Direct-acting antivirals in women of reproductive age infected with hepatitis C virus.

Eliminating hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the population of women of reproductive age is important not only for the health of women themselves but also for the health of newborns. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of this goal by analysing the effectiveness of contemporary therapy in a large cohort from everyday clinical practice along with identifying factors reducing therapeutic success. The analysed population consisted of 7861 patients, including 3388 women aged 15-49, treated in 2015-2022 in 26 hepatology centres. Data were collected retrospectively using a nationwide EpiTer-2 database. Females were significantly less often infected with HCV genotype 3 compared to males (11.2% vs. 15.7%) and less frequently showed comorbidities (40.5% vs. 44.2%) and comedications (37.2% vs. 45.2%). Hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation, HIV and HBV coinfections were reported significantly less frequently in women. Regardless of the treatment type, females significantly more often reached sustained virologic response (98.8%) compared to males (96.8%). Regardless of gender, genotype 3 and cirrhosis were independent factors increasing the risk of treatment failure. Women more commonly reported adverse events, but death occurred significantly more frequently in men (0.3% vs. 0.1%), usually related to underlying advanced liver disease. We have demonstrated excellent effectiveness and safety profiles for treating HCV infection in women. This gives hope for the micro-elimination of HCV infections in women, translating into a reduced risk of severe disease in both women and their children.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of direct-acting antivirals in patients with cirrhosis and history of hepatic decompensation: Epi-Ter2 Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the real-life effectiveness and safety of direct acting antivirals (DAAs) in patients with cirrhosis and history of hepatic decompensation compared to those with compensated cirrhosis. METHOD: Data of patients treated with DAAs and included in the EpiTer-2 database (N = 10 152) were collected retrospectively. The primary endpoint was sustained viral response (SVR) at 12 weeks posttreatment. Patients were also evaluated in terms of liver-related adverse events and treatment modification/discontinuation. RESULTS: The overall SVR rate was 91.4% in the intent to treat (ITT) analysis and 95.2% in the per-protocol (PP) analysis (P < .001). Patients with decompensated cirrhosis had lower SVR rates compared to those with compensated cirrhosis in ITT analysis (86.4% vs 92.0%, P < .001), while not in PP analysis (92.9% vs 95.5%, P > .05). Adverse events (AE) occurred 45.6% and 29.3% of patients with decompensated and compensated cirrhosis (P < .001). Patients with decompensated cirrhosis were at higher risk of death (5.4% vs 0.9%; P < .0001) or liver decompensation (21.5% vs 1.3%; P < .0001). Treatment with protease inhibitors was not associated with hepatic decompensation (P = .3). Only 82.6% of patients with decompensated cirrhosis completed DAA treatment (vs 92.8% in compensated cirrhotics; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Despite higher frequency of AE and treatment modifications, once completed, DAAs yield comparable results for patients with decompensated and compensated cirrhosis. High rate of serious adverse events in patients with advanced liver disease treated with PI may not be related to the detrimental effect of the medications, but rather to the disease itself.

Is an 8-week regimen of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir sufficient for all hepatitis C virus infected patients in the real-world experience?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The revolution of the antiviral treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection resulting in higher effectiveness came with the introduction of direct-acting antivirals with pangenotypic regimens as a final touch. Among them, the combination of glecaprevir (GLE) and pibrentasvir (PIB) provides the opportunity for shortening therapy to 8 weeks in the majority of patients. Because of still insufficient evaluation of this regimen in the real-world experience, our study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of 8-week GLE/PIB in chronic hepatitis C patients depending on liver fibrosis and genotype (GT). METHODS: The analysis included patients who received GLE/PIB for 8 weeks selected from the EpiTer-2 database, large retrospective national real-world study evaluating antiviral treatment in 12 584 individuals in 22 Polish hepatology centers. RESULTS: A total of 1034 patients with female predominance (52%) were enrolled in the analysis. The majority of them were treatment naïve (94%), presented liver fibrosis (F) of F0-F3 (92%), with the most common GT1b, followed by GT3. The overall sustained virologic response after exclusion of nonvirologic failures was achieved in 95.8% and 98%, respectively (P = 0.19). In multivariate logistic regression HCV GT-3 (beta = 0.07, P = 0.02) and HIV infection (beta = -0.14, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of nonresponse. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated high effectiveness of 8-week GLE/PIB treatment in a non-GT3 population irrespective of liver fibrosis stage. Comparable efficacy was achieved in non-cirrhotic patients regardless of the genotype, including GT3 HCV.

