Treatment intensification strategies for men undergoing definitive radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Treatment intensification of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) plays a crucial role in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: We performed a critical narrative review of the relevant literature and present new developments in evidence-based treatment intensification strategies. RESULTS: For men with high-risk prostate cancer, there is strong evidence to support prolonging androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to 18-36 months and escalating the dose to the prostate using a brachytherapy boost. A potentially less toxic alternative to a brachytherapy boost is delivering a focal boost to dominant intraprostatic lesions using EBRT. In patients who meet STAMPEDE high-risk criteria, there is evidence to support adding a second-generation anti-androgen agent, such as abiraterone acetate, to long-term ADT. Elective pelvic lymph node irradiation may be beneficial in select patients, though more prospective data is needed to elucidate the group of patients who may benefit the most. Tumor genomic classifier (GC) testing and advanced molecular imaging will likely play a role in improving patient selection for treatment intensification as well as contribute to the evolution of treatment intensification strategies for future patients. CONCLUSION: Treatment intensification using a combination of EBRT, advanced hormonal therapies, and brachytherapy may improve patient outcomes and survival in men with high-risk prostate cancer. Shared decision-making between patients and multidisciplinary teams of radiation oncologists, urologists, and medical oncologists is essential for personalizing care in this setting and deciding which strategies make sense for individual patients.

Reirradiation and PD-1 inhibition with nivolumab for the treatment of recurrent diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: a single-institution experience.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a rare, aggressive brain tumor with no known cure. Reirradiation (reRT) at recurrence can prolong survival. The impact of irradiation may be heightened when combined with PD-1 inhibition. We describe our experience using reRT, with or without PD-1 inhibition, in a cohort of patients with recurrent DIPG. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of children who received reRT with or without concomitant PD-1 inhibition for recurrent DIPG at a single institution between 2005 and 2016. We compared progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between those who received reRT alone or in combination with PD-1 inhibition. We then compared reRT to a cohort of patients who did not receive reRT. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included (8-reRT with nivolumab; 4-reRT alone; 19-no reRT). Patients who received reRT had prolonged OS compared to no reRT (22.9 months-reRT with nivolumab; 20.4 months-reRT alone; 8.3 months-no reRT; p < 0.0001). Patients who received reRT with nivolumab vs. reRT only had slightly prolonged OS from diagnosis and from reRT (22.9 vs. 20.4 months for time from diagnosis; 6.8 vs. 6.0 months for time from reRT). All patients receiving reRT with or without nivolumab tolerated the therapy without acute or late toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience demonstrates the tolerability of reRT with concurrent PD-1 inhibition for recurrent DIPG and suggests that combination therapy may offer survival benefit. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm the benefits of this combination therapy.

Quantitative assessment of PSMA PET response to therapy in castration-sensitive prostate cancer using an automated imaging platform for disease identification and measurement.

RATIONALE: Prostate cancer treatment response may be automatically quantified using a molecular imaging analysis platform targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer who underwent PSMA-targeted molecular imaging prior to and 3 months or more after treatment was conducted. Disease burden was analyzed with aPROMISE, an artificial intelligence imaging platform that automatically quantifies PSMA-positive lesions. The calculated PSMA scores for prostate/bed, nodal, and osseous disease sites were compared with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values. RESULTS: Of 30 eligible patients, the median decline in prostate/bed, nodal, and osseous disease PSMA scores were 100% (range 52-100%), 100% (range - 87-100%), and 100% (range - 21-100%), respectively. PSMA score decline was significantly associated with PSA decline. CONCLUSION: Changes in aPROMISE PSMA scores are associated with changes in PSA and may quantify treatment response.

