RESUMEN
PURPOSE: There are scarce data describing the outcomes of hospitalized patients admitted with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) stratified by race. In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the difference in outcomes between adult white and black patients hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: Data were obtained from the 2016 and 2017 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Our primary outcome was inpatient mortality while the secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), total hospital charges (THC), red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, diagnosis of bowel perforation, and severe sepsis with septic shock. We conducted the analysis using STATA software. We used propensity-matched multivariate regression analysis to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: Among 71 million hospital hospitalizations, we found 177,574 hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis of IBD, with 24,635 (13.9%) for black patients, 124,899 (70.3%) for white patients, and 28,040 (15.8%) were for others. There was no significant difference in inpatient mortality for black vs white patients. Among secondary outcomes, white compared to black patients had increased odds of having a diagnosis of bowel perforation when admitted with a diagnosis of IBD while there was no difference in the odds of developing septic shock. White patients admitted with a diagnosis of UC were also found to have increased total LOS and THC. CONCLUSION: White patients hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of IBD had no difference in inpatient mortality or septic shock but had worse outcomes such as increased odds of bowel perforation compared to black patients.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Factores Raciales , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease are considered independent risk factors for developing atrial fibrillation (AF). Percutaneous occlusion of left atrial appendage (LAAC) using WATCHMAN device is a widely accepted alternative to anticoagulation therapy to prevent ischemic stroke in AF in patients who are not candidates for anticoagulation. There is limited data regarding the utilization and periprocedural safety of this intervention in patients with CKD/ESRD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all hospitalizations from 2016 to 2017 with (ICD-10) procedure diagnosis code of LAA closure using WATCHMAN procedure with and without a secondary diagnosis of CKD/ESRD in acute-care hospitals across the United States using the national inpatient sample. Demographic variables (gender, race, income, hospital characteristics, medical comorbidities) were collected and compared. The primary outcomes were inpatient mortality, hospital length, and cost of stay. RESULTS: There were over 71 million discharges included in the combined 2016 and 2017 NIS database. Sixteen thousand five hundred five hospitalizations were for adult patients with a procedure code for LAA closure via watchman procedure. Of 16,505 patients, 3245 (19.66%) had CKD and ESRD. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality, length, and cost of stay in patients with and without CKD/ESRD. There were no statistically significant differences in periprocedural cerebrovascular accidents in both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with and without ESRD/CKD who undergo LAA occlusion with Watchman have similar procedure related, in-hospital mortality, and complications.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Fallo Renal Crónico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Adulto , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM) are systemic autoimmune diseases that have been associated with high in-hospital mortality (IHM). The aim of this study was to use the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), a large US population database, to determine the reasons for hospitalization and IHM in patients with DM and PM. METHODS: We conducted a medical records review of adult DM/PM hospitalizations in 2016 and 2017 in acute care hospitals across the United States using the NIS. The reasons for IHM and reasons for hospitalization were divided into 19 broad categories based on their principal International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10) diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 27,140 hospitalizations carried either a principal or secondary ICD-10 code for DM or PM. The main reasons for hospitalization were rheumatologic (22%, n = 6085), cardiovascular (15%, n = 3945), infectious (13%, n = 3515), respiratory (12%, n = 3170), and gastrointestinal, (8%, n = 2150). A total of 3.5% of all patients experienced IHM. Infectious (34%, n = 325), respiratory (23%, n = 215), and cardiovascular (15%, n = 140) diagnoses were the most common reasons for IHM. Sepsis ICD-10 A41.9 was the most frequent specific principal diagnosis for both hospitalizations and IHM. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis demonstrated that in the NIS the most common reasons for hospitalization in patients with DM/PM were rheumatologic diagnoses. However, IHM in these patients was most frequently from infectious diagnoses, highlighting the need for increased attention to infectious complications in these patients.
Asunto(s)
Dermatomiositis , Polimiositis , Adulto , Dermatomiositis/diagnóstico , Dermatomiositis/epidemiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Polimiositis/diagnóstico , Polimiositis/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare potentially fatal multisystem inflammatory condition that is often triggered by an underlying medical condition. Epidemiologic data of HLH in adults with rheumatologic diseases are limited. The aim of our study was to characterize HLH hospitalizations in the US adult population with a special focus on patients with concomitant rheumatologic diseases. METHODS: We conducted a medical records review of hospitalizations in the United States during 2016 and 2017 with a diagnosis of HLH. Hospitalizations were selected from the National Inpatient Sample. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes were used to identify rheumatologic diseases. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORadj) for the association of HLH and rheumatologic diseases. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty hospitalizations had a principal billing diagnosis of HLH. The median age of our study population was 47.5 years, and males made up 55% of the population. Overall mortality was 17%, and the median length of stay was 12 days. Twenty-five percent of the HLH cases had a concomitant rheumatologic diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with nephritis (ORadj, 5.7), SLE without nephritis (ORadj, 9.2), adult-onset Still disease (ORadj, 338.9), and ankylosing spondylitis (ORadj, 10.7) were significantly associated with HLH. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis represents the largest sample to date to assess HLH hospitalizations. Our study showed that SLE, adult-onset Still disease, and ankylosing spondylitis were strongly associated with HLH.
Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Linfohistiocitosis Hemofagocítica , Enfermedad de Still del Adulto , Adulto , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Linfohistiocitosis Hemofagocítica/diagnóstico , Linfohistiocitosis Hemofagocítica/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Still del Adulto/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Still del Adulto/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Still del Adulto/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare the outcomes of patients primarily admitted for ischemic stroke with and without a secondary diagnosis of RA. METHODS: Data were abstracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016 and 2017 database. The NIS was searched for hospitalizations for adult patients with ischemic stroke as principal diagnosis with and without RA as secondary diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Hospital length of stay (LOS), total hospital charges, odds of receiving tissue plasminogen activator, and mechanical thrombectomy were secondary outcomes of interest. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses were used accordingly to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: There were more than 71 million discharges included in the combined 2016 and 2017 NIS database. Of 525,570 patients with ischemic stroke, 8670 (1.7%) had RA. Hospitalizations for ischemic stroke with RA had less inpatient mortality (4.7% vs. 5.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.85; p = 0.001), shorter LOS (5.1 vs 5.7 days, p < 0.0001), lower mean total hospital charges ($61,626 vs. $70,345, p < 0.0001), and less odds of undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (3.9% vs. 5.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.72; p < 0.0001) compared with those without RA. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalizations for ischemic stroke with RA had less inpatient mortality, shorter LOS, lower total hospital charges, and less likelihood of undergoing mechanical thrombectomy compared with those without RA. However, the odds of receiving tissue plasminogen activator were similar between both groups. Further studies to understand its mechanism would be helpful.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Isquemia Encefálica , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Adulto , Artritis Reumatoide/complicaciones , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Hospitalización , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/terapia , Activador de Tejido PlasminógenoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the outcomes of patients primarily admitted for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with and without systemic sclerosis (SSc). The primary outcome was odds of inpatient mortality. Hospital length of stay, total hospital charges, rates of cardiovascular procedures, and treatments were secondary outcomes of interest. METHODS: Data were abstracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016 and 2017 Database. The NIS was searched for hospitalizations for adult patients with ACS (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI], non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI], and unstable angina) as principal diagnosis with and without SSc as secondary diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analysis was used accordingly to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: There were more than 71 million discharges included in the combined 2016 and 2017 NIS database. There were 1,319,464 hospitalizations for adult patients with a principal International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code for ACS. There were 1155 (0.09%) of these hospitalizations that had SSc. The adjusted odds ratios for inpatient mortality for ACS, STEMI, and NSTEMI hospitalizations with coexisting SSc compared with those without SSc were 2.02 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-3.43; p = 0.009), 2.47 (95% CI, 1.05-5.79; p = 0.038), and 2.19 (95% CI, 1.14-4.23; p = 0.019), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Acute coronary syndrome hospitalizations with SSc have increased inpatient mortality compared with those without SSc. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and NSTEMI hospitalizations with SSc have increased inpatient mortality compared with STEMI and NSTEMI hospitalizations without SSc, respectively. Acute coronary syndrome hospitalizations with SSc have similar hospital length of stay, total hospital charges, rates of revascularization strategies (percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass surgery, and thrombolytics), and other interventions (such as percutaneous external assist device and intra-aortic balloon pump) compared with those without SSc.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Adulto , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Esclerodermia Sistémica/diagnóstico , Esclerodermia Sistémica/epidemiología , Esclerodermia Sistémica/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to describe the rates and characteristics of nonelective 30-day readmission among adult patients hospitalized for acute gout and to assess predictors of readmission. METHODS: We analyzed the 2017 Nationwide Readmission Database. Gout hospitalizations were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification code. Hospitalizations for adult patients were included. We excluded planned or elective readmissions. We utilized χ2 tests to compare baseline characteristics between readmissions and index hospitalizations. We used multivariate Cox regression to identify independent predictors of readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 11,727 index adult hospitalizations with acute gout listed as the principal diagnosis were discharged alive and included. One thousand five hundred ninety-four (13.6%) readmissions occurred within 30 days. Acute gout was the most common reason for readmission. Readmissions had higher inpatient mortality (2.4% vs 0.1%, p < 0.0001), greater mean age (68.1 vs 67.0 years, p = 0.021), and longer hospital length of stay (5.9 vs 3.8 days, p < 0.0001) compared with index hospitalizations. Charlson Comorbidity Index scores of ≥2 (score 2: adjusted hazards ratio [AHR], 1.67; p = 0.001; score ≥3: AHR, 2.08; p < 0.0001), APR-DRG (All Patients Refined Diagnosis Related Groups) severity levels ≥2 (level 2: AHR, 1.43; p = 0.044; level 3: AHR, 1.83; p = 0.002; level 4: AHR, 2.38; p = 0.002), admission to metropolitan hospital (AHR, 1.83; p = 0.012), atrial fibrillation (AHR, 1.31; p = 0.004), and anemia (AHR, 1.30; p = 0.001) were significantly associated with 30-day readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Acute gout readmissions were associated with worse outcomes compared with index hospitalizations. Charlson Comorbidity Index scores ≥2, APR-DRG severity levels ≥2, admission to metropolitan hospital, atrial fibrillation, and anemia were significant predictors of readmission.
Asunto(s)
Gota , Readmisión del Paciente , Adulto , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Gota/diagnóstico , Gota/epidemiología , Gota/terapia , Hospitalización , Hospitales , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Bleomycin is a useful treatment option for recalcitrant verrucae. Several different methods of bleomycin delivery have been described, including intralesional injection, intralesional injection combined with laser, microneedling, multiple puncture and adhesive tape. We reviewed the literature to evaluate the various methods of bleomycin administration to treat warts, including the different doses, instruments and procedures used. Intralesional injection (cure rate ranged from 67.8% to 99.23%) and topical bleomycin with multipuncture or microneedling methods (63.6% to 100%) were found to be effective in the treatment of warts. Overall, pain is significantly less with microneedling and multipuncture techniques compared with intralesional injection. Bleomycin injection combined with pulsed dye laser, electroporation, or by other methods, such as, microneedle patches or adhesive tape do not seem to be more beneficial than bleomycin administered by intralesional injection, multipuncture or microneedling techniques.
Asunto(s)
Láseres de Colorantes , Verrugas , Administración Cutánea , Bleomicina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Inyecciones Intralesiones , Verrugas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients primarily admitted for atrial fibrillation (AFib) with and without a secondary diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (SSc). The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Hospital length of stay (LOS), total hospital charges, odds of undergoing ablation, and electrical cardioversion were secondary outcomes of interest. METHODS: Data were abstracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016 and 2017 Database. The NIS was searched for adult hospitalizations with AFib as principal diagnosis with and without SSc as secondary diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analysis was used accordingly to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: There were over 71 million discharges included in the combined 2016 and 2017 NIS database. Of 821,630 AFib hospitalizations, 750 (0.09%) had SSc. The adjusted odds ratio for inpatient mortality for AFib with coexisting SSc compared with without coexisting SSc was 3.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.27-8.52; p = 0.014). Atrial fibrillation with coexisting SSc hospitalizations had similar LOS (4.2 vs 3.4 days; p = 0.767), mean total hospital charges ($40,809 vs $39,158; p = 0.266), odds of undergoing ablation (2.7% vs 4.2%; p = 0.461), and electrical cardioversion (12.0% vs 17.5%; p = 0.316) compared with without coexisting SSc. CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted primarily for AFib with a secondary diagnosis of SSc have more than 3 times the odds of inpatient death compared with those without coexisting SSc. Hospital LOS, total hospital charges, likelihood of undergoing ablation, and electrical cardioversion were similar in both groups.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Adulto , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/diagnóstico , Esclerodermia Sistémica/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Using National Inpatient Database (NIS), comparison of clinical outcomes for patients primarily admitted for atrial fibrillation/flutter with and without a secondary diagnosis of amyloidosis was done. Inpatient mortality was the primary outcome and hospital length of stay (LOS), mean total hospital charges, odds of undergoing cardiac ablation, pharmacologic cardioversion, having a secondary discharge diagnosis of heart block, cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest were secondary outcomes. METHODS: NIS database of 2016, 2017 was used for only adult hospitalizations with atrial fibrillation/flutter as principal diagnosis with and without amyloidosis as secondary diagnosis using ICD-10 codes. Multivariate logistic with linear regression analysis was used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: 932,054 hospitalizations were for adult patients with a principal discharge diagnosis of atrial fibrillation/flutter. 830 (0.09%) of these hospitalizations had amyloidosis. Atrial fibrillation/flutter hospitalizations with co-existing amyloidosis have higher inpatient mortality (4.22% vs 0.88%, AOR: 3.92, 95% CI 1.81-8.51, p = 0.001) and likelihood of having a secondary discharge diagnosis of cardiac arrest (2.40% vs 0.51%, AOR: 4.80, 95% CI 1.89-12.20, p = 0.001) compared to those without amyloidosis. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalizations of atrial fibrillation/flutter with co-existing amyloidosis have higher inpatient mortality and odds of having a secondary discharge diagnosis of cardiac arrest compared to those without amyloidosis. However, LOS, total hospital charges, likelihood of undergoing cardiac ablation, pharmacologic cardioversion, having a secondary discharge diagnosis of heart block and cardiogenic shock were similar between both groups.