Real-world experience with Grazoprevir/Elbasvir in the treatment of previously "difficult to treat" patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 and 4.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Grazoprevir/elbasvir (GZR/EBR) was approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and 4 infected patients with or without compensated liver cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to assess GZR/EBR regimen in the real-world experience, particularly in previously "difficult-to-treat" patients with chronic kidney diseases, human immunodeficiency virus-coinfected, cirrhotics, and treatment-experienced. METHODS: The analysis included patients treated with GZR/EBR selected from 10 152 individuals from the EpiTer-2 database, large national real-world study evaluating antiviral treatment in 22 Polish hepatology centers between 2015 and 2018. Data were completed retrospectively and submitted online. RESULTS: A total of 1615 patients who started GZR/EBR therapy in 2017 and 2018 with a female predominance (54%) and median age of 54 years were analyzed. The majority were infected with GT1b (89%) and treatment naïve (81%). Liver cirrhosis was diagnosed in 19%, and 70% of patients had comorbidities, of which chronic renal disease was present in 7% and HIV-coinfection in 4%. Overall, a sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved by 95% according to intent-to-treat (ITT) and 98% after exclusion of lost to follow up (modified ITT). No differences were found in cure rate between all included patients and subpopulations previously considered as difficult-to-treat. Majority of patients completed the treatment course as scheduled, adverse events were mostly mild and did not lead to therapy discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: GZR/EBR treatment carried-out in patients infected with HCV genotype 1 and 4 demonstrated good tolerability and an excellent SVR rate with no effectiveness reduction in so called difficult-to-treat populations.

Monoexponential and Biexponential Fitting of Diffusional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal Analysis for Prediction of Liver Fibrosis Severity.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the value of monoexponential and biexponential approach to the diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging signal in the prediction of the liver fibrosis. METHODS: Forty patients with hepatitis C were included. Quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and pure molecular diffusion (D), pseudodiffusion (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) was performed using 9 b values (b = 0, 20, 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000 s/mm). RESULTS: Significant fibrosis was found in 14 subjects. Monoexponentally derived ADC parameters were significantly correlated. Apparent diffusion coefficient calculated from all b values and ADC based on high b values were significantly related to the fibrosis grade (P < 0.02), and none of intravoxel incoherent motion parameters presented such an association. Apparent diffusion coefficient based on high b values was the best predictor of significant fibrosis with area under the curve of 0.81, sensitivity of 0.57, and specificity of 0.92. CONCLUSION: Intravoxel incoherent motion parameters did not allow for prediction of the liver fibrosis. Apparent diffusion coefficient calculated based on high b values presents considerable specificity in predicting significant fibrosis.

The efficacy of paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir+dasabuvir and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir is comparable in patients who failed interferon-based treatment with first generation protease inhibitors - a multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: According to the EASL and AASLD guidelines, the recommended treatment for patients who failed to achieve a sustained virologic response (SVR) on prior interferon-based triple therapy with protease inhibitors (PI), is a combination of sofosbuvir and NS5A inhibitors. Polish national recommendations also allow the use of paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir+dasasbuvir±ribavirin (PrODR) in this group of patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PrODR vs. ledipasvir/sofosbuvir±RBV (LSR) in PI-experienced patients in real-life setting. METHODS: Our analysis included patients registered in the nationwide, investigators initiated, multicentre EpiTer-2 database. Among 4530 patients registered, 335 with genotype 1 (93% 1b) were previously treated with IFN-based regimens with PIs: 127 with boceprevir (BOC), 208 with telaprevir (TVR). Patients with advanced fibrosis (F3/F4) were significantly predominant (BOC 28.4%/61.4%, TVR 18.8%/64.4%, respectively). Subjects were assigned to IFN-free retreatment as follows: BOC - 64 (50.4%) PrODR and 63 (49.6%) LSR; TVR- 103 (49.5%) PrODR and 105 (50.5%) LSR. RESULTS: SVR rates were comparable for particular groups: BOC → PrODR- 100%; BOC → LSR - 98%; TVR → PrODR - 97%; TVR → LSR - 96% (intent-to treat analysis-ITT) and BOC → PrODR→100%; BOC → LSR - 99%; TVR → PrODR - 99%; TVR → LSR - 98% (modified intent-to treat analysis-mITT). Both treatment regimens had a favourable safety profile. Adverse events (AEs) were generally mild or moderate in severity. Three deaths were reported. The treatment was stopped due to AEs in five patients (three treated with PrODR and two with LSR). CONCLUSION: Efficacy and safety of treatment with PrODR and LSR is comparable in BOC or TVR-experienced patients.