A Dose Accumulation Assessment of Alignment Errors During Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) techniques produce high-dose peaks and low-dose valleys within a tumor. Lattice stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a form a SFRT delivered across 5 fractions. Because of the high spatial dose gradients associated with SFRT, it is critical for fractionated SFRT patients to be aligned correctly for treatment. Here we investigate the dosimetric effect of daily alignment uncertainty through a dose accumulation study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dose accumulation was retrospectively performed for 10 patients enrolled on a phase 1 trial. Lattice stereotactic body radiation therapy was completed in 5 fractions with 20 Gy prescribed to the entire tumor and a simultaneous integrated boost of 66.7 Gy prescribed to a set of regularly spaced high-dose spheres. Daily alignment error was quantified through manually selected landmarks in both the planning computed tomography scan and daily cone beam computed tomography. The dosimetric effect of alignment errors was quantified by translating the isocenter in the treatment planning system by the daily average alignment error. Large errors were simulated by translating isocenter 5 and 10 mm for 1 and 2 fractions, independently assessing errors in the superior-inferior and axial directions. The reduction of dose gradients was quantified using the dose ratio (DR) of the mean dose in the high-dose and low-dose spheres. RESULTS: The average alignment error was 1.8 mm across the patient population resulting in minor smoothing of the high- and low-dose distributions in the dose accumulation. Quantitatively, the DR decreased from 3.42 to 3.32 (P = .093) in the dose accumulation study. The simulated worst case was an inferior-superior shift of 10 mm for 2 fractions where the average DR decreased to 2.72 (P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The dose accumulation study revealed on average DR only decreased from 3.42 to 3.32. However, setup errors >5 mm resulted in larger dosimetric degradation, reflecting a larger effect for individual high-dose spheres within regions exhibiting larger displacements.

Brainstem Toxicity in Pediatric Patients Treated with Protons Using a Single-vault Synchrocyclotron System.

Purpose: Cranial radiation therapy remains an integral component of curative treatment for pediatric patients with brain tumors. Proton beam radiation therapy (PBT) can limit collateral radiation dose to surrounding normal tissue, thus reducing off-target exposure while maintaining appropriate tumor coverage. While PBT offers significant advantages over photon therapy for pediatric patients with intracranial malignancies, cases of brainstem necrosis after PBT have raised concerns that PBT may pose an increased risk of necrosis over photon therapy. We investigated the incidence of brainstem necrosis at our institution in children treated with PBT for intracranial malignancies. Patients and Methods: Patients with pediatric brain tumor treated with passively scattered PBT, using a gantry-mounted, synchrocyclotron single-vault system between 2013 and 2018, were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria included patients 21 years of age or younger who received a minimum 0.1 cm3 maximum brainstem dose of 50 Gray relative biological effectiveness (GyRBE). Patients were assessed for "central nervous system necrosis" in the brainstem per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0 (US National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland) criteria. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included for analysis. The median age was 10.3 years. Twenty-one (36.2%) patients received craniospinal irradiation. Thirty-four (58.6%) patients received chemotherapy. The median prescription radiation dose was 54 GyRBE. Regarding published dosimetric constraints used at 3 separate proton centers, the goal brainstem D50% <52 GyRBE was exceeded in 23 (40%) patients, but the brainstem Dmax <58 GyRBE was not exceeded in any patients. No patient experienced grade ≥2 brainstem injury. One patient demonstrated radiographic changes consistent with grade 1 toxicity. This patient had myeloablative chemotherapy with tandem stem cell rescue before PBT. Conclusion: Our data demonstrates a low risk of any brainstem injury in children treated with passively scattered PBT using a single-vault synchrocyclotron.

LITE SABR M1: Planning design and dosimetric endpoints for a phase I trial of lattice SBRT.

