Comparison of embryologist stress, somatization, and burnout reported by embryologists working in UK HFEA-licensed ART/IVF clinics and USA ART/IVF clinics.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the prevalence of occupational stress, somatization, and burnout reported by UK and US, embryologists and the impact of work conditions on these well-being outcomes? SUMMARY ANSWER: Surveyed UK and US embryologists reported moderate perceived stress, low somatic symptom severity, high levels of burnout, and overall stressful work conditions, but with differences that could be due to country-specific occupational and employment characteristics. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY?: Spanish, UK, US, and international surveys have identified high levels of occupational stress, somatization, burnout, and occupational health issues among embryologists. These issues have been attributed to embryologists' occupational challenges and work conditions. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A cross-sectional web-based survey was sent to 253 embryologists working in UK ART/IVF clinics and 487 embryologists working in US ART/IVF clinics. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Participants self-reported their stress levels, somatization, burnout, and work conditions. Proportions across the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15), Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS), a single-item work unit grade (A-F), and customized occupational and sociodemographic questionnaires were calculated using descriptive statistics. Welch's t-test was utilized to compare PSS and PHQ-15 scores between groups. Risk ratios were calculated using log-binomial regression for all models except for levels of anxiety related to performing cryostorage tasks, for which Poisson models were used. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In total, 50.6% (128) of the embryologists in the UK and 50.1% (244) in the US completed the survey. Both groups self-reported moderate PSS and low PHQ-15 scores, although fewer UK embryologists scored high on the MBI cynicism dimension than their US colleagues (43% UK vs 60% US embryologists, P < 0.05). The UK and US embryologists did not differ on the MBI exhaustion dimension with both scoring high for exhaustion (59% UK vs 62% US). Although 81% and 80% of UK and US embryologists, respectively, reported working overtime, more embryologists in the UK reported being adequately compensated. Increasing levels of anxiety-related to cryostorage showed a dose-dependent increased risk of burnout on at least two MBI-GS dimensions only in the UK group, and, a dose-dependent likelihood of higher PSS and PHQ-15 scores in both groups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Since the two groups were surveyed 9 months apart and were self-reporting, the study is limited by the differences in responsibilities, scheduling, and workload specific to the time of year. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Work-related health issues and occupational challenges shared by UK and US embryologists could be addressed by organizational enhancements and technology. Lower levels of stress and burnout among UK embryologists might be due to the HFEA-provided structure/certainty. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported without any external funding by TMRW Life Sciences Inc., which is developing and commercializing an automated platform for embryology. M.G.C. and M.S.L. are full-time employees and stockholders/shareholders with TMRW Life Sciences, and A.M. of Novavax, Inc. was an employee of TMRW Life Sciences. G.P. is a consultant for TMRW Life Sciences. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05326802; NCT05708963.

Tailored support may reduce mental and relational impact of infertility on infertile patients and partners.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the psychological impact of infertility on infertile patients and partners of infertile patients? DESIGN: This online, international, quantitative survey assessed the impact of infertility on mental health, relationships and daily activities for 1944 respondents. Respondents were male or female infertile patients (n = 1037) or partners to infertile patients (n = 907; not necessarily partners of the patient sample) and were recruited at different stages of the treatment journey. RESULTS: The most common emotions were 'sadness' at infertility diagnosis and 'anxiety' during treatment. Emotions differed in nature and intensity throughout the journey. Envy of others who achieved pregnancy was frequently reported by women. More than half of respondents (60.4%; n = 1174) perceived the infertility journey to have impacted their mental health, and 44.1% (n = 857) of respondents sought mental health support. More patients reported mental health impacts (70.1%, n = 727) than partners (49.3%, n = 447). One in three respondents indicated that their relationship had suffered due to the infertility diagnosis. Of these respondents, 55.0% (n = 409) strongly agreed that infertility caused an emotional strain. Patients more often than partners reported a detrimental impact on daily activities. Respondents most commonly agreed with statements regarding an 'effect on work-life balance'. CONCLUSION: Treatment journey stages are defined by their impact profile, which differs between infertile patients and partners of infertile patients. Negative impacts are diverse (mental health, relational, daily activities). There was disparity between the number of respondents reporting mental health issues and the number seeking mental health support. This indicates the need for support services tailored to different treatment stages.