Effectiveness and safety of direct-acting antivirals in the therapy of HCV-infected elderly people.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) with their effectiveness and safety has revolutionized the approach to treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. Nevertheless, elderly patients have often been excluded from clinical trials, so the results of real-world studies are particularly important in the context of the geriatric population. The study aimed to analyze the effectiveness and safety of antiviral DAA treatment in HCV-infected patients over the age of 65, with notable inclusion of those over the age of 85. METHODS: The analyzed patients were divided by age into three groups: group A (65-74 years), group B (75-84 years) and group C (85 years or older). Patients started DAA based therapy at 22 hepatology centers between July 2015 and December 2022. RESULTS: A total of 3505 elderly patients were included in the analysis, and this group consisted of 2501 patients in group A, 893 in group B, and 111 in group C. The study population, regardless of age, was dominated by women. Patients had a high prevalence of comorbidities (84.9%, 92.2%, and 93.7%, respectively) as well as a high rate of concomitant medications. The sustained virological response was 97.9% in groups A and B and 100% in group C. The therapy was well-tolerated, with a comparable safety profile observed in all analyzed groups. CONCLUSIONS: DAA-based therapies are highly effective and well tolerated by the elderly patients, including those over 85. Age should not be a barrier to treatment, but careful management is necessary.

Real-life effectiveness of antiviral therapy for HCV infection with pangenotypic regimens in HIV coinfected patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-life efficacy of pangenotypic antivirals in HIV-HCV-positive patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The analysis included 5650 subjects who were treated with pangenotypic anti-HCV drugs: 5142 were HCV-positive and 508 were HIV-HCV-positive. RESULTS: Patients with HCV-monoinfection were older (p < 0.0001), however patients with HCV-monoinfection had a higher proportion of advanced fibrosis F4 (p < 0.0001). There were no differences between the study groups in the rate of SVR12 in ITT-analysis (87,6% versus 93,9% in coinfection and monoinfection group, respectively; p > 0.05). However, there was a difference between study groups in PP-analysis, HIV/HCV and HCV, respectively 95.9% vs 97.9%, p = 0.0323. Additionally, there were a higher rate of patients who did not apply for follow-up (SVR12) in coinfected patients (7,9% vs 3,6% respectively p = 0.0001). In multivariante analysis, factors associated with worse response to the pangenotypic anti-HCV therapy included male sex, HCV genotype 3, stage of fibrosis and decompensation of liver function and HIV coinfection. CONCLUSIONS: The real-life results of pangenotypic anti-HCV treatment are veryeffective in the group of HIV-HCV-coinfected patients. However, the finaleffectiveness is slightly lower than that obtained in HCV monoinfectedpatients.

Preparation of HCV infected patients to the triple therapy with first generation protease inhibitors.

In 2011 the European Medicines Agency approved two new drugs (boceprevir and telaprevir) to treat patients with chronic hepatitis C or compensated liver cirrhosis infected with genotype 1 HCV. Their usage together with a standard therapy, ie. pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin significantly increased the chance of sustained virologic response among both previously unsuccessfully treated and naïve patients. However, this involves a greater number of side effects that poorly monitored can be life threatening. To the known side effects of standard therapy joined new, such as dysguasia, anorectal symptoms. Both drugs can compromise cardiac complications, especially in predisposed patients. Furthermore there is also a greater risk of rash and serious skin reactions. New problem is the interaction between drugs and first generation protease inhibitors resulting from the inhibition of cytochrome p450, common to many drugs pathway.

