RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The value of administering intravenous alteplase before endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke has not been studied extensively, particularly in non-Asian populations. METHODS: We performed an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial in Europe involving patients with stroke who presented directly to a hospital that was capable of providing EVT and who were eligible for intravenous alteplase and EVT. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive EVT alone or intravenous alteplase followed by EVT (the standard of care). The primary end point was functional outcome on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 [no disability] to 6 [death]) at 90 days. We assessed the superiority of EVT alone over alteplase plus EVT, as well as noninferiority by a margin of 0.8 for the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the odds ratio of the two trial groups. Death from any cause and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage were the main safety end points. RESULTS: The analysis included 539 patients. The median score on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days was 3 (interquartile range, 2 to 5) with EVT alone and 2 (interquartile range, 2 to 5) with alteplase plus EVT. The adjusted common odds ratio was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 1.15; P = 0.28), which showed neither superiority nor noninferiority of EVT alone. Mortality was 20.5% with EVT alone and 15.8% with alteplase plus EVT (adjusted odds ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.84 to 2.30). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 5.9% and 5.3% of the patients in the respective groups (adjusted odds ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.60 to 2.81). CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized trial involving European patients, EVT alone was neither superior nor noninferior to intravenous alteplase followed by EVT with regard to disability outcome at 90 days after stroke. The incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was similar in the two groups. (Funded by the Collaboration for New Treatments of Acute Stroke consortium and others; MR CLEAN-NO IV ISRCTN number, ISRCTN80619088.).
Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombectomía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Combinada , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Aspirin and unfractionated heparin are often used during endovascular stroke treatment to improve reperfusion and outcomes. However, the effects and risks of anti-thrombotics for this indication are unknown. We therefore aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of intravenous aspirin, unfractionated heparin, both, or neither started during endovascular treatment in patients with ischaemic stroke. METHODS: We did an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial with a 2 × 3 factorial design in 15 centres in the Netherlands. We enrolled adult patients (ie, ≥18 years) with ischaemic stroke due to an intracranial large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation in whom endovascular treatment could be initiated within 6 h of symptom onset. Eligible patients had a score of 2 or more on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and a CT or MRI ruling out intracranial haemorrhage. Randomisation was done using a web-based procedure with permuted blocks and stratified by centre. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either periprocedural intravenous aspirin (300 mg bolus) or no aspirin, and randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive moderate-dose unfractionated heparin (5000 IU bolus followed by 1250 IU/h for 6 h), low-dose unfractionated heparin (5000 IU bolus followed by 500 IU/h for 6 h), or no unfractionated heparin. The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was the main safety outcome. Analyses were based on intention to treat, and treatment effects were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) or common ORs, with adjustment for baseline prognostic factors. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number, ISRCTN76741621. FINDINGS: Between Jan 22, 2018, and Jan 27, 2021, we randomly assigned 663 patients; of whom, 628 (95%) provided deferred consent or died before consent could be asked and were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. On Feb 4, 2021, after unblinding and analysis of the data, the trial steering committee permanently stopped patient recruitment and the trial was stopped for safety concerns. The risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was higher in patients allocated to receive aspirin than in those not receiving aspirin (43 [14%] of 310 vs 23 [7%] of 318; adjusted OR 1·95 [95% CI 1·13-3·35]) as well as in patients allocated to receive unfractionated heparin than in those not receiving unfractionated heparin (44 [13%] of 332 vs 22 [7%] of 296; 1·98 [1·14-3·46]). Both aspirin (adjusted common OR 0·91 [95% CI 0·69-1·21]) and unfractionated heparin (0·81 [0·61-1·08]) led to a non-significant shift towards worse modified Rankin Scale scores. INTERPRETATION: Periprocedural intravenous aspirin and unfractionated heparin during endovascular stroke treatment are both associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage without evidence for a beneficial effect on functional outcome. FUNDING: The Collaboration for New Treatments of Acute Stroke consortium, the Brain Foundation Netherlands, the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Stryker, Medtronic, Cerenovus, and the Dutch Heart Foundation.