Impact of empathic physician contact on patient anxiety and distress during the waiting period after embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Can an empathic physician phone call in the interval between embryo transfer and first serum human chorionic gonadotrophin measurement decrease anxiety and distress amongst patients undergoing IVF? DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial at a single academically-affiliated fertility centre including patients aged 18-43 undergoing their first embryo transfer with autologous fresh or euploid cryopreserved embryos following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (frozen embryo transfer, FET/PGT-A). After embryo transfer, participants were randomized to a 5-minute scripted phone call (intervention) from a single physician 3-4 days after embryo transfer or to routine care. The primary and secondary outcomes included were change in State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores from the start of IVF stimulation to 8-9 days after embryo transfer, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 231 participants (164 fresh, 67 FET/PGT-A) were randomized to intervention (n = 116) or routine care (n = 115). While mean STAI and HADS scores increased in both groups, the intervention group experienced lower mean increases than the routine care group for both the STAI (3.3 [0.97] versus 7.8 [1.10], respectively; P = 0.002) and the HADS (0.3 [0.44] versus 2.4 [0.53], respectively; P = 0.003). Most participants in the intervention group found the call helpful (91.4%) and reported that it decreased distress and anxiety (81%). CONCLUSIONS: A brief empathic phone call from a physician during the waiting period resulted in significantly lower self-reported levels of patient anxiety and distress. As the intervention in this study averaged 5 min, implementing this in clinical practice would not be onerous and may ease the distress associated with the waiting period.

Research-supported mobile applications and internet-based technologies to mediate the psychological effects of infertility: a review.

Infertility is a chronic condition commonly accompanied by psychological and emotional distress. A significant contributor to the discontinuation of infertility treatment is the psychological burden of treatment. Many individuals experiencing infertility report high levels of depression and anxiety. Unfortunately, barriers to traditional individual and couples counselling include stigmatization, finances, trepidation, challenges of travel and uncertainty. New technology, such as mobile applications and internet-based programmes, may be a feasible option for reducing the emotional distress of infertility diagnoses and treatments. This review focuses on current and developing technologies designed to decrease emotional distress in individuals with infertility.

Barriers and factors associated with significant delays to initial consultation and treatment for infertile patients and partners of infertile patients.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the key drivers and barriers for infertile patients and their partners to see an infertility specialist and initiate treatment? DESIGN: An online, international, 30-minute quantitative survey collected data from 1944 respondents from nine countries. Respondents were infertile patients (n = 1037) or partners of infertile patients (n = 907; but not necessarily partners of the patient sample), at different stages of the treatment journey. RESULTS: The overall average times were 3.2 years to receiving a medical infertility diagnosis, 2.0 years attempting to achieve pregnancy without assistance before treatment, and 1.6 years of treatment before successful respondents achieved pregnancy. The most common driver for considering treatment after a consultation (n = 1025) was an equal desire within the couple to have a child (40.8%). Of the partners (n = 356), 29.8% reported that transparency of information from healthcare professionals about treatment expectations was important. A significantly higher proportion of respondents seeking treatment reported that healthcare professionals offered supportive services (61.2%) and mental health services (62.0%), than of the 207 respondents who did not seek treatment (32.4% and 36.7%, respectively; P < 0.001). Perceived cost was the most commonly reported barrier for respondents not seeking a consultation (37.5% of n = 352) or treatment (42.0% of n = 207). Of the 95 respondents who discontinued treatment, 34.7% discontinued due to the financial impact. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents reported significant delays to seeking treatment, probably negatively impacting the chances of achieving pregnancy. Motivational coherence within couples was a key driver and cost of treatment was the main barrier. Reported supportive service offerings by healthcare professionals were significantly associated with continuation of the treatment journey.

