RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Diastolic dysfunction is an increasingly common cardiac pathology linked to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Previous studies have implicated glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists as potential therapies for improving diastolic dysfunction. In this study, we investigate the physiologic and metabolic changes in a mouse model of angiotensin II (AngII)-mediated diastolic dysfunction with and without the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide (Lira). METHODS: Mice were divided into sham, AngII, or AngII+Lira therapy for 4 weeks. Mice were monitored for cardiac function, weight change, and blood pressure at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. After 4 weeks of treatment, tissue was collected for histology, protein analysis, targeted metabolomics, and protein synthesis assays. RESULTS: AngII treatment causes diastolic dysfunction when compared to sham mice. Lira partially prevents this dysfunction. The improvement in function in Lira mice is associated with dramatic changes in amino acid accumulation in the heart. Lira mice also have improved markers of protein translation by Western blot and increased protein synthesis by puromycin assay, suggesting that increased protein turnover protects against fibrotic remodeling and diastolic dysfunction seen in the AngII cohort. Lira mice also lost lean muscle mass compared to the AngII cohort, raising concerns about peripheral muscle scavenging as a source of the increased amino acids in the heart. CONCLUSIONS: Lira therapy protects against AngII-mediated diastolic dysfunction, at least in part by promoting amino acid uptake and protein turnover in the heart. Liraglutide therapy is associated with loss of mean muscle mass, and long-term studies are warranted to investigate sarcopenia and frailty with liraglutide therapy in the setting of diastolic disease.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective short-term treatment for schizophrenia and depression, amongst other disorders. Lidocaine is typically added to reduce pain from intravenous propofol injection. However, depending on the dose used in the ECT setting, it can shorten seizure duration. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lidocaine dose on seizure duration. METHODS: This retrospective, naturalistic cohort study included 169 patients treated with ECT. We examined 4714 ECT sessions with propofol or propofol plus lidocaine. Ictal quality was manually rated by visual inspection. The main outcome of this study was the relation of lidocaine with seizure duration after controlling for socio-demographic, ECT, and other anesthetic variables. RESULTS: There was a significant negative association between lidocaine usage and seizure duration. Multivariate analyses showed that seizure duration was shortened by an average of 3.21 s in sessions with lidocaine. Moreover, in this subgroup, there was a significant negative dose-dependent association between lidocaine dose and seizure length. Complementarily, a significant positive association between preictal BIS and seizure length was found in the subgroup of sessions where preictal was used. CONCLUSIONS: We provide additional evidence highlighting the importance of caution regarding lidocaine dosing due to the effect on seizure length in the ECT setting. It is advisable for clinicians to exercise caution when administering lidocaine regarding its dosing and seizure length in ECT settings. Future investigation is needed to assess causal relationships by studying certain vulnerable groups or employing other charge calculation techniques, such as the titration method.