PURPOSE: Lattice stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a form of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) using SBRT methods. This study reports clinical dosimetric endpoints achieved for Lattice SBRT plans delivering 20 Gy in 5 fractions to the periphery of a tumor with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of 66.7 Gy, as part of a prospective Phase I clinical trial (NCT04133415). Additionally, it updates previously reported planning and delivery techniques based on extended experience with a broader patient population. METHODS: Patients were enrolled on a single-arm phase I trial conducted between November 2019 and August 2020. Eligibility was restricted to tumors >4.5 cm in the largest dimension. Characteristic SFRT dose gradients were achieved using a lattice of 1.5 cm diameter spheres spaced within the GTV in a regular pattern, with peak-to-valley dose varying from 66.7 Gy to 20 Gy within 1.5 cm. Organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing followed AAPM TG101 recommendations for 5-fraction SBRT. RESULTS: Twenty patients (22 plans) were enrolled on study, with one additional plan treated off study. All OAR and target coverage planning objectives were achieved, with the exception of a single small bronchus. Conformity of the 20 Gy isodose line significantly improved over the course of the study. The majority (85.2%) of treatment fractions were delivered in a 30 minutes timeslot, with 4 (3.5%) exceeding a total treatment time of 40 minutes. CONCLUSION: Lattice SBRT planning techniques produce consistent and efficient treatment plans. Refined techniques described here further improve the quality of the planning technique.

LITE SABR M1: A phase I trial of Lattice stereotactic body radiotherapy for large tumors.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an attractive treatment option for patients with metastatic and/or unresectable tumors, however its use is limited to smaller tumors. Lattice is a form of spatially fractionated radiotherapy that may allow safe delivery of ablative doses to bulky tumors. We previously described Lattice SBRT, which delivers 20 Gy in 5 fractions with a simultaneous integrated boost to 66.7 Gy in a defined geometric arrangement (Lattice boost). The goal of this study was to prospectively evaluate the acute toxicity and quality of life (QoL) of patients with large tumors (>5 cm) treated with Lattice SBRT. METHODS: This was a single-arm phase I trial conducted between October 2019 and August 2020. Patients with tumors > 4.5 cm were eligible. Lattice SBRT was delivered every other day. The primary outcome was the rate of 90-day treatment-associated (probably or definitely attributable) grade 3 + acute toxicity by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 criteria. Other outcomes included changes in patient reported toxicity and QoL inventories, GTV, and peripheral blood cytokines. RESULTS: Twenty patients (22 tumors) were enrolled. Median GTV was 579.2 cc (range: 54.2-3713.5 cc) in volume and 11.1 cm (range: 5.6-21.4 cm) in greatest axial diameter. Fifty percent of tumors were in the thorax, 45% abdomen/pelvis, and 5% extremity. There was no likely treatment-associated grade 3 + toxicity in the 90-day period (acute and sub-acute). There was one case of grade 4 toxicity possibly associated with Lattice SBRT. CONCLUSIONS: This phase I study met its primary endpoint of physician reported short-term safety. An ongoing phase II clinical trial of Lattice SBRT will evaluate late safety and efficacy of this novel technique.

Antagonistic anti-urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) antibodies significantly inhibit uPAR-mediated cellular signaling and migration.

Interactions between urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) and its various ligands regulate tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. Antibodies that bind specific uPAR epitopes may disrupt these interactions, thereby inhibiting these processes. Using a highly diverse and naïve human fragment of the antigen binding (Fab) phage display library, we identified 12 unique human Fabs that bind uPAR. Two of these antibodies compete against urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) for uPAR binding, whereas a third competes with beta1 integrins for uPAR binding. These competitive antibodies inhibit uPAR-dependent cell signaling and invasion in the non-small cell lung cancer cell line, H1299. Additionally, the integrin-blocking antibody abrogates uPAR/beta1 integrin-mediated H1299 cell adhesion to fibronectin and vitronectin. This antibody and one of the uPAR/uPA antagonist antibodies shows a significant combined effect in inhibiting cell invasion through Matrigel/Collagen I or Collagen I matrices. Our results indicate that these antagonistic antibodies have potential for the detection and treatment of uPAR-expressing tumors.