Infertility remains a top stressor despite the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on infertility patients? DESIGN: An anonymous cross-sectional online survey was sent to patients who attended a large university-affiliated infertility practice in the USA between 1 January 2019 and 1 April 2020. At three different time-points respondents were asked to note their top three stressors, from a list of 10 commonly reported life stressors. RESULTS: The questionnaire was sent to 10,481 patients, with 3604 responses (response rate 34%) received. A total of 2202 non-pregnant female respondents were included in the final analysis. One-third of respondents had a prior diagnosis of an anxiety disorder, and 11% reported taking anxiolytic medications; over one-quarter had a prior diagnosis of a depressive disorder and 11% reported taking antidepressant medications. At all three time-points, infertility was noted to be the most frequent top stressor. Coronavirus was noted to be the third most common stressor among the respondents in early March but, at the time of writing, is similar to that of infertility (63% and 66%, respectively). A total of 6% of patients stated that infertility treatment, including IVF, should not be offered during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: Despite the unprecedented global pandemic of COVID-19, causing economic and societal uncertainty, the stress of infertility remains significant and is comparable a stressor to the pandemic itself.

Insights from clinical experience in treating IVF poor responders.

'Poor responders' is a term used to describe a subpopulation of IVF patients who do not respond well to ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins. While there is no standard definition of a poor responder, these patients tend to be of advanced maternal age (≥40 years), have a history of poor ovarian response with conventional stimulation protocols, and/or have low ovarian reserve. Despite the heterogeneity of this patient group, there are characteristics and needs common to many poor responders that can be addressed through a holistic approach. Stimulation during the earlier stages of follicle maturation may help synchronize follicle development for improved response to later gonadotrophin stimulation, and supplementation with dehydroepiandrosterone or human growth hormone may promote early follicle development in poor responders. IVF protocols should be specifically tailored to poor responders to complement the patient's natural cycle. Because poor responders tend to have high levels of stress and anxiety, patients should receive psychological counselling and support, both prior to and during IVF cycles, to ensure optimal outcomes and improve patients' experience. It is important to set realistic expectations with poor responders and their partners to help patients make informed decisions and better manage their distress and anxiety.

The impact of younger age on treatment discontinuation in insured IVF patients.

PURPOSE: This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine whether age influences treatment discontinuation among insured patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). We hypothesized that the youngest patients would be the least likely to discontinue treatment. METHODS: All women age 18-42 who underwent their first fresh, non-donor IVF cycle from 2002 to 2013 were followed until a live birth was achieved, until they discontinued treatment at our center (not presenting for treatment for a one-year period), or until they completed six fresh or frozen embryo transfer cycles, whichever occurred first. RESULTS: Of 11,361 women included, 4336 (38.2 %) discontinued treatment at our center before achieving a live birth or undergoing six IVF cycles. Discontinuation differed by age for cycles 2-4 (all P ≤ 0.004), with the proportion among women age 40-42 averaging 6-7 % higher than the other groups; discontinuation per cycle was similar among women <30 compared to women age 30-<35 and 35-<40. This continued in cycles 5 and 6, and in the sixth, 35.2, 32.0, 32.3, and 40.2 % of women among the four age groups discontinued treatment, respectively (P = 0.17). In cycles 2-5, women in the oldest two age groups with secondary infertility consistently discontinued treatment more frequently than those with primary infertility. CONCLUSIONS: We found that women in the oldest age group were more likely to discontinue IVF treatment than younger women. Surprisingly, we found that the youngest women discontinued treatment in a similar fashion to women age 30-<40.

The impact of stress on fertility treatment.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of this review was to summarize the recent research on the relationship between stress and assisted reproductive technology treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: Women and men with infertility report high levels of distress that can impact their quality of life. There are numerous psychosocial interventions, including cognitive behavior therapy and/or self-help ones, which may decrease distress, increase patient retention and improve pregnancy rates. SUMMARY: Patient distress is an important factor to consider. Decreasing burden of care may lead to significant improvements in assisted reproductive technology outcome.