Effectiveness of pangenotypic retreatment of chronic hepatitis C after prior failure of pangenotypic therapies.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the overall excellent efficacy of pangenotypic direct­acting antiviral (DAA) options, there is still a small percentage of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who do not respond to the therapy. OBJECTIVES: This analysis was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of pangenotypic retreatment in the cases of pangenotypic therapy failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included patients treated with the pangenotypic regimen, selected from the EpiTer­2 database, a real­world project evaluating DAA­based treatment in Poland. RESULTS: Of a total 15 123 patients, 4345 received 1 course of the pangenotypic treatment (PAN group) and 48 patients were retreated with pangenotypic regimens after a failure of the pangenotypic therapy (PAP group). The patients from the PAP group were more often men (79% vs 53%; P <0.001), had higher median (interquartile range [IQR]) body mass index (27.5 [25.7-30.1] vs 25.7 [22.9-28.7] kg/m2; P <0.001), were more often infected with genotype 3 (58% vs 27%; P <0.001), and more frequently had liver cirrhosis (46% vs 21%; P <0.001) than the patients in the PAN group. Importantly, no significant difference in the treatment effectiveness was found between the PAP and PAN groups with sustained virologic response (SVR) rate of 89.6% vs 93.7% (P = 0.39) in intention­to­treat, and 91.5% vs 97.6% (P = 0.17) in the per-protocol analysis. The selection of a specific retherapy regimen did not affect SVR. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated the excellent effectiveness of pangenotypic regimens and confirmed that most DAA nonresponders could be successfully retreated with another pangenotypic regimen. The best retreatment strategy is a triple pangenotypic regimen, especially in patients with unfavorable response factors, such as genotype 3 infection, cirrhosis, and male sex.

Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Direct-Acting Antivirals in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C and Epilepsy: An Epi-Ter-2 Study in Poland.

INTRODUCTION: In Poland, active HCV infection affects between 0.4 and 0.5% of the population, i.e., about 150,000 people, while the number of patients with epilepsy is estimated to be 350,000-400,000. Currently available antiviral therapies show little interaction with neurological drugs. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the treatment of chronic HCV infection in patients with coexisting epilepsy. METHODS: A total of 184 epilepsy patients were selected from the group of 10,152 HCV-infected patients treated for HCV infection within the Epiter-2 database from 2015 to 2018. Comparing the effectiveness and safety of anti-HCV regimens between the patients with comorbid epilepsy and 3573 patients without comorbidities was our study's objective. RESULTS: The effectiveness of anti-HCV treatment was high in both the sample and the control group. No statistically significant SVR difference was observed between the sample group, with ITT = 93.5% and mITT = 95.5%, and the control group, with ITT = 95.2% and mITT = 97.5%, regardless of the genotype and the stage of liver disease at the start of therapy. The treatment was safe in patients with epilepsy. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness and safety of HCV treatment in patients with epilepsy are comparable to those of patients with no significant comorbidities.

Rescue Therapy after Failure of HCV Antiviral Treatment with Interferon-Free Regimens.

Direct-acting antivirals (DAA) regimens have provided hope for eliminating hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Patients following ineffective therapy with DAA, especially those previously treated with inhibitors of non-structural protein 5A (NS5A), remain a challenge. The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of DAA pangenotypic options in patients after failure of NS5A containing genotype-specific regimens. The analysis included 120 patients selected from the EpiTer-2 database with data on 15675 HCV-infected individuals treated with IFN-free therapies from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2022 at 22 Polish hepatology centres. The majority of them were infected with genotype (GT) 1b (85.8%) and one-third was diagnosed with fibrosis F4. Among the rescue pangenotypic regimens, the most commonly used was the sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) ± ribavirin (RBV) combination. The sustained virologic response, which was a measure of treatment effectiveness, was achieved by 102 patients, resulting in cure rate of 90.3% in the per protocol analysis. All 11 non-responders were infected with GT1b, 7 were diagnosed with cirrhosis, and 9 were treated with SOF/VEL±RBV. We demonstrated the high effectiveness of the pangenotypic rescue options in patients after genotype specific NS5A-containing regimens failures, identifying cirrhosis as a negative prognostic factor of treatment effectiveness.

