RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The CUT score is a thyroid nodule malignancy risk assessment scoring system intended to guide surgeons in treating Bethesda 3 and 4 thyroid nodules. It is based on clinical (C) and ultrasonographic (U) features and a five-tiered (T) representing cytology. PURPOSE: Our study aimed to assess the utility of the CUT score in predicting thyroid malignancy in the North American population. The main reason for creating this score is to reduce unnecessary surgeries on these challenging thyroid nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective record review study applied the CUT score to 219 Bethesda 3 and 4 thyroid nodules. A total of 203 Bethesda 3 and 16 Bethesda 4 nodules from patients treated between January 2015 and December 2019 at a single institution were assessed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the CUT diagnostic test. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed. Iteration of analysis was performed after stratification according to body mass index to assess CUT score accuracy in obese and non-obese patients. RESULTS: Of 219 nodules analyzed, 148 were characterized as benign and 71 as malignant. Prevalence rates of malignancy were 29.6% (n = 60) and 68.8% (n = 11) in Bethesda 3 and 4 nodules, respectively. The mean CU (clinical, ultrasonography) score was 5.35 ± 1.38 in benign nodules versus 4.96 ± 1.5 in malignant nodules (p = 0.08). The area under the curve (AUC = 0.433) for the association of CUT scores with nodule malignancy was not significant (p = 0.13). The CUT score was insignificant as a diagnostic test for nodule malignancy in obese (AUC = 0.45; p = 0.72) and non-obese patients (AUC = 0.39; p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: The CUT score did not correlate with preoperative malignancy risk estimates in Bethesda 3 thyroid nodules and, therefore, may have limited utility as a predictor of malignancy in these thyroid nodules.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Nódulo Tiroideo , Biopsia con Aguja Fina , Humanos , América del Norte/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/diagnóstico por imagen , Nódulo Tiroideo/diagnóstico por imagen , Nódulo Tiroideo/patología , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the perioperative surgical outcomes for head and neck cancer patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed using data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database between 2010 and 2014. Logistic regression analysis by enter and backward stepwise methods were used. RESULTS: A total of 8346 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients with concomitant CVD had a higher frequency of complications (57.6%) compared with those without (47.4%) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.23-1.48, p < 0.001). Patients with CVD comorbidities were prone to experience in-patient mortality at both admission (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.42-4.05) and readmission (OR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.10-5.87). CVD patients have prolonged hospital admission (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.02-1.27, p = 0.020) and higher cost (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.15-1.43, p < 0.001). Patients with congestive heart failure were prone to 30 days readmission (OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.10-2.53, p = 0.019) and 90 days (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.14-2.39, p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: This is the first study identifying factors predicting higher risk of perioperative complications of surgical management of head and neck cancer. Those with CVD had higher risk of adverse events.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Atención a la Salud , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/complicaciones , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Humanos , Readmisión del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that cesarean birth in pregnant women with COVID-19 may decrease maternal adverse events and perinatal transmission. This systematic review aimed to evaluate variations in clinical presentation, laboratory findings, and maternal/neonatal outcomes in COVID-19 patients who delivered vaginally versus via cesarean. METHODS: A comprehensive search following PRISMA guidelines was performed for studies published up to May 23, 2020, using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, Science Direct, and clinicaltrials.gov. Original retrospective and prospective studies, case reports, or case series with sufficient data for estimating the association of COVID-19 with different pregnancy outcomes with no language restriction and published in peer-reviewed journals were included. Pooled mean and arcsine transformation proportions were applied. Next, a two-arm meta-analysis was performed comparing the perinatal outcomes between the study groups. RESULTS: Forty-two studies with a total of 602 pregnant women with COVID-19 were included. The mean age was 31.8 years. Subgroup analysis showed that Americans had the lowest gestational age (mean = 32.7, 95%CI = 27.0-38.4, P < 0.001) and the highest incidence of maternal ICU admission (95%CI = 0.45%-2.20, P < 0.001) of all nationalities in the study. There was no significant difference in perinatal complications, premature rupture of membrane, placenta previa/accreta, or gestational hypertension/pre-eclampsia between women who delivered vaginally versus by cesarean. Importantly, there were also no significant differences in maternal or neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Vaginal delivery was not associated with worse maternal or neonatal outcomes when compared with cesarean. The decision to pursue a cesarean birth should be based on standard indications, not COVID-19 status.