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Adulto , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Heparina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To report a randomized trial comparing the Legflow paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB) + Supera stenting to Supera stenting alone in patients with intermediate to long superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions. METHODS: The multicenter RAPID trial ( controlled-trials.com ; identifier ISRCTN47846578) randomized (1:1) 160 patients (mean age 67 years; 102 men) with Rutherford category 2-6 ischemia to treatment with Legflow PEB + Supera stent or Supera stent alone in intermediate to long SFA lesions (mean lesion length 15.8±7.4 vs 15.8±7.6 cm, respectively). The efficacy outcome was primary patency, defined as freedom from restenosis on duplex ultrasound or angiography. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics including the percentage of occlusions were similar between groups. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the estimated primary patency at 1 year was 68.3% (95% CI 56.7% to 79.9%) in the PEB + Supera group vs 62.0% (95% CI 49.1% to 74.9%) in the Supera group (p=0.900). Per-protocol analysis showed a 12-month primary patency estimate of 74.7% (95% CI 63.1% to 86.3%) in the PEB + Supera group vs 62.0% (95% CI 49.1% to 74.9%) in the control group (p=0.273). Secondary patency estimates at 12 months (per-protocol analysis) were 89.0% (95% CI 80.6% to 97.4%) vs 98.0% (95% CI 94.1% to 100%; p=0.484); the estimates for freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) were 83.0% (95% CI 72.8% to 93.2%) and 77.8% (95% CI 66.6% to 89.0%; p=0.277), respectively. CONCLUSION: The short-term results from the multicenter RAPID randomized controlled trial indicate that the Legflow PEB is safe and feasible for the treatment of intermediate to long SFA lesions. In this trial, at least 70% of the patients suffered an occlusion. The PEB group had higher rates of primary patency and freedom from CD-TLR, although there were no statistically significant differences vs controls.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón/instrumentación , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Arteria Femoral , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Anciano , Aleaciones , Angiografía , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures are treated conservatively or in selected cases with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV). The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to determine predictive factors for a high visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score after conservative, sham or PV and is based on previously published randomized trials. METHODS: The VERTOS II compared conservative versus PV, and VERTOS IV compared sham versus PV treatment. The conservative group received pain medication. The sham and PV group received subcutaneous lidocaine/bupivacaine. In addition, the PV group received cementation, which was simulated in the sham group. Nineteen different predictors of high (≥ 5) versus low (< 5) VAS pain score at 12 months were investigated. RESULTS: 20.7% of patients in the PV group demonstrated a VAS ≥ 5 at the 12-month, compared to 40.1% in the conservative or sham group, with a significant difference (χ2(1) = 15.26, p < 0.0001, OR = 2.57, 95% CI = 1.59 to 4.15). In the subgroup analysis, we detected five predictors for the risk of high pain scores (VAS ≥ 5 after 12 months follow-up), namely: female, baseline VAS > 8, long-term baseline pain, mild/severe Genant and new fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant more patients had a high pain score at 12 months in the sham and conservative group when compared with the PV group. Five predictors were identified for sustained high local back pain, regardless of the received treatment. Patients with moderate fracture deformity were less likely to have high pain scores at 12 months if they received PV than if they had sham or conservative therapy.