Implications for the usage of the left lateral liver graft for infants ≤10 kg, irrespective of a large-for-size situation--are monosegmental grafts redundant?

Organ donor shortage for infant liver transplant recipients has lead to an increase in splitting and living donation. For cases in which even transplantation of the left lateral graft (Couinaud's segments II + III) results in a "large for size situation" with an estimated graft body weight ratio (GBWR) of >4%, monosegmental liver transplantation was developed. This, however, bears complications because of greater parenchymal surface and suboptimal vascular flow. We exclusively use the left lateral graft from living donors or split grafts. Temporary abdominal closure is attempted in cases of increased pressure. We report of 41 pediatric transplants in 38 children ≤10 kg. Within this group, there were 23 cases with a GBWR of ≥4, and 15 cases with a GBWR <4. There was no statistical difference in vascular or biliary complications. Despite a more frequent rate of temporary abdominal closure, we did not find a higher rate of intra-abdominal infections. Overall, patient and graft survival was excellent in both groups (one death, three re-transplants). We noticed, however, that the ventro-dorsal diameter of the graft appears to be more relevant to potential graft necrosis than the actual graft size. In conclusion, the usage of monosegmental grafts seems unnecessary if transplantation of left lateral grafts is performed by an experienced multidisciplinary team, and temporary abdominal closure is favored in cases of increased abdominal pressure.

WOFIE stimulates regulatory T cells: a 2-year follow-up of renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Initial interruption of immunosuppression for 72 hr was analyzed in renal transplant recipients according to Calne et al.'s "window of opportunity for immunologic engagement" (WOFIE) concept. METHODS: This pilot study was designed as a randomized, open-label, prospective trial of 40 recipients (20 in the WOFIE group, 20 in the control group) of cadaveric kidney transplants who were followed up for 2 years. Immunosuppression comprised tacrolimus (trough levels 5-8 ng/mL), daclizumab (1 mg per kilogram of body weight on day 0 and after 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks), mycophenolate mofetil (1-2 g/day), and prednisolone (maintenance dose of 10 mg/day). After induction with daclizumab, prednisolone, and mycophenolate mofetil, immunosuppression was interrupted for 72 hr in the WOFIE group. Steroid withdrawal followed in both groups within 12 to 16 weeks posttransplant. RESULTS: Patient and graft survival did not differ significantly between the two cohorts. However, the WOFIE group experienced less acute rejection episodes and developed better graft function. Although all but one of the patients in the WOFIE group successfully discontinued steroid treatment, permanent steroid withdrawal was achieved in only 76.4% of the control group. After daclizumab discontinuation, the WOFIE group demonstrated an increase of CD4CD25 T cells in peripheral blood (P<0.05 vs. control group), which was stable over time and strongly correlated with a significantly higher expression level of Foxp3-mRNA. CONCLUSIONS: Initial interruption of immunosuppression for 72 hr correlates with the induction of regulatory immunologic mechanisms and allows early and reliable minimization of immunosuppressive treatment.

Embryonic stem cells share immune-privileged features relevant for tolerance induction.

Continuous immunosuppressive treatment allows the majority of transplant recipients to accept their donated organ and prevent acute graft rejection. However, life-long suppression of the immune system to respond appropriately to infectious, fungal, and carcinogenic threats coincides with substantial morbidity and mortality for the host. Thus for the past five decades research in the field of transplantation medicine has focused on innovative strategies to induce graft tolerance to donor alloantigens, a state in which the recipient's lymphocytes have learned to accept the foreign organ or tissue as "self" without the need of permanent immunosuppression. The fact that individuals of the same species attack each other's tissues can be explained with the set of specific antigens, designated as major histocompatibility antigens, which are expressed on each cell of the body and normally widely differ between nonrelated individuals. According to the genetic laws of transplantation, survival of allogeneic grafts is correlated with the number of differences among these histocompatibility antigens. An important exception to this rule can be observed in pregnant women who tolerate their unborn conceptus expressing a full set of nonmaternal antigens inherited by the father. The exact mechanisms of immune privilege exhibited by embryonic tissue during prenatal development have not yet been characterized in each detail. The field of maternofetal immunobiology has lately emerged as a new scientific branch in immunology which is gathering useful insights for future innovative tolerance strategies to prevent allogeneic graft rejection.

