RESUMEN
Monitoring is a major component of asthma management in children. Regular monitoring allows for diagnosis confirmation, treatment optimization, and natural history review. Numerous factors that may affect disease activity and patient well-being need to be monitored: response and adherence to treatment, disease control, disease progression, comorbidities, quality of life, medication side-effects, allergen and irritant exposures, diet and more. However, the prioritization of such factors and the selection of relevant assessment tools is an unmet need. Furthermore, rapidly developing technologies promise new opportunities for closer, or even "real-time," monitoring between visits. Following an approach that included needs assessment, evidence appraisal, and Delphi consensus, the PeARL Think Tank, in collaboration with major international professional and patient organizations, has developed a set of 24 recommendations on pediatric asthma monitoring, to support healthcare professionals in decision-making and care pathway design.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Humanos , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/terapia , Niño , Calidad de Vida , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Técnica Delphi , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Suboptimal adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is associated with poor asthma control. Adult studies suggest that simplification of ICS regimen leads to better adherence. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine whether once-daily, compared with twice-daily, ICS dosing was associated with better adherence among children with asthma. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of children with asthma prescribed with either once-daily or twice-daily ICS monotherapy between 2011 and 2019. Our primary adherence outcome was the proportion of prescribed days covered (PPDC)-that is, the number of days for which the drug was dispensed by the pharmacy divided by the number of days for which it was prescribed. The impact of once-daily vs twice-daily ICS regimen on adherence was evaluated using linear multivariable regression analysis adjusting for covariates. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with greater than or equal to 75% adherence analyzed using logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 232 children (61% boys; mean age of 5.8 [3.6] years) were included; 120 children were prescribed once-daily, and 112 twice-daily, ICS. The median PPDC was 66.8% for the once-daily and 57.9% for the twice-daily group (P = .03). Children prescribed once-daily ICS had a 7.2% (95% confidence interval, 1.3-13.1) greater mean PPDC compared with the twice-daily group and greater odds of having PPDC greater than or equal to 75% (71.4% vs 45.5%; odds ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.26). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that once-daily dosing of ICS is associated with better medication adherence than twice-daily dosing. Whether the gain in adherence leads to better asthma control and health outcomes remains to be evaluated.
Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Administración por Inhalación , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la MedicaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Asthma guided self-management enhances patients' control of their condition under the guidance of the treating physician. The aim of the present study was to understand how physicians perceive, endorse, uptake, and support asthma guided self-management. METHODS: We conducted a secondary supplementary analysis of data originally collected as part of a multicenter collective case study in which physicians treating patients with asthma were interviewed. Using reflective thematic analysis, we aimed to explore physicians' understanding of guided asthma self-management as related to four ideas, namely: (a) understanding of the disease management and treatment goals; (b) defining medical frame and guidance; (c) describing the importance of patient-physician relationship; and (d) implementing asthma guided self-management. RESULTS: Evidence indicates that physicians perceived optimal guided self-management as related to patients' adherence to physician's instructions and recommendations, supported by the adjustment of prescribed pharmaceutical therapy contingent upon patient's symptoms. Some physicians also perceived behavior change and environmental control along with the medical recommendations. While physicians' perception of asthma and its treatment were aligned with the recommended guidelines-i.e., patient-centered care approach based on guided self-management, the actual guidance offered to patients remained primarily directive and paternalistic. Non-pharmacological approaches, such as exercise, smoking cessation, patient self-monitoring, and self-management supported by education and written self-management plans, were given little consideration in the context of the recommended treatment plan.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Médicos , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/terapia , Humanos , Cooperación del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en MedicinaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Early disease morbidity has been associated with asthma persistence in wheezing preschoolers; however, whether asthma control trajectories shortly after diagnosis could influence remission is unknown. We examined the association between asthma control trajectories 2â years post-diagnosis in preschoolers and subsequent disease remission. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre population-based retrospective cohort study consisting of 48â687 children with asthma diagnosed before 5â years old and born between 1990 and 2013 in four Canadian provinces who had prolonged disease activity post-diagnosis. Prolonged disease activity was defined as one or more medical visits or medications for asthma every 6-month period for at least four of the six periods post-diagnosis. Follow-up began at 3â years post-diagnosis (at cohort entry). Remission was defined as 2 consecutive years without drug claims or medical visits for asthma or asthma-like conditions following cohort entry. Asthma control trajectories, ascertained over four 6-month periods following diagnosis using a validated index, were classified as: "controlled throughout", "improving control", "worsening control", "out of control throughout" and "fluctuating control". Adjusted Cox models estimated associations between asthma control trajectories and time to remission. A random effects meta-analysis summarised province-specific hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: The pooled remission rate was 8.91 (95% CI 8.80-9.02) per 100 person-years. Compared with children controlled throughout, poorer asthma control was associated with incrementally lower hazard ratios of remission in four other trajectories: improving control (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.96), fluctuating control (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.85), worsening control (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.62-0.75) and out of control throughout (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.45-0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Asthma control trajectories 2â years following a diagnosis in preschoolers were associated with remission, highlighting the clinical relevance of documenting control trajectories in early life.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes , Asma , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Canadá , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Objective: The pediatric obese-asthma phenotype is associated with poor control, perhaps because of medication nonadherence. This study aimed to assess whether weight status is associated with nonadherence in children prescribed new asthma maintenance therapies.Methods: A historical cohort was constructed from a clinical database linking individual patient and prescription data to Quebec's prescription claims registry. Children aged 2-18 years with specialist-diagnosed asthma who were newly prescribed one of the following maintenance controllers: leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA); low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS); medium/high-dose ICS; or combination therapy (ICS with long-acting beta-2 agonists and/or LTRA), at the Asthma Center of the Montreal Children's Hospital from 2000-2007 were included. Primary nonadherence was defined as not claiming any prescriptions, whereas secondary nonadherence was measured with the proportion of prescribed days covered (PPDC ≤ 50%) among primary adherers over a 6-month follow-up period. A modified Poisson regression model served to estimate the effect of excess weight (BMI > 85th percentile) on primary and secondary nonadherence.Results: Approximately one third of patients were primary nonadherers and 60% took less than 50% of prescribed therapy. Excess weight was associated with a trend toward increased risk of primary nonadherence in children newly prescribed low-dose ICS (RR 1.53, 95%CI 0.94-2.49), and of secondary nonadherence in children initiating medium/high-dose ICS (RR 1.24; 95%CI 0.98-1.59).Conclusions: Excess weight status is a possible determinant of primary nonadherence in children initiating low-dose ICS and secondary nonadherence to higher-dose ICS regimens. This hypothesis-generating study suggests that nonadherence may be a potential contributor to higher morbidity in children with obese-asthma.
Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Peso Corporal , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Administración por Inhalación , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos , Antagonistas de Leucotrieno/uso terapéutico , Masculino , QuebecRESUMEN
Importance: While intravenous magnesium decreases hospitalizations in refractory pediatric acute asthma, it is variably used because of invasiveness and safety concerns. The benefit of nebulized magnesium to prevent hospitalization is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of nebulized magnesium in children with acute asthma remaining in moderate or severe respiratory distress after initial therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized double-blind parallel-group clinical trial from September 26, 2011, to November 19, 2019, in 7 tertiary-care pediatric emergency departments in Canada. The participants were otherwise healthy children aged 2 to 17 years with moderate to severe asthma defined by a Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score of 5 or greater (on a 12-point scale) after a 1-hour treatment with an oral corticosteroid and 3 inhaled albuterol and ipratropium treatments. Of 5846 screened patients, 4332 were excluded for criteria, 273 declined participation, 423 otherwise excluded, 818 randomized, and 816 analyzed. Interventions: Participants were randomized to 3 nebulized albuterol treatments with either magnesium sulfate (n = 410) or 5.5% saline placebo (n = 408). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was hospitalization for asthma within 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included PRAM score; respiratory rate; oxygen saturation at 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes; blood pressure at 20, 40, 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes; and albuterol treatments within 240 minutes. Results: Among 818 randomized patients (median age, 5 years; 63% males), 816 completed the trial (409 received magnesium; 407, placebo). A total of 178 of the 409 children who received magnesium (43.5%) were hospitalized vs 194 of the 407 who received placebo (47.7%) (difference, -4.2%; absolute risk difference 95% [exact] CI, -11% to 2.8%]; P = .26). There were no significant between-group differences in changes from baseline to 240 minutes in PRAM score (difference of changes, 0.14 points [95% CI, -0.23 to 0.50]; P = .46); respiratory rate (0.17 breaths/min [95% CI, -1.32 to 1.67]; P = .82); oxygen saturation (-0.04% [95% CI, -0.53% to 0.46%]; P = .88); systolic blood pressure (0.78 mm Hg [95% CI, -1.48 to 3.03]; P = .50); or mean number of additional albuterol treatments (magnesium: 1.49, placebo: 1.59; risk ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.11]; P = .47). Nausea/vomiting or sore throat/nose occurred in 17 of the 409 children who received magnesium (4%) and 5 of the 407 who received placebo (1%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among children with refractory acute asthma in the emergency department, nebulized magnesium with albuterol, compared with placebo with albuterol, did not significantly decrease the hospitalization rate for asthma within 24 hours. The findings do not support use of nebulized magnesium with albuterol among children with refractory acute asthma. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01429415.