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Nacimiento Prematuro , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Mujeres Embarazadas , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies have shown intra-arterial therapies to be effective in controlling neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELMs), but the evidence supporting the selection of specific methods is limited. This meta-analysis is the first to compare survival outcomes between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in the treatment of NELM. METHODS: A systematic search according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in PubMed and Embase databases was conducted in February 2020 for published studies comparing survival outcomes between TACE and TARE in the treatment of NELM. RESULTS: Six eligible cohort studies with a total of 643 patients were identified. The TACE and TARE groups were similar in terms of age, sex, hepatic tumor burden, tumor grade, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score. The patients treated with TACE had significantly better overall survival (odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-3.22, p = 0.014) than those treated with TARE. Overall survival ranged from 16.8 to 81.9 months with TACE and from 14.5 to 66.8 months with TARE. No significant differences in hepatic progression-free survival (OR, 1.01; 95% CI 0.75-1.35; p = 0.96) or tumor response were observed within the first 3 months (OR, 2.87; 95% CI 0.81-10.21; p = 0.10) or thereafter (OR, 0.98; 95% CI 0.12-7.86; p = 0.99). The complication rates were similar between the two groups, with 6.9% of the TACE patients versus 8.5% of TARE patients reporting major complications (OR, 1.16; 95% CI 0.54-2.48; p = 0.71) and respectively 44.6% and 58.8% of the TACE and TARE patients reporting minor adverse events (OR, 1.08; 95% CI 0.39-2.99; p = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar tumor responses, an overall survival benefit was associated with TACE treatment of NELM compared with TARE treatment. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm this finding and clarify whether certain subpopulations benefit from different transarterial methods.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Whether prone positioning of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 pneumonia has benefits over supine positioning is not clear. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine whether prone versus supine positioning during ventilation resulted in different outcomes for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, and Web of Science for prospective and retrospective studies up through April 2023. We included studies that compared outcomes of patients with COVID-19 after ventilation in prone and supine positions. The primary outcomes were three mortality measures: hospital, overall, and intensive care unit (ICU). Secondary outcomes were mechanical ventilation days, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and hospital length of stay. We conducted risk of bias analysis and used meta-analysis software to analyze results. Mean difference (MD) was used for continuous data, and odds ratio (OR) was used for dichotomous data, both with 95% CIs. Significant heterogeneity (I2) was considered if I2 was >50%. A statistically significant result was considered if the p-value was <0.05. Of 1787 articles identified, 93 were retrieved, and seven retrospective cohort studies encompassing 5216 patients with COVID-19 were analyzed. ICU mortality was significantly higher in the prone group (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.43-3.43; p=0.0004). No statistically significant difference was observed between prone and supine groups for hospital mortality (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.66-1.37; p=0.78) or overall mortality (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.72-1.64; p=0.71). Studies that analyzed primary outcomes had significant heterogeneity. Hospital length of stay was significantly higher in the prone than in the supine group (MD, 6.06; 95 % CI, 3.15-8.97; p<0.0001). ICU length of stay and days of mechanical ventilation did not differ between the two groups. In conclusion, mechanical ventilation with prone positioning for all patients with COVID-19 pneumonia may not provide a mortality benefit over supine positioning.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has been accepted as a routine adjunct among surgeons who perform thyroid and parathyroid surgeries. Thyroid and parathyroid surgeries use various patient positioning strategies that have poorly understood effects on IONM. The aim of this study was to compare IONM signals between the transaxillary and transcervical approaches. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 463 adult patients who underwent a total of 502 procedures. The procedures performed included total thyroidectomy, right or left hemithyroidectomy, and parathyroidectomy. Vagus nerve and recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) latency and amplitude measurements were analyzed intra-operatively. The distances between the vagus nerve and the trachea were measured via ultrasound during transaxillary procedures. RESULTS: Compared to the transcervical approach, the right vagus nerve latency was significantly decreased in the transaxillary approach. Transaxillary surgery was not associated with increased latency or decreased amplitude on IONM. The distance between the vagus nerve and trachea was significantly decreased post-positioning during transaxillary approaches. DISCUSSION: Despite differences in patient positioning, a transaxillary approach was not associated with increased stress on the vagus nerve or RLN, according to IONM data. The decreased right vagus nerve latency associated with a transaxillary approach highlights the importance of considering patient positioning and laterality while interpreting IONM data.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Nervio Laríngeo Recurrente , Glándula Tiroides , Adulto , Humanos , Glándula Tiroides/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos del Nervio Laríngeo Recurrente/etiología , Traumatismos del Nervio Laríngeo Recurrente/prevención & control , Tiroidectomía/métodos , Posicionamiento del PacienteRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of presumptive antibiotics, used in chest traumas requiring thoracostomies, in preventing infections such as empyema and pneumonia. METHODS: According to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases was conducted by two independent reviewers. Studies evaluating the role of antibiotics were included. RESULTS: Antibiotic administration was associated with a lower incidence of overall infectious complications (OR:0.6, 95%CI: 0.43 to 0.84, p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis revealing that the best protective effect against empyema (OR:0.35, 95%CI to 0.65, p = 0.001). When stratified by trauma type, antibiotic use was protective in penetrating injuries, against empyema (OR:0.14, 95%CI: 0.04 to 0.47, p = 0.001) and pneumonia (OR:0.24, 95%CI:, 0.12 to 0.53, p = 0.001) while there was no protective effect in blunt trauma against empyema (OR:0.25 95%CI: 0.03 to 1.73, p = 0.16) or pneumonia (OR:1.22, 95%CI: 0.38 3.90, p = 0.72). CONCLUSION: Presumptive antibiotic use in thoracostomies has a clear role in preventing infectious complications in trauma patients. This role is primarily attributed to their protective effect on penetrating trauma patients.
Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica , Tubos Torácicos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Traumatismos Torácicos/cirugía , Toracostomía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Tubos Torácicos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Toracostomía/efectos adversos , Toracostomía/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: Vibrio vulnificus is a rare but life-threatening infection that effects the population near warm coastal areas. This infection could be fulminant and rapidly progress to severe sepsis and necrotizing soft tissue infection. Early diagnosis and treatment are critical to saving patients' lives. With multiple studies reporting discrepancies in prognostic factors and different treatment protocols, we aimed through this meta-analysis to assess these factors and protocols and the impact on the outcome of the infection. Materials and Methods: In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases by two independent reviewers was reported. Studies evaluating prognostic factors and treatment outcomes of Vibrio vulnificus infections were included. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, version 3.0 was used. Results: Two hundred eleven studies were identified. Of those, eight studies met our inclusion criteria. The following factors on presentation were associated with higher mortality rates; concomitant liver disease (odds ratio [OR], 4.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.43-7.87; p < 0.001), renal disease (OR, 3.90; 95% CI, 1.37-11.12; p = 0.011), septic shock (OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.84-4.31; p < 0.001), higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (OR, 3.40; 95% CI, 2.26-5.12; p < 0.001), elevated band cells count (OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.13-6.0; p = 0.024), hypoalbuminemia (OR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.58-7.35; p = 0.002), and infection involving multiple limbs (OR, 4.36; 95% CI, 1.72-11.07; p = 0.002). Interestingly, different antibiotic regimens did not have any impact on outcomes, however, delayed surgical intervention after the first 12 or 24 hours was associated with higher mortality rates (OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.39-5.0; p = 0.003 and OR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.54-5.78; p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: The presence of liver or renal disease, higher APACHE II scores, septic shock, hypoalbuminemia, or elevated band cell on presentation should alert the physician to the higher risk of mortality. Different antibiotic regimens did not impact the outcomes in these patients and delayed surgical intervention is associated with worsening of mortality.
Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Vibrio vulnificus , Humanos , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There have been few reports of robotic-assisted transaxillary parathyroidectomy in the literature. We aim to report our experience with robotic-assisted transaxillary parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) in the Western population. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed from July 2010 through July 2019 at two institutions, one in the United States and one in France. Demographic characteristics and perioperative data were collected for all patients undergoing robotic-assisted transaxillary parathyroidectomy by a single surgeon at each institution. A linear regression model was developed to describe the learning curve for this procedure at each institution. RESULTS: One-hundred and two patients with PHPT were included with a median age of 55.6±12.4 years and median body mass index (BMI) of 25.5±6.1 kg/m2. The majority of patients were female (80.4%). Median total operative time was 116±53 minutes. Minor complications were reported in 2 patients (1.96%), and one case was converted to a trans-cervical approach (TCA) for four-gland exploration. Median patient follow-up time was 6.5±12.2 months, and disease recurrence was reported in one patient. Calculated learning curves showed that one surgeon achieved proficiency by the eighth case, and the other achieved proficiency by the fourteenth case. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest reported experience of robotic-assisted transaxillary parathyroidectomy for PHPT in the Asian and Western population. Analysis of the procedural learning curve demonstrates that proficiency in this technique was achieved after performance of less than 15 surgeries. This procedure is safe and feasible in the hands of experienced surgeons for select patients with localized disease.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We examined the effect of psychiatric comorbidities on perioperative surgical outcomes and the leading causes of readmissions in patients who underwent thyroid and parathyroid operations. METHOD: Patient information was retrieved from the Nationwide Readmission Database (2010-2017). Multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors for hospital readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 181,007 and 53,808 patients underwent thyroid and parathyroid operations, respectively. Of those, 8,468 (4.7%) and 6,112 (11.4%) patients were readmitted within 30 days. Psychiatric comorbidities were more frequent in readmitted cohorts after thyroidectomies (14.9% vs 10.4%; P < .001) and parathyroidectomies (16.8% vs 11.5%; P < .001), with anxiety being the most frequent cause (thyroid: 