RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Climate change has significant implications for health, yet healthcare provision itself contributes significant greenhouse gas emission. Medical students need to be prepared to address impacts of the changing environment and fulfil a key role in climate mitigation. Here we evaluate the effectiveness of an online module on climate-change and sustainability in clinical practice designed to achieve learning objectives adapted from previously established sustainable healthcare priority learning outcomes. METHODS: A multi-media, online module was developed, and 3rd and 4th year medical students at Brighton and Sussex Medical School were invited to enrol. Students completed pre- and post-module questionnaires consisting of Likert scale and white space answer questions. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of responses was performed. RESULTS: Forty students enrolled and 33 students completed the module (83% completion rate). There was a significant increase in reported understanding of key concepts related to climate change and sustainability in clinical practice (p < 0.001), with proportion of students indicating good or excellent understanding increasing from between 2 - 21% students to between 91 - 97% students. The majority (97%) of students completed the module within 90 min. All students reported the module was relevant to their training. Thematic analysis of white space responses found students commonly reported they wanted access to more resources related to health and healthcare sustainability, as well as further guidance on how to make practical steps towards reducing the environmental impact within a clinical setting. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate learner outcomes of an online module in the field of sustainable health and healthcare. Our results suggest that completion of the module was associated with significant improvement in self-assessed knowledge of key concepts in climate health and sustainability. We hope this approach is followed elsewhere to prepare healthcare staff for impacts of climate change and to support improving the environmental sustainability of healthcare delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study registered with Brighton and Sussex Medical School Research Governance and Ethics Committee (BSMS RGEC). Reference: ER/BSMS3576/8, Date: 4/3/2020.
Asunto(s)
Gases de Efecto Invernadero , Estudiantes de Medicina , Cambio Climático , Curriculum , Humanos , Facultades de MedicinaRESUMEN
Aims Rheumatic disease (RMD) patients treated with long-term glucocorticoids (GC) are at risk of developing tertiary adrenal insufficiency. With this survey we aimed to assess the knowledge of RMD patients taking long-term glucocorticoid therapy regarding risk of adrenal insufficiency and understanding of the "steroid sick day rules". Methods RMD patients taking ≥2.5 mg prednisolone daily for ≥3 months were recruited from the Rheumatology outpatient department in Beaumont Hospital, Dublin. Patient knowledge and previous counselling of steroid sick day rules was determined using an 8-point questionnaire carried out face-to-face or via phone call. Results 51 RMD patients on GC therapy were recruited. 3/51 (5.9%) of patients reported that they had been counselled on the Sick Day Rules. 2/51 (3.9%) carried a steroid emergency card or MedicAlert bracelet. Few patients would increase their steroid dose appropriately in response to infection, vomiting or peri-procedure [14/51 (27.5%); 9/51 (17.7%) and 5/51 (7.2%), respectively]. Conclusion We demonstrate a significant deficit of patient knowledge around the precautions for long-term GC use in rheumatic diseases. We suspect that our results may be generalisable to many other RMD units. We are currently reviewing our procedures around healthcare professional and patient education, issuing of information leaflets, emergency cards or MedicAlert bracelets etc. to at risk patients.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Suprarrenal , Reumatología , Humanos , Glucocorticoides , Ausencia por Enfermedad , Insuficiencia Suprarrenal/inducido químicamente , Insuficiencia Suprarrenal/tratamiento farmacológico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , EsteroidesRESUMEN
Aims Our aim was to determine the number of cases of aneuploidy which were prenatally diagnosed in our tertiary referral unit from 2005-2015 and to analyse the subsequent outcomes of Trisomies 13, 18 and 21(T13, T18 and T21). Methods This was a retrospective observational study. We firstly determined the total number of prenatally diagnosed aneuploidies. We then analysed their subsequent outcomes including average gestation at miscarriage or IUD, mode of delivery and neonatal outcome. Results 402 cases of T13, T18 or T21 were identified of which 40% opted for expectant management. T18 was the most likely diagnosis to result in miscarriage, IUD or intrapartum death. The highest caesarean delivery rate was in T21. Conclusion With regards to T13 and T18, live birth rates show that some parents may achieve the goal of spending time with their baby in the immediate postpartum period. This information will act as a valuable resource in our counselling.
Asunto(s)
Aneuploidia , Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Down/genética , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Síndrome de la Trisomía 13/diagnóstico , Síndrome de la Trisomía 13/genética , Síndrome de la Trisomía 18/diagnóstico , Síndrome de la Trisomía 18/genética , Aborto Espontáneo , Cesárea , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Embarazo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With the advent of general practitioner fundholding, there has been growth in outreach clinics covering many specialties. The benefits and costs of this model of service provision are unclear. AIM: A pilot study aimed to evaluate an outreach model of ophthalmic care in terms of its impact on general practitioners, their use of secondary ophthalmology services, patients' views, and costs. METHOD: A prospective study, from April 1992 to March 1993, of the introduction of an ophthalmic outreach service in 17 general practices in London was undertaken. An ophthalmic outreach team, comprising an ophthalmic medical practitioner and an ophthalmic nurse, held clinics in the practices once a month. Referral rates to Edgware General Hospital ophthalmology outpatient department over one year from the study practices were compared with those from 17 control practices. General practitioners' assessments of the scheme and its impact on their knowledge and practice of ophthalmology were sought through a postal survey of all partners and interviews with one partner in each practice. Patient surveys were conducted using self-administered structured questionnaires. A costings exercise compared the outreach model with the conventional hospital ophthalmology outpatient clinic. RESULTS: Of 1309 patients seen by the outreach team in the study practices, 480 (37%) were referred to the ophthalmology outpatient department. The annual referral rate to this department from control practices was 9.5 per 10,000 registered patients compared with 3.8 per 10,000 registered patients from study practices. A total of 1187 patients were referred to the outpatient department from control practices. An increase in knowledge of ophthalmology was reported by 18 of 47 general practitioners (38%). Nineteen (40%) of 47 general practitioners took advantage of the opportunity for inservice training with the outreach team; they were more likely to change their routine practice for ophthalmic care or referral criteria for patients with cataracts or diabetes than those who did not attend for inservice training. The outreach scheme was popular with patients, for whom ease of access and familiarity of surroundings were major advantages. The cost per patient seen in the outreach clinics (48.09 pounds) was about three times the cost per patient seen in the outpatient department (15.71 pounds). CONCLUSION: The model of ophthalmic outreach care in this pilot study was popular with patients and general practitioners and appeared to act as an effective filter of demand for care in the hospital setting. However, the educational impact of the scheme was limited. Although the unit costs (per patient) of the outreach scheme compared unfavourably with those of conventional outpatient treatment, potential health gains from this more accessible model of care require further exploration.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/organización & administración , Oftalmología/organización & administración , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/economía , Humanos , Londres , Oftalmología/economía , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Reproductive failure occurred in a swine herd in which the epizootiology of enteroviruses and the porcine parvovirus were being studied. Three virgin boars that were seropositive for the parvovirus were mated to seronegative, previously unmated gilts. The 11 gilts that farrowed had small litters, with high perinatal mortality. The remaining 12 gilts were marketed because of infertility, and the reproductive tracts were examined. Pathologic findings included early embryonal death attributed to viral infection. After the reproductive failure, all gifts and boars were seropositive for the parvovirus, suggesting that the reproductive failure was associated with a parvovirus infection.