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas por Compresión , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Vertebroplastia , Dolor de Espalda/etiología , Femenino , Fracturas por Compresión/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas por Compresión/etiología , Fracturas por Compresión/terapia , Humanos , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vertebroplastia/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty is increasingly used for treatment of pain in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, but the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of the procedure remain uncertain. We aimed to clarify whether vertebroplasty has additional value compared with optimum pain treatment in patients with acute vertebral fractures. METHODS: Patients were recruited to this open-label prospective randomised trial from the radiology departments of six hospitals in the Netherlands and Belgium. Patients were aged 50 years or older, had vertebral compression fractures on spine radiograph (minimum 15% height loss; level of fracture at Th5 or lower; bone oedema on MRI), with back pain for 6 weeks or less, and a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 5 or more. Patients were randomly allocated to percutaneous vertebroplasty or conservative treatment by computer-generated randomisation codes with a block size of six. Masking was not possible for participants, physicians, and outcome assessors. The primary outcome was pain relief at 1 month and 1 year as measured by VAS score. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00232466. FINDINGS: Between Oct 1, 2005, and June 30, 2008, we identified 431 patients who were eligible for randomisation. 229 (53%) patients had spontaneous pain relief during assessment, and 202 patients with persistent pain were randomly allocated to treatment (101 vertebroplasty, 101 conservative treatment). Vertebroplasty resulted in greater pain relief than did conservative treatment; difference in mean VAS score between baseline and 1 month was -5·2 (95% CI -5·88 to -4·72) after vertebroplasty and -2·7 (-3·22 to -1·98) after conservative treatment, and between baseline and 1 year was -5·7 (-6·22 to -4·98) after vertebroplasty and -3·7 (-4·35 to -3·05) after conservative treatment. The difference between groups in reduction of mean VAS score from baseline was 2·6 (95% CI 1·74-3·37, p<0·0001) at 1 month and 2·0 (1·13-2·80, p<0·0001) at 1 year. No serious complications or adverse events were reported. INTERPRETATION: In a subgroup of patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and persistent pain, percutaneous vertebroplasty is effective and safe. Pain relief after vertebroplasty is immediate, is sustained for at least a year, and is significantly greater than that achieved with conservative treatment, at an acceptable cost. FUNDING: ZonMw; COOK Medical.
Asunto(s)
Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Fracturas por Compresión/terapia , Osteoporosis/complicaciones , Manejo del Dolor , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/terapia , Vertebroplastia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bélgica , Cementos para Huesos/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Fracturas por Compresión/economía , Fracturas por Compresión/etiología , Fracturas por Compresión/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Dolor/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/economía , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vertebroplastia/economíaRESUMEN
The urachus is a vestigial structure of the allantois and cloaca. It involutes as fetal development progresses to become a fibrous cord, which courses between the umbilicus and bladder dome within the retropubic space. Infection occasionally occurs in patients with congenital patent urachus. Here, we report a patient with infection of a previously closed urachal tract presenting as an abdominal mass. This has rarely been described in the literature. Current knowledge on imaging findings to the diagnosis is discussed.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) is an alternative option to treat pain after an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). Controversy exists as to whether PV increases the risk of new OVCFs or prevents further vertebral height loss in treated levels. We assessed both during 1-year follow-up in patients with acute OVCF randomised to PV or a sham procedure. METHODS: VERTOS IV is a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing PV with sham therapy in 180 patients. New OVCFs and further vertebral height loss were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 12 months (interquartile range (IQR) = 12-12) 31 new fractures were reported in 15 patients from the PV group and 28 new fractures in 19 patients from the sham group. The occurrence of new vertebral fractures did not significantly differ between the groups (χ2(1) = 0.83, p = 0.36, OR = .71, 95%CI = 0.33-1.50). There was no higher fracture risk of adjacent versus distant vertebrae. After sham procedure, further height loss of treated vertebrae occurred more frequently (7 patients (8%) in the PV group and 39 (45%) in the sham group (χ2(1) = 28.85, p < 0.001, OR = 9.84, 95%CI = 4.08-23.73)) and was more severe (p < .001) than after PV. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of further vertebral height loss is significantly lower after PV compared to a sham intervention, i.e. PV protects against progressive vertebral height loss. In addition, PV does not increase the risk of new adjacent and distant OVCFs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1a, therapeutic study. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01200277.
