RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a rare cause of heart failure (HF), presenting with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction either at the end of pregnancy or in the months following delivery. In rare cases, PPCM leads to severe impairment of LV function, refractory cardiogenic shock or advanced HF. LV assist devices (LVAD) have been shown to be a feasible treatment option in advanced HF. However, little is known about long-term outcomes and prognosis of PPCM patients undergoing LVAD implantation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from PPCM patients undergoing LVAD implantation in two tertiary centers with respect to long-term outcomes was performed. RESULTS: Twelve patients of median age 30 (18-39) years were included. Eight patients were experiencing cardiogenic shock (INTERMACS 1) at implantation. Seven patients were implanted within 1 month of their PPCM diagnosis. Median duration of LVAD support was 19 (2-92) months with median follow up of 67 (18-136) months (100% complete). In-hospital and 1-year mortality were 0% and 8.3%, respectively. Two patients died on LVAD support, four patients were successfully bridged to transplantation, two patients are still on LVAD, and four were successfully weaned due to sufficient LV recovery (one died after LV function deteriorated again). CONCLUSION: LVAD treatment of decompensated end-stage PPCM is feasible. Early LVAD provision led to hemodynamic stabilization in our cohort and facilitated safe LV recovery in one third of these young female patients.
Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatías , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Periodo Periparto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cardiomiopatías/complicaciones , Cardiomiopatías/cirugía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/complicaciones , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Driveline (DL) damages are a common difficulty among ventricular assist devices (VAD). Repairing the electrical fibers inside the DL on a running pump is hazardous and requires technical expertise, which is not easily available on site. A new feature of the HeartMate3 (Abbott, U.S.A.) LVAD is a modular driveline that allows an easy exchange of the DL cord. In this report we analyze our experiences with this feature. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 302 patients who underwent either HeartMate II or HeartMate 3 implantation between February 2004 and September 2021. Patients were screened for driveline faults and need for exchange or repair of driveline or VAD exchange. Documented were baseline characteristics, reasons for DL or VAD exchange, and complications. Follow-up was three months after the procedure. RESULTS: We present a cohort of 302 patients who underwent either HMII (n = 107;35.4%) or HM 3 (n = 195; 64.5%) implantation. Out of those, 40 patients (40/302; 13.2%) required driveline repair (DLRe) or exchange (DLEx). Out of 107 HMII patients, 9 showed severe DL damages (9/107; 8.4%). Six patients (6/9; 66.6%) underwent DLRe, two patients (2/6; 33.3%) required VAD exchange after DLRe, one patient (1/2;50%) experienced emergency VAD exchange after pump stop. The DLRe procedure in the other four patients (4/6; 66.6%) was successful. Due to damage to the internal driveline two patients (2/9; 22.2%) underwent emergency device exchange and one patient (1/9;11.1%) was listed for transplantation. 31 out 195 HM3 patients underwent exchange of the modular DL. In none of the cases, damages of the internal fibers were the reasons for the exchange. In 100% of the cases, damages of the external coating were the reason for DL exchange. In none of the cases, complications occurred after the exchange procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Driveline damages are a habitual, recurrent complication in VAD patients. The exchange of the modular driveline cable of the HM3 is feasible and safe compared to the conventional DL repair in HMII patients. Risky repair attempts and surgical LVAD exchange due to major damages of the electrical fibers can be avoided successfully by the new feature of HM3 driveline.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Trasplante de Corazón , Corazón Auxiliar , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients receiving left ventricle assist devices (LVADs) as bridge to recovery remain a minority with 1%-5% of LVADs explanted after improvement of myocardial function. Nevertheless, considering the growing population of patients supported with LVADs, an increasing demand of new explantation strategies is expected in the near future. A novel plug for LVAD explantation has been developed and its biocompatibility profile needs to be proved. This study tested the biocompatibility of this novel plug in an in vivo ovine model. METHODS: Six adult Blackhead Persian female sheep received plug implantation on the cardiac apex via minimally invasive approach and were clinically observed up to 90 days. Echocardiography was performed to detect thrombus formation or further plug-related complications. After the observation period, euthanasia was performed and samples including the plug and the surrounding tissues were obtained to be analyzed with correlative light and electron microscopy. Organ necrosis, ischemia and peripheral embolism were investigated. RESULTS: Three animals survived surgery and completed the follow-up time without experiencing clinical complications. Echocardiographic controls excluded the presence of an intracavitary thrombus in the left ventricle (LV). Autopsy confirmed no signs of local infection, LV thrombus or peripheral embolism. Light and electron microscopy revealed an intact epithelium covering a layer of connective tissue on the plug surface facing the heart lumen. CONCLUSIONS: This novel apical plug for LVAD explantation allows for endothelial and connective tissue growth on its ventricular side within 90 days from surgery. Further studies are required to fully demonstrate the biocompatibility of this apical plug and investigate the optimal anticoagulation regimen to be applied after implantation.
