Effect of bivalirudin on coagulation in neonatal (cord) and adult human blood in vitro.

INTRODUCTION: Bivalirudin is recommended as an alternative to heparin in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Although it has been used in infants and children for this indication, there is a paucity of data on the pharmacologic effects of bivalirudin in neonates. Given the immaturity of the hemostatic system in neonates, we hypothesized that coagulation responses to bivalirudin in this population would be different than in adults. METHODS: Blood samples were drawn from placenta-cord units and from healthy adult donors. The study was carried out in two steps. First, bivalirudin was added to cord and adult blood samples at concentrations of 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 µg/mL. Activated clotting time and thromboelastographic variables were recorded. Next, we used a Chandler loop system to assess the efficacy of bivalirudin in a simple model of cardiopulmonary bypass. The loops were primed with cord or adult blood and were run until thrombus was detected. Plasma bivalirudin concentrations were measured at 1, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 75 min after initiating rotation of the loops using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Bivalirudin elicited a dose-dependent prolongation inhibition of coagulation in both cord and adult blood samples with greater potency in cord blood in comparison to adult blood (activated clotting time: 627 ± 50 vs. 452 ± 22 s at 15 µg/mL bivalirudin, p < .0001). This relative potency was also demonstrated in the Chandler loop system, but interestingly, cord blood appeared to inactivate bivalirudin more rapidly than adult blood with earlier clotting in loops containing cord blood. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that bivalirudin has greater potency in cord blood in vitro than in adult blood. Plasma degradation appears to proceed more rapidly in cord blood than in adults. Both of these findings should be considered when planning dosing regimens in neonatal patients.

Dabigatran pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic in sheep: Informing dose for anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND: The effect of the anticoagulant, dabigatran, and its antagonist, idarucizumab, on coagulation remains poorly quantified. There are few pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic data available to determine dabigatran dose in humans or animals undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: Five sheep were given intravenous dabigatran 4 mg/kg. Blood samples were collected for thromboelastometric reaction time (R-time) and drug assay at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, 480 min, and 24 h. Plasma dabigatran concentrations and R-times were analyzed using an integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model using non-linear mixed effects. The impact of idarucizumab 15 mg/kg administered 120 min after dabigatran 4 mg/kg and its effect on R-time was observed. RESULTS: A 2-compartment model described dabigatran pharmacokinetics with a clearance (CL 0.0453 L/min/70 kg), intercompartment clearance (Q 0.268 L/min/70 kg), central volume of distribution (V1 2.94 L/70 kg), peripheral volume of distribution (V2 9.51 L/70 kg). The effect compartment model estimates for a sigmoid EMAX model using Reaction time had an effect site concentration (Ce50 64.2 mg/L) eliciting half of the maximal effect (EMAX 180 min). The plasma-effect compartment equilibration half time (T1/2keo) was 1.04 min. Idarucizumab 15 mg/kg reduced R-time by approximately 5 min. CONCLUSIONS: Dabigatran reversibly binds to the active site on the thrombin molecule, preventing activation of coagulation factors. The pharmacologic target concentration strategy uses pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic information to inform dose. A loading dose of dabigatran 0.25 mg/kg followed by a maintenance infusion of dabigatran 0.0175 mg/kg/min for 30 min and a subsequent infusion dabigatran 0.0075 mg/kg/min achieves a steady state target concentration of 5 mg/L in a sheep model.