WOFIE synergizes with calcineurin-inhibitor treatment and early steroid withdrawal in kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: According to the window of opportunity for immunologic engagement (WOFIE) concept, as designed by R. Calne, the authors prospectively analyzed the effect of a 72-hr immunosuppressive window on graft function in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Immunosuppressive therapy comprised tacrolimus (trough levels, 5-8 ng/mL after day 8 posttransplantation), daclizumab (1 mg/kg body weight at day 0 and 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks posttransplantation), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (1-2 g/day), and prednisolone. All patients received an induction therapy including daclizumab, prednisolone, and MMF. WOFIE patients were stopped from immunosuppression for 72 hr posttransplant. Steroids were withdrawn in both groups 12 to 16 weeks after transplantation and dual therapy with MMF and low-dose tacrolimus ensued. RESULTS: Thirty renal transplant recipients (16 in the WOFIE group and 14 in the control group) have been enrolled since May 2000. Patient and graft survival were 93.8% and 87.5%, respectively, in the WOFIE group and 100.0% and 92.9% in the control group, respectively. One patient in the WOFIE group died of cytomegalovirus infection with stable graft function. There were no grafts lost because of acute rejection or primary nonfunction in either group. Patients treated according to the WOFIE protocol revealed less acute rejection episodes during the time of observation (first biopsy-confirmed acute rejection rate 12.5% in the WOFIE group vs. 42.9% in the control cohort). Whereas 92.1% of the WOFIE patients were successfully discontinued from steroids, permanent steroid withdrawal was achieved in only 60% of the control cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Initial interruption of immunosuppression was associated with a decrease of acute graft rejections. Subsequently, the authors postulate a synergistic effect on the immunosuppressive efficiency of calcineurin inhibitors when combined with an initial drug-free window.

Future strategies for tolerance induction: a comparative study between hematopoietic stem cells and macrophages.

So far, clinical benefit of hematopoietic stem cell induced donor-specific tolerance across major histocompatibility complex (MHC) barriers was hampered by either graft rejection or graft-versus-host disease. An alternative approach focuses on the use of donor-derived cells that bear an inherent mechanism to circumvent allospecific rejection upon injection into non-immunosuppressed hosts. Using a myeloablative conditioning model in the rat, full donor chimeric recipients were generated and their potential to induce long-term cardiac allograft survival was compared with the fate of grafts transferred to non-immunosuppressed host rats pretreated with donor-macrophages derived from the peritoneal cavity in the LEW to DA inbred strain combination. The induction of full multilineage long-term donor-chimerism (> 150 days) after initial host conditioning using two doses of cyclophosphamide and one shot of busulphan prevented acute graft rejection, whereas non-chimeric animals experienced acute and complete rejection. Conversely, vigorous T-cell depletion is required to protect conditioned animals from lethal graft-versus-host disease. Instead, the use of donor intraperitoneal macrophages achieved a state of transient chimerism and subsequent long-term graft survival in fully immunocompetent rats without the need of lethal conditioning regimens. In conclusion, the complex immunologic interactions, observed after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation as a means to induce donor chimerism, and subsequent long-term graft acceptance can be avoided if appropriate cell populations can be identified that, by themselves, induce a transient state of donor chimerism prevailing long enough to deviate allospecific immune responses, as outlined in this study.

Spontaneous tolerance: experience with the rat liver transplant model.

