RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Controversy continues in the treatment of breast cancer in women over 70 years of age. In 2016, the Society of Surgical Oncology recommended against routine use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx) as part of the 'Choosing Wisely Campaign'. This study examines the oncologic safety of avoidance of routine SLNBx in patients over 70 years of age with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify women with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and ILC diagnosed between 2012 and 2020. Clinical and pathological staging, axillary staging, surgery type, and lymph node positivity between patients with IDC or ILC were compared. RESULTS: Among women with T1 tumors, 85,949 (79.6%) patients with IDC and 12,761 (81.5%) patients with ILC underwent SLNBx (p < 0.001). Among patients who underwent SLNBx, those with IDC were more likely to have positive nodes (n = 7535, 8.8%) than those with ILC (n = 1041, 8.2%; p = 0.02). During the time interval of interest, for both IDC and ILC patients, the rate of axillary lymph node dissection decreased and rates of SLNBx or no axillary staging increased. On multivariate analysis, ILC histology was associated with use of SLNBx, but without nodal positivity. CONCLUSION: A trend de-escalation of axillary staging was identified in this study, however the majority of patients meeting the 'Choosing Wisely' criteria are still undergoing SLNBx. No increased risk of nodal positivity was identified among patients with ILC, suggesting that surgeons can continue to choose wisely and limit the use of SLNBx in women over 70 years of age with T1 ILC tumors.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama , Carcinoma Lobular , Linfadenopatía , Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Lobular/cirugía , Carcinoma Lobular/patología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/cirugía , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been the standard of care for clinically node-negative women with invasive breast cancer (IBC); however, there is less agreement on whether to perform SLNB when the risk of metastasis is low or when it does not affect survival or locoregional control. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved survey was sent to members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons asking in which scenarios surgeons would recommend SLNB. Descriptive statistics and multivariable analysis were performed using SPSS software. RESULTS: There was a 23% response rate; 68% identified as breast surgical oncologists, 6% as surgical oncologists, 24% as general surgeons, and 2% as other. The majority practiced in a community setting (71%) versus an academic setting (29%). In a healthy female with clinical T1N0 hormone receptor-positive (HR+) IBC, 83% favored SLNB if the patient was 75 years of age, versus 35% if the patient was 85 years of age. Academic surgeons were less likely to perform axillary staging in a healthy 75-year-old (odds ratio [OR] 0.51 [0.32-0.80], p = 0.004) or a healthy 85-year-old (OR 0.48 [0.31-0.74], p = 0.001). For DCIS, 32% endorsed SLNB in women undergoing lumpectomy, with breast surgical oncologists and academic surgeons being less likely to endorse this procedure (OR 0.54 [0.36-0.82], p = 0.028; and OR 0.53 [0.34-0.83], p = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Despite studies showing that omitting SLNB in older patients with HR+ IBC does not impact regional control or survival, most surgeons are still opting for axillary staging. In addition, one in three are performing SLNB for lumpectomies for DCIS. Breast surgical oncologists and academic surgeons were more likely to be practicing based on recent data and guidelines. Practice patterns are changing but there is still room for improvement.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Cirujanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Axila/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático CentinelaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Extracellular vehicles (EVs) released by malignant tumor cells can mediate the immune response and promote metastasis through intercellular communication. EV analysis is an emerging cancer surveillance tool with advantages over traditional liquid biopsy methods. The aim of this pilot study is to identify actionable EV signatures in metastatic breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under an IRB-approved protocol for the analysis of patient plasma, samples were collected from women with newly diagnosed or progressive metastatic breast cancer and from women without cancer. Enriched EVs were analyzed via a bead-based multiplex assay designed to detect 37 distinct tumor-relevant epitopes. The mean fluorescent intensity of EV epitopes meeting a minimum threshold of detectability was compared between groups via independent samples t-test. Subgroup analysis was conducted for metastatic breast cancer patients who were positive for estrogen and/or progesterone receptors and negative for HER2. Other variables potentially affecting CD105 levels were also analyzed. RESULTS: CD105 was found to have a significantly higher mean fluorescent intensity in participants with metastatic breast cancer compared to control participants (P = 0.04). ER/PR+ subgroup analysis revealed a similar pattern compared to control participants (P = 0.01). Other analyzed variables were not found to have a significant correlation with CD105 levels. CONCLUSIONS: CD105 EV levels were significantly higher in samples from participants with breast cancer compared to controls. Given that CD105 is known to mediate angiogenesis and promote metastasis, EV-associated CD105 in plasma represents a potential biomarker for diagnosis, surveillance and therapeutic targeting in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Vesículas Extracelulares , Biomarcadores , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Vesículas Extracelulares/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Receptores de ProgesteronaAsunto(s)
Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Cirujanos , Humanos , Axila , Estadificación de NeoplasiasRESUMEN
Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are rare but once metastasised, can lead to the release of vasoactive substances into the systemic circulation, and the classical features of carcinoid syndrome (CS) such as flushing and diarrhoea. A consequence of CS is carcinoid heart disease (CHD) which primarily affects the right-sided heart valves and can eventually lead to right heart failure. In this cohort, tricuspid and/or pulmonary valve replacement provides symptomatic relief. A patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with CHD can lead to the shunting of oxygen deficient blood to the systemic circulation causing hypoxaemia and reduced exercise tolerance. Additionally, the haemodynamic changes caused by regurgitant right-sided heart valves can increase the patency of a PFO allowing the passage of vasoactive substances to the systemic circulation thereby affecting the left-sided heart valves. We present data on the incidence of PFO in patients referred for surgery at our centre, in which the standard approach is to close the defect at time of cardiothoracic surgery. In addition, we present a series of four cases that highlight how the option of percutaneous PFO closure prior to open valve surgery may reduce haemodynamic instability and open a window of opportunity to enhance preoperative status. Percutaneous PFO closure then acts as a bridge to definitive cardiothoracic surgery, although there are risks in such an approach.
Asunto(s)
Cardiopatía Carcinoide , Foramen Oval Permeable , Humanos , Foramen Oval Permeable/complicaciones , Foramen Oval Permeable/cirugía , Cardiopatía Carcinoide/complicaciones , Cardiopatía Carcinoide/cirugía , Cardiopatía Carcinoide/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Survival benefit after resection of the breast primary for women with metastatic breast cancer reported in retrospective studies has not been uniformly confirmed by randomized controlled trials. To assess the need for dissemination of trial results by the ACS Cancer Research Program Dissemination and Implementation (ACS CRP D&I) committee, we analyzed trends and predictors of surgery and other therapies for stage IV breast cancer. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to identify women diagnosed with clinical stage IV breast cancer of ductal, lobular, or metaplastic histology between 2004 and 2017. Trends in utilization of breast surgery and other treatments and possible predictors of breast surgery were examined in univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: We identified 87,331 cases meeting inclusion criteria. Rates of surgical resection rose until 2009, peaking at 37%, then declined to a rate of 18% in 2017. The largest decline was seen in the hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2-) subgroup with up to 70% of patients undergoing surgery in 2007, down to 15% in 2017. In 2004, the rate of systemic therapy alone was slightly more common than locoregional therapy (surgery and/or radiation) with or without systemic therapy (48% vs 37%). However, by 2017, systemic therapy alone was by far more common (69% vs 20%). CONCLUSION: Rates of surgical resection of the breast primary for stage IV breast cancer have been on the decline in recent years, suggesting that providers at Commission on Cancer accredited hospitals are becoming more selective about who will be offered surgical resection.