Expression patterns of mismatch repair proteins in cervical cancer uncover independent prognostic value of MSH-2.

OBJECTIVE: Although early-detected cervical cancer is associated with good survival, the prognosis for late-stage disease is poor and treatment options are sparse. Mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D) has surfaced as a predictor of prognosis and response to immune checkpoint inhibitor(s) in several cancer types, but its value in cervical cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to define the prevalence of MMR-D in cervical cancer and assess the prognostic value of MMR protein expression. METHODS: Expression of the MMR proteins MLH-1, PMS-2, MSH-2, and MSH-6 was investigated by immunohistochemical staining in a prospectively collected cervical cancer cohort (n=508) with corresponding clinicopathological and follow-up data. Sections were scored as either loss or intact expression to define MMR-D, and by a staining index, based on staining intensity and area, evaluating the prognostic potential. RNA and whole exome sequencing data were available for 72 and 75 of the patients and were used for gene set enrichment and mutational analyses, respectively. RESULTS: Five (1%) tumors were MMR-deficient, three of which were of neuroendocrine histology. MMR status did not predict survival (HR 1.93, p=0.17). MSH-2 low (n=48) was associated with poor survival (HR 1.94, p=0.02), also when adjusting for tumor stage, tumor type, and patient age (HR 2.06, p=0.013). MSH-2 low tumors had higher tumor mutational burden (p=0.003) and higher frequency of (frameshift) mutations in the double-strand break repair gene RAD50 (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: MMR-D is rare in cervical cancer, yet low MSH-2 expression is an independent predictor of poor survival.

Mismatch repair markers in preoperative and operative endometrial cancer samples; expression concordance and prognostic value.

BACKGROUND: The endometrial cancer mismatch repair (MMR) deficient subgroup is defined by loss of MSH6, MSH2, PMS2 or MLH1. We compare MMR status in paired preoperative and operative samples and investigate the prognostic impact of differential MMR protein expression levels. METHODS: Tumour lesions from 1058 endometrial cancer patients were immunohistochemically stained for MSH6, MSH2, PMS2 and MLH1. MMR protein expression was evaluated as loss or intact to determine MMR status, or by staining index to evaluate the prognostic potential of differential expression. Gene expression data from a local (n = 235) and the TCGA (n = 524) endometrial cancer cohorts was used for validation. RESULTS: We identified a substantial agreement in MMR status between paired curettage and hysterectomy samples. Individual high expression of all four MMR markers associated with non-endometrioid subtype, and high MSH6 or MSH2 strongly associated with several aggressive disease characteristics including high tumour grade and FIGO stage, and for MSH6, with lymph node metastasis. In multivariate Cox analysis, MSH6 remained an independent prognostic marker, also within the endometrioid low-grade subgroup (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that in addition to determine MMR status, MMR protein expression levels, particularly MSH6, may add prognostic information in endometrial cancer.

A 10-gene prognostic signature points to LIMCH1 and HLA-DQB1 as important players in aggressive cervical cancer disease.

BACKGROUND: Advanced cervical cancer carries a particularly poor prognosis, and few treatment options exist. Identification of effective molecular markers is vital to improve the individualisation of treatment. We investigated transcriptional data from cervical carcinomas related to patient survival and recurrence to identify potential molecular drivers for aggressive disease. METHODS: Primary tumour RNA-sequencing profiles from 20 patients with recurrence and 53 patients with cured disease were compared. Protein levels and prognostic impact for selected markers were identified by immunohistochemistry in a population-based patient cohort. RESULTS: Comparison of tumours relative to recurrence status revealed 121 differentially expressed genes. From this gene set, a 10-gene signature with high prognostic significance (p = 0.001) was identified and validated in an independent patient cohort (p = 0.004). Protein levels of two signature genes, HLA-DQB1 (n = 389) and LIMCH1 (LIM and calponin homology domain 1) (n = 410), were independent predictors of survival (hazard ratio 2.50, p = 0.007 for HLA-DQB1 and 3.19, p = 0.007 for LIMCH1) when adjusting for established prognostic markers. HLA-DQB1 protein expression associated with programmed death ligand 1 positivity (p < 0.001). In gene set enrichment analyses, HLA-DQB1high tumours associated with immune activation and response to interferon-γ (IFN-γ). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a 10-gene signature with high prognostic power in cervical cancer. HLA-DQB1 and LIMCH1 are potential biomarkers guiding cervical cancer treatment.

Preoperative risk stratification in endometrial cancer (ENDORISK) by a Bayesian network model: A development and validation study.

