RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of a venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the postcardiotomy shock setting (PC-ECMO) can be life-saving. Risk stratification for patients under PC-ECMO is currently challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the discriminatory ability of the different available risk scores for mortality in PC-ECMO patients. METHODS: Patients aged >18 years undergoing coronary artery bypass, valve surgery, or a combination of these procedures and implanted an ECMO for postcardiotomy shock between January 2017 and June 2022 in a single ELSO registered center were retrospectively included. The STS, Euroscore II, SAVE, modified SAVE, APACHE II, and VIS scores were compared for their discriminatory ability concerning weaning and 30-day survival. RESULTS: During the study period, 7342 patients underwent coronary bypass or valve surgery, of whom 109 patients with PC-ECMO were included in the analysis. The Euroscore II and STS scores were not associated significantly with 30-day mortality, whereas the SAVE, the modified SAVE, APACHE II, and VIS scores significantly predicted 30-day mortality. The SAVE and the modified SAVE scores showed moderate discrimination ability with AUCs of 0.672 and 0.695, while the APACHE and VIS scores had a satisfactory discriminatory ability with AUCs of 0.727 and 0.844, respectively. CONCLUSION: Currently used risk scores for PC-ECMO patients do not provide satisfactory predictions for weaning and survival. VIS at the 24th hour can be a valuable parameter for risk analysis and prospective studies can investigate novel PC-ECMO risk scoring systems.
Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Choque , Humanos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Choque CardiogénicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Inflammation is a component in the pathogenesis of critical limb ischemia. We aimed to assess how inflammation affects response to treatment in patients treated for critical limb ischemia using neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocytes ratios (PLR) as markers of inflammation. METHODS: Patients in a single tertiary cardiovascular center with critical limb ischemia unsuitable for surgical or interventional revascularization were retrospectively identified. Data were collected on medical history for risk factors, previous surgical or endovascular revascularization, and outcome. A standard regimen of low molecular weight heparin, aspirin, statins, iloprost infusions, and a standard pain medication protocol were applied to each patient per hospital protocol. Patients with improvement in ischemic pain and healed ulcers made up the responders group and cases with no worsening pain or ulcer size or progression to minor or major amputations made up the non-responders group. Responders and Non-responders were compared for risk factors including pretreatment NLR and PLR. RESULTS: 268 included patients who were not candidates for surgical or endovascular revascularization were identified. Responders had significantly lower pretreatment NLR (4.48 vs 8.47, p < 0.001) and PLR (162.19 vs 225.43, p = 0.001) values. After controlling for associated risk factors NLR ≥ 4.63 (p < 0.001) and PLR ≥ 151.24 (p = 0.016) were independently associated with no response to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocytes ratio are markers of inflammation that are reduced in patients improving with medical treatment suggesting a decreased state of inflammation before treatment in responding patients.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Iloprost/uso terapéutico , Isquemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfocitos , Neutrófilos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Humanos , Iloprost/efectos adversos , Isquemia/sangre , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Recuento de Linfocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/sangre , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Excessive bleeding following cardiac surgery is associated with worse outcomes. We aimed to analyze preoperative and operative factors associated with excessive bleeding in coronary artery bypass patients to better understand which patients are under increased risk. METHODS: The study was conducted as an observational study in a tertiary center for cardiac surgery by retrospective analysis of the hospital database. Patients were grouped according to chest tube output within the postoperative 24 h. Patients in the 4th percentile of chest tube output per kilogram were categorized as having excessive bleeding. Patients with excessive bleeding were compared with the other patients for preoperative and operative factors. Factors significant in univariate analysis were carried onto the multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Patients with excessive bleeding were more likely to be males (91.4% vs. 78.7%, p = .002), have lower body mass index (BMI) (27.4 vs. 29.2, p < .001), and low platelets (6.9% vs. 1.5%, p = .006). Cardiopulmonary bypass (101.8 vs. 110.9 min, p = .022) time was longer in the excessive bleeding group. Patients with excessive bleeding were more likely to have more than three vessels revascularized. Male sex, lower BMI, low platelets, and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time were independently associated with increased bleeding. CONCLUSION: Male sex, lower BMI, low platelet count, and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time are associated with extensive bleeding after elective coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). Patients with higher bleeding risk should be identified preoperatively to account for adverse outcomes after CABG.