Asunto(s)
Embolia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Animales , Remoción de Dispositivos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Humanos , OvinosRESUMEN
An intra-cavitary left ventricular (LV) thrombus is a relative contraindication to LV assist device (LVAD) implantation based on increased thromboembolic risks. Herein, we present our experience with LVAD patients with or without preoperative diagnosis of LV-thrombus. We retrospectively investigated 563 patients who received LVAD implantation between 2004 and 2018. Diagnosis of LV-thrombus was verified with computed tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, or intraoperative LV inspection. The primary endpoint was 30-day survival free of stroke and pump thrombosis. Overall, 72 patients (12.8%) had a diagnosis of LV-thrombus. They were younger (51 years; IQR:41-59), affected by severely reduced ejection fraction (15%; IQR:10-20), more often presenting with dilated cardiomyopathy (61.8%) and INTERMACS profile 1 (33.3%). Preoperative atrial fibrillation was frequent in patients without LV-thrombus (38.9%). Conventional sternotomy was the preferred approach in LV-thrombus patients (77.8%), based on more HMII implantations in these patients (41.7%). Survival free of strokes and pump thrombosis at 30 days was comparable (P = .5751) between patients with (83.3%) or without LV-thrombus (80.9%). LVAD implantation in patients with preoperative LV-thrombus is safe and feasible. When managed through correct diagnostic and intraoperative strategies including accurate inspection of the LV cavity, these patients show similar 30-day outcomes compared to patients without LV-thrombus.
Asunto(s)
Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Corazón Auxiliar , Trombosis/complicaciones , Trombosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , EsternotomíaRESUMEN
Acute hemodynamic decompensation (AHD) during ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation occurs in about 11% of cases. Prophylactic use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (pro-tMCS) has been applied to prevent AHD during VT ablation, but evidence supporting this practice is still lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the procedural characteristics and outcomes of pro-tMCS for VT ablation. PubMed/Medline was screened until February 2020. Articles including adults receiving pro-tMCS for VT ablation were included, and a meta-analysis to compare proMCS and no-tMCS was performed. Primary outcome was in-hospital/30-day mortality. Five observational studies presenting 400 procedures (pro-tMCS: n = 187; no-tMCS: n = 213) were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Impella and TandemHeart were used in 86.6% and 13.4% of cases, respectively. In the pro-tMCS group, more VTs were induced (mean difference: 0.52, confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.77, P < .0001), and patients remained in VT on average for 24.04 minutes longer (CI: 18.28-29.80, P < .00001). Procedural success was comparable between groups, as was VT recurrence. Pro-tMCS patients had an odds ratio of 0.55 (CI: 0.28-1.05, P = .07) for in-hospital/30-day mortality and 0.55 (CI: 0.32-0.94, P = .03) for mortality at follow-up. Sixty-four percent of no-tMCS patients received rescue tMCS. The most common tMCS-related complications were bleeding events. Pro-tMCS allowed for a prolonged time on VTs and the induction of more VTs. Although these advantages were not associated with differences in procedural success, VT recurrence, or in-hospital/30-day mortality in the overall population, pro-tMCS might improve long-term survival. Further prospective studies are urgently needed to confirm these results.
Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Corazón Auxiliar , Taquicardia Ventricular/cirugía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Taquicardia Ventricular/mortalidadRESUMEN
Literature on the air travel activities of patients supported by permanent mechanical assist devices is rare. To the best of our knowledge, no air travel guidelines or fitness prerequisites exist on whether and when ventricular assist device (VAD) patients are allowed to travel by plane after device implantation. In this study, we evaluated the topic of air travel after VAD implantation. This working group aimed to produce a report on air travel passengers supported by VADs, regarding their fitness to fly. Fifty left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients were surveyed in a worldwide multicenter study. The single survey was performed with a multimethod design, including interviews conducted face-to-face, online, and on phone. Out of 50 patients, 97% described their traveling by aircraft as perfect and uneventful during the flight. Eighty-five percent of the study participants consulted their medical practitioner before the flight. No patient reported the occurrence of a severe condition associated with flying. LVAD alarms, especially low flow alarms, did not occur in any of the devices. Thirty-five percent of the surveyed patients, however, stated a major problem pertaining to the security check procedures at the airport. The results of this study suggest that commercial air travel is safe for stable patients on permanent VAD support and traveling can be resumed securely after VAD implantation. Conscientious preparation by packing necessary devices, fluids, medications, and careful preparation for the airport security check is recommended.
Asunto(s)
Viaje en Avión/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Corazón Auxiliar/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic touching thousands of people all around the world. Patients supported with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are affected by long-standing cardiovascular diseases and subjected to variations of the normal cardiovascular physiology, thus requiring an even closer monitoring during the COVID-19 outbreak. Nevertheless, the COVID-19 pandemic led to a drastic reduction in routine clinical activities and a consequent risk of looser connections between LVAD patients and their referring center. Potential deleterious effects of such a situation can be a delayed recognition of LVAD-related complications, misdiagnosis of COVID-19, and impaired social and psychological well-being for patients and families. As one of the largest LVAD programs worldwide, we designed a sustainable and enforceable telemonitoring algorithm which can be easily adapted to every LVAD center so as to maintain optimal quality of care for LVAD patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Femenino , Salud Global , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de SaludRESUMEN
Literature on driving capacities of ventricular assist device patients is rare and driving restrictions differ from center to center. Currently, no guidelines exist on whether and when left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients are allowed to begin driving cars after device implantation. In this study, we assess the driving abilities of patients after LVAD implantation. Three hundred and ninety LVAD patients have been surveyed in a worldwide, multicenter study. The single survey followed a multi-method design, including online, phone, and face-to-face interviews. Out of 390 patients, 72% are still driving and 28% did not continue driving after LVAD implantation. Reasons for discontinuation were capability (24%), insecurity (17%), and disapproval by family members (9%) or doctors (5%). Ninety percent of the patients describe their ability to drive as perfect or adequate. Sixty-nine percent state that they are not restricted in their general driving capacity. Forty-nine percent report not to be restricted in agility to drive by the device equipment. The majority of patients have not been involved in car accidents or major complications (94%). Eight accidents were reported (3%). Out of those, all were minor collisions. No patient reported the occurrence of a fatal accident or casualties. LVAD alarms did occur in six incidents (2%) with the majority being low battery alarms. The results of this study suggest that driving with a left ventricular assist device is safe for stable patients and driving can be resumed 3 months after LVAD implantation after careful patient assessment.