The impact of lifestyle behaviors on infertility treatment outcome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The impact of lifestyle behaviors on fertility is poorly understood, as is the impact of specific behaviors on the advanced reproductive technologies. It is vital for healthcare professionals to understand which lifestyle behaviors can have the greatest negative impact in an effort to improve patient recommendations. The purpose of this article is to review the recent research on this topic. RECENT FINDINGS: The majority of research in this area is epidemiological; there are a few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding weight loss in infertility patients, but no RCTs on other lifestyle behaviors. High or low BMI, alcohol, vigorous exercise, nicotine, and antidepressant medications may have an adverse impact on fertility. It is unclear whether dietary supplements can have a positive impact on fertility. Patients do not appear to follow recommendations for lifestyle behavior modifications during infertility treatment. SUMMARY: Healthcare professionals need to be more effective in making lifestyle behavior recommendations for infertility patients, including those receiving treatment. VIDEO ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/COOG/A13.

Patients' administration preferences: progesterone vaginal insert (Endometrin®) compared to intramuscular progesterone for Luteal phase support.

BACKGROUND: Administration of exogenous progesterone for luteal phase support has become a standard of practice. Intramuscular (IM) injections of progesterone in oil (PIO) and vaginal administration of progesterone are the primary routes of administration. This report describes the administration preferences expressed by women with infertility that were given progesterone vaginal insert (PVI) or progesterone in oil injections (PIO) for luteal phase support during fresh IVF cycles. METHODS: A questionnaire to assess the tolerability, convenience, and ease of administration of PVI and PIO given for luteal phase support was completed by infertile women diagnosed with PCOS and planning to undergo IVF. The women participated in an open-label study of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropins (HP-hMG) compared with recombinant FSH (rFSH) given for stimulation of ovulation. RESULTS: Most women commented on the convenience and ease of administration of PVI, while a majority of women who administered IM PIO described experiencing pain. In addition, their partners often indicated that they had experienced at least some anxiety regarding the administration of PIO. The most distinguishing difference between PVI and PIO in this study was the overall patient preference for PVI. Despite the need to administer PVI either twice a day or three times a day, 82.6% of the patients in the PVI group found it "very" or "somewhat convenient" compared with 44.9% of women in the PIO group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this comprehensive, prospective patient survey, along with findings from other similar reports, suggest that PVI provides an easy-to-use and convenient method for providing the necessary luteal phase support for IVF cycles without the pain and inconvenience of daily IM PIO. Moreover, ongoing pregnancy rates with the well-tolerated PVI were as good as the pregnancy rates with PIO. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT00805935.

Prevention of Pregnancy Loss: Combining Progestogen Treatment and Psychological Support.

Pregnancy loss can be defined as a loss before either 20 or 24 weeks of gestation (based on the first day of the last menstrual period) or the loss of an embryo or fetus less than 400 g in weight if the gestation age is unknown. Approximately 23 million pregnancy losses occur worldwide every year, equating to 15-20% of all clinically recognized pregnancies. A pregnancy loss is usually associated with physical consequences, such as early pregnancy bleeding ranging in severity from spotting to hemorrhage. However, it can also be associated with profound psychological distress, which can be felt by both partners and may include feelings of denial, shock, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and suicide. Progesterone plays a key part in the maintenance of a pregnancy, and progesterone supplementation has been assessed as a preventative measure in patients at increased risk of experiencing a pregnancy loss. The primary objective of this piece is to assess the evidence for various progestogen formulations in the treatment of threatened and recurrent pregnancy loss, postulating that an optimal treatment plan would preferably include a validated psychological support tool as an adjunct to appropriate pharmacological treatment.

The impact of a reminder email on the return to care behavior of infertility patients after a first office visit: A quality improvement project.