RESUMEN
Objective: COVID-19, a respiratory infection caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, can cause varying degrees of illness ranging from mild respiratory illness to severe respiratory failure. Systemic sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune disease, with an increased prevalence of infections as compared to the general population. In this study, we compare the clinical outcomes and resource utilization for COVID-19 hospitalizations in patients with and without systemic sclerosis. Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample database, 2020, to study the characteristics, morbidity, mortality, cost, and resource utilization among primary COVID-19 hospitalizations with and without systemic sclerosis. Results: There were 1,050,040 patients aged ⩾ 18 years with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Of these, 775 (0.07%) patients had a secondary diagnosis of systemic sclerosis. Although there was no statistically significant difference regarding individual outcomes; in-hospital mortality, vasopressor use, cardiac arrest, acute kidney injury, and disposition to facility were numerically higher in hospitalizations with systemic sclerosis. The composite endpoint of major adverse events was higher in the systemic sclerosis cohort (adjusted odds ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-2.17, p = 0.022). Conclusion: COVID-19 patients with systemic sclerosis had worse outcomes (i.e. higher composite endpoint of major adverse events) than those without systemic sclerosis. Further studies are needed to establish a better understanding of the relationship between COVID-19 and systemic sclerosis.
RESUMEN
Background: Coronavirus-19, primarily a respiratory virus, affects multiple organs and can lead to exacerbation of autoimmune or systemic conditions. Patients with autoimmune diseases, rheumatoid arthritis particularly, are susceptible to infection and complications from COVID-19. RA has become well-associated with COVID-19 infections, but large-scale studies evaluating outcomes among this vulnerable group are limited. Methods: For the retrospective analysis, we used the National Inpatient Sample database to compare COVID-19 patients with and without RA. A total of 1,050,040 adult hospitalizations were included in the study between January 1 to December 31, 2020: COVID-19 with RA (n = 21,545; 2.1%) and COVID-19 without RA (n = 1,028,495; 97.9%). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included mechanical ventilation requirement, vasopressor use, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, acute kidney injury, acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis, gastrostomy, tracheostomy, length of stay, health care utilization costs, and disposition. A secondary analysis evaluating in-hospital mortality and mechanical ventilation with respect to age was conducted. Results: COVID-19 patients with RA had significantly increased in-hospital mortality compared to COVID-19 patients without RA (12.9% vs 11.1%, adjusted OR [aOR]: 1.2 [95% CI 1.1-1.3], p < 0.001). This cohort also had significantly increased rates of mechanical ventilation, pressor use, and cardiogenic shock. Conclusions: Given limited large evidence regarding COVID-19 with respect to RA, future research should be focused on this topic to improve outcomes for this subset of patients.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Since the 1999 Institute of Medicine report, hospitals have implemented a myriad of measures to protect patients from medical errors. At this point, looking beyond errors may bring additional safety benefits. This study aims to analyze predictors of in-hospital death regardless of underlying diagnoses in an effort to identify additional targets for improvement. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of hospitalizations from the 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (OR) for variables associated with in-hospital death. Results: There were 121,026,484 adult hospital discharges in the database. Multivariable analysis showed the following variables were associated with higher in-hospital death: Age (OR, 1.04), Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR, 1.23), male (OR, 1.16), income Q1 (OR, 1.12), income Q2 (OR, 1.07), west region (OR, 1.07), non-elective admission (OR, 2.01), urban hospital location (OR, 1.17), and weekend admission (OR, 1.14). Percentage of deaths for weekend versus weekday admissions was 2.7% versus 2.1%. Fewer procedures (ICD-10-PCS) were done in first 24 hours of weekend admissions when compared to weekday admissions (34.8% vs 46.8%; p<0.001). Only 524,295 in-hospital deaths were expected for weekend admissions but 673,085 were observed. Conclusion: Weekend hospital admissions were associated with higher adjusted mortality and a lower rate of procedures when compared to weekday admissions. Further studies should be done to further clarify and confirm if additional staffing and procedural availability on weekends could improve hospital