Asunto(s)
Albuterol/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Magnesio/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Aguda , Administración por Inhalación , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Ipratropio/uso terapéutico , Magnesio/efectos adversos , Masculino , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS: To synthesize factors that facilitates or hinders the choice of a new living environment for a person with dementia by the informal caregiver. BACKGROUND: In an effort to develop evidenced-based interventions to support caregivers, it is essential to explore their experience. DESIGN: A qualitative systematic review using thematic synthesis. Studies published up to July 2019 were retrieved from four electronic databases. Two independent reviewers selected studies and assessed their methodological quality. FINDINGS: Choosing a new living environment for a person with dementia includes two main concerns for caregivers: (1) evaluating the current living environment and caregiving arrangements; and (2) evaluating potential living environments. The key factor, that is acceptability, reflects the extent to which a change of living environment is personally and socially perceived as desirable, suitable, as well as decent for all stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS: Future interventions must consider that caregivers' decision-making process is highly social and value-laden.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Toma de Decisiones , Demencia/terapia , Características de la Residencia , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to explore the effectiveness of various systemic corticosteroid (SCS) regimens to mitigate relapse in children with asthma discharged from an acute care setting. DATA SOURCES: Medline, EMBASE, Global Health, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, EMB ALL, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Proquest Dissertations and Theses Global, and LILACS were searched using controlled vocabulary and key words. Additional citations were searched via clinical trial registries, Google Scholar, bibliographies, a SCOPUS forward search of a sentinel paper, and hand searching conference abstracts. STUDY SELECTION: No limitations based on language, publication status, or year of publication were applied. Two independent reviewers searched to identify randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of SCS regimens to prevent relapse in children following treatment for acute asthma. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included. In 3 studies comparing SCS to placebo, asthma relapse was significantly reduced (RR = 0.10; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.77; I2 = 0%). A network analysis identified a significant reduction in relapse in children treated with intramuscular corticosteroids (OR = 0.038; 95% CrI: 0.001, 0.397), short-course oral prednisone (OR = 0.054; 95% CrI: 0.002, 0.451), and oral dexamethasone (OR = 0.071; 95% CrI: 0.002, 0.733) compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: This review found evidence that SCS reduces relapse in children following treatment for acute asthma, albeit based on a limited number of studies. Additional studies are required to assess the differential effect of SCS doses and treatment duration to prevent relapse in children following discharge for acute asthma.
Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Aguda , Humanos , Metaanálisis en Red , Recurrencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current evidence regarding the relationship between childhood obesity, decreased response to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), and poor asthma control is conflicting. OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether obesity (1) is associated with time to first exacerbation among children with asthma initiating step 3 maintenance therapies and (2) modifies the effectiveness of step 3 therapies. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from clinical data linked to health and drug administrative databases. The cohort consisted of children aged 2 to 18 years with specialist-confirmed asthma who initiated medium/high-dose ICS monotherapy or low/medium-dose ICS with leukotriene receptor antagonist/long-acting ß-agonist (combination therapy) at the Montreal Children's Hospital Asthma Center from 2000 to 2007. Children were classified as exposed to step 3 therapies when they were dispensed a corresponding drug claim during follow-up, whereas those without claims were classified as nonadherers. Marginal structural Cox models were used to estimate the effect of obesity (body mass index > 97th percentile) and treatment on time to exacerbation, which was defined as any emergency department visit, hospitalization, or use of oral corticosteroids for asthma. RESULTS: Of the 4621 cohort patients, 231 initiated ICS monotherapy, and 97 initiated combination therapy. The hazard ratio (HR) for obesity was 1.67 (95% CI, 1.41-1.98). Compared with nonobese nonadherers, the HR for obese nonadherers was 1.54 (95% CI, 0.97-2.45); the HR for ICS monotherapy in obese and nonobese children was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.47-1.52) and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.37-0.91), respectively; and the HR for combination therapy in obese and nonobese children was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.13-1.89) and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.23-0.92), respectively. CONCLUSION: Obesity might be a determinant of shorter exacerbation-free time in children with asthma; however, we could not rule out a differential response to step 3 therapies by obesity status, potentially because of a lack of precision.
Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Obesidad Infantil/complicaciones , Administración por Inhalación , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Asma/complicaciones , Niño , Preescolar , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Fenotipo , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop and validate measures of experiences of an emergency department (ED) visit suitable for use by older adults or their family members. METHODS: A cohort of patients aged 75 years and older who were discharged home was recruited at 4 EDs. At 1 week after the visit, patients or family members were interviewed by telephone to assess problems experienced at the visit. Twenty-six questions based on 6 domains of care found in the literature were developed: 16 questions were administered to all patients; 10 questions were administered to bed patients only. Scales were developed with multiple correspondence analysis. Regression analyses were used to validate the scales, using 2 validation criteria: perceived overall quality of care and willingness to return to the same ED. RESULTS: Four hundred twelve patients completed the 1-week interview, 197 ambulatory and 215 bed patients; family members responded for 75 patients. Two scales were developed, assessing personal care and communication (8 questions; α=.63) and waiting times (2 questions; α=.79). Both scales were significantly independently associated with perceived overall quality of care and willingness to return to the same ED. CONCLUSION: Two scales assessing important aspects of ED care experienced by older adults are ready for further evaluation in other settings.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comunicación , Familia , Femenino , Viviendas para Ancianos , Humanos , Masculino , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Psicometría , Quebec , Tiempo de TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the characteristics of the caregiving experience according to age at onset of dementia to adapt support programs. METHOD: Fifty-seven spouse caregivers of persons with early-onset dementia (PEOD) and 93 spouse caregivers of persons with late-onset dementia (PLOD) participated. The characteristics of the caregiving experience were assessed using questionnaires. We compared the two groups according to age at onset of the disease using a multivariate test, Pillai's Trace test. RESULTS: The analysis showed that there were similarities and differences between the two groups of spouse caregivers. All spouse caregivers were confident in their caregiving role and fairly well prepared for future needs and reported mild depressive and anxious symptoms. However, they lacked informal support, had low confidence in requesting respite care and reported effects on their health. Compared to spouse caregivers of PLOD, spouse caregivers of PEOD had more severe perceptions of the cognitive disorders of persons with dementia (PWD) and had a better sense of preparedness and knowledge of services. Spouse caregivers of PLOD were more confident in their ability to control disturbing thoughts. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that programs should provide information on support networks to improve preparedness for spouse caregivers of PLOD as well as emphasizing positive coping strategies for caregivers of PEOD to maintain good-quality relationships with PWD, which influences the perception of the symptoms. For both groups, family relationships should be considered.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Cuidadores/psicología , Demencia/enfermería , Esposos/psicología , Edad de Inicio , Anciano , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/enfermería , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Intermitentes , Autoeficacia , Apoyo SocialRESUMEN
Although montelukast is generally well tolerated, postmarketing studies have reported serious neuropsychiatric adverse drug reactions (ADRs) leading to a United States Food and Drug Administration black box warning. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of neuropsychiatric ADRs leading to discontinuation of montelukast in asthmatic children.We conducted a retrospective cohort study in children aged 1-17â years initiated on montelukast. In a nested cohort study, children initiated on montelukast as monotherapy or adjunct therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) were matched to those initiated on ICS monotherapy. A non-leading parental interview served to ascertain the occurrence of any ADRs with any asthma medication, and circumstances related to, and evolution of, the event.Out of the 106 participants who initiated montelukast, most were male (58%), Caucasian (62%) with a median (interquartile range) age of 5 (3-8)â years. The incidence (95% CI) of drug cessation due to neuropsychiatric ADRs was 16 (10-26)%, mostly occurring within 2â weeks. Most frequent ADRs were irritability, aggressiveness and sleep disturbances. The relative risk of neuropsychiatric ADRs associated with montelukast versus ICS was 12 (2-90).In the real-life setting, asthmatic children initiated on montelukast experienced a notable risk of neuropsychiatric ADRs leading to drug cessation, that is significantly higher than that associated with ICS.