Changes in characteristics of patients with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis from the beginning of the interferon-free era.

BACKGROUND: Nearly 290000 patients with chronic hepatitis C die annually from the most severe complications of the disease. One of them is liver cirrhosis, which occurs in about 20% of patients chronically infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), which replaced interferon (IFN)-based regimens, significantly improved the prognosis of this group of patients, increasing HCV eradication rates and tolerability of therapy. Our study is the first to assess changes in patient profile, effectiveness, and safety in the HCV-infected cirrhotic population in the IFN-free era. AIM: To document changes in patient characteristics and treatment regimens along with their effectiveness and safety profile over the years. METHODS: The studied patients were selected from 14801 chronically HCV-infected individuals who started IFN-free therapy between July 2015 and December 2021 in 22 Polish hepatology centers. The retrospective analysis was conducted in real-world clinical practice based on the EpiTer-2 multicenter database. The measure of treatment effectiveness was the percentage of sustained virologic response (SVR) calculated after excluding patients lost to follow-up. Safety data collected during therapy and the 12-wk post-treatment period included information on adverse events, including serious ones, deaths, and treatment course. RESULTS: The studied population (n = 3577) was balanced in terms of gender in 2015-2017, while the following years showed the dominance of men. The decline in the median age from 60 in 2015-2016 to 57 years in 2021 was accompanied by a decrease in the percentage of patients with comorbidities and comedications. Treatment-experienced patients dominated in 2015-2016, while treatment-naive individuals gained an advantage in 2017 and reached 93.2% in 2021. Genotype (GT)-specific options were more prevalent in treatment in 2015-2018 and were supplanted by pangenotypic combinations in subsequent years. The effectiveness of the therapy was comparable regardless of the period analyzed, and patients achieved an overall response rate of 95%, with an SVR range of 72.9%-100% for the different therapeutic regimens. Male gender, GT3 infection, and prior treatment failure were identified as independent negative predictors of therapeutic success. CONCLUSION: We have documented changes in the profile of HCV-infected cirrhotic patients over the years of accessibility to changing DAA regimens, confirming the high effectiveness of IFN-free therapy in all analyzed periods.

Pangenotypic triple versus double therapy in HCV-infected patients after prior failure of direct-acting antivirals.

Aim of the study: Despite the excellent effectiveness of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, still a few percent of patients fail therapy. The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of triple vs double rescue treatment in such a population. Material and methods: The study included all consecutive DAA-experienced patients retreated with pangenotypic options from the EpiTer-2 database, a retrospective national multicenter real-world project evaluating antiviral treatment in HCV-infected patients in 2015-2023. Results: The studied population consisted of 269 patients, of whom 208 were treated with the double (P2) and 61 with the triple (P3) pangenotypic option. No statistically significant differences were found between these subpopulations, except a significantly more frequent history of liver transplantation in the P3 group (6.6% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.01). In the P2 group, two-thirds of patients were treated with velpatasvir/sofosbuvir, while in the P3 group the majority of patients received a combination of velpatasvir/sofosbuvir/voxilaprevir. Virological response at the end of therapy was comparable in both analyzed subpopulations, but the sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was significantly higher in triple retherapy, 98.3% vs. 88.7%, p = 0.02, calculated after exclusion of patients lost to follow-up. Lower SVR was achieved in genotype 3-infected men with cirrhosis, 88.9% and 80% in P3 and P2, respectively. Conclusions: A comparison of double and triple pangenotypic retherapy in patients after failure of DAA therapy showed a higher sustained virological response in the triple option with a comparable response at the end of therapy. The factors reducing the chances of cure were cirrhosis, genotype 3 infection and male gender.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of direct-acting antivirals in hepatitis C virus patients with mental disorders.