Asunto(s)
Estatura , Fracturas por Compresión/cirugía , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/cirugía , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Vertebroplastia/métodos , Anciano , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fracturas por Compresión/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Países Bajos , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/complicaciones , Dolor/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/complicaciones , Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vertebroplastia/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether percutaneous vertebroplasty results in more pain relief than a sham procedure in patients with acute osteoporotic compression fractures of the vertebral body. DESIGN: Randomised, double blind, sham controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Four community hospitals in the Netherlands, 2011-15. PARTICIPANTS: 180 participants requiring treatment for acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures were randomised to either vertebroplasty (n=91) or a sham procedure (n=89). INTERVENTIONS: Participants received local subcutaneous lidocaine (lignocaine) and bupivacaine at each pedicle. The vertebroplasty group also received cementation, which was simulated in the sham procedure group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measure was mean reduction in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at one day, one week, and one, three, six, and 12 months. Clinically significant pain relief was defined as a decrease of 1.5 points in VAS scores from baseline. Secondary outcome measures were the differences between groups for changes in the quality of life for osteoporosis and Roland-Morris disability questionnaire scores during 12 months' follow-up. RESULTS: The mean reduction in VAS score was statistically significant in the vertebroplasty and sham procedure groups at all follow-up points after the procedure compared with baseline. The mean difference in VAS scores between groups was 0.20 (95% confidence interval -0.53 to 0.94) at baseline, -0.43 (-1.17 to 0.31) at one day, -0.11 (-0.85 to 0.63) at one week, 0.41 (-0.33 to 1.15) at one month, 0.21 (-0.54 to 0.96) at three months, 0.39 (-0.37 to 1.15) at six months, and 0.45 (-0.37 to 1.24) at 12 months. These changes in VAS scores did not, however, differ statistically significantly between the groups during 12 months' follow-up. The results for secondary outcomes were not statistically significant. Use of analgesics (non-opioids, weak opioids, strong opioids) decreased statistically significantly in both groups at all time points, with no statistically significant differences between groups. Two adverse events occurred in the vertebroplasty group: one respiratory insufficiency and one vasovagal reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous vertebroplasty did not result in statistically significantly greater pain relief than a sham procedure during 12 months' follow-up among patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01200277.
Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda/cirugía , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Fracturas por Compresión/cirugía , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/cirugía , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Vertebroplastia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dolor de Espalda/fisiopatología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Fracturas por Compresión/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/fisiopatología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Dimensión del Dolor , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid endarterectomy has been shown to be beneficial in symptomatic patients with a severe stenosis (70% to 99%) of the internal carotid artery (ICA). Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the standard of reference in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis but has a relatively high complication rate. In a diagnostic study we investigated the accuracy of noninvasive testing compared with DSA. METHODS: In a prospective diagnostic study we performed duplex ultrasound (DUS), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and DSA on 350 consecutive symptomatic patients. Stenoses were measured with the observers blinded for clinical information and other test results. Separate and combined test results of DUS and MRA were compared with the reference standard DSA. Only the stenosis measurements of the arteries on the symptomatic side were included in the analyses. RESULTS: DUS analyzed with previously defined criteria resulted in a sensitivity of 87.5% (95% CI, 82.1% to 92.9%) and a specificity of 75.7% (95% CI, 69.3% to 82.2%) in identifying severe ICA stenosis (70% to 99%). Stenosis measurements on MRA yielded a sensitivity of 92.2% (95% CI, 86.2% to 96.2%) and a specificity of 75.7% (95% CI, 68.6% to 82.5%). When we combined MRA and DUS results, agreement between these 2 modalities (84% of patients) gave a sensitivity of 96.3% (95% CI, 90.8% to 99.0%) and a specificity of 80.2% (95% CI, 73.1% to 87.3%) for identifying severe stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: MRA showed a slightly better accuracy than DUS in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. To achieve the best accuracy, however, both tests should be performed subsequently.