BACKGROUND: Bayesian networks (BNs) are machine-learning-based computational models that visualize causal relationships and provide insight into the processes underlying disease progression, closely resembling clinical decision-making. Preoperative identification of patients at risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM) is challenging in endometrial cancer, and although several biomarkers are related to LNM, none of them are incorporated in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to develop and externally validate a preoperative BN to predict LNM and outcome in endometrial cancer patients. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Within the European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer (ENITEC), we performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study including 763 patients, median age 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 58-71), surgically treated for endometrial cancer between February 1995 and August 2013 at one of the 10 participating European hospitals. A BN was developed using score-based machine learning in addition to expert knowledge. Our main outcome measures were LNM and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS). Preoperative clinical, histopathological, and molecular biomarkers were included in the network. External validation was performed using 2 prospective study cohorts: the Molecular Markers in Treatment in Endometrial Cancer (MoMaTEC) study cohort, including 446 Norwegian patients, median age 64 years (IQR 59-74), treated between May 2001 and 2010; and the PIpelle Prospective ENDOmetrial carcinoma (PIPENDO) study cohort, including 384 Dutch patients, median age 66 years (IQR 60-73), treated between September 2011 and December 2013. A BN called ENDORISK (preoperative risk stratification in endometrial cancer) was developed including the following predictors: preoperative tumor grade; immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), p53, and L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM); cancer antigen 125 serum level; thrombocyte count; imaging results on lymphadenopathy; and cervical cytology. In the MoMaTEC cohort, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.88) for LNM and 0.82 (95% CI 0.77-0.87) for 5-year DSS. In the PIPENDO cohort, the AUC for 5-year DSS was 0.84 (95% CI 0.78-0.90). The network was well-calibrated. In the MoMaTEC cohort, 249 patients (55.8%) were classified with <5% risk of LNM, with a false-negative rate of 1.6%. A limitation of the study is the use of imputation to correct for missing predictor variables in the development cohort and the retrospective study design. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we illustrated how BNs can be used for individualizing clinical decision-making in oncology by incorporating easily accessible and multimodal biomarkers. The network shows the complex interactions underlying the carcinogenetic process of endometrial cancer by its graphical representation. A prospective feasibility study will be needed prior to implementation in the clinic.

High degree of heterogeneity of PD-L1 and PD-1 from primary to metastatic endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: PD-L1 and PD-1 are predictive markers for immunotherapy and increasingly relevant in endometrial cancer. The reported fraction of positive primary tumors has been inconsistent. We investigated the expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 in primary tumors, also stratified by MSI. As immunotherapy is foremost relevant for metastatic disease, PD-L1 and PD-1 expression was also assessed in corresponding metastatic lesions. METHODS: PD-L1 and PD-1 was investigated in a prospective, population based endometrial cancer cohort of 700 patients with corresponding metastatic lesions from 68 and 74 patients respectively. Fresh tissue was used for gene expression analysis. RESULTS: In primary tumors, PD-L1 and PD-1 are expressed in 59% and 63%, respectively, but with no impact on survival, nor when stratified for MSS and MSI. Expression patterns of PD-L1 and PD-1 are similar in MSI and MSS tumors. Available metastatic lesions show heterogeneous expression of PD-L1 and PD-1. In gene expression analysis several genes related to immunological activity, including CD274 (encoding for PD-L1), were upregulated in PD-1 positive tumors. CONCLUSION: PD-L1 and PD-1 are frequently expressed in endometrial cancer and expression patterns are similar across MSS and MSI tumors. Expression in corresponding metastatic lesions is discordant compared to primary tumors. These findings are in particular relevant for treatment decisions in advanced and recurrent disease.

Clinicopathologic and molecular markers in cervical carcinoma: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is a major health problem worldwide. Identification of effective clinicopathologic and molecular markers is vital to improve treatment stratification. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to validate a set of well-defined clinicopathologic features in a large population-based, prospectively collected cervical cancer cohort to support their use in the clinic. Further, we explored p53 and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 as potential prognostic markers in cervical cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Tissue was collected from 401 patients with cervical cancer. Clinical data that included follow-up evaluations were collected from patient journals. Histopathologic data were evaluated and revised by an expert pathologist. The prognostic impact of selected clinicopathologic variables was analyzed in the whole cohort. Tissue microarrays were prepared from 292 carcinomas, and p53 and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 protein levels were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Fresh frozen samples from overlapping cervical carcinomas previously were subjected to human papilloma virus typing (n=94), whole exome (n=100) and RNA (n=79) sequencing; the results were available for our analyses. RESULTS: Among the clinicopathologic variables, vascular space invasion, histologic type, and tumor size were verified as strong independent prognostic markers. High p53 protein levels were associated significantly with markers for aggressive phenotype and survival, also in multivariate survival analysis, but did not reflect TP53 mutational status. High human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 protein levels were identified in 21% of all tumors. ERBB2 amplification was associated with poor outcome (P=.003); human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 protein level was not. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support that the Féderation Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique s guidelines should include vascular space invasion and tumor size 2-4 cm and that careful selection of histologic type is essential for stratification of patient risk groups. High p53 levels independently predict poor survival yet do not reflect mutational status in cervical cancer. Amplified ERBB2 significantly links to poor survival, while HercepTest does not. With optimal stratification, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-based therapy may improve cervical cancer treatment.