Asunto(s)
Conducción de Automóvil , Corazón Auxiliar , Implantación de Prótesis , Accidentes de Tránsito , Adulto , Anciano , Ventrículos Cardíacos/cirugía , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Cardiomiopatías/cirugía , Corazón Auxiliar , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Heart transplantation is associated with major hurdles, including the limited number of available organs for transplantation, the risk of rejection due to genetic discrepancies, and the burden of immunosuppression. In this study, we demonstrated the feasibility of permanent genetic engineering of the heart during ex vivo perfusion. Lentiviral vectors encoding for short hairpin RNAs targeting beta2-microglobulin (shß2m) and class II transactivator (shCIITA) were delivered to the graft during two hours of normothermic EVHP. Highly efficient genetic engineering was indicated by stable reporter gene expression in endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes. Remarkably, swine leucocyte antigen (SLA) class I and SLA class II expression levels were decreased by 66% and 76%, respectively, in the vascular endothelium. Evaluation of lactate, troponin T, and LDH levels in the perfusate and histological analysis showed no additional cell injury or tissue damage caused by lentiviral vectors. Moreover, cytokine secretion profiles (IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) of non-transduced and lentiviral vector-transduced hearts were comparable. This study demonstrated the ex vivo generation of genetically engineered hearts without compromising tissue integrity. Downregulation of SLA expression may contribute to reduce the immunogenicity of the heart and support graft survival after allogeneic or xenogeneic transplantation.
Asunto(s)
Vectores Genéticos , Trasplante de Corazón , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase I , Lentivirus , Animales , Lentivirus/genética , Trasplante de Corazón/métodos , Vectores Genéticos/genética , Porcinos , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase I/genética , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase I/inmunología , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase I/metabolismo , Perfusión/métodos , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase II/genética , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase II/metabolismo , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase II/inmunología , Microglobulina beta-2/genética , Citocinas/metabolismo , Ingeniería Genética , Miocitos Cardíacos/metabolismo , Miocitos Cardíacos/inmunología , Humanos , ARN Interferente Pequeño/genética , Supervivencia de Injerto/inmunología , Supervivencia de Injerto/genética , Células Endoteliales/metabolismo , Células Endoteliales/inmunología , Proteínas Nucleares , TransactivadoresRESUMEN
Severe right heart failure, often overlooked and challenging to manage, has prompted a growing interest in innovative approaches to provide functional support. This study uses experimentation in large porcine models to introduce a novel prototype of a pulsatile mechanical circulatory support device and document its effects when deployed as a right ventricular assist device (RVAD). The pulsatile ventricular assist platform (pVAP), featuring a membrane pump driven by an intra-aortic balloon pump console, actively generates pulsatile flow to propel right ventricular blood into the pulmonary artery. This novel prototype demonstrates promising potential in addressing the challenges of right heart failure management. After preliminary in vitro assessments, the pVAP was tested on seven porcine models in a healthy state and after the induction of right ventricular failure. During the procedure, a set of standard ( ie , standard-of-care) hemodynamic measurements was obtained. Additionally, invasive pressure-volume loop analysis was employed to examine left ventricular hemodynamics. Results indicated that activation of the pVAP during right ventricular failure significantly improved systemic hemodynamics and enhanced left ventricular function. This study sheds light on the potential of the pVAP in managing right heart failure.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Hemodinámica , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico , Flujo Pulsátil , Animales , Porcinos , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/instrumentación , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/métodos , Flujo Pulsátil/fisiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/fisiopatología , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/cirugía , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Total artificial heart (TAH) implantation is a rarely performed procedure. Contrarily, left ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation is rather common in many centers. As transplantation is quantitatively limited cardiac replacement with artificial hearts is a viable alternative in the treatment of severe biventricular heart failure. An alternative to TAH is the implantation of two VADs in a TAH configuration. We hereby present the first multi-center study on 3-months outcomes of patients treated by cardiectomy and placement of two HeartMate 3s in a TAH configuration. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated a cohort of 15 patients that underwent HM3-TAH-implantation at three international institutions. Follow-up was 3 months after implantation. Baseline, intra- and postoperative parameters as well as survival data and adverse events were collected. RESULTS: A total of 1089 days on HM3-TAH were observed. Thirty-day survival after HM3-TAH implantation was 53% (8/15) and three month survival was 40% (6/15). The longest duration on device was 274 days. Causes of death were multi-organ failure, sepsis, and neurological adverse events. No technical complications were documented. Two patients remained on the device. Four patients (26%) were successfully bridged to transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of two HeartMate 3s in a TAH configuration is a last resort and off-label concept in cases of extreme biventricular heart failure. In a diligently selected patient cohort, HM3-TAH implantation is a feasible method to increase the chance of survival in a severely ill patient cohort and successfully bridge patients to heart transplantation that would otherwise have died.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Trasplante de Corazón , Corazón Artificial , Corazón Auxiliar , Humanos , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Corazón Artificial/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugíaRESUMEN
Objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is considered to deteriorate endothelial function through hyperinflammation. We aimed to investigate microvascular dysfunction using the angiographic parameters thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (TFC) and myocardial blush grade (MBG), in COVID-19 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: One hundred and sixty-five patients presented with ACS (62.4% ST elevated myocardial infarction) and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between March 1 and June 30, 2020, were enrolled in the study. The polymerase chain reaction test was performed in case of suggestive symptoms or typical computerized tomography findings. Results: Twenty-six patients (15.7%) were tested positive for COVID-19. Significantly higher values were observed in TFC in patients with COVID-19 (p<0.001), whereas COVID-19 patients had significantly lower MBGs (Grade 0 and 1) (p<0.001). Peak troponin-I value was also higher in the COVID-19 group (27335 vs. 15959 ng/dL, p=0.006). Mortality risk was higher in COVID-19 patients (38.4% vs. 7.2%, p<0.001). TFC and ejection fraction may predict in-hospital mortality among COVID-19 patients with ACS according to logistic regression results. In correlation analysis, TFC correlated positively with C-reactive protein (r=0.340, p<0.001) and peak troponin-I value (r=0.369, p<0.001). Conclusion: COVID-19 is associated with slow coronary flow and microvascular impairment in ACS.
RESUMEN
The edge-to-edge mitral valve repair technique, invented by Alfieri and colleagues, introduced valve repair as a treatment option for patients with complex diseases where standard annuloplasty and related repair techniques are insufficient, due to annular calcification and patient frailty. We retrospectively evaluated the results of a transaortic edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (Alfieri stitch) in high-risk patients who were undergoing aortic valve replacement. From February, 2012 to December, 2017, 43 patients underwent transaortic edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with concomitant aortic valve replacement at a single institution. Preoperative and postoperative echocardiograms were compared. Home telephone follow up was conducted and postoperative morbidity was examined, including the need for reoperation, stroke and cardiac arrhythmia. 30-day and long-term survival rates were also determined. Mitral regurgitation (MR) was graded semi-quantitatively as 0 (trace and/or none), mild (1), moderate (2) or moderate to severe (3-4). The patients were 74 ± 7.8 years old. 65% of the patients were male. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 115 ± 37 minutes and mean cross-clamp time was 71 ± 23 minutes. There was a significant improvement in preoperative vs postoperative median MR grade (2 (IQR 2-3) vs 0 (IQR 0-1); P = 0.05). Follow-up transthoracic echocardiograms in 29 patients obtained at a median of 9 months' (range 3 - 19 months') and in 16 patients at a median of 34 months' postoperatively (range 21 - 53 months') showed mild (1 (IQR 1-2)) grade of mitral regurgitation. 30-day survival was 98%. Long term survival at 12 and 24 months' were 88% and 81% respectively. Mitral valve reoperation was conducted in 1 patient (2%), who was suffering of endocarditis. Stroke occurred in 2 patients (7%). Cardiac arrhythmia was observed in 15 patients (35%). 8 patients (19%) suffered from atrial fibrillation and 7 patients (16%) displayed atrioventricular blockage. 10 patients (23%) could be treated conservatively and 5 patients (12%) needed implantation of a pacemaker. Transaortic edge-to-edge mitral valve repair can be safely performed during aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients and improves even long-term MR grade. Postoperative cardiac arrhythmia occurs frequently. 66% of them could be treated successfully by conservative procedures.