Spatially fractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (Lattice) for large tumors.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has demonstrated clinical benefits for patients with metastatic and/or unresectable cancer. Technical considerations of treatment delivery and nearby organs at risk can limit the use of SBRT in large tumors or those in unfavorable locations. Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) may address this limitation because this technique can deliver high-dose radiation to discrete subvolume vertices inside a tumor target while restricting the remainder of the target to a safer lower dose. Indeed, SFRT, such as GRID, has been used to treat large tumors with reported dramatic tumor response and minimal side effects. Lattice is a modern approach to SFRT delivered with arc-based therapy, which may allow for safe, high-quality SBRT for large and/or deep tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Herein, we report the results of a dosimetry and quality assurance feasibility study of Lattice SBRT in 11 patients with 12 tumor targets, each ≥10 cm in an axial dimension. Prior computed tomography simulation scans were used to generate volumetric modulated arc therapy Lattice SBRT plans that were then delivered on clinically available Linacs. Quality assurance testing included external portal imaging device and ion chamber analyses. RESULTS: All generated plans met the standard SBRT dose constraints, such as those from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 101. Additionally, we provide a step-by-step approach to generate and deliver Lattice SBRT plans using commercially available treatment technology. CONCLUSIONS: Lattice SBRT is currently being tested in a prospective trial for patients with metastatic cancer who need palliation of large tumors (NCT04553471, NCT04133415).

Brain metastasis growth on preradiosurgical magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: A previous analysis showed that brain metastases that are treated with frameless stereotactic radiation surgery (SRS) and planned with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) >14 days before SRS had worse local control (LC). To evaluate if worse LC may be due to unaccounted interval metastasis growth and radiosurgical marginal miss, we quantified growth before SRS on preradiosurgical imaging. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed data from patients who were treated with fixed-frame SRS for brain metastases at our institution between 2010 and 2013 and had pretreatment diagnostic brain MRI and SRS-planning MRI scans available. Metastases were contoured on the pretreatment MRI scan and the day-of-treatment planning MRI scan for volumetric comparison. Growth rates were calculated. Serial volumetric contour expansions on the pretreatment MRI scans were used to determine the minimum margin necessary to encompass the entire metastasis on day of the SRS. LC was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Among 411 brain metastases in 165 patients, the time between pretreatment and treatment MRI was associated with metastasis growth (P < .001) with a mean growth rate of 0.02 ml/day (95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.03) and a 1.35-fold volume increase at 14 days. Time between MRI scans was associated with the amount of margin that was needed to target the entire brain metastasis volume on the day of the SRS (P < .001), as were volume of metastasis on the pre-treatment MRI (P < .001) and melanoma histology (P < .001). LC was not associated with growth rate among patients who underwent fixed-frame SRS. CONCLUSIONS: Time between pretreatment MRI and SRS is associated with brain metastasis growth, but LC is not compromised when patients receive fixed-frame SRS with same-day MRI planning. Margins may be needed for metastases that are treated with frameless SRS to account for growth between the planning MRI and SRS delivery. SUMMARY: In this study, we quantify brain metastasis growth over time by taking advantage of the availability of 2 pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging scans taken at 2 time points among patients treated with frame-fixed radiation surgery. We found that metastasis growth is associated with time, initial metastasis size, melanoma histology, and concurrent chemotherapy. Performing serial margin expansions demonstrated factors that are associated with the amount of margin that is needed to target the entire metastasis on the day of radiation surgery.

