Selective vitamin D receptor activation as anti-inflammatory target in chronic kidney disease.

Paricalcitol, a selective vitamin D receptor (VDR) activator used for treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease (CKD), has been associated with survival advantages, suggesting that this drug, beyond its ability to suppress parathyroid hormone, may have additional beneficial actions. In this prospective, nonrandomised, open-label, proof-of-concept study, we evaluated the hypothesis that selective vitamin D receptor activation with paricalcitol is an effective target to modulate inflammation in CKD patients. Eight patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate between 15 and 44 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and an intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) level higher than 110 pg/mL received oral paricalcitol (1 µg/48 hours) as therapy for secondary hyperparathyroidism. Nine patients matched by age, sex, and stage of CKD, but a PTH level <110 pg/mL, were enrolled as a control group. Our results show that five months of paricalcitol administration were associated with a reduction in serum concentrations of hs-CRP (13.9%, P < 0.01), TNF-α (11.9%, P = 0.01), and IL-6 (7%, P < 0.05), with a nonsignificant increase of IL-10 by 16%. In addition, mRNA expression levels of the TNFα and IL-6 genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells decreased significantly by 30.8% (P = 0.01) and 35.4% (P = 0.01), respectively. In conclusion, selective VDR activation is an effective target to modulate inflammation in CKD.

Kidney Transplantation After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Plasma Cell Dyscrasias: Case Reports.

The plasma cell dyscrasias (PCDs) include a number of entities such as multiple myeloma, primary amyloidosis, and monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease. Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is the only cure for a variety of hematologic and oncologic diseases. Clinically significant renal impairment is a common feature in plasma cell myeloma, affecting 20% to 55% of patients at initial diagnosis; 2% to 3% of patients present with failure sufficiently severe to require hemodialysis. This circumstance is associated with a high early mortality. The necessity for immunosuppression after HCT could complicate its management and may precipitate the development of complications. In some patients an effective alternative could be kidney transplant (KT); however, the presence of 2 transplants will require optimal adjustment of immunosuppression and management of complications. At present, there are few published cases of KT after HCT, and the experience of managing 2 transplants is limited. We would like to describe our experience with 4 patients who had a PCD and initially received HCT and received subsequent KT. In our experience the progress and outcome of KT after HCT were optimal. We would like to address that a higher incidence of cytopenia associated with the combination of immunosuppression (lenalidomide, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, etc.) and other drugs (ie, valganciclovir) should be considered together with an increased risk of opportunistic infections and PCD relapse.