Asunto(s)
Acetatos , Agresión/efectos de los fármacos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Glucocorticoides , Genio Irritable/efectos de los fármacos , Quinolinas , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/inducido químicamente , Acetatos/administración & dosificación , Acetatos/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Antiasmáticos/efectos adversos , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiología , Canadá/epidemiología , Preescolar , Ciclopropanos , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sulfuros , Privación de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: There are very few studies on primary adherence (i.e., first filling of a prescription) to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in asthma patients; two have involved children. Moreover, adherence can be overestimated when considering only secondary adherence (i.e., following the medication recommendations for a defined period) and ignoring primary adherence. We aimed thus to evaluate the real-world primary and secondary adherence to ICS and to develop an integrated primary and secondary adherence (IPSA) measure. METHODS: From two clinical databases of pediatric and adult asthma patients, we included 198 children and 206 adults with one ICS prescription recorded in their medical chart between 2010 and 2012 and follow-up data for ≥12 months. Adherence was estimated from written prescriptions and prescription claims data. Primary adherence was defined as filling the ICS prescription at a pharmacy within 12 months. Secondary adherence was defined as the proportion of days covered (PDC) in subjects who filled their prescription at least once. The IPSA was based on the PDC with a correction factor for primary adherence. RESULTS: Primary adherence to ICS at 12 months was 89.4 % in children and 69.4 % in adults. Secondary adherence at 12 months in children was 33.9 %, and the IPSA was 30.3 %. These values were 52.8 and 36.6 %, respectively, in adults. CONCLUSIONS: Primary adherence to ICS is low in adults and secondary adherence is poor in children and adults. Using the PDC as a unique measure of adherence led to significant overestimation in adults; IPSA leads to more valid estimates of adherence to ICS.
Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración por Inhalación , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Farmacias , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Asthma management guidelines recommend low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as first-line therapy for adults and adolescents with persistent asthma. The addition of anti-leukotriene agents to ICS offers a therapeutic option in cases of suboptimal control with daily ICS. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of anti-leukotriene agents added to ICS compared with the same dose, an increased dose or a tapering dose of ICS (in both arms) for adults and adolescents 12 years of age and older with persistent asthma. Also, to determine whether any characteristics of participants or treatments might affect the magnitude of response. SEARCH METHODS: We identified relevant studies from the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of Trials, which is derived from systematic searches of bibliographic databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and the trial registries clinicaltrials.gov and ICTRP from inception to August 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults and adolescents 12 years of age and older on a maintenance dose of ICS for whom investigators added anti-leukotrienes to the ICS and compared treatment with the same dose, an increased dose or a tapering dose of ICS for at least four weeks. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methods expected by Cochrane. The primary outcome was the number of participants with exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (except when both groups tapered the dose of ICS, in which case the primary outcome was the % reduction in ICS dose from baseline with maintained asthma control). Secondary outcomes included markers of exacerbation, lung function, asthma control, quality of life, withdrawals and adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: We included in the review 37 studies representing 6128 adult and adolescent participants (most with mild to moderate asthma). Investigators in these studies used three leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs): montelukast (n = 24), zafirlukast (n = 11) and pranlukast (n = 2); studies lasted from four weeks to five years. Anti-leukotrienes and ICS versus same dose of ICSOf 16 eligible studies, 10 studies, representing 2364 adults and adolescents, contributed data. Anti-leukotriene agents given as adjunct therapy to ICS reduced by half the number of participants with exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (risk ratio (RR) 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29 to 0.86; 815 participants; four studies; moderate quality); this is equivalent to a number needed to treat for additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) over six to 16 weeks of 22 (95% CI 16 to 75). Only one trial including 368 participants reported mortality and serious adverse events, but events were too infrequent for researchers to draw a conclusion. Four trials reported all adverse events, and the pooled result suggested little