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that 58 million people worldwide are infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). Patients with severe psychiatric disorders could not be treated with previously available interferon-based therapies due to their unfavorable side effect profile. This has changed with the introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAA), although their real-life tolerance and effectiveness in patients with different psychiatric disorders remain to be demonstrated. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DAA in patients with various mental illnesses. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study encompassing 14272 patients treated with DAA for chronic hepatitis C in 22 Polish hepatology centers, including 942 individuals diagnosed with a mental disorder (anxiety disorder, bipolar affective disorder, depression, anxiety-depressive disorder, personality disorder, schizophrenia, sleep disorder, substance abuse disorder, and mental illness without a specific diagnosis). The safety and effectiveness of DAA in this group were compared to those in a group without psychiatric illness (n = 13330). Antiviral therapy was considered successful if serum ribonucleic acid (RNA) of HCV was undetectable 12 wk after its completion [sustained virologic response (SVR)]. Safety data, including the incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and deaths, and the frequency of treatment modification and discontinuation, were collected during therapy and up to 12 wk after treatment completion. The entire study population was included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Per-protocol (PP) analysis concerned patients who underwent HCV RNA evaluation 12 wk after completing treatment. RESULTS: Among patients with mental illness, there was a significantly higher percentage of men, treatment-naive patients, obese, human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus-coinfected, patients with cirrhosis, and those infected with genotype 3 (GT3) while infection with GT1b was more frequent in the population without psychiatric disorders. The cure rate calculated PP was not significantly different in the two groups analyzed, with a SVR of 96.9% and 97.7%, respectively. Although patients with bipolar disorder achieved a significantly lower SVR, the multivariate analysis excluded it as an independent predictor of treatment non-response. Male sex, GT3 infection, cirrhosis, and failure of previous therapy were identified as independent negative predictors. The percentage of patients who completed the planned therapy did not differ between groups with and without mental disorders. In six patients, symptoms of mental illness (depression, schizophrenia) worsened, of which two discontinued treatments for this reason. New episodes of sleep disorders occurred significantly more often in patients with mental disorders. Patients with mental illness were more frequently lost to follow-up (4.2% vs 2.5%). CONCLUSION: DAA treatment is safe and effective in HCV-infected patients with mental disorders. No specific psychiatric diagnosis lowered the chance of successful antiviral treatment.

Real-world effectiveness of genotype-specific and pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals in HCV-infected patients with renal failure.

Aim of the study: The aim is to summarize the effectiveness and safety of genotype-specific and pangenotypic hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatments in patients with renal failure. Material and methods: In the EpiTer-2 database, which includes data from 22 hepatology centers in Poland, 593 patients with HCV infection and kidney failure were identified. According to KDIGO 2022, they fulfilled the criteria of chronic kidney disease. Patients were divided into two groups: treated with genotype-specific regimens (n = 428) and pangenotypic options (n = 165), in relation to the stage of kidney disease determined using the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (Cockcroft and Gault equation). Two separate groups were created for hemodialyzed patients (n = 134) and patients after kidney transplantation (n = 89). Results: In a total of 593 patients, 78.7% were treatment-naïve and 23.9% had liver cirrhosis, in 27.5% of cases decompensated. In both groups, the dominant genotype was GT1b. Among patients treated with genotype-specific regimens, LDV/SOF ± RBV, OBV/PTV/r + DSV ± RBV, and GZR/EBR ± RBV treatments were given to 31.5%, 31.5%, and 34.8% of patients respectively. In pangenotypic regimens, GLE/PIB was chosen in 50.3%. Ninety-six percent and 98.8% of patients in the genotype-specific regimen and 88.5% and 94.8% in the pangenotypic regimen achieved a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12) in the intention-to-treat and per protocol population respectively. Liver cirrhosis was identified as a risk factor for virological failure. During the study, 14 patients died, 7 in each of the two groups, none related to the antiviral treatment. Conclusions: Both types of treatment regimens are equally effective and safe in patients with renal failure. The stage of renal failure or transplant does not influence the antiviral response.

[Forecasting of efficacy of chronic hepatitis B therapy]. / Prognozowanie skutecznosci terapii przewleklego zapalenia watroby typu B.

Predictors of effective chronic hepatitis B therapy were described in that article. The predictors are: ALT, HBV genotype, HBV DNA, qantification of HBsAg. New predictors as cccDNA and level of HBeAg were described too.

[Efficacy of triple therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C not treated and patients previously treated ineffectively]. / Skutecznosc terapii trójlekowej u chorych przewlekle zakazonych HCV, nieleczonych i z nieskuteczna wczesniejsza terapia.