Preoperative anemia, leukocytosis and thrombocytosis identify aggressive endometrial carcinomas.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to investigate preoperative hematological parameters for anemia, leukocytosis and thrombocytosis in relation to established prognostic factors and survival in endometrial cancer. METHODS: 557 patients treated for endometrial carcinoma were prospectively included in a study focusing on the relationship between preoperative hemoglobin, leukocyte and platelet counts, and a panel of clinicopathological characteristics and outcome. RESULTS: Preoperative anemia was present in 15.8%, leukocytosis in 11.2% and thrombocytosis in 12.1%. Among patients with localized disease (FIGO stage I/II), 18.1% had anemia and/or thrombocytosis at diagnosis. Patients with advanced disease (high FIGO stage and lymph-node metastasis) had significantly lower hemoglobin count, higher leukocyte count and higher platelet count (all p<0.008). Patients with anemia, leukocytosis and thrombocytosis had significantly shorter 5-year disease-specific survival of 61.3%, 66.0% and 61.0% respectively, compared to 87.7%, 86.3% and 87.3% for patients with normal counts (all p<0.001). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, lower hemoglobin counts and higher platelet counts were independently associated with poor outcome adjusted for the standardly applied prognostic markers (p<0.033). CONCLUSION: Preoperative anemia, leukocytosis or thrombocytosis in women with endometrial carcinoma is associated with advanced disease and poor disease-specific survival.

Plasma growth differentiation factor-15 is an independent marker for aggressive disease in endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Better biomarkers are needed in order to identify patients with endometrial carcinoma at risk of recurrence and who may profit from a more aggressive treatment regimen. Our objective was to explore the applicability of plasma growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) as a marker for recurrent disease, as well as a marker for poor prognosis and lymph node metastases. METHODS: EDTA-blood samples were obtained from 235 patients with endometrial cancer before primary surgery. For 36 of these patients, matching blood samples were collected at time of recurrence. Blood samples were also collected from 78 patients with endometrial hyperplasia. Plasma GDF-15 was measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Preoperative pelvic MRI scans for 141 patients were investigated in parallel for imaging variables. RESULTS: Preoperative plasma level of GDF-15 was significantly higher for patients who experienced recurrence (1780 ng/L; 95% CI; 518-9475 ng/L) than for patients who did not develop recurrent disease (1236 ng/L; 95% CI; 307-7030 ng/L) (p<0.001). Plasma levels of GDF-15 at recurrence (2818 ng/L, 95% CI 2088-3548 ng/L) were significantly higher than plasma levels of GDF-15 measured at time of primary diagnosis (1857 ng/L, 95% CI; 1317-2398 ng/L) (p = 0.001). High plasma level GDF-15 independently predicts recurrent disease (OR = 3.14; 95% CI 2.10-4.76) and lymph node metastases (OR = 2.64; 95% CI 1.52-4.61). Patients with high plasma level of GDF-15 had significantly larger tumor volume (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Elevated plasma level of GDF-15 is associated with aggressive disease and lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma. GDF-15 may be helpful in indicating recurrent disease.

Molecular profiling in fresh tissue with high tumor cell content promotes enrichment for aggressive adenocarcinomas in cervix.

Many emerging tools for comprehensive molecular profiling of malignant lesions demand fresh frozen tissue with a high tumor purity. Often, a tumor epithelial content of at least 80% is recommended. This approach may lead to a systematic bias, and therefore we explore if this introduces a selection of cases with a certain phenotype in cervical cancer. Clinicopathologic data for a population-based cohort of 328 patients have been studied. Fresh frozen tumor specimens were available for 151 of these patients and investigated for epithelial tumor cell portion in hematoxylin-stained frozen sections by light microscopy. The estimated tumor purity in the samples was compared with FIGO stage, histopathologic characteristics and survival. High tumor purity was significantly more often found in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) compared to adenocarcinoma (AC) (P=0.03). For the subgroup of AC (n=40), there was a significant association between high tumor purity in the fresh frozen samples and later occurrence of recurrent disease (P=0.04). In SCC, no significant associations between tumor purity and disease stage, grade or outcome were found. Apparently in line with this, grade was found to influence prognosis in AC, but not in SCC. Our findings suggest that selection of samples based on high tumor purity in fresh frozen tissue may introduce a selection bias toward aggressive disease for the subgroup of AC, but not for SCC of the cervix. Thus, the prevalence of potential molecular biomarkers identified in AC in particular should be validated in a population-based setting to further explore clinical relevance. Also, molecular biomarkers only prevalent in subgroups with low tumor purity may go undetected in sample collections enriched for high tumor purity.