Discovery of additional brain metastases on the day of stereotactic radiosurgery: risk factors and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE High-resolution double-dose gadolinium-enhanced Gamma Knife (GK) radiosurgery-planning MRI (GK MRI) on the day of GK treatment can detect additional brain metastases undiagnosed on the prior diagnostic MRI scan (dMRI), revealing increased intracranial disease burden on the day of radiosurgery, and potentially necessitating a reevaluation of appropriate management. The authors identified factors associated with detecting additional metastases on GK MRI and investigated the relationship between detection of additional metastases and postradiosurgery patient outcomes. METHODS The authors identified 326 patients who received GK radiosurgery at their institution from 2010 through 2013 and had a prior dMRI available for comparison of numbers of brain metastases. Factors predictive of additional brain metastases on GK MRI were investigated using logistic regression analysis. Overall survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method, and postradiosurgery distant intracranial failure was estimated by cumulative incidence measures. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model and Fine-Gray regression modeling assessed potential risk factors of overall survival and distant intracranial failure, respectively. RESULTS The mean numbers of brain metastases (SD) on dMRI and GK MRI were 3.4 (4.2) and 5.8 (7.7), respectively, and additional brain metastases were found on GK MRI in 48.9% of patients. Frequencies of detecting additional metastases for patients with 1, 2, 3-4, and more than 4 brain metastases on dMRI were 29.5%, 47.9%, 55.9%, and 79.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). An index brain metastasis with a diameter greater than 1 cm on dMRI was inversely associated with detecting additional brain metastases, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.57 (95% CI 0.4-0.9, p = 0.02). The median time between dMRI and GK MRI was 22 days (range 1-88 days), and time between scans was not associated with detecting additional metastases. Patients with additional brain metastases did not have larger total radiosurgery target volumes, and they rarely had an immediate change in management (abortion of radiosurgery or addition of whole-brain radiation therapy) due to detection of additional metastases. Patients with additional metastases had a higher incidence of distant intracranial failure than those without additional metastases (p = 0.004), with an adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio of 1.4 (95% CI 1.0-2.0, p = 0.04). Significantly worse overall survival was not detected for patients with additional brain metastases on GK MRI (log-rank p = 0.07), with the relative adjusted hazard ratio of 1.07, (95% CI 0.81-1.41, p = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS Detecting additional brain metastases on GK MRI is strongly associated with the number of brain metastases on dMRI and inversely associated with the size of the index brain metastasis. The discovery of additional brain metastases at time of GK radiosurgery is very unlikely to lead to aborting radiosurgery but is associated with a higher incidence of distant intracranial failure. However, there is not a significant difference in survival. ▪ CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE Type of question: prognostic; study design: retrospective cohort trial; evidence: Class IV.

Imaging the urokinase plasminongen activator receptor in preclinical breast cancer models of acquired drug resistance.

Subtype-targeted therapies can have a dramatic impact on improving the quality and quantity of life for women suffering from breast cancer. Despite an initial therapeutic response, cancer recurrence and acquired drug-resistance are commonplace. Non-invasive imaging probes that identify drug-resistant lesions are urgently needed to aid in the development of novel drugs and the effective utilization of established therapies for breast cancer. The protease receptor urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is a target that can be exploited for non-invasive imaging. The expression of uPAR has been associated with phenotypically aggressive breast cancer and acquired drug-resistance. Acquired drug-resistance was modeled in cell lines from two different breast cancer subtypes, the uPAR negative luminal A subtype and the uPAR positive triple negative subtype cell line MDA-MB-231. MCF-7 cells, cultured to be resistant to tamoxifen (MCF-7 TamR), were found to significantly over-express uPAR compared to the parental cell line. uPAR expression was maintained when resistance was modeled in triple-negative breast cancer by generating doxorubicin and paclitaxel resistant MDA-MB-231 cells (MDA-MB-231 DoxR and MDA-MB-231 TaxR). Using the antagonistic uPAR antibody 2G10, uPAR was imaged in vivo by near-infrared (NIR) optical imaging and (111)In-single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Tumor uptake of the (111)In-SPECT probe was high in the three drug-resistant xenografts (> 46 %ID/g) and minimal in uPAR negative xenografts at 72 hours post-injection. This preclinical study demonstrates that uPAR can be targeted for imaging breast cancer models of acquired resistance leading to potential clinical applications.

Targeting uPAR with antagonistic recombinant human antibodies in aggressive breast cancer.

