558

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in diagnosis prostate cancer (PCa) grade, biopsy and treatment approach over a decade (2011-2020) at a population level within a clinical quality cancer registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed by prostate biopsy between 2011 and 2020 were retrieved from the Victorian Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry, a prospective, state-wide clinical quality registry in Australia. Distributions of each grade group (GG) proportion over time were modelled with restricted cubic splines, separately by biopsy technique, age group and subsequent treatment method. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2020, 24 308 men were diagnosed with PCa in the registry. The proportion of GG 1 disease declined from 36-23%, with commensurate rises in GG 2 (31-36%), GG 3 (14-17%) and GG 5 (9.3-14%) disease. This pattern was similar for men diagnosed by transrectal ultrasonography or transperineal biopsy. Patients aged <55 years had the largest absolute reduction in GG 1 PCa, from 56-35%, compared to patients aged 55-64 (41-31%), 65-74 (31-21%), and ≥75 years (12-10%). The proportion of prostatectomies performed for patients with GG 1 disease fell from 28% to 7.1% and, for primary radiation therapy, the proportion fell from 22% to 3.5%. CONCLUSION: From 2011 to 2020, there has been a substantial decrease in the proportion of GG 1 PCa diagnosed, particularly in younger men. The percentage of interventional management performed in GG 1 disease has fallen to very low levels. These results reflect the implementation of major changes to diagnostic and treatment guidelines and inform the future allocation of treatment methods.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Biopsia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Próstata/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Clasificación del Tumor
2.
Psychooncology ; 31(3): 496-503, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34623735

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Feeling depressed and lethargic are common side effects of prostate cancer (PCa) and its treatments. We examined the incidence and severity of feeling depressed and lack of energy in patients in a population based PCa registry. METHODS: We included men diagnosed with PCa between 2015 and 2019 in Victoria, Australia, and enrolled in the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry. The primary outcome measures were responses to two questions on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) patient reported instrument: problems with feeling depressed and problems with lack of energy 12 months following treatment. We evaluated associations between these and age, cancer risk category, treatment type, and urinary, bowel, and sexual function. RESULTS: Both outcome questions were answered by 9712 out of 12,628 (77%) men. 981 patients (10%) reported at least moderate problems with feeling depressed; 1563 (16%) had at least moderate problems with lack of energy and 586 (6.0%) with both. Younger men reported feeling depressed more frequently than older men. Lack of energy was more common for treatments that included androgen deprivation therapy than not (moderate/big problems: 31% vs. 13%), irrespective of disease risk category. Both outcomes were associated with poorer urinary, bowel, and sexual functional domain scores. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported depressive feelings and lack of energy were frequent in this population-based registry. Problems with feeling depressed were more common in younger men and lack of energy more common in men having hormonal treatment. Clinicians should be aware of the incidence of these symptoms in these at-risk groups and be able to screen for them.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Anciano , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Emociones , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Sistema de Registros , Autoinforme
3.
BMC Urol ; 22(1): 18, 2022 Feb 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35130897

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) rates have been increasing worldwide despite a lack of evidence of superior patient-reported outcomes (PROs) compared to open radical prostatectomy (ORP). METHODS: This retrospective study included men who contributed data to the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry-Victoria (PCOR-Vic), underwent ORP or RARP between January 2014 and May 2018, and completed the EPIC-26 questionnaire 12 months post-surgery. Urinary and sexual bother items, the urinary incontinence domain score, the urinary irritative/obstructive domain score, the sexual domain score and the pad usage item from the EPIC-26 questionnaire were compared between the two cohorts. Unmatched and propensity score matched cohorts were used to determine if there were differences in urinary and sexual PROs between ORP and RARP after accounting for the patient case-mix and surgeon characteristics. RESULTS: Of 3826 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP), 1047 received ORP and 2779 received RARP. Propensity score matching reduced the magnitude of the observed differences in four out of six outcomes (urinary bother, urinary incontinence domain, pad usage and sexual domain). Using a propensity score matched cohort, there were no statistically significant differences for RARP patients, compared to ORP patients, in terms of urinary bother (Rd = 0.47%, P = 0.707), urinary incontinence domain scores (Coeff = - 0.84, P = 0.506), urinary irritative/obstructive domain scores (Coeff = 1.03, P = 0.105), pad usage (Rd = - 0.75%, P = 0.771) and sexual bother (Rd = - 0.89%, P = 0.731). RARP patients had slightly higher sexual domain scores (Coeff = 3.65, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: There were no differences in urinary PROs between ORP and RARP when assessed 12 months post-surgery. The sexual domain slightly favoured RARP, however this was not deemed clinically significant.