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral/efectos adversos , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral/métodos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Patients undergoing explantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) after improvement of myocardial function remain a minority. Nevertheless, considering the growing population of LVAD patients, increasing demand for new explantation strategies is expected. Herein, we present a retrospective review of seven patients undergoing HeartMate3 explantation with the use of a custom-made apical ring plug in four medical centers. The primary outcome was status at intensive care unit discharge. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and transfusions. Six out of seven patients were males. The median age at explantation and time on LVAD support was 35 years (range:13-73) and 10 months (range:9-24), respectively. No technical difficulties were experienced during plug implantation via a conventional sternotomy or through a left lateral thoracotomy, either with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Perioperative transfusions ranged from 0 to 3 units/patient. No re-operations for bleeding, hemorrhagic, embolic, or plug-related infective events were observed. Heparin was started 6 hours after surgery as a bridge to oral anticoagulation (international normalized ratio: 2-2.5). All patients were discharged alive from intensive care unit. This novel plug device for HeartMate3 explantation was successfully and safely implanted in this first patient series. Notwithstanding, its use should still be considered off-label and larger studies are required to investigate its long-term results.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Miocardio , Esternotomía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The HeartMate 3 (HM 3; Abbott) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has improved hemocompatibility-related adverse outcomes. In sporadic cases, external compression of the outflow graft causing obstruction (eOGO) can result from substance accumulation between the outflow graft and its bend relief. We sought to evaluate the prevalence, course, and clinical implications of eOGO in an international study. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective analysis of HM 3 LVADs implanted between November 2014 and April 2021 (n = 2108) was conducted across 17 cardiac centers in 8 countries. We defined eOGO as obstruction >25% in the cross-sectional area in imaging (percutaneous angiography, computed tomography, or intravascular ultrasound). The prevalence and annual incidence were calculated. Serious adverse events and outcomes (death, transplantation, or device exchange) were analyzed for eOGO cases. RESULTS: Of 2108 patients, 62 were diagnosed with eOGO at a median LVAD support duration of 953 (interquartile range, 600-1267) days. The prevalence of eOGO was 3.0% and the incidence at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years of support was 0.6%, 2.8%, 4.0%, 5.2%, and 9.1%, respectively. Of 62 patients, 9 were observed, 27 underwent surgical revision, 15 underwent percutaneous stent implantation, 8 received a heart transplant, and 2 died before intervention. One patient underwent surgical revision and later stent implantation. The mortality with therapeutic intervention was 9/53 (17.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Although uncommon, HM 3 LVAD-supported patients might develop eOGO with an increasing incidence after 1 year of support. Although engineering efforts to reduce this complication are under way, clinicians must maintain a focus on early detection and remain vigilant.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Device exchange to a newer generation left ventricular assist device (LVAD) offers the opportunity to benefit from improved adverse events profiles. We present the three-year results of a patient cohort undergoing VAD upgrades to a new generation device focusing on outcomes and adverse events. METHODS: We present the first series of patients who underwent LVAD upgrade to HeartMate 3™ (Abbott Laboratories; Abbott Park, IL, USA). All operations were performed less invasively. Follow-up time was three years after LVAD exchange. RESULTS: Overall four HeartMate II™ (Abbott Laboratories; Abbott Park, IL, USA) and two HVAD patients underwent LVAD upgrade. In five cases severe infection of the VAD led to device exchange (83%, 5/6). Three-year survival after LVAD exchange was 100% (6/6). In the follow-up examinations one patient showed a single syncope and several low flow alarms (1/6). The remaining five patients showed no technical malfunctions of the LVAD or hemodynamic adverse events (5/6). Four out of five patients whose devices had to be changed due to an infection suffered a local re-infection (4/5), which did not require any further surgical intervention. Four patients were successfully transplanted, and two patients were still on device support at three years after LVAD exchange. CONCLUSIONS: Three-year outcomes and adverse events after LVAD exchange to HeartMate 3™ (Abbott Laboratories). show excellent results. The superior hemocompatibility in terms of pump thrombosis makes the HM3 a favored choice in case of LVAD exchange due previous pump thrombosis. However, in cases of exchange due to device infection the risk of re-infection remains high.