difference between groups (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.22; 1024 participants; three studies; moderate quality). Investigators noted between-group differences favouring the addition of anti-leukotrienes for morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), asthma symptoms and night-time awakenings, but not for reduction in ß2-agonist use or evening PEFR. Anti-leukotrienes and ICS versus higher dose of ICSOf 15 eligible studies, eight studies, representing 2008 adults and adolescents, contributed data. Results showed no statistically significant difference in the number of participants with exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.39; 1779 participants; four studies; moderate quality) nor in all adverse events between groups (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.03; 1899 participants; six studies; low quality). Three trials reported no deaths among 834 participants. Results showed no statistically significant differences in lung function tests including morning PEFR and FEV1 nor in asthma control measures including use of rescue ß2-agonists or asthma symptom scores. Anti-leukotrienes and ICS versus tapering dose of ICSSeven studies, representing 1150 adults and adolescents, evaluated the combination of anti-leukotrienes and tapering-dose of ICS compared with tapering-dose of ICS alone and contributed data. Investigators observed no statistically significant difference in % change from baseline ICS dose (mean difference (MD) -3.05, 95% CI -8.13 to 2.03; 930 participants; four studies; moderate quality), number of participants with exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.04; 542 participants; five studies; low quality) or all adverse events (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.08; 1100 participants; six studies; moderate quality). Serious adverse events occurred more frequently among those taking anti-leukotrienes plus tapering ICS than in those taking tapering doses of ICS alone (RR 2.44, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.92; 621 participants; two studies; moderate quality), but deaths were too infrequent for researchers to draw any conclusions about mortality. Data showed no improvement in lung function nor in asthma control measures. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For adolescents and adults with persistent asthma, with suboptimal asthma control with daily use of ICS, the addition of anti-leukotrienes is beneficial for reducing moderate and severe asthma exacerbations and for improving lung function and asthma control compared with the same dose of ICS. We cannot be certain that the addition of anti-leukotrienes is superior, inferior or equivalent to a higher dose of ICS. Scarce available evidence does not support anti-leukotrienes as an ICS sparing agent, and use of LTRAs was not associated with increased risk of withdrawals or adverse effects, with the exception of an increase in serious adverse events when the ICS dose was tapered. Information was insufficient for assessment of mortality.
Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Leucotrieno/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Adulto , Antiasmáticos/efectos adversos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Antagonistas de Leucotrieno/efectos adversos , Números Necesarios a Tratar , Ápice del Flujo Espiratorio/efectos de los fármacos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few instruments exist to ascertain the severity of a preschool-aged child's asthma exacerbations managed at home. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop and validate a functional status instrument to assess asthma exacerbation severity in preschoolers. METHODS: The parent-completed Asthma Flare-up Diary for Young Children (ADYC), which was developed systematically, comprises 17 items, each scored from 1 (best) to 7 (worst). The ADYC was completed daily from the onset of an upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) until asthma symptom resolution; the cumulative daily score was reported. The ADYC was examined for key psychometric properties in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of pre-emptive high-dose fluticasone in preschoolers with URTI-induced asthma. RESULTS: In 121 children aged 2.7 ± 1.1 years (59.5% male), the ADYC's internal consistency (Cronbach α = .97), feasibility (97% completion), and test-retest reliability (r = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59-0.80) were demonstrated. The ADYC was responsive to change between 2 consecutive days (Guyatt statistic = 0.77) with a minimal important difference of 0.22 (0.17-0.27). Of 871 episodes, the cumulative ADYC score was significantly higher during exacerbations than during URTIs (mean difference [MD], 7.6; 95% CI, 6.4-8.9) and for exacerbations with an acute-care visit (MD, 9.1; 95% CI, 7.6-10.7), systemic corticosteroids (MD, 10.1; 95% CI, 8.3-12.0), and hospitalization (MD, 6.8; 95% CI, 2.9-10.7) versus those without. In children receiving fluticasone, the ADYC score was significantly lower versus that in the placebo group (MD, 5.1; 95% CI, 1.8-8.3). CONCLUSIONS: The 17-item ADYC proved feasible, responsive to day-to-day changes, and discriminative across exacerbations of different severities. In a trial testing effective therapy in preschoolers, it identified a significant reduction in asthma exacerbation severity.