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía de Substracción Digital , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiografía de Substracción Digital/efectos adversos , Arteria Carótida Interna/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/clasificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The performance of a semiautomatic technique for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis quantification of the internal carotid artery in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The degree of stenosis of 52 ICAs was quantified by measuring the cross-sectional area along the center lumen line. This was performed both by 3 independent observers and the semiautomated method. The degree of stenosis was defined as the amount of cross-sectional lumen reduction. RESULTS: Agreement between the method and observers was good (weighted-kappa, kappaW = 0.89). Reproducibility of measurements of the semiautomated technique was better (kappaW = 0.97) than that of the observers (kappaW = 0.76), and the evaluated technique was considerably less time-consuming. CONCLUSIONS: Because the user interaction is limited, this technique can be used to replace an expert observer in 3-dimensional stenosis quantification of the ICA at CE-MRA in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Arteria Carótida Interna , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Anciano , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) may occur in 45% of patients at 2 years follow-up. Paclitaxel-coated balloons have been found to reduce neointimal hyperplasia, and thus reduce restenosis. Recently, the Legflow(®) paclitaxel-coated balloon (Cardionovum Sp.z.o.o., Warsaw, Poland) (LPEB) has been introduced. This balloon is covered with shellac, a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved natural resin, to obtain an equally distributed tissue concentration of paclitaxel. The RAPID trial is designed to assess restenosis after PTA using the Legflow balloon combined with nitinol stenting versus uncoated balloons with nitinol stenting in SFA lesions >5 cm. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 176 adult patients with Rutherford class 2 to class 6 symptoms due to intermediate (5-15 cm) or long (>15 cm) atherosclerotic lesions in the SFA will be randomly allocated for treatment with LPEB with nitinol stenting or uncoated balloon angioplasty with stenting. Stenting will be performed using the Supera(®) stent in both groups (IDEV Technologies Inc., Webster, TX). The primary endpoint is the absence of binary restenosis of the treated SFA segment. Secondary outcomes are target lesion revascularization (TLR), clinical and hemodynamic outcome, amputation rate, mortality rate, adverse events, and device-specific adverse events. Follow up consists of four visits in which ankle-brachial indices (ABI), toe pressure measurements, and duplex ultrasound (DUS) will be performed. Furthermore, a peripheral artery questionnaire (PAQ) will be completed by the patients at each follow-up. In the event that DUS reveals a symptomatic >50% restenosis, or a >75% asymptomatic restenosis, additional digital subtraction angiography will be performed with any necessary re-intervention. DISCUSSION: The RAPID trial is a multicenter randomized controlled patient blind trial that will provide evidence concerning whether the use of the Legflow paclitaxel/shellac coated balloons with nitinol stenting significantly reduces the frequency of restenosis in intermediate and long SFA lesions compared to standard PTA and stenting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN47846578.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón/instrumentación , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/terapia , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Arteria Femoral , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Proyectos de Investigación , Stents , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Aleaciones , Amputación Quirúrgica , Angiografía de Substracción Digital , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Angioplastia de Balón/mortalidad , Índice Tobillo Braquial , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/mortalidad , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/fisiopatología , Protocolos Clínicos , Constricción Patológica , Diseño de Equipo , Falla de Equipo , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Hiperplasia , Recuperación del Miembro , Neointima , Países Bajos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Diseño de Prótesis , Falla de Prótesis , Recurrencia , Resinas de Plantas , Método Simple Ciego , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Doppler DúplexRESUMEN
This report describes a rare vascular complication of surgical placement of a marking clip and a possible approach to problem solving. A 55-year-old patient presented with loss of sensation in the fingers and loss of peripheral pulsations in the right arm 4 days after right upper lobectomy for a pT2N1 moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of the lung. Duplex examination and computed tomography were performed the same day and showed a subtotal stenosis of the right subclavian artery, which was caused by the surgical placement of a metal clip to mark the surgical boundary. Selective angiography was subsequently performed. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) successfully dilated the stenosis and pushed the clip off. Flow in the right subclavian artery (RSA) was completely restored as were neurology and peripheral pulses. In conclusion, arterial stenosis by a surgical (marking) clip may be feasibly treated with PTA.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Neumonectomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Arteria Subclavia , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Angiografía , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Constricción Patológica/diagnóstico , Constricción Patológica/terapia , Dedos/irrigación sanguínea , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Imagenología Tridimensional , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Stents , Arteria Subclavia/patología , Tomografía Computarizada EspiralRESUMEN