Since ten years pegylated interferon alpha and ribavirin (PR) are a standard treatment for the patients with chronic HCV infection. Recently, new drugs emerge called direct-acting antivirals. The first of them, telaprevir (TVR) and boceprevir (BOC), which peptidomimetic NS3/4A HCV serine protease inhibitors, have been recorded this year in Europe. Adding them to the PR significantly increases efficacy of standard treatment and creates the possibility of its reduction. This paper presents, based on the results of the third phase studies, the efficacy of triple therapy in selected groups of patients. Also includes current recommendations for treatment with BOC or TVR in combination with PR.

Best therapy for the easiest to treat hepatitis C virus genotype 1b-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: The revolution in treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection dates back to the introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). The increase in efficacy was most pronounced in patients infected with genotype (GT) 1b, as this was the most poorly responsive population to treatment during the interferon era. AIM: To identify the most effective interferon-free therapy for GT1b-infected patients and to determine positive and negative predictors of virological response. METHODS: This real-world retrospective analysis included patients chronically infected with GT1b HCV whose data were obtained from the multicenter observational EpiTer-2 database. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated for each therapeutic regimen as the percentage of sustained virological responses (SVR). Assessment of the safety was based on the evaluation of the course of therapy, the occurrence of adverse events including serious ones, deaths during treatment and in the post 12-wk follow-up period. RESULTS: The studied population consisted of 11385 patients with a mean age of 53 ± 14.8 years and a female predominance (53.4%). The majority of them were treatment-naïve (74.6%) and patients with cirrhosis accounted for 24.3%. Of the DAA regimens used, 76.9% were GT-specific with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir ± ribavirin being the most used option (32.4%). A total of 10903 patients responded to treatment resulting in a 98.1% in the per-protocol analysis after excluding 273 patients without SVR data. The effectiveness of all regimens exceeded 90% and the highest SVR of 98.9% was achieved in patients treated with a combination of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. Logistic regression analyses showed that the virologic response was independently associated with female sex [odds ratio (OR) = 1.67], absence of decompensated cirrhosis at baseline (OR = 2.42) and higher baseline platelets (OR = 1.004 per 1000/µL increase), while the presence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection significantly decreased the odds of response (OR = 0.39). About 95%-100% of patients completed therapy irrespective of the drug regimen. At least one adverse effect occurred in 10.9%-36.3% and most of them were mild. No treatment related deaths have been reported. CONCLUSION: We documented very high effectiveness and a good safety profile across all DAA regimens. Positive predictors of SVR were female sex, absence of decompensated cirrhosis at baseline and higher platelet count while HIV coinfection reduced the effectiveness.

Efficacy of 8- versus 12-week treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in chronic hepatitis C patients eligible for 8-week regimen in a real-world setting.

Introduction: Non-cirrhotic treatment-naive hepatitis C patients infected with genotype 1 can be treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) for 8 weeks, but in practice this regimen is frequently extended up to 12 weeks at least in part due to insufficient real-world data supporting shortening of treatment. The aim of our study was to compare 8- and 12-week regimens' efficacy in patients eligible for 8-week therapy in a real-world setting. Material and methods: Data of HCV genotype 1 infected patients treated with LDV/SOF between 2015 and 2018 included in the EpiTer-2 database were analyzed with respect to patients' characteristics and length of treatment. Results: Among a total of 1718 patients treated with LDV/SOF, 679 were included in the analysis, 238 (35%) received 8-week regimen, whereas 441 were treated for 12 weeks although they fulfilled the criteria for a shorter course. The majority of patients were infected with genotype 1b (89%) and demonstrated minimal fibrosis (55%). The 12-week regimen was assigned significantly more frequently to patients with comorbidities, concomitant medications and advanced liver fibrosis. The sustained virologic response rate was similar after 8 (98%) and 12 (97%) weeks of therapy according to intent-to-treat analysis and reached 99% in both groups after exclusion of patients lost to follow-up. Conclusions: We confirmed high effectiveness regardless of treatment duration with LDV/SOF in non-cirrhotics infected with HCV genotype 1 eligible for the 8-week regimen according to the current label. This real-world study also demonstrated no need for addition of ribavirin (RBV) in this population and showed that shortening of treatment significantly improves the safety profile of LDV/SOF medication.