Tumor Treating Fields therapy with standard systemic therapy versus standard systemic therapy alone in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer following progression on or after platinum-based therapy (LUNAR): a randomised, open-label, pivotal phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are electric fields that disrupt processes critical for cancer cell survival, leading to immunogenic cell death and enhanced antitumour immune response. In preclinical models of non-small-cell lung cancer, TTFields amplified the effects of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. We report primary results from a pivotal study of TTFields therapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: This randomised, open-label, pivotal phase 3 study recruited patients at 130 sites in 19 countries. Participants were aged 22 years or older with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer progressing on or after platinum-based therapy, with squamous or non-squamous histology and ECOG performance status of 2 or less. Previous platinum-based therapy was required, but no restriction was placed on the number or type of previous lines of systemic therapy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to TTFields therapy and standard systemic therapy (investigator's choice of immune checkpoint inhibitor [nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab] or docetaxel) or standard therapy alone. Randomisation was performed centrally using variable blocked randomisation and an interactive voice-web response system, and was stratified by tumour histology, treatment, and region. Systemic therapies were dosed according to local practice guidelines. TTFields therapy (150 kHz) was delivered continuously to the thoracic region with the recommendation to achieve an average of at least 18 h/day device usage. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. The safety population included all patients who received any study therapy and were analysed according to the actual treatment received. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02973789. FINDINGS: Between Feb 13, 2017, and Nov 19, 2021, 276 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive TTFields therapy with standard therapy (n=137) or standard therapy alone (n=139). The median age was 64 years (IQR 59-70), 178 (64%) were male and 98 (36%) were female, 156 (57%) had non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, and 87 (32%) had received a previous immune checkpoint inhibitor. Median follow-up was 10·6 months (IQR 6·1-33·7) for patients receiving TTFields therapy with standard therapy, and 9·5 months (0·1-32·1) for patients receiving standard therapy. Overall survival was significantly longer with TTFields therapy and standard therapy than with standard therapy alone (median 13·2 months [95% CI 10·3-15·5] vs 9·9 months [8·1-11·5]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·74 [95% CI 0·56-0·98]; p=0·035). In the safety population (n=267), serious adverse events of any cause were reported in 70 (53%) of 133 patients receiving TTFields therapy plus standard therapy and 51 (38%) of 134 patients receiving standard therapy alone. The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were leukopenia (37 [14%] of 267), pneumonia (28 [10%]), and anaemia (21 [8%]). TTFields therapy-related adverse events were reported in 95 (71%) of 133 patients; these were mostly (81 [85%]) grade 1-2 skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. There were three deaths related to standard therapy (two due to infections and one due to pulmonary haemorrhage) and no deaths related to TTFields therapy. INTERPRETATION: TTFields therapy added to standard therapy significantly improved overall survival compared with standard therapy alone in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after progression on platinum-based therapy without exacerbating systemic toxicities. These data suggest that TTFields therapy is efficacious in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and should be considered as a treatment option to manage the disease in this setting. FUNDING: Novocure.

Intravenous Dabigatran Provides Adequate Anticoagulation for Cardiopulmonary Bypass Using a Rabbit Model.

BACKGROUND: Heparin anticoagulation has been used successfully for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, an alternative anticoagulant approach is desirable due to the cases of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Dabigatran provides anticoagulation for an in vitro model of simulated CPB. The current analysis tests the hypothesis that dabigatran provides sufficient anticoagulation for CPB in intact rabbits. METHODS: Nonlinear mixed effects models were used to estimate dabigatran parameters for a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model in 10 New Zealand White rabbits. A dabigatran infusion designed to maintain a plasma concentration of 90 µg/ml was run throughout CPB based on the pharmacokinetics. Animals were subjected to sternotomy and anticoagulated with IV dabigatran (six animals) or heparin (four animals). Rabbits were cannulated centrally using the right atrium and ascending aorta and CPB was maintained for 120 min. Measurement of activated clotting time, thromboelastometric reaction time, and blood gases were performed during CPB. Then, the animals were euthanized, and the brain and one kidney were removed for histology. Sections of the arterial filters were inspected using electron microscopy. RESULTS: The observed dabigatran concentrations during CPB were greater than the target concentration, ranging from 137 ± 40 µg/ml at 5 min of CPB to 428 ± 150 µg/ml at 60 min, and 295 ± 35 µg/ml at 120 min. All rabbits completed 2 h of CPB without visible thrombosis. In the two groups, reaction time values were elevated, reaching 10,262 ± 4,198 s (dabigatran group) and 354 ± 141 s (heparin group) at 120 min of CPB. Brains and kidneys showed no evidence of thrombosis or ultrastructural damage. Sections of the arterial line filter showed minimal or no fibrin. There was no significant difference in outcomes between dabigatran- and heparin-treated animals. CONCLUSIONS: In this first-use, proof-of-concept study, the authors have shown that dabigatran provides acceptable anticoagulation similar to heparin to prevent thrombosis using a rabbit CPB model.

