RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine functional independence at admission as a predictor of outcomes during an initial inpatient hospitalization for a pediatric brain injury. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 531 pediatric inpatients with traumatic (n = 298) or nontraumatic (n = 233) brain injuries. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data extracted from the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. MAIN MEASURE: The Functional Independence Measure for Children, a measure of self-care, mobility, and cognitive independence. RESULTS: Logistic regression analyses indicated that children with traumatic brain injury showed greater odds of making large functional gains in comparison with children with nontraumatic brain injury. For both groups, children entering rehabilitation with a moderate level of functional independence had the highest probability of making large gains. Children with a nontraumatic brain injury entering treatment with a high level of functioning made greater gains than those entering with low functioning. The opposite trend emerged for children with traumatic injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Level of functioning at admission may be a useful predictor of progress during an inpatient stay for youth with brain injuries. Children with nontraumatic brain injury entering treatment with low functioning are expected to make slower progress during hospitalization.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/rehabilitación , Lesiones Encefálicas/rehabilitación , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Admisión del Paciente , Recuperación de la Función , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recovery from respiratory illness (RI), a common reason for hospitalization, can be protracted for some children because of high illness severity or underlying medical complexity. OBJECTIVE: We assessed which children hospitalized with RI are the most likely to use post-acute facility care (PAC) for recovery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 609,800 hospitalizations for patients in 43 US children's hospitals between 2010- 2015 for RI, identified with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Classification System. Discharge to PAC was identified using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Discharge Status Codes. We compared patient characteristics by PAC use with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: There were 2660 (0.4%) RI hospitalizations resulting in PAC transfer (n = 2660, 0.4%). Discharges to PAC had greater percentages of technology assistance (83.2% vs 15.1%), neuromuscular chronic condition (57.5% vs 8.9%), and mechanical ventilation (52.7% vs 9.1%), ð < 0.001 for all. The highest likelihood of PAC use occurred with ≥11 vs no chronic conditions (odds ratio [OR] 11.7 [95% CI, 8.0- 17.2]), ≥9 vs no therapeutic medication classes (OR 4.8 [95% CI, 1.8-13.0]), and existing tracheostomy (OR 3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-3.5). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) acute-care length of stay (LOS) for children most likely to use PAC was 19 (8-56) days; LOS remained long (median 13 [6-41] days) for children with the same attributes (n = 9448) not transferred to PAC. CONCLUSIONS: Children with RI who are most likely to use PAC have a high prevalence of multiple chronic conditions, multiple medications, and medical technology. Future investigations should assess the supply of PAC against the demand of hospitalized children with RI who might need it.
Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Hospitalización , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/terapia , Atención Subaguda/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Acute care hospitals are challenged to provide efficient, high-quality care to children who have medically complex conditions and may require weeks or months for recovery. Although the use of home health care (HHC) and facility-based postacute care (PAC) after discharge is well documented for adults, to our knowledge, little is known for children. OBJECTIVE: To assess the national prevalence of, characteristics of children discharged to, and variation in use across states of HHC and PAC for children. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective analysis of 2,423,031 US acute care hospital discharges in 2012 for patients ages 0 to 21 years from the nationally representative Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Kids' Inpatient Database. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Discharges to HHC (eg, visiting or private-duty home nursing) and PAC (eg, rehabilitation facility) were identified from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Discharge Status Codes. We compared children's characteristics (eg, race/ethnicity and number of chronic conditions) by discharge type using generalized linear regression. RESULTS: The median age of participants was 3 years (interquartile range, 0-13 years), and 45.6% were female. Of 2,423,031 US acute care hospital discharges in 2012 for patients ages 0 to 21 years, 122,673 discharges (5.1%) were to HHC and 26,282 (1.1%) were to PAC facilities. Neonatal care was the most common reason (44.5%, n = 54,589) for acute care hospitalization with discharge to HHC. Nonneonatal respiratory, musculoskeletal, and trauma-related problems, collectively, were the most common reasons for discharge to PAC (42.9%, n = 11,275). When compared with PAC, more discharges to HHC had no chronic condition (34.4% vs 18.0%, P < .001) and fewer discharges to HHC had 4 or more chronic conditions (22.5% vs 37.7%, P < .001). In multivariable analysis, Hispanic children were less likely to use PAC (0.8% vs 1.1%; odds ratio [OR], 0.9 [95% CI, 0.8-0.9]) or HHC (3.3% vs 5.5%; OR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.7-0.8]) compared with other children. Children with 4 or more chronic conditions compared with no chronic conditions had a higher likelihood of HHC use (11.0% vs 4.4%; OR, 2.9 [95% CI, 2.8-3.0]) and PAC (3.9% vs 0.8%; OR, 4.5 [95% CI, 4.3-4.9]). After case-mix adjustment, there was significant (P < .001) variation across states in HHC (range, 0.4%-24.5%) and PAC (range, 0.4%-4.9%) use. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Home health care and PAC use after discharge for hospitalized children is infrequent, even for children with multiple chronic conditions. It varies significantly by race/ethnicity and across states. Further investigation is needed to assess reasons for this variation and to determine for which children HHC and PAC are most effective.