outcomes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of national United States (U.S.) data on emergency department (ED) utilization among patients with psychiatric disorders (PD). This study aims to determine the most common reasons for ED visits among patients with PD, and baseline characteristics of patients who present to the ED due to PD. METHODS: We obtained data from the Nationwide Emergency department Sample (NEDS), the largest all-payer ED database in U.S. Each ED visit in NEDS 2018, can have only 1 "principal" diagnosis, which is the main reason for the visit and up to 34 "secondary" diagnoses. We abstracted data for all ED visits with "any" diagnosis of a PD, using the ICD-10 code "F". We highlighted the 10 most common "principal" diagnoses based on organ-system involved, and most specific "principal" diagnoses for all ED visits by patients with "any" diagnosis of PD. We then highlighted baseline characteristics of ED visits with a "principal" diagnosis of PD. RESULTS: A total of 38.4 million ED visits for patients with PD, among these, 5,911,984 had PD as the principal diagnosis. Patients who presented principally due to PD were more likely to come from lower income household. Mental disorders and injuries and poisoning were the most common principal diagnosis by organ system categories for patients with PD. LIMITATIONS: Possibility of coding errors and absence of date on race. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety disorder, alcohol intoxication and major depressive disorder (MDD) were the most common specific psychiatric "principal" diagnosis for ED presentation among patients with PD.
Asunto(s)
Intoxicación Alcohólica , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Background There is scarcity of national level data on the reasons for Emergency Department (ED) presentation among patients with Giant cell arteritis (GCA) in the United States. This study aims to outline the most common reasons for ED presentation among these patients, and the baseline characteristics and outcomes of ED visits principally for GCA. Materials and methods We obtained data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) 2018 database. Each ED visit in the NEDS has a principal diagnosis (the main reason for the visit) and can have up to 34 other secondary diagnoses. We searched for ED visits for patients aged ≥50 with any diagnosis of GCA using ICD-10 codes. The most common principal discharge diagnoses were divided into organ systems, and specific principal discharge diagnoses were recorded for ED visits among patients with GCA in descending order of frequency. We then outlined baseline characteristics and outcomes of ED visits with a principal diagnosis of GCA. Results There were 20,886 ED visits for patients with GCA in 2018. Infections, as well as rheumatologic and cardiovascular disease were the most common reasons for ED presentation, and GCA was the most common specific principal discharge diagnosis for ED visits. There were 3888 ED visits with a principal diagnosis of GCA. These patients were predominantly elderly females, admitted, Medicare insured, with minimal comorbidity burden, and presented to metropolitan teaching hospitals in the south. Conclusion GCA patients are most likely to present to the ED due to their underlying GCA. Infections and CV are also common reasons for presentation to the ED.
RESUMEN
Background Long-term longitudinal studies on giant cell arteritis (GCA) hospitalizations are limited. Here we aim to fill gaps in knowledge by analyzing longitudinal trends of GCA hospitalizations over the last two decades in the United States (U.S.). Materials and methods We performed a 21-year longitudinal trend analysis of GCA hospitalizations using data obtained from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database between 1998 and 2018. Using the NIS database, we searched for hospitalizations for patients aged ≥ 50 years with a principal diagnosis of GCA using ICD billing codes. The principal diagnosis was the main reason for hospitalization. We used all hospitalizations in patients without GCA aged ≥50 years as the control population. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analysis was utilized to calculate the adjusted p-trend for outcomes of interest. Results The incidence of GCA hospitalization remained stable at about one per 100,000 U.S. persons throughout the study period. There was no statistically significant change in the inpatient mortality for the GCA group during the study period (adjusted p-trend=0.111). In comparison, inpatient mortality reduced from 4.4% to 3.1% from 1998 to 2018 (adjusted p-trend <0.0001) in the control group. The proportion of whites reduced, while the proportion of racial minorities increased over time in both the GCA and control groups. Conclusion The non-GCA control population saw significant reductions in mortality over time, but unfortunately, the GCA group did not see such improvements. More research into additional treatment modalities for inpatient GCA management may help improve mortality.