Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is better than single-bundle reconstruction in terms of objective assessment but not in terms of subjective score.

PURPOSE: A comparison of clinical outcomes between double-bundle (DB) and single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction for patients with ACL injury. METHODS: Sixty patients were treated with either SB (n = 30) or DB (n = 30) ACL reconstruction between 2011 and 2012. The hamstring tendons were autografted with suspensory fixation on the femoral side, while a bio-absorbable interference screw was used for fixation on the tibial side. These patients were evaluated using Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) forms (both objective and subjective), Lachman test, pivot shift test, and KT 1000 arthrometer. RESULTS: After a median follow-up duration of 35.5 months (ranging between 30 and 42 months), the frequency of patients who had high objective IKDC scores was significantly higher in the DB group than those in the SB group. In terms of DB, the Lachman test was normal in 26 patients (86.7%), nearly normal in three patients (10%), and abnormal in one patient (3.3%); comparatively, in terms of SB, the Lachman test was normal in 20 patients (66.7%), nearly normal in eight patients (26.7%) and abnormal in two patients (6.6%). The pivot shift test was negative in 29 patients (96.7%) and 21 patients (70%) for DB and SB, respectively. The average KT-1000 side-to-side difference was 1.0 mm for DB and 1.5 mm for SB. The subjective IKDC and Lysholm score showed non-significant differences between both techniques. CONCLUSION: Double-bundle ACL reconstruction was found to have a significant advantage in anterior and rotational stability as well as objective IKDC than that of SB reconstruction. However, subjective measurements showed no statistical differences between the techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Comparison of latissimus dorsi tendon transfer with subscapularis release versus sliding of internal rotation contracture in obstetrical brachial plexus paralysis sequela.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the functional results of latissimus dorsi (LD) tendon transfer with those of subscapularis (SS) muscle release versus sliding. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with internal rotation contracture and external rotation (ER) weakness as sequelae of Erb's palsy were included in the study. Of the patients, 24 were included in group 1 (11 boys and 13 girls), with a mean age of 2 years 8 months (range 1.5-5 years) and a follow-up period of 62 months (range 38-68 months). The patients in group 1 underwent LD tendon transfer, with internal rotation contracture and SS release procedures. Thirty-two patients were included in group 2 (18 boys and 14 girls), with a mean age of 2 years 6 months (range 1.5-4.8 years) and a follow-up period of 58 months (range 38-68 months). The patients in group 2 underwent LD tendon transfer with SS sliding. RESULTS: A significant improvement in preoperative passive ER from - 3.6° to 67.3° after operation was observed in group 1. In group 2, preoperative passive ER in adduction improved from 0° to 72.3°. We found no significant difference (P = 0.1) in postoperative improvement in active ER in both groups (group 1 vs. group 2: 75° vs. 77.3°). Similarly, no significant difference (P = 0.7) in postoperative improvement in passive ER was found between the groups (group 1 vs. group 2: 71° vs. 72.3°). CONCLUSIONS: LD tendon transfer with SS release or sliding is an effective procedure to improve shoulder ER in patients with OBPP, with no inferiority of SS muscle release or sliding for internal rotation contractures and increased passive range of shoulder motion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.

Modified Stoppa as an alternative surgical approach for fixation of anterior fracture acetabulum: a randomized control clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Fracture acetabulum is a challenging, difficult to treat orthopedic injury due to its location and associated concomitant injuries. The modified Stoppa approach for reduction of fracture acetabulum improves access to quadrilateral surface and posterior column and is considered to be advantageous in many facets of the surgery. METHODS: A randomized controlled clinical study was conducted to provide an update on our experience with modified Stoppa as a favorable surgical approach in acetabular fractures. In the period between 2015 and 2017; 18 patients with acetabular fractures operated by the classical ilioinguinal approach were retrospectively reviewed through their medical records as a controlled group and selected 20 patients with acetabular fractures were operated in the period between 2017 and 2019 using the modified Stoppa approach, as a clinical case group. The two groups were compared regarding operative data and postoperative clinical data, complications, and follow up. Cases were operated in Al Zahraa University Hospital and Nasr City Insurance Hospital by the same surgeon and one of the co-authors. RESULTS: (Group A) those operated by ilioinguinal approach and (Group B) those operated using Stoppa approach. The whole study included 25 males (66%); mean age was 41.8 ± 8.42 (range 18-65) years. The mean follow-up period was 18.5 months with 5 patients lost to follow-up. Both column fractures were observed in most of the patients (45%). We observed anatomical reduction, excellent clinical outcome scores in 75% of patients of group B (p = 0.030), and less complications. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that the modified Stoppa approach is the most convenient approach when surgery is required and achieved favorable results in the treatment of anterior acetabular fractures because it improves visualization in lateral compression injuries and allows treatment of both column fractures with single incision. Hence, it is recommended as an alternative to ilioinguinal approach in developing countries. Further, larger-scale comparative studies of the two surgical modalities for different acetabular fracture types and long-term complications are recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: A retrospective registration is proceeding through Clinicaltrials.gov. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic clinical study.

Posterior Interosseous Neurectomy Alternative for Treating Chronic Wrist Pain.

Background Wrist denervation is one of the several available options for treating chronic wrist pain; partial wrist denervation performed through a single dorsal incision by resecting the distal posterior interosseous nerve provides good outcomes. Questions/Purposes This study evaluated the results of posterior interosseous neurectomy (PIN) in patients with chronic wrist pain secondary to scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) and scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC). Methods In total, 30 wrists obtained from 28 patients (25 males, 3 females) were assessed. The dominant hands of 25 (right-handed) patients, nondominant hands of 5, and both hands of 2 were considered. The average age at the time of surgery was 35 (range: 19-50) years, and the average follow-up duration was 18 (range: 12-30) months. Fifteen and 13 patients had wrists with SNAC and SLAC, respectively, and all of those underwent PIN performed through the dorsal approach. The pre- and postoperative range of motion, grip strength, and pain relief percentage were recorded for all the 30 wrists. Results The average postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 30 (range: 20-80), and the difference between the pre- and postoperative scores was statistically significant. Ninety percent of the patients were satisfied with the results of PIN and reported improvement in grip strength and pain relief. Conclusions Thus, PIN may be an effective surgical technique for wrist reconstruction. Clinical Relevance To help patients challenge pain and maintain their wrist joint range of motion.