Research question: Prior research has determined that up to half of infertility patients attend one visit with an infertility specialist but do not return for a diagnostic workup or treatment. As part of a quality-of-care improvement project, patients who had not returned after one visit with an infertility specialist received an email which asked why they had not returned. The return to care behavior was then compared to a period of time when the email was not sent out, to answer the question as to whether or not the email had a significant impact on behavior. Design: From July 2017 to March 2018, 301 eligible patients who attended one visit but did not return to care received an email; 657 subsequent patients from April to December 2018 did not receive one. The email asked questions about that visit, offered support, contact information for the employee sending the email and why they had not returned. Results: All patients were followed for 11 months after their initial visit. Forty-one percent of the email group returned to care, compared to 32% who did not (P < 0.0014). For those who gave a reason why they hadn't returned, 32% of the respondents conceived on their own, 3% transferred to another infertility center, 31% were taking a break, 3% were unhappy with their care, and 31% made a return to care appointment. Thus, the email was associated with a significant increase in return to care when compared to women who did not receive an email. The most common reason why patients did not return was spontaneous conception closely followed by taking a break. Conclusions: A compassionate email sent after one visit may increase return to care behavior.

The Impact of the FertiStrong Mobile Application on Anxiety and Depression in Men: A Randomised Control Pilot Study.

Background: Male factor accounts for up to half of all cases of infertility. Previously, research has focused on the psychological effects of infertility on female partners, but recent studies show negative consequences on male patients as well. Despite evidence that men are affected by infertility, there is limited studies focusing on coping methods for them. Aims: Determine if a cognitive-behavioral and relaxation mobile application, targeted at men experiencing infertility, could lead to decreases in psychological distress. Settings and Design: Randomized controlled. Materials and Methods: Thirty-nine men participated in a randomized pilot study of the FertiStrong application. Participants completed a demographic form, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Fertility Problem Inventory (FPI) at baseline and one month follow-up. The intervention group downloaded the FertiStrong application and used it when needed. Control participants received routine infertility care. Statistical Analysis Used: Normally distributed data is presented as mean+/- SD; Differences in proportions were tested using Chi-square test and within group comparison were performed using paired t-test. Results: One participant was excluded, resulting in 38 participants, 19 in each group. There were no baseline differences in demographic characteristics (P>0.31). For the HADS anxiety domain, the control group had a small increase between baseline and follow up, while the intervention group had a small decrease. For the HADS depression domain, there was a slight increase in the controls. For the FPI, the control group had a two-point increase, from moderately stressed to extremely high while the intervention group had a five-point decrease, from extremely high to moderately high, but was not significant. Each FPI domain-specific score in the intervention group decreased and one, Rejection of Childfree lifestyle, was significant (P=0.03). The increase in stress level was significantly greater in the control group (P<0.02). Conclusion: Recruitment was challenging due to the short recruitment phase and the sample size was smaller than planned. However, there were several significant improvements noted in the intervention group and on all testing, the intervention group trended to less distress. More research is needed on convenient interventions for men experiencing infertility.

Understanding the perceptions of and emotional barriers to infertility treatment: a survey in four European countries.

BACKGROUND: Infertility can significantly impact women's lives and personal relationships. Despite the negative impact of infertility, a significant number of women who are struggling to conceive do not consult a physician. This cross-sectional survey was conducted to determine the emotional impact of infertility on women to identify which aspects of fertility treatment contribute to the psychological stress experienced by so many patients and to identify barriers to seeking treatment. METHODS: Women (n = 445; 18-44 years) who had received fertility treatment within the past 2 years or were having trouble conceiving but had not received treatment, completed a 15-min survey online. RESULTS: Participants were from France (n = 108), Germany (n = 111), Italy (n = 112) and Spain (n = 114). Responses indicated that infertility causes a range of emotions and can strain relationships. Women who had received treatment were more likely to feel hopeful (26 versus 21%) and closer to their partner than women not in treatment (33 versus 19%, P < 0.05). Most women delayed starting treatment because of a desire to conceive naturally, and on the advice of physicians. Women aged ≥35 years took longer to seek help with their fertility issues. Injection-related anxiety was the second greatest barrier to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study has provided insight into the physical and psychological challenges of infertility treatments and permitted a better understanding of the factors that impact patient lives. A treatment protocol with minimal injections and provision of additional information may lessen the emotional impact and challenges of infertility and contribute to patient satisfaction with fertility treatment protocols.