Rivaroxaban Reduces the Dabigatran Dose Required for Anticoagulation During Simulated Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

BACKGROUND: Heparin is the standard anticoagulant for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); however, there are problems with its use that make the development of suitable alternatives desirable. Currently, no ideal alternative exists. We have previously reported that the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran can prevent coagulation in simulated CPB at high concentrations. These high concentrations may cause difficulties in achieving the reversal of dabigatran with idarucizumab, given the markedly different pharmacokinetics of the 2 drugs. Herein, we test the hypothesis that the addition of the anti-Xa drug rivaroxaban would provide suitable anticoagulation at a lower concentration of dabigatran given likely synergy between the 2 classes of drugs. The primary goal of the study was to investigate whether the addition of rivaroxaban reduces the concentration of dabigatran necessary to allow 2 hours of simulated CPB. METHODS: The study was performed in sequential steps. Blood collected from consenting healthy donors was used throughout. First, we added graded concentrations of dabigatran and rivaroxaban alone and in combination and assessed inhibition of anticoagulation using thromboelastometry. Using results from this step, combinations of dabigatran and rivaroxaban were tested in both Chandler loop and simulated CPB circuits. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were added before recalcification, and the circuits were run for 120 minutes. In both models of CPB, 120 minutes of circulation without visible thrombus was considered successful. In the Chandler loop system, idarucizumab was added to reverse anticoagulant effects. In the CPB circuits, the arterial line filters were examined using scanning electron microscope (SEM) to qualitatively assess for fibrin deposition. RESULTS: In vitro analysis of blood samples treated with dabigatran and rivaroxaban showed that dabigatran and rivaroxaban individually prolonged clotting time (CT) in a dose-dependent manner. However, when combined, the drugs behaved synergistically. In the Chandler loop system, dabigatran 2400 and 4800 ng/mL plus rivaroxaban (150 ng/mL) effectively prevented clot formation and reduced the dynamics of clot propagation for 120 minutes. Idarucizumab (250-1000 µg/mL) effectively reversed anticoagulation. In the CPB circuits, dabigatran (2500 ng/mL) and rivaroxaban (200 ng/mL) were successful in allowing 120 minutes of simulated CPB and prevented fibrin deposition. Biomarkers of coagulation activation did not increase during simulated CPB. Heparin controls performed similarly to dabigatran and rivaroxaban. CONCLUSIONS: The dual administration of oral anticoagulant drugs (dabigatran and Rivaroxaban) with different pharmacologic mechanisms of action produced synergistic inhibition of coagulation in vitro and successfully prevented clotting during simulated CPB.

Delayed concentration effect models for dabigatran anticoagulation.

INTRODUCTION: Dabigatran is an anticoagulant with potential use during cardiopulmonary bypass in children and adults. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship for dabigatran anticoagulation effect was investigated in an intact animal model using rabbits. METHODS: Ten male New Zealand white rabbits were given a novel preparation of intravenous dabigatran 15 mg.kg-1 . Blood samples were collected for activated clotting time, thromboelastometric reaction time, and drug assay at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180, 300, and 420 min. Plasma dabigatran concentrations and coagulation measures were analyzed using an integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model using nonlinear mixed effects. Effects (activated clotting and thromboelastometric reaction times) were described using a sigmoidal EMAX model. Pharmacokinetic parameters were scaled using allometry and standardized to a 70 kg size standard. Pharmacodynamics were investigated using both an effect compartment model and an indirect response (turnover) model. RESULTS: A two-compartment model described dabigatran pharmacokinetics with a clearance (CL 0.135 L.min-1 .70 kg-1 ), intercompartment clearance (Q 0.33 L.min-1 .70 kg-1 ), central volume of distribution (V1 12.3 L.70 kg-1 ), and peripheral volume of distribution (V2 30.1 L.70 kg-1 ). The effect compartment model estimates for a sigmoid EMAX model with activated clotting time had an effect site concentration (Ce50 20.1 mg.L-1 ) eliciting half of the maximal effect (EMAX 899 s) and a Hill coefficient (N 0.66). The equilibration half time (T1/2 keo) was 1.4 min. Results for the reaction time were plasma concentration (Cp50 65.3 mg.L-1 ), EMAX 34 min, N 0.80 with a baseline thromboelastometric reaction time of 0.4 min. The equilibration half time (T1/2 keo) was 2.04 min. CONCLUSIONS: Dabigatran reversibly binds to the active site on the thrombin molecule, preventing thrombin-mediated activation of coagulation factors. The effect compartment model performed slightly better than the turnover model and was able to adequately capture pharmacodynamics for both activated clotting and thromboelastometric reaction times. The equilibration half time was short (<2 min). These data can be used to inform future animal preclinical studies for those undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. These preclinical data also demonstrate the magnitude of parameter values for a delayed effect compartment model that are applicable to humans.