Components of the plasminogen activation system, which are overexpressed in aggressive breast cancer subtypes, offer appealing targets for development of new diagnostics and therapeutics. By comparing gene expression data in patient populations and cultured cell lines, we identified elevated levels of the urokinase plasminogen activation receptor (uPAR, PLAUR) in highly aggressive breast cancer subtypes and cell lines. Recombinant human anti-uPAR antagonistic antibodies exhibited potent binding in vitro to the surface of cancer cells expressing uPAR. In vivo these antibodies detected uPAR expression in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) tumor xenografts using near infrared imaging and (111)In single-photon emission computed tomography. Antibody-based uPAR imaging probes accurately detected small disseminated lesions in a tumor metastasis model, complementing the current clinical imaging standard (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose at detecting non-glucose-avid metastatic lesions. A monotherapy study using the antagonistic antibodies resulted in a significant decrease in tumor growth in a TNBC xenograft model. In addition, a radioimmunotherapy study, using the anti-uPAR antibodies conjugated to the therapeutic radioisotope (177)Lu, found that they were effective at reducing tumor burden in vivo. Taken together, our results offer a preclinical proof of concept for uPAR targeting as a strategy for breast cancer diagnosis and therapy using this novel human antibody technology.

Molecular basis of binding of the Plasmodium falciparum receptor BAEBL to erythrocyte receptor glycophorin C.

Plasmodium falciparum invades human erythrocytes by redundant pathways. Unlike Plasmodium vivax that has one Duffy Binding-Like (DBL) receptor, P. falciparum has four members of the DBL receptor family. Furthermore, one of these DBL genes, BAEBL, has polymorphisms at four amino acids in region II; each polymorphism binds to a different erythrocyte receptor. One BAEBL variant (VSTK) binds specifically to erythrocyte glycophorin C and binds poorly to neuraminidase-treated erythrocytes. When the amino acid threonine (T121) in BAEBL (VSTK) is changed to a lysine (VSKK), it no longer requires sialic acid as a receptor. To explore the molecular basis of sialic acid binding, we modeled the structure of region II of BAEBL (VSTK) on the crystal structure of a related DBL receptor, region II of erythrocyte binding antigen-175 (EBA-175). Four charged amino acids, R52, R114, E54 and D125, are predicted to surround T121 in BAEBL (VSTK). They were individually mutated to alanine (R52A, R114A, E54A, and D125A) or lysine (R52K, R114K) and expressed on the surface of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells. BAEBL (VSTK) with mutations in R52 or R114 of BAEBL (VSTK) bound neuraminidase-treated erythrocytes. Unlike the arginine mutations, E54A and D125A still bound poorly to neuraminidase-treated erythrocytes. These findings suggest that the two arginine residues surrounding T121 are critical for the binding specificity of BAEBL (VSTK) to sialic acid and suggest a role for arginine in sialic acid binding independent of its negative charge.

HOXA5 regulates hMLH1 expression in breast cancer cells.

Homeobox protein HOXA5 functions as a transcriptional factor for genes that are not only involved in segmentation identity but also in cell differentiation. Although HOXA5 has been shown to regulate the expression of the tumor-suppressor protein p53, its role in breast tumorigenesis is not well understood. Using yeast as a model system, we now demonstrate that overexpression of HOXA5 in yeast can be used to identify downstream target genes that are homologous in humans. One such identified gene was that of the mismatch repair pathway component MutL homolog 1. Analysis of the promoter region of the gene for human MutL homolog 1 (hMLH1) displayed several putative HOXA5-binding sites. In transient transfection experiments, the overexpression of HOXA5 transactivated the hMLH1 promoter-reporter construct. In addition, chromatin immunoprecipitation assay using a human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 demonstrated that HOXA5 binds to the hMLH1 promoter in vivo. Furthermore, we demonstrate that, in the presence of HOXA5, there is an increase in in vivo repair activity in MCF-7 cells. Taken together, our results indicate that HOXA5 is a transcriptional regulator of hMLH1 in breast cancer cells.