Tackling burden in ART: an integrated approach for medical staff.

Discontinuation is a problem in fertility clinics. Many couples discontinue assisted reproductive technologies (ART) without achieving a live birth for reasons other than poor prognosis or the cost of treatment. Discontinuation has been attributed to the burden of treatment. The causes of burden can be broadly classified according to whether they originate in the patient, clinic or treatment. Interventions to alleviate these burdens include provision of comprehensive educational material, screening to identify highly distressed patients, provision of tailored coping tools and improvements in the clinic environment and medical interventions. Practical interventions to reduce the different causes of burden in ART exist, but further development and evaluation of the efficacy of these interventions requires more precise definition of terms and theory. In this paper, we propose a general integrated approach to cover different perspectives in dealing with burden in ART clinics. We firstly describe the integrated approach and present common sources of burden. We then describe interventions that could help reduce the burden in ART. Our paper is aimed at fertility clinic staff because of their day-to-day involvement with patients. However, this discussion should also be relevant to companies that develop treatments and to psychosocial experts. Reducing the burden of treatment should lead to improved outcomes, namely better quality of life during treatment and lower discontinuation rates.

The psychological impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on women who become pregnant after receiving treatment for infertility: a longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the psychological health of patients with infertility who have become pregnant with that of women who have not. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study conducted from April 2020 to June 2020. The participants completed three questionnaires over this period. SETTING: A single large, university-affiliated infertility practice. PATIENTS: A total of 443 pregnant women and 1,476 women still experiencing infertility who completed all three questionnaires. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-reported primary stressor over three months of the first major COVID-19 surge; further data on self-reported sadness, anxiety, loneliness, and the use of personal coping strategies. RESULTS: Pregnant participants were significantly less likely to report taking an antidepressant or anxiolytic medication, were less likely to have a prior diagnosis of depression, were more likely to cite COVID-19 as a top stressor, and overall were less likely to practice stress-relieving activities during the first surge. CONCLUSIONS: Women who became pregnant after receiving treatment for infertility cited the pandemic as their top stressor and were more distressed about the pandemic than their nonpregnant counterparts but were less likely to be engaging in stress-relieving activities. Given the ongoing impact of the pandemic, patients with infertility who become pregnant after receiving treatment should be counseled and encouraged to practice specific stress-reduction strategies.

An internet-based mind/body intervention to mitigate distress in women experiencing infertility: A randomized pilot trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if an internet-based mind/body program would lead to participants experiencing infertility (1) being willing to be recruited and randomized and (2) accepting and being ready to engage in a fertility-specific intervention. Secondary exploratory goals were to examine reduced distress over the course of the intervention and increased likelihood to conceive. METHODS: This was a pilot randomized controlled feasibility trial with a between-groups, repeated measure design. Seventy-one women self-identified as nulliparous and meeting criteria for infertility. Participants were randomized to the internet-based version of the Mind/Body Program for Fertility or wait-list control group and asked to complete pre-, mid- and post-assessments. Primary outcomes include retention rates, number of modules completed, and satisfaction with intervention. Secondary exploratory outcomes sought to provide preliminary data on the impact of the program on distress (anxiety and depression) and self-reported pregnancy rates relative to a quasi-control group. RESULTS: The retention, adherence, and satisfaction rates were comparable to those reported in other internet-based RCTs. Although time between pre- and post-assessment differed between groups, using intent-to-treat analyses, women in the intervention group (relative to the wait-list group) had significant reduction in distress (anxiety, p = .003; depression, p = .007; stress, p = .041 fertility-social, p = .018; fertility-sexual, p = .006), estimated as medium-to-large effect sizes (ds = 0.45 to 0.86). The odds of becoming pregnant was 4.47 times higher for the intervention group participants as compared to the wait-list group, OR 95% CI [1.56, 12.85], p = .005 and occurred earlier. The findings suggest that the research design and program specific to this population are feasible and acceptable. Replication efforts with an active control group are needed to verify distress reduction and conception promotion findings.