Asunto(s)
Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Prostatectomía/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Victoria
4.
Eur Urol Oncol ; 4(2): 319-322, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31411964

RESUMEN

Conservative management, specifically with active surveillance (AS), has emerged as the preferred approach for low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC). We evaluated the trend for conservative management (ie, no active treatment within 12mo of diagnosis) for LRPC in an Australian population-based cohort of men captured in the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry Victoria (PCOR-Vic). Of the 3201 men diagnosed with LRPC between January 2009 and December 2016, 60% (1928/3201) had conservative management, and 52% (1664/3201) were documented to be on AS. There was an increase in conservative management from 52% in 2009 to 73% in 2016 (p<0.001), largely attributable to an increase in AS from 33% in 2009 to 67% in 2016 (p<0.001). When stratified by age group, the increase in conservative management was more pronounced among younger patients: from 37% to 66% for men aged <60yr versus from 72% to 86% for men aged ≥70yr. In multivariable analyses, increasing age, lower prostate-specific antigen and clinical category, lower socioeconomic status, and being diagnosed in public metropolitan institutions were all independently associated with a greater likelihood of conservative management. Identification of sociodemographic and institutional variations in practice allows for targeted strategies to improve management for men with LRPC. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at the uptake of conservative management (no active treatment within 12 mo of diagnosis) over time in an Australian population-based cohort of men with low-risk prostate cancer. The proportion of men with low-risk prostate cancer managed conservatively increased from 52% in 2009 to 73% in 2016. The increase in the uptake of conservative management for low-risk prostate cancer in Australia is concordant with international guidelines and other international population-based studies.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Australia/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia
6.
Investig Clin Urol ; 58(6): 447-452, 2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29124245

RESUMEN

Purpose: To report our outcomes with the use of a thermo-expandable metallic intraprostatic stent (Memokath) for patients with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) secondary to prostatic obstruction, and to assess it is a feasible option for many frail and elderly men unsuitable for surgery. Materials and Methods: We reviewed patients who underwent insertion of a Memokath stent for BOO over 17 years (January 1999 to December 2015) at one regional center over a long follow-up period (median, 7 years). Patients were selected if they had obstructive urinary symptoms or urinary retention with an indwelling catheter in situ, and were ineligible for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) under general or spinal anesthesia. Primary outcomes assessed were the improvement in urinary symptoms and voiding parameters, as well as the ability to void spontaneously if catheterized, along with complications. Results: One hundred forty-four patients who presented with BOO or urinary retention had a Memokath stent inserted. Ninety patients (62.5%) had a successful stent insertion with a significant difference between the median preoperative (550 mL) and postoperative residual volume (80 mL, p<0.0001). Nearly two-thirds of men (64%) returned to unassisted voiding with no increased risk of complications over time. Fifty-four patients (37.5%) experienced stent failure. Main complications requiring stent removal or repositioning were migration, occlusion, refractory urinary retention and irritative voiding symptoms. Conclusions: In elderly and frail men with BOO deemed unsuitable to undergo TURP, prostatic stent is a safe and practical alternative to long-term catheterization.


Asunto(s)
Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Stents , Obstrucción del Cuello de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Retención Urinaria/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Remoción de Dispositivos , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Próstata , Diseño de Prótesis , Falla de Prótesis , Stents/efectos adversos , Obstrucción del Cuello de la Vejiga Urinaria/etiología , Retención Urinaria/etiología
7.
Cent European J Urol ; 64(4): 262-3, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24578909

RESUMEN

We report a rare case of a patient presenting with scrotal hematoma associated with retroperitoneal hemorrhage after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). We propose a mechanism for the formation of scrotal hematoma and its importance as a sign of retroperitoneal hemorrhage.

8.
Urology ; 59(3): 424-7, 2002 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11880085

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of irrigation of the distal vas deferens with sterile water at the time of vasectomy on sperm clearance. Is it possible to accelerate clearance and avoid the problem of lingering sperm? METHODS: Two hundred men undergoing vasectomy were randomized to receive either a standard vasectomy or vasectomy plus irrigation of each vas deferens with sterile water. The interval between vasectomy and the production of two azoospermic semen samples was recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 37 patients were excluded for failing to follow the postvasectomy protocol for semen analysis, leaving 87 in the control group and 76 who received vasal irrigation. No statistically significant differences existed between the two groups with regard to the mean time to clearance (26.4 weeks, control group versus 28.6 weeks, flush group), proportion clear at 16 weeks (29% versus 21%), or proportion with lingering sperm at 40 weeks (22% versus 26%). CONCLUSIONS: Irrigation of the vas deferens with sterile water does not accelerate the clearance of spermatozoa after vasectomy. Men wishing to undergo vasectomy must be counseled about the possibility of lingering sperm.


Asunto(s)
Irrigación Terapéutica/métodos , Vasectomía/métodos , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oligospermia , Estudios Prospectivos , Semen/citología , Recuento de Espermatozoides , Conducto Deferente
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA