RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) has been used clinically to limit torso bleeding and restore central perfusion. The objective of this study was to determine the sequelae of prolonged REBOA in a nonhuman primate animal model. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Prolonged duration of REBOA is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Threshold occlusion values tied to relative risk have yet to be determined. METHODS: Juvenile baboons were subjected to 40% to 55% total blood volume hemorrhage to achieve profound hypotension and shock. Zone I REBOA was performed for 60 minutes to assess acute injury and survival at 4 hours (group 1; n = 7). Post-REBOA 10-day survival and complications were then compared between 60 minutes (group 2; n = 8) and 30 minutes (group 3; n = 6) REBOA animals. RESULTS: Overall survival was 20/21 (95%). IL-6 and IL-8 were elevated at 1 and 4 hours in group 1 (P = 0.005; P = 0.001). Comparing 60-minute REBOA with 30-minute REBOA, there was (1) hypertension compared with normotension (P = 0.005), (2) increased base deficit (P = 0.003), (3) elevated Troponin I (P = 0.04), and histological evidence of kidney injury (P = 0.004). In addition, group 2 demonstrated paralysis with histopathologic changes of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) in 4/8 (50%), with no SCI in group 3 (P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: REBOA limits mortality in the primate model of severe hemorrhagic shock. However, unopposed balloon inflation in the distal thoracic aorta for 60 minutes results in high rates of spinal cord ischemia, an effect mitigated by limiting balloon inflation to 30 minutes.
Asunto(s)
Oclusión con Balón/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Resucitación/métodos , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Isquemia de la Médula Espinal/etiología , Animales , Aorta , Oclusión con Balón/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Masculino , Papio , Estudios Prospectivos , Resucitación/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Choque Hemorrágico/complicaciones , Choque Hemorrágico/mortalidad , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Isquemia de la Médula Espinal/epidemiología , Isquemia de la Médula Espinal/prevención & control , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Extended-release (ER) local anesthetics are often incorporated in multi-modal analgesia or as an alternative when the effect of systemic analgesics may confound research. In this study, we compared the analgesic efficacy of 2 ER bupivacaine anesthetics with different ER mechanisms, a slow-release bupivacaine-meloxicam polymer (BMP) and a sucrose acetate isobutyrate bupivacaine (SABER-B) system. We used a full-thickness unilateral skin incision porcine model to evaluate the efficacy of these 2 ER bupivacaine analgesics. Eighteen male swine were randomized into 3 groups: control (saline; n = 6), bupivacaine:meloxicam (10 mg/kg, 0.3 mg/kg; n = 6), and SABER-B (10 mg/kg; n = 6). After surgery, pigs were assessed for changes in body weight, salivary cortisol level, and response to von Frey testing at 1, 3, 6, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and 168 h. Body weight and salivary cortisol levels were not significantly different between groups. Based on the von Frey testing, the pigs that received analgesics showed a significantly higher withdrawal threshold of nociceptive stimulus than those that received saline at 1, 3, 6, and 24 h after the surgery. At 48 h after surgery, the SABER-B group had a significantly higher withdrawal threshold than the saline group. The withdrawal threshold was not significantly different from the baseline measurement on intact skin at 3 and 6 h after surgery in the BMP group or 1 and 3 h for the SABERB group. The analgesic effects of BMP were greatest at 3 and 6 h after surgery and that of SABER-B as 1 and 3 h SABER-B provided an earlier onset of analgesia and longer analgesia duration than did BMP. This study demonstrates that ER bupivacaine can provide pigs with 24 to 48 h of analgesia for incisional pain.
Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales , Bupivacaína , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Dolor Postoperatorio , Animales , Bupivacaína/administración & dosificación , Bupivacaína/farmacología , Masculino , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/farmacología , Dolor Postoperatorio/veterinaria , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Porcinos , Meloxicam/administración & dosificación , Hidrocortisona , Distribución AleatoriaRESUMEN
Balloon venoplasty is a commonly used clinical technique to treat deep vein stenosis and occlusion as a consequence of trauma, congenital anatomic abnormalities, acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or stenting. Chronic deep venous obstruction is histopathologically characterized by thrombosis, fibrosis, or both. Currently, no direct treatment is available to target these pathological processes. Therefore, a reliable in vivo animal model to test novel interventions is necessary. The rodent survival inferior vena cava (IVC) venoplasty balloon model (VBM) allows the study of balloon venoplasty in non-thrombotic and post-thrombotic conditions across multiple time points. The local and systemic effect of coated and uncoated venoplasty balloons can be quantified via tissue, thrombus, and blood assays such as real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), western blot, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), zymography, vein wall and thrombus cellular analysis, whole blood and plasma assays, and histological analysis. The VBM is reproducible, replicates surgical human interventions, can identify local vein wall-thrombi protein changes, and allows multiple analyses from the same sample, decreasing the number of animals required per group.
Asunto(s)
Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Vena Cava Inferior , Trombosis de la Vena , Vena Cava Inferior/cirugía , Animales , Ratas , Trombosis de la Vena/patología , RatonesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated E-selectin inhibition with GMI-1271 (Uproleselan [GMI]) alone and in combination with the standard of care low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) to improve vein recanalization, decrease vein wall inflammation and protect against adverse bleeding in a primate model. We sought to examine this novel treatment of venous thrombosis. METHODS: Using a well-documented primate animal model, iliac vein thrombosis was induced by balloon occlusion of the iliac vein for 6 hours. Starting on day 2 after thrombosis, animals began treatment in two phases. In phase one, nontreated controls received no treatment (n = 5) vs animals treated with the E-selectin inhibitor GMI, 25 mg/kg, subcutaneous (SC), once daily (n = 4) for 21 days (previously published data). In phase two, animals were treated with GMI plus a combination of LMWH 1.5 mg/kg or 40 mg (GMI + LMWHc) SC once daily (n = 8) for 19 days; and animals treated with LMWH 1.5 mg/kg or 40 mg (LMWHc) SC once daily (n = 6) for 19 days. Animals were evaluated by magnetic resonance venography for vein recanalization and inflammation by gadolinium extravasation, duplex ultrasound, coagulation tests (thromboelastography, bleeding time, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen) and complete blood count at baseline, days 2, 7, 14, and 21 at euthanasia. Statistical analysis included using unpaired t test with Welch's correction for direct comparisons and one-way analysis of variance for comparison between the groups. RESULTS: Percent vein recanalization by magnetic resonance venography was highest in the GMI alone group followed by GMI + LMWHc, both significantly different from control. On ultrasound examination, animals treated with GMI alone had no decrease in open vein lumen by day 21, whereas decreases were observed in groups GMI + LMWHc (-26%), LMWHc (-27%), and controls (-80%). Vein wall inflammation decreased significantly in all treated groups. Intimal fibrosis and intimal thickness was best preserved in the GMI alone group. An analysis of total vein wall collagen revealed a trend in all treatment groups of decreasing vein wall collagen. No clinically significant bleeding events were noted in any group. The LMWH groups trended to have prolonged coagulation test values, whereas E-selectin inhibition with GMI did not cause clinically significant changes in coagulation measures. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with E-selectin inhibition results in improved vein recanalization, a decrease in vein wall inflammation and vein wall intimal thickness and fibrosis, with no changes in markers of coagulation. E-selectin inhibition with GMI alone is superior to E-selectin inhibition combined with LMWH, LMWH alone, and no treatment in this deep vein thrombosis model of iliac vein thrombosis.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Selectina E/antagonistas & inhibidores , Glucolípidos/uso terapéutico , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , PapioRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: There is an inter-relationship between thrombosis and inflammation. Previously, we have shown the importance of P-selectin in thrombogenesis and thrombus resolution in many preclinical animal models. The role of E-selectin has been explored in rodent models and in a small pilot study of clinical calf vein deep venous thrombosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the role of E-selectin in thrombosis in a primate model of proximal iliac vein thrombosis, a model close to the human condition. METHODS: Iliac vein thrombosis was induced with a well-characterized primate model. Through a transplant incision, the hypogastric vein and iliac vein branches were ligated. Thrombus was induced by balloon occlusion of the proximal and distal iliac vein for 6 hours. The balloons were then deflated, and the primates recovered. Starting on postocclusion day 2, animals were treated with the E-selectin inhibitor GMI-1271, 25 mg/kg subcutaneously, once daily until day 21 (n = 4). Nontreated control animals received no treatment (n = 5). All animals were evaluated by magnetic resonance venography (MRV); evaluation of vessel area by ultrasound, protein analysis, hematology (complete blood count), and coagulation tests (bleeding time, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, and thromboelastography) were performed at baseline, day 2, day 7, day 14, and day 21 with euthanasia. In addition, platelet function and CD44 expression on leukocytes were determined. RESULTS: E-selectin inhibition by GMI-1271 significantly increased vein recanalization by MRV vs control animals on day 14 (P < .05) and day 21 (P < .0001). GMI-1271 significantly decreased vein wall inflammation by MRV with gadolinium vein wall enhancement vs control also on day 14 (P < .0001) and day 21 (P < .0001). The thromboelastographic measure of clot strength (maximum amplitude) showed significant decreases in animals treated with GMI-1271 vs controls at day 2 (P < .05) and day 7 (P < .05). Animals treated with GMI-1271 had significant vessel area increase by day 21 vs controls (P < .05) by ultrasound. Vein wall intimal thickening (P < .001) and intimal fibrosis (P < .05) scores were significantly decreased in GMI-1271-treated animals vs controls. Importantly, no significant differences in hematology or coagulation test results were noted between all groups, suggesting that E-selectin inhibition carries no bleeding potential. GMI-1271 did not affect platelet function or aggregation or CD44 expression on leukocytes. In addition, no episodes of bleeding were noted in either group. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that E-selectin modulates venous thrombus progression and that its inhibition will increase thrombus recanalization and decrease vein wall inflammation, without affecting coagulation. The use of an E-selectin inhibitor such as GMI-1271 could potentially change how we treat deep venous thrombosis.