A novel alternative placement site and technique for totally implantable vascular access ports in non-human primates.

BACKGROUND: Two novel approaches to implanting a central venous catheter port in non-human primates (NHPs) using peripheral insertion are presented and compared. METHODS: Sixty vascular access port (VAP) implants were attempted in 52 NHPs by saphenous vein puncture (n = 20) or saphenous vein cutdown (n = 40). RESULTS: Fifty eight procedures were successful. Eighteen of 20 VAPs were successfully placed using saphenous vein puncture, and 40 of 40 using saphenous vein cutdown. There were no significant differences between procedures. Mean implantation times were similar between groups. At explant or study endpoint, all 58 VAPs were patent. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular access port implantation by saphenous vein puncture or saphenous vein cutdown is safe and effective in NHPs. It is less invasive than conventional procedures, has fewer complications, provides outstanding patency, and reduces surgery time. Furthermore, it allows for cooperative in-homecage VAP use, minimizing handling stress. We recommend these refined methods for long-term vascular access in NHPs.

Rodents Versus Pig Model for Assessing the Performance of Serotype Chimeric Ad5/3 Oncolytic Adenoviruses.

Oncolytic adenoviruses (Ad) are promising tools for cancer therapeutics. Most Ad-based therapies utilize species C serotypes, with Adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) most commonly employed. Prior clinical trials demonstrated low efficiency of oncolytic Ad5 vectors, mainly due to the absence of Ad5 primary receptor (Coxsackie and Adenovirus Receptor, CAR) on cancer cells. Engineering serotype chimeric vectors (Ad5/3) to utilize Adenovirus type 3 (Ad3) receptors has greatly improved their oncolytic potential. Clinical translation of these infectivity-enhanced vectors has been challenging due to a lack of replication permissive animal models. In this study, we explored pigs as a model to study the performance of fiber-modified Ad5/3 chimeric vectors. As a control, the Ad5 fiber-unmodified virus was used. We analyzed binding, gene transfer, replication, and cytolytic ability of Ad5 and Ad5/3 in various non-human cell lines (murine, hamster, canine, porcine). Among all tested cell lines only porcine cells supported active binding and replication of Ad5/3. Syrian hamster cells supported Ad5 replication but showed no evidence of productive viral replication after infection with Ad5/3 vectors. Transduction and replication ability of Ad5/3 in porcine cells outperformed Ad5, a phenomenon often observed in human cancer cell lines. Replication of Ad5 and Ad5/3 was subsequently evaluated in vivo in immunocompetent pigs. Quantitative PCR analyses 7 days post infection revealed Ad5 and Ad5/3 DNA and replication-dependent luciferase activity in the swine lungs and spleen indicating active replication in these tissues. These studies demonstrated the flaws in using Syrian hamsters for testing serotype chimeric Ad5/3 vectors. This is the first report to validate the pig as a valuable model for preclinical testing of oncolytic adenoviruses utilizing Adenovirus type 3 receptors. We hope that these data will help to foster the clinical translation of oncolytic adenoviruses including those with Ad3 retargeted tropism.

Portal donor-specific blood transfusion and mycophenolate mofetil allow steroid avoidance and tacrolimus dose reduction with sustained levels of chimerism in a pig model of intestinal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In a pig model of intestinal transplantation, we previously showed that hepatic conditioning through portal donor-specific blood transfusion (pDSBT), high-dose tacrolimus (TAC), and steroids prevented rejection and increased survival Our current study tests a protocol of pDSBT, short-term mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and low-dose TAC to eliminate the use of steroids, reduce TAC dosage, and increase the level of chimerism in the peripheral blood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four groups of outbred, mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC)-reactive pigs underwent bowel transplants and pDSBT. Immunosuppression (group 1, high-dose TAC and steroids; group 2, low-dose TAC and MMF; group 3, low-dose TAC, MMF, and aminoguanidine; group 4, low-dose TAC, MMF, and arginine) was discontinued after 28 days. RNA was extracted from intestinal graft and native liver biopsies for cytokine measurements. Chimerism levels were determined using a Q-PCR analysis. RESULTS: Pig survival and death rates due to rejection did not significantly differ between the four groups. Chimerism levels determined by Q-PCR analysis were not different until day 28. After discontinuation of immunosuppression, we noted a trend (P = 0.15) toward higher mean chimerism levels on day 60 for groups 2, 3, and 4 (9%) vs. group 1 (0.5%). Tissue cytokine and serum nitrate levels did not significantly differ between the four groups. Attempts to modify nitric oxide synthase activity offered no added benefit. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of pDSBT, MMF, and low-dose TAC (vs. high-dose TAC and steroids) allowed sustained levels of mixed chimerism to develop after discontinuation of immunosuppression.

Long-term hepatic vascular access in the nonhuman primate for recurrent portal vein infusion.

Islet cell transplantation in nonhuman primates is generally performed in the liver, by infusion of the transplant into the portal vein. We introduced a vascular access port with the catheter tip located in the splenic vein to avoid multiple major survival surgeries. This procedure was conducted in 16 cynomolgus and 9 rhesus macaques. A subset underwent islet cell transplantation. A historic control group (n = 17) received the transplant via open midline laparotomy. The groups did not differ in operation time (median about 60 min): however, animals undergoing midline laparotomy required significantly more opioid pain relief postoperatively than animals implanted with a hepatic vascular access port. Animals after port placement and transplantation had significantly higher blood hemoglobin values than those in the control group, but these values were still in the normal range. In addition to transplantation, the port could be used for administration of biologics and for blood sampling. In all cases, the port remained patent for infusion purposes (median follow-up 336 days, range 62-485 days). Patency for blood sampling was maintained in about half of the animals: the 50% survival of patency for sampling was 255 days. This difference between infusion and sampling patency is most likely due to the location of the catheter tip in the splenic vein, with occlusion caused by the small vessel-to-catheter ratio. We conclude that hepatic vascular access enables long-term frequent administration of cells, medication, or other products and also serves to sample blood: hence, this procedure contributes to a higher level of animal's well-being.

Refinement of vascular access port placement in nonhuman primates: complication rates and outcomes.

Chronic vascular access is often needed in experimental animal studies, and vascular access ports (VAP) have been proposed as an alternative to conventional venipuncture. We previously reported on VAP implantation by using femoral venous cutdown (FVC) and tunneling. In an attempt to decrease the moderate complications associated with the FVC method, we developed the single-incision, peripheral-insertion (SIPI) method. In a retrospective evaluation, 92 FVC procedures were compared with 113 SIPI procedures in cynomolgus and rhesus macaques and baboons with as much as 2.5 y of follow-up. The rate of complications was significantly lower for the SIPI method than for the FVC method (19.4% versus 33.7%), particularly in regard to infectious complications (8.0% versus 27.3%, respectively). In addition, VAP patency for blood sampling and fluid infusion was significantly better for the SIPI method than for the FVC method, with 1-y patency rate of 83% and 46%, respectively, and 2-y patency rate of 74% and 36%, respectively. Additional advantages of the SIPI method include the simplified implantation of the VAP and access in the homecage without any sedation or restraint after appropriate training of animals to cooperate. We conclude that the SIPI method presents an opportunity for refinement and is superior to the FVC method for chronic vascular access.