Soluble major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I antigens released from hepatocytes and the passenger leukocyte population of the liver allograft have both been considered as important contributors for spontaneous liver tolerance upon allogeneic transplantation into fully MHC-mismatched hosts. This study was conducted to delineate the role of "passenger leukocytes" (PL) as well as local intra-graft defence mechanisms of long-term accepted liver allografts in more detail. Orthotopic liver transplantation was performed in male inbred rats as follows (n = 4-6): (i) Lewis (LEW; RT1.(l)) --> LEW; (ii) DA (RT1.(av1)) --> DA; (iii) DA --> LEW; (iv) LEW --> DA; (v) LEW (10-Gy whole body irradiation [WBI], d-7) --> DA; (vi) LEW (10-Gy WBI, d-7) --> LEW; (vii) LEW (10-Gy WBI, d-7) --> LEW (parked for 36 hours) --> DA; and (viii) LEW (10-Gy WBI, d-7) --> DA (parked for 36 hours) --> DA. The model specifically investigated the role of PLs as potential contributors to liver tolerance as WBI destroys this nonresident liver population. Characterization of Fas/FasL expression and the frequency of apoptotic cell death was performed by immunohistochemistry and TUNEL staining. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, by the use of Fas and FasL-specific cDNA probes, was performed on isolated hepatocytes of tolerized and rejected livers at various time points after transplantation. Animal survival in the various experimental groups was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival statistics and related log-rank statistics as follows: (i) < 100 days; (ii) > or = 100 days; (iii) > 100 days; (iv) 11.3 +/- 1.0 day; (v) 9.0 +/- 0.5 days; (vi) > 100 days; (vii) 5/6 > 100 days; and (viii) 8.0 +/- 1.5 days. Immunohistochemistry revealed high numbers of proliferating cells in tolerized liver allografts. Apoptotic cell death of hepatocytes could be detected in both rejecting and to a lower extent in tolerized animals. Conversely, only tolerized but not rejected liver allografts revealed upregulation of FasL-expression on hepatic parenchymal cells from day 3 onwards. Irradiated LEW livers, in turn, lose their ability to survive in allogeneic DA hosts (group v) whereas they survive in syngeneic hosts (group vi), indicating that irradiation itself does not destroy the liver parenchyma. Reconstitution of irradiated LEW livers with syngeneic (group vii) but not with allogeneic (group viii) PLs restored tolerance induction. The underlying mechanisms of immune-privilege observed with liver allografts appear to share characteristics of clonal exhaustion suggesting that alloreactive lymphocytes are depleted by AICD via the FasL/Fas signal transduction pathway. The high frequency of apoptotic lymphocytes found in the portal tract of tolerized (but not rejected) LEW grafts supposes that functional FasL expression on graft hepatocytes mediates specific elimination of graft-directed effector lymphocytes. This mechanism constitutes peripheral deletion as one of the possible tolerogenic mechanisms involved. Chimerical liver grafts consisting of donor (LEW) parenchyma and host (DA) passenger leukocytes lose their tolerogenic capacity. In contrast, syngeneic reconstitution with LEW-PLs, restores liver graft acceptance upon transplantation into allogeneic DA hosts. This phenomenon is not relying on the induction of micro- or macrochimeric hosts, as no LEW PLs were found in spleen, thymus or the blood compartment from long-term surviving DA rats. Thus, non-resident liver cells contribute significantly to liver graft acceptance. Subsequently, liver tolerance appears to be mainly induced in the graft itself.

Tolerance-inducing strategies in transplantation surgery-current status and perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Life-long immunosuppressive medication has to be administered to the majority of solid-organ recipients after transplantation of genetically mismatched organs in order to circumvent acute graft loss due to alloreactive rejection responses triggered by the host's immune system. However, life-long suppression of the immune system implicitly limits the host's ability to respond appropriately to infectious, fungal and carcinogenic threats. Simultaneously non-targeted inhibition of immunological defense mechanisms coincides with substantial morbidity and mortality for the host. Thus, for the past five decades research in the field of transplantation medicine has focused on innovative strategies to induce graft tolerance to donor alloantigens, a state in which the recipient's lymphocytes have learned to accept the foreign organ or tissue as "self" or "non-dangerous" without the need of chronic immunosuppression. Achieving that specific goal of donor-specific tolerance would not only minimize the risk of the recipient to suffer from serious side effects resulting from continuous immunosuppressive therapy, but would also prevent loss of long-term graft function caused by chronic rejection processes. Recently, numerous insights into the dynamic interrelationships of host immune responses elicited by donor antigen-presentation, either on the graft itself or on specialized antigen-presenting cells, have substantially broadened our understanding of the cascade of events that result in the acquisition of tolerance. METHOD: We highlight areas of research that are currently particularly helpful not only to set up new strategies to induce donor-specific tolerance or long-term graft acceptance, but also to identify and describe parameters which serve to characterize those patients who have acquired a state of tolerance and are safe to be weaned off from their immunosuppressive regimen.