AIM: Maximal cytoreduction to minimal residual tumor is the most important determinant of prognosis in patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Preoperative prediction of suboptimal cytoreduction, defined as residual tumor >1 cm, could guide treatment decisions and improve counseling. The objective of this study was to identify predictive computed tomographic (CT) scan and clinical parameters for suboptimal cytoreduction at primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage EOC and to generate a nomogram with the identified parameters, which would be easy to use in daily clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2005 and December 2008, all patients with primary surgery for suspected advanced stage EOC at six participating teaching hospitals in the South Western part of the Netherlands entered the study protocol. To investigate independent predictors of suboptimal cytoreduction, a Cox proportional hazard model with backward stepwise elimination was utilized. RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen patients with FIGO stage III/IV EOC entered the study protocol. Optimal cytoreduction was achieved in 52 (45%) patients. A suboptimal cytoreduction was predicted by preoperative blood platelet count (p=0.1990; odds ratio (OR)=1.002), diffuse peritoneal thickening (DPT) (p=0.0074; OR=3.021), and presence of ascites on at least two thirds of CT scan slices (p=0.0385; OR=2.294) with a for-optimism corrected c-statistic of 0.67. CONCLUSION: Suboptimal cytoreduction was predicted by preoperative platelet count, DPT and presence of ascites. The generated nomogram can, after external validation, be used to estimate surgical outcome and to identify those patients, who might benefit from alternative treatment approaches.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/cirugía , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/cirugía , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Neoplasia Residual/cirugía , Nomogramas , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/patología , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patología , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasia Residual/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Prospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Atherosclerosis of femoropopliteal arteries is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) has only limited success in treating these arteries, mainly because of the high rate of recurrent stenosis. Cryoplasty has been proposed as a technique which might improve treatment outcome. This study reports our single-center experience with cryoplasty. Thirty-two claudicants, 33 arteries, in whom conservative therapy failed, were consecutively included. Duplex ultrasound (US), angiography, and ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurement were performed before the procedure; ABI and duplex US, 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. Patients' symptoms were categorized according to the Rutherford classification. Lesions were classified as TASC A, B, or C according to angiographic appearance. Differences in ABI before and after the procedure were defined as significant at p < 0.05 by paired t-test. Patency was evaluated using duplex US by determining the peak systolic velocity ratio. Sixteen TASC A lesions, 13 TASC B lesions, and 4 TASC C lesions were included. ABI improved significantly for TASC A lesions 2 weeks and 3 months postprocedure. Patency after 2 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months was 93%, 67%, and 64% for TASC A lesions, 83%, 31%, and 31% for TASC B lesions, and 100%, 50%, and 33% for TASC C lesions, respectively. In conclusion, cryoplasty has good immediate success rates and patency rates similar to the results of conventional PTA in the literature.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón/métodos , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/terapia , Crioterapia/métodos , Arteria Femoral , Pierna/irrigación sanguínea , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/terapia , Arteria Poplítea , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiografía , Índice Tobillo Braquial , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularAsunto(s)
Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/patología , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Hiperesplenismo/terapia , Feocromocitoma/patología , Arteria Esplénica , Trombocitopenia/terapia , Angiografía de Substracción Digital , Resultado Fatal , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess accuracy of contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography as compared with three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography and reference digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enhanced and 3D TOF MR angiography and DSA were performed in 51 consecutive patients suspected of having carotid artery stenosis at duplex ultrasonography. Stenoses were measured by two independent observers blinded to clinical information and other test results. Pearson correlation coefficients were used, and kappa for interobserver variabilities was estimated. Sensitivity and specificity of enhanced and 3D TOF MR angiography were calculated and compared with those of DSA. RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.94 (P <.01) for enhanced angiography versus DSA, 0.92 (P <.01) for 3D TOF angiography versus DSA, and 0.93 (P <.01) for enhanced versus 3D TOF angiography for observer 1 and 0.94 (P <.01), 0.95 (P <.01), and 0.94 (P <.01), respectively, for observer 2. kappa statistics were 0.81 for enhanced angiography, 0.79 for 3D TOF angiography, and 0.78 for DSA. Stenosis measurements of observer 1 at enhanced MR angiography, with inclusion of carotid arteries on the symptomatic side only, compared with those of DSA yielded a sensitivity of 90% (95% CI: 68%, 99%) and a specificity of 77% (95% CI: 55%, 92%). 3D TOF angiography yielded a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI: 67%, 97%) and a specificity of 73% (95% CI: 50%, 89%) compared with those of DSA. For observer 2, sensitivity and specificity for enhanced angiography were 91% (95% CI: 70%, 99%) and 76% (95% CI: 52%, 91%), respectively, and 90% (95% CI: 68%, 99%) and 77% (95% CI: 51%, 92%), respectively, for 3D TOF angiography. CONCLUSION: Accuracy of enhanced MR angiography in diagnosis of severe stenosis is similar to that of 3D TOF MR angiography.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiografía de Substracción Digital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Three-dimensional time-of-flight (3D TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is generally considered to overestimate the degree of stenosis in the internal carotid artery (ICA) in comparison with the reference standard intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA). We evaluated whether the degree of stenosis was more accurately assessed with 3D TOF MRA if corresponding projections on MRA and DSA were compared instead of comparison of maximal stenosis at MRA with maximal stenosis at DSA. METHODS: From February 1997 to December 1999, we included 186 symptomatic and 17 asymptomatic consecutive patients suspected of having carotid artery stenosis on the basis of clinical presentation and screening with duplex ultrasound scan examination. All patients subsequently underwent DSA and MRA imaging. From each ICA, 12 maximum intensity projections with 3D TOF MRA and two or three projections with DSA were obtained. First, we compared the maximal stenosis at MRA with the maximal stenosis at DSA. Subsequently, we used the stenosis at MRA measured on the projection corresponding with the DSA projection that showed the maximal stenosis. For both strategies, the mean differences in stenosis and sensitivity and specificity for assessment of severe stenosis (70% to 99%) were calculated and compared. RESULTS: The MRA and DSA images of 354 ICAs could be compared. The sensitivity and specificity of MRA with the projection that showed the maximal stenosis were 92.6% (95% CI, 85.3% to 97.0%) and 82.7% (95% CI, 78.1% to 87.3%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity with the MRA projection, corresponding with the DSA projection showing the maximal stenosis, were 88.3% (95% CI, 81.8% to 94.8%) and 89.6% (95% CI, 85.9% to 93.3%), respectively. The mean difference between maximal stenosis at MRA and DSA was 7.5% (95% CI, 5.2% to 9.9%). The mean difference between stenosis at MRA and DSA in corresponding projections was 0.4% (95% CI, -2.0% to 2.7%). CONCLUSION: If corresponding MRA and intraarterial DSA projections are compared, 3D TOF MRA does not overestimate carotid stenosis.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía de Substracción Digital , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare flow-interrupted contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for hemodialysis access imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two accesses (14 arteriovenous grafts [AVGs], eight arteriovenous fistulas [AVFs]) in 18 consecutive patients were imaged with flow-interrupted contrast-enhanced MR angiography and subsequent conventional DSA. MR image quality was assessed as excellent, good, or nondiagnostic. Anastomotic diameters in AVGs and postanastomotic diameters in AVFs were measured in consideration of an adjacent normal segment. Reductions in the diameter of the lumen and interobserver differences were analyzed with method comparison as described by Bland and Altman and expressed as the mean difference with its 95% confidence limits (CLs) (mean +/- 2 SDs). RESULTS: Image quality obtained with flow-interrupted contrast-enhanced MR angiography was considered excellent in 73% (16 of 22) and good in 23% (5 of 22). Method comparison analysis between MR angiography and DSA indicated a mean difference of 3.2% (95% CLs: -26.7%, 33.1%) for observer 1 and 4.1% (95% CLs: -23.8%, 32.1%) for observer 2. Interobserver analysis at MR angiography indicated a mean difference of 3.2% (95% CLs: -28.8%, 35.2%), and that at DSA indicated a mean difference of 3.6% (95% CLs: -9.4%, 16.7%). CONCLUSION: Image quality and anatomic depiction with flow-interrupted contrast-enhanced MR angiography and with DSA were comparable.