Levels of Evidence Supporting the North American and European Perioperative Care Guidelines for Anesthesiologists between 2010 and 2020: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Although there are thousands of published recommendations in anesthesiology clinical practice guidelines, the extent to which these are supported by high levels of evidence is not known. This study hypothesized that most recommendations in clinical practice guidelines are supported by a low level of evidence. METHODS: A registered (Prospero CRD42020202932) systematic review was conducted of anesthesia evidence-based recommendations from the major North American and European anesthesiology societies between January 2010 and September 2020 in PubMed and EMBASE. The level of evidence A, B, or C and the strength of recommendation (strong or weak) for each recommendation was mapped using the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association classification system or the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The outcome of interest was the proportion of recommendations supported by levels of evidence A, B, and C. Changes in the level of evidence over time were examined. Risk of bias was assessed using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II. RESULTS: In total, 60 guidelines comprising 2,280 recommendations were reviewed. Level of evidence A supported 16% (363 of 2,280) of total recommendations and 19% (288 of 1,506) of strong recommendations. Level of evidence C supported 51% (1,160 of 2,280) of all recommendations and 50% (756 of 1,506) of strong recommendations. Of all the guidelines, 73% (44 of 60) had a low risk of bias. The proportion of recommendations supported by level of evidence A versus level of evidence C (relative risk ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.18 to 4.74; P = 0.933) or level of evidence B versus level of evidence C (relative risk ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 0.72 to 3.72; P = 0.243) did not increase in guidelines that were revised. Year of publication was also not associated with increases in the proportion of recommendations supported by level of evidence A (relative risk ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.23; P = 0.340) or level of evidence B (relative risk ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.15; P = 0.283) compared to level of evidence C. CONCLUSIONS: Half of the recommendations in anesthesiology clinical practice guidelines are based on a low level of evidence, and this did not change over time. These findings highlight the need for additional efforts to increase the quality of evidence used to guide decision-making in anesthesiology.

Survey of Practice Pattern in Patients With Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Requiring Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse reaction to heparin. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are routinely anticoagulated with heparin before the initiation of bypass. Heparin is contraindicated, however, in patients with acute HIT, and alternatives to routine practice are often used. While guidelines have recently been published addressing this topic 10, there remains variance between institutions in how these cases are treated. Our goal was to better delineate practice trends in the diagnosis and management of HIT patients requiring CPB. METHODS: We surveyed members of the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) and the American Society for Extracorporeal Technology (AmSECT) using an online survey tool. RESULTS: We received 304 completed surveys (5.8% response rate), 75% completed by an anesthesiologist, and 24% by a perfusionist. The majority of respondents used clinical history and/or antibody testing (71% and 63%, respectively) to diagnose HIT. Seventy-five percent of respondents reported using an institutional protocol for HIT-CPB cases. Most respondents (89%) reported having at least 1 case in the last 3 years, with a total case experience of at least 785 cases (785 = the minimum number of cases in each case volume category × the number of respondents choosing that category). The strategy recommended in published guidelines, bivalirudin, was the most commonly reported alternative anticoagulation strategy (75%) used by respondents in HIT cases, with most (83%) using the activated clotting time (ACT) to monitor anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Most responding SCA and AmSECT members reported that their institution used a protocol or guideline for HIT/CPB cases, and most guidelines directed the use of bivalirudin as an alternative anticoagulant. Various other methods such as plasmapheresis are also being used with success in this patient population. Further research, including comparison studies of alternative anticoagulant strategies, is required to elucidate the best approach to these difficult cases.

High-Dose Dabigatran Is an Effective Anticoagulant for Simulated Cardiopulmonary Bypass Using Human Blood.