7.87%, parathyroid: 6.8%). Psychiatric comorbidities were associated with greater risk of in-hospital mortality (thyroid: odds ratio = 2.07, 95% confidence interval = 1.13-3.53; P = .015 and parathyroid: odds ratio = 1.67, 95% confidence interval = 1.04-2.70; P = .005), postoperative complications (thyroid: odds ratio = 1.528, 95% confidence interval = 1.473-1.585; P < .001 and parathyroid: odds ratio = 3.26, 95% confidence interval = 2.84-3.73; P < .001), prolonged duration of stay (thyroid: beta coefficient = 1.142, 95% confidence interval = 1.076-1.207; P < .001 and parathyroid: beta coefficient = 2.15, 95% confidence interval = 1.976-2.32; P < .001), and 30-day readmissions (thyroid: hazard ratio = 1.18, 95% confidence interval = 1.03-1.18; P = .047 and parathyroid: hazard ratio = 1.23, 95% confidence interval = 1.11-1.36; P < .001). Psychosis had the greatest risk of readmission (thyroid: hazard ratio = 1.51 and parathyroid: hazard ratio = 1.42), and dementia (odds ratio = 2.58) had the greatest risk of postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Concomitant psychiatric conditions after thyroid and parathyroid operations were associated with increased risk of postoperative complications, prolonged hospital stays, and greater rates of readmissions.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Paratiroides/cirugía , Paratiroidectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Enfermedades de la Tiroides/cirugía , Tiroidectomía/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades de las Paratiroides/epidemiología , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodo Perioperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades de la Tiroides/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Poblaciones Vulnerables/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Graves disease is well known to have multiple adverse effects on the cardiovascular system. We compared the cardiovascular outcomes after surgical intervention versus medical treatment in patients with Graves disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all Graves disease patients with a cardiovascular comorbidity who underwent either surgical or medical management (N = 151). Perioperative biochemical and cardiovascular outcomes from the surgical versus the medical groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 151 patients, 69 (45.6%) patients underwent total thyroidectomy and 82 (54.3%) patients received medical treatment. Hypertension resolved in 44.7% of the patients from the surgical group vs 18% in the medical group (P = .03). Tachyarrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation and tachycardia, improved in 85.9% of patients in the surgical group vs 66% in the medical group (P = .01). All cardiovascular manifestations examined, hypertension, tachyarrhythmias, and heart failure, improved in 69% of patients in the surgical group and 42.6% of patients in the medical group during the follow-up period (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment offers a significant and rapid clinical improvement of cardiovascular manifestations in Graves disease patients, such as hypertension, tachyarrhythmias, and heart failure. Surgery should be considered and recommended in Graves disease patients with known cardiovascular manifestations.
Asunto(s)
Antitiroideos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Graves/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Hipertensión/terapia , Taquicardia/terapia , Tiroidectomía , Adulto , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedad de Graves/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taquicardia/diagnóstico , Taquicardia/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Remote-access thyroid and parathyroid surgery has gained popularity recently due to its benefit of avoiding visible neck scars. Most of these techniques were described and performed in Asia, on patients with different body habitus compared to American patients. We aim to analyze the learning curve in performing these operations in North America.â¯. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of a 10-year experience by a single surgeon at a North American institute. Patients who underwent thyroid or parathyroid procedures by aâ¯transaxillary, retroauricular,â¯orâ¯transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) were included. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) was used to analyze learning curvesâ¯based on intraoperative blood loss and total operative times and learning phases were divided accordingly. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-two remote-access thyroid and parathyroid procedures were performed during the study period. Total operative time for transaxillary procedures was initially reduced after the 69th procedure and then again after the 134th case. For retroauricular procedures, marked reduction in the operative time was observed after 21 procedures. Most patients (57.02%) were discharged home on the same day during the mastering phase. In theâ¯transaxillaryâ¯procedures, only 1 case of brachial plexus injury occurred prior to the routine use of somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring. DISCUSSION: Remote-access thyroid and parathyroid surgeries can be performed safely with minimal complications in a select group of patients. Analysis of the learning curve in performing these operations aids in structuring a safe and effective learning period for endocrine surgeons seeking to venture into this modality of treatment.