A randomized-controlled trial of SOF/VEL/VOX with or without ribavirin for retreatment of chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The combination of sofosbuvir, velpatasvir and voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) is recommended for the retreatment of patients with HCV infection in whom previous direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment failed. However, whether ribavirin further increases the therapeutic efficacy of SOF/VEL/VOX retreatment remains unclear. We aimed to test this hypothesis in a randomized-controlled trial. METHODS: We randomly assigned 315 patients with DAA treatment failure from five Egyptian sites into two groups. Group A (n = 158) received SOF/VEL/VOX for 12 weeks, and group B (n = 157) received SOF/VEL/VOX + weight-based ribavirin for 12 weeks. Therapeutic efficacy was defined as SVR12 (sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment end). Safety and tolerability were evaluated by monitoring treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities. RESULTS: Males comprised 53.9% of group A and 57.1% of group B (p = 0.58); mean ages were 51.8 and 47.3 years in group A and B, respectively. Seventeen patients in each group were lost to follow-up. SVR12 rates were 87.3% (138/158) by intention-to-treat analysis and 97.8% (138/141) by per-protocol analysis in group A; and 87.9% (138/157) and 98.5% (138/140), respectively, in group B (p = n.s. for intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses). Both regimens were well-tolerated, with no deaths and only one serious AE (anemia) in group B, which required ribavirin discontinuation. Fifty-five patients in group A vs. 77 in group B experienced any AE (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: This randomized-controlled trial showed equal, high efficacy of both regimens for the retreatment of previous DAA failures, although ribavirin was associated with more AEs. Therefore SOF/VEL/VOX monotherapy should be the preferred retreatment strategy. CLINCIALTRIALS. GOV NUMBER: NCT04695769. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: HCV treatment guidelines recommend retreatment of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment failures with the combination of sofosbuvir, velpatasvir and voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) for 12 weeks. However, whether ribavirin exerts an additional/synergistic effect remains unclear. The present study confirmed that SOF/VEL/VOX without ribavirin is the best regimen for retreatment of DAA treatment failures, and thus will help guide clinicians caring for patients who are not cured with a first course of DAA therapy.

High success rates for the use of sofosbuvir/ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + ribavirin and sofosbuvir/simeprevir/daclatasvir + ribavirin in retreatment of chronic hepatitis C infection after unsuccessful sofosbuvir/daclatasvir therapy: a real-life experience.

The aim of this work was assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of two different regimens for retreatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients who failed to respond to SOF/DCV-based therapy. This prospective study included 104 HCV patients who failed to respond to SOF/DCV-based therapy. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed. The 12-week sustained virological response (SVR12) rates were 96% and 94.4% in groups B and A, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 1.000). Most adverse events reported were mild to moderate, with no deaths during the study. Multi-target direct-acting antiviral (DAA) combinations are efficient for retreatment of HCV patients after failure of SOF/DCV-based therapy in real-world management.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02992457.

Safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir and sofosbuvir/daclatasvir in the treatment of hepatitis C in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related decompensated cirrhosis is a severe life-threatening illness. The safety of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has opened a gate of hope for that subgroup of patients who were previously contraindicated for interferon therapy. OBJECTIVE: We aimed at the investigation of the safety and efficacy of different DAAs regimens in the treatment of HCV-related decompensated cirrhosis patients, to determine sustained virological response (SVR)12 rates and to analyze the factors associated with response. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center study including HCV-related decompensated cirrhosis patients who received DAAs. Demographic, laboratory and clinical data were analyzed. The SVR12 rate was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included the predictors of response, changes in the baseline model for end-stage liver disease and child-turcotte-pugh (CTP) scores, and fibroindices (APRI and fibrosis-4 index) at 12 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: In total, 145 eligible patients (141 with CTP class B and 4 with class C) were enrolled in this study. SVR12 was achieved by 88.06% (118/134) of efficacy population on different DAAs regimens, Treatment was discontinued in 11 patients because of severe side effects without any deaths. Younger age showed a significant positive association with SVR12. CONCLUSIONS: DAAs can be used for the treatment of HCV-related decompensated liver disease, with acceptable SVR12 rates and safety profiles.