BACKGROUND: Currently no ideal alternative exists for heparin for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor for which a reversal agent exists. The primary end point of the study was to explore whether Dabigatran was an effective anticoagulant for 120 minutes of simulated CPB. METHODS: The study was designed in 2 sequential steps. Throughout, human blood from healthy donors was used for each experimental step. Initially, increasing concentrations of Dabigatran were added to aliquots of fresh whole blood, and the anticoagulant effect measured using kaolin/tissue factor-activated thromboelastography (rapidTEG). The dynamics of all thromboelastography (TEG) measurements were studied with repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Based on these data, aliquots of blood were treated with high-concentration Dabigatran and placed in a Chandler loop as a simple ex vivo bypass model to assess whether Dabigatran had sufficient anticoagulant effects to maintain blood fluidity for 2 hours of continuous contact with the artificial surface of the PVC tubing. Idarucizumab, humanized monoclonal antibody fragment, was used to verify the reversibility of Dabigatran effects. Finally, 3 doses of Dabigatran were tested in a simulated CPB setup using a heart-lung machine and a commercially available bypass circuit with an arteriovenous (A-V) loop. The primary outcome was the successful completion of 120 minutes of simulated CPB with dabigatran anticoagulation, defined as lack of visible thrombus. Thromboelastographic reaction (R) time was measured repeatedly in each bypass simulation, and the circuits were continuously observed for clot. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was used to visualize fibrin formation in the filters meshes during CPB. RESULTS: In in vitro blood samples, Dabigatran prolonged R time and reduced the dynamics of clot propagation (as measured by speed of clot formation [Angle], maximum rate of thrombus generation [MRTG], and time to maximum rate of thrombus generation [TMRTG]) in a dose-dependent manner. In the Chandler Loop, high doses of Dabigatran prevented clot formation for 120 minutes, but only at doses higher than expected. Idarucizumab decreased R time and reversed anticoagulation in both in vitro and Chandler Loops settings. In the A-V loop bypass simulation, Dabigatran prevented gross thrombus generation for 120 minutes of simulated CPB. CONCLUSIONS: Using sequential experimental approaches, we showed that direct thrombin inhibitor Dabigatran in high doses maintained anticoagulation of blood for simulated CPB. Idarucizumab reduced time for clot formation reversing the anticoagulation action of Dabigatran.

Elevated free hemoglobin and decreased haptoglobin levels are associated with adverse clinical outcomes, unfavorable physiologic measures, and altered inflammatory markers in pediatric cardiac surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: There are data suggesting that free hemoglobin (Hb), heme, and iron contribute to infection, thrombosis, multiorgan failure, and death in critically ill patients. These outcomes may be mitigated by haptoglobin. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: 164 consecutively treated children undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease were evaluated for associations between free Hb and haptoglobin and clinical outcomes, physiologic metrics, and biomarkers of inflammation RESULTS: Higher perioperative free Hb levels (and lower haptoglobin levels) were associated with mortality, nosocomial infection, thrombosis, hours of intubation and inotropes, increased interleukin-6, peak serum lactate levels, and lower nadir mean arterial pressures. The median free Hb in patients without infection (30 mg/dL; 29 interquartile range [IQR], 24-52 mg/dL) was lower than in those who became infected (39 mg/dL; IQR, 33-88 mg/ 31 dL; p = 0.0046). The median mechanical ventilation requirements were 19 (IQR, 7-72) hours in patients with higher levels of haptoglobin versus 48 (IQR, 18-144) hours in patients with lower levels (p = 0.0047). Transfusion dose, bypass duration, and complexity of surgery were all significantly correlated with Hb levels and haptoglobin levels. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that these variables were independently and significantly associated with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated pre- and postoperative levels of free Hb and decreased levels of haptoglobin were associated with adverse clinical outcomes, inflammation, and unfavorable physiologic metrics. Transfusion, RACHS score, and duration of bypass were associated with increased free Hb and decreased haptoglobin. Further investigation of the role of hemolysis and haptoglobin as potential mediators or markers of outcomes is warranted.

Impact of the Choice of Risk Model for Identifying Low-risk Patients Using the 2014 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Perioperative Guidelines.

WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC: WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: BACKGROUND:: The 2014 American College of Cardiology Perioperative Guideline recommends risk stratifying patients scheduled to undergo noncardiac surgery using either: (1) the Revised Cardiac Index; (2) the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator; or (3) the Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest calculator. The aim of this study is to determine how often these three risk-prediction tools agree on the classification of patients as low risk (less than 1%) of major adverse cardiac event. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study using a sample of 10,000 patient records. The risk of cardiac complications was calculated for the Revised Cardiac Index and the Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest models using published coefficients, and for the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator using the publicly available website. The authors used the intraclass correlation coefficient and kappa analysis to quantify the degree of agreement between these three risk-prediction tools. RESULTS: There is good agreement between the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest estimates of major adverse cardiac events (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.70), while only poor agreement between (1) American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator and the Revised Cardiac Index (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.40), and (2) Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest and Revised Cardiac Index (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.30). The three prediction models disagreed 29% of the time on which patients were low risk. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variability in the predicted risk of cardiac complications using different risk-prediction tools. Including more than one prediction tool in clinical guidelines could lead to differences in decision-making for some patients depending on which risk calculator is used.

0.9% NaCl (Normal Saline) - Perhaps not so normal after all?

Crystalloid infusion is widely employed in patient care for volume replacement and resuscitation. In the United States the crystalloid of choice is often normal saline. Surgeons and anesthesiologists have long preferred buffered solutions such as Ringer's Lactate and Plasma-Lyte A. Normal saline is the solution most widely employed in medical and pediatric care, as well as in hematology and transfusion medicine. However, there is growing concern that normal saline is more toxic than balanced, buffered crystalloids such as Plasma-Lyte and Lactated Ringer's. Normal saline is the only solution recommended for red cell washing, administration and salvage in the USA, but Plasma-Lyte A is also FDA approved for these purposes. Lactated Ringer's has been traditionally avoided in these applications due to concerns over clotting, but existing research suggests this is not likely a problem. In animal models and clinical studies in various settings, normal saline can cause metabolic acidosis, vascular and renal function changes, as well as abdominal pain in comparison with balanced crystalloids. The one extant randomized trial suggests that in very small volumes (2 l or less) normal saline is not more toxic than other crystalloids. Recent evidence suggests that normal saline causes substantially more in vitro hemolysis than Plasma-Lyte A and similar solutions during short term storage (24 hours) after washing or intraoperative salvage. There are now abundant data to raise concerns as to whether normal saline is the safest replacement solution in infusion therapy, red cell washing and salvage, apheresis and similar uses. In the USA, Plasma-Lyte A is also FDA approved for use with blood components and is likely a safer solution for these purposes. Its only disadvantage is a higher cost. Additional studies of the safety of normal saline for virtually all current clinical uses are needed. It seems likely that normal saline will eventually be abandoned in favor of safer, more physiologic crystalloid solutions in the coming years.

Perioperative Use of Focused Transthoracic Cardiac Ultrasound: A Survey of Current Practice and Opinion.

BACKGROUND: The advent of portable ultrasound machines in recent years has led to greater availability of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) in the perioperative and critical care setting. To our knowledge, its use in the perioperative setting among anesthesiologists remains undefined. We sought to assess the use of FoCUS by members of the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) in clinical practice, to identify variations in its application, to outline limits to its use, and to understand the level of training of physicians using this technology. METHODS: A 26-question anonymous and voluntary online survey assessing the participants' training level with FoCUS, frequency of use, and opinions regarding incorporating it into residency training and developing a pathway to basic certification. The survey was distributed to the members of the SCA via email. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 379 of 3660 members of the SCA (10%). Of the respondents, the majority (67%) had completed a cardiovascular anesthesiology fellowship with 58% identifying their practice as academic, while 37% stated they were in private practice, and 6% were military/Veterans Administration. Most (84%) of the respondents practiced in North America. Eighty-one percent reported familiarity with FoCUS, while 47% stated they use it in their clinical practice. Those practicing in North America were significantly less likely to utilize FoCUS in their practice as compared to other respondents. With regard to training and certification, 88% believe FoCUS education should be integrated into residency training programs and 74% believe there should be a pathway to basic certification for FoCUS. CONCLUSIONS: While most cardiovascular anesthesiologists are familiar with FoCUS, a minority have integrated it into their practice. Roadblocks such as lack of training, the fear of missing diagnoses, lack of resources, and the lack of a formal certification process must be addressed to allow for more widespread use of perioperative cardiac ultrasound.