Asunto(s)
Asma/diagnóstico , Registros de Salud Personal , Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/etiología , Preescolar , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Fluticasona/administración & dosificación , Fluticasona/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few instruments exist to measure caregivers' functional status during a young child's asthma exacerbation. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop and validate a measure of caregivers' functional status during a preschooler's asthma exacerbation. METHODS: The psychometric properties of the 21-item questionnaire Effects of a Young Child's Asthma Flare-up on the Parents (ECAP) were tested in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of pre-emptive high-dose fluticasone in preschoolers with virus-induced asthma. Caregivers completed the ECAP questionnaire on the last day their child exhibited symptoms of an upper respiratory tract infection or asthma exacerbation (episode). The mean of each item, scored on a scale of 1 (best) to 7 (worst), provided the ECAP score. RESULTS: Ninety-three preschoolers (2.5 ± 1.0 years old; 62.4% male) experienced 878 episodes. Feasibility (80% questionnaire return rate; 90% completion) and internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.97) were high. Of 628 episodes with a completed ECAP questionnaire, 621 (98.9%) had data on exacerbations, and 609 (97.0%) had data on health care use. The ECAP score was significantly higher for children experiencing an asthma exacerbation versus those who were not (mean difference, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6-1.0) and for episodes resulting versus not resulting in an emergency visit (mean difference, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4), systemic corticosteroid use (mean difference, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7), or hospitalization (mean difference, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.5). The ECAP score was significantly lower in children treated with fluticasone versus those treated with placebo (mean difference, -0.7; 95% CI, -1.1 to -0.3). CONCLUSIONS: The 21-item ECAP questionnaire, showing high feasibility, internal consistency, discriminative validity, and responsiveness, has the psychometric properties to serve as a validated outcome to measure the burden of preschoolers' asthma exacerbations on their caregivers' functional status.
Asunto(s)
Asma/epidemiología , Cuidadores , Calidad de Vida , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Preescolar , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Psicometría , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
AIM: The aim of this study was to explore the needs of spouse caregivers of persons with dementia (PWD) and then to compare them based on the PWD's age at disease onset. This data could be used to adapt support programmes to address differences between the two groups. METHOD: Thirty-eight spouse caregivers of persons with late-onset dementia and 40 spouse caregivers of persons with early-onset dementia (PEOD) agreed to participate in the study. The mean ± SD age of the PEOD was 57.6 ± 4.0 years, whereas it was 80.9 ± 5.3 years for the persons with late-onset dementia. Interviews were conducted in the spouse caregivers' homes with only the spouse caregiver. The semi-structured interviews were based on the French version of the Carers Outcome Agreement Tool. The interviews were analyzed in two steps. The first step was qualitative to identify needs. The data were thematically analyzed using QSR NVivo 10. The second step was quantitative to compare the needs depending on the PWD's age at onset. The comparison between the two groups was performed using the χ2 test. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that the majority of needs are the same for the two groups of spouse caregivers. All caregivers need to unwind, to stimulate and pay attention to the PWD, to break the isolation, and to be more prepared and confident. However, some differences emerge, with the spouse caregivers of PEOD expressing a greater number of needs. The caregivers of PEOD seem to have a greater need to interact and maintain contacts with other people (P = 0.001), have more general care-related needs (P = 0.005), require more appropriate care structures (P = 0.037), and need greater assistance with administrative procedures (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: To improve spouse caregivers' well-being and sense of efficiency, it would be interesting to develop a support programme with a common framework and specific modules depending on the PWD's age at disease onset.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Costo de Enfermedad , Demencia/enfermería , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Apoyo Social , Esposos/psicología , Adaptación Psicológica , Edad de Inicio , Anciano , Demencia/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Necesidades , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: People with asthma may experience exacerbations or "attacks" during which their symptoms worsen and additional treatment is required. Written action plans may advocate doubling the dose of inhaled steroids in the early stages of an asthma exacerbation to reduce the severity of the attack and to prevent the need for oral steroids or hospital admission. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of increased versus stable doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as part of a patient-initiated action plan for home management of exacerbations in children and adults with persistent asthma. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register, which is derived from searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) to March 2016. We handsearched respiratory journals and meeting abstracts. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared increased versus stable doses of ICS for home management of asthma exacerbations. We included studies of children or adults with persistent asthma who were receiving daily maintenance ICS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials, assessed quality and extracted data. We contacted authors of RCTs for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: This review update added three new studies including 419 participants to the review. In total, we identified eight RCTs, most of which were at low risk of bias, involving 1669 participants with mild to moderate asthma. We included three paediatric (n = 422) and five adult (n = 1247) studies; six were parallel-group trials and two had a cross-over design. All but one study followed participants for six months to one year. Allowed maintenance doses of ICS varied in adult and paediatric studies, as did use of concomitant medications and doses of ICS initiated during exacerbations. Investigators gave participants a study inhaler containing additional ICS or placebo to be started as part of an action plan for treatment of exacerbations.The odds of treatment failure, defined as the need for oral corticosteroids, were not significantly reduced among those randomised to increased ICS compared with those taking their usual stable maintenance dose (odds ratio (OR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 1.18; participants = 1520; studies = 7). When we analysed only people who actually took their study inhaler for an exacerbation, we found much variation between study results but the evidence did not show a significant benefit of increasing ICS dose (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.30; participants = 766; studies = 7). The odds of having an unscheduled physician visit (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.41; participants = 931; studies = 3) or acute visit (Peto OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.24 to 3.98; participants = 450; studies = 3) were not significantly reduced by an increased versus stable dose of ICS, and evidence was insufficient to permit assessment of impact on the duration of exacerbation; our ability to draw conclusions from these outcomes was limited by the number of studies reporting these events and by the number of events included in the analyses. The odds of serious events (OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.77 to 3.71; participants = 394; studies = 2) and non-serious events, such as oral irritation, headaches and changes in appetite (OR 2.15, 95% CI 0.68 to 6.73; participants = 142; studies = 2), were neither increased nor decreased significantly by increased versus stable doses of ICS during an exacerbation. Too few studies are available to allow firm conclusions on the basis of subgroup analyses conducted to investigate the impact of age, time to treatment initiation, doses used, smoking history and the fold increase of ICS on the magnitude of effect; yet, effect size appears similar in children and adults. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence does not support increasing the dose of ICS as part of a self initiated action plan to treat exacerbations in adults and children with mild to moderate asthma. Increased ICS dose is not associated with a statistically significant reduction in the odds of requiring rescue oral corticosteroids for the exacerbation, or of having adverse events, compared with a stable ICS dose. Wide confidence intervals for several outcomes mean we cannot rule out possible benefits of this approach.
Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Beclometasona/administración & dosificación , Niño , Enfermedad Crónica , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences and adjustment modes of couples during the period between the initial signs of the Alzheimer's disease (AD) and the years following diagnosis, particularly in the case of early-onset AD. DESIGN: A dyadic interpretative phenomenological analysis was conducted with married couples in which one member of each couple received a diagnosis of probable early-onset AD (before 65 years of age). PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen young couples, followed by the National Reference Centre for Young Persons with AD, agreed to participate. For seven of the couples, the caregiver was a woman. The mean age was 57.4 (SD = 4.2) for the caregivers and 57.3 (SD = 4.1) for the persons with AD. METHODS: The semi-structured interviews were conducted in the couples' homes. Each interview was conducted with both spouses to capture their interactions in the context of individual and shared experiences. RESULTS: Two higher-order themes emerged from the analyses: the 'need to know' and, after the diagnosis, the 'need not to know more'. Indeed, the first signs mark the beginning of a period of doubt and a search for understanding. This pursuit of knowledge progresses to the recognition of more intense and severe signs that encourage couples to seek medical attention. Both reassuring and destabilising, the diagnosis is a breaking point that modifies how the changes and painful effects associated with disease are experienced. Couples employ strategies to minimise their suffering and consequently their knowledge about the disease. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the couples oscillate between the need to know and the fear of knowing. To protect themselves, they use strategies to reduce their suffering and to distance the disease. The use of these avoidance strategies indicates that certain times in the course of disease management are less appropriate for couples to accept the assistance offered by formal caregivers.