Supplemental Antithrombin Is Effective in Achieving Adequate Anticoagulation in Infants and Children With an Inadequate Response to Heparin.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that supplemental antithrombin (AT) is effective in establishing adequate anticoagulation in infants and children with initially inadequate responses to heparin. DESIGN: Following institutional review board approval, a retrospective chart review was conducted on pediatric patients receiving AT during cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. SETTING: A single institutional review in a hospital setting. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one pediatric patients with age ranging from 1 day to 36 months (median 12 weeks) receiving AT during the study period. INTERVENTIONS: As this was a retrospective chart review, no active interventions on patients were performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data collected included: patient age, sex, weight, activated clotting time (ACT) values, as well as heparin and AT doses. Primary outcomes were the increase in the ACT from pre- to post-AT and the number of patients who achieved an ACT>480 seconds. The paired t-test was used to compare pre- and post-AT ACT. Mean dose of AT was 50 U/kg (standard deviation 6). Following administration of AT, 30 pediatric patients achieved an ACT of>480 seconds. The post-AT ACT was significantly higher than the pre-AT by a mean of 327 seconds (p<0.0001); 96% of patients achieved an adequate ACT to initiate cardiopulmonary bypass. No adverse events attributable to AT were recorded. CONCLUSION: AT was effective in achieving adequate anticoagulation in a small cohort of infants and children undergoing cardiac surgery who initially were poorly responsive to heparin. Further research to examine the utility of AT in improving clinical outcomes is warranted.

Outcomes are Worse in US Patients Undergoing Surgery on Weekends Compared With Weekdays.

BACKGROUND: Increasing surgical access to previously underserved populations in the United States may require a major expansion of the use of operating rooms on weekends to take advantage of unused capacity. Although the so-called weekend effect for surgery has been described in other countries, it is unknown whether US patients undergoing moderate-to-high risk surgery on weekends are more likely to experience worse outcomes than patients undergoing surgery on weekdays. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether patients undergoing surgery on weekends are more likely to die or experience a major complication compared with patients undergoing surgery on a weekday. RESEARCH DESIGN: Using all-payer data, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 305,853 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery, colorectal surgery, open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, and lower extremity revascularization. We compared in-hospital mortality and major complications for weekday versus weekend surgery using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: After controlling for patient risk and surgery type, weekend elective surgery [adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=3.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.26-4.49; P<0.001] and weekend urgent surgery (AOR=2.11; 95% CI, 1.68-2.66; P<0.001) were associated with a higher risk of death compared with weekday surgery. Weekend elective (AOR=1.58; 95% CI, 1.29-1.93; P<0.001) and weekend urgent surgery (AOR=1.61; 95% CI, 1.42-1.82; P<0.001) were also associated with a higher risk of major complications compared with weekday surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing nonemergent major cardiac and noncardiac surgery on the weekends have a clinically significantly increased risk of death and major complications compared with patients undergoing surgery on weekdays. These findings should prompt decision makers to seek to better understand factors, such physician and nurse staffing, which may contribute to the weekend effect.

Feasibility of Report Cards for Measuring Anesthesiologist Quality for Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: In creating the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System, Congress has mandated pay-for-performance (P4P) for all physicians, including anesthesiologists. There are currently no National Quality Forum-endorsed risk-adjusted outcome metrics for anesthesiologists to use as the basis for P4P. METHODS: Using clinical data from the New York State Cardiac Surgery Reporting System, we conducted a retrospective observational study of 55,436 patients undergoing cardiac surgery between 2009 and 2012. Hierarchical logistic regression modeling was used to examine the variation in in-hospital mortality or major complications (Q-wave myocardial infarction, renal failure, stroke, and respiratory failure) among anesthesiologists, controlling for patient demographics, severity of disease, comorbidities, and hospital quality. RESULTS: Although the variation in performance among anesthesiologists was statistically significant (P = 0.025), none of the anesthesiologists in the sample was classified as a high- or low-performance outliers. The contribution of anesthesiologists to outcomes represented 0.51% of the overall variability in patient outcomes (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.0051; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.002-0.014), whereas the contribution of hospitals to patient outcomes was 2.90% (ICC = 0.029; 95% CI, 0.017-0.050). The anesthesiologist median odds ratio (MOR) was 1.13 (95% CI, 1.08-1.24), suggesting that the variation between anesthesiologist was modest, whereas the hospital MOR was 1.35 (95% CI, 1.25-1.48). In a separate analysis, the contribution of surgeons to overall outcomes represented 1.76% of the overall variability in patient outcomes (ICC = 0.018, 95% CI, 0.010-0.031), and the surgeon MOR was 1.26 (95% CI, 1.19-1.37). Twelve of the surgeons were identified as performance outliers. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of anesthesiologists on the total variability in cardiac surgical outcomes was probably about one-fourth as large as the surgeons' contribution. None of the anesthesiologists caring for cardiac surgical patients in New York State over a 3+ year period were identified as performance outliers. The use of a performance metric based on death or major complications for P4P may not be feasible for cardiac anesthesiologists.