Participation in a High-Risk Program Is Associated with a Diagnosis of Earlier-Stage Disease Among Women at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer Development.

BACKGROUND: High-risk programs provide recommendations for surveillance/risk reduction for women at elevated risk for breast cancer development. This study evaluated the impact of high-risk surveillance program participation on clinicopathologic breast cancer features at the time of diagnosis. METHODS: Women followed in the authors' high-risk program (high-risk cohort [HRC]) with a diagnosis of breast cancer from January 2015 to June 2021 were identified and compared with the general population of women undergoing breast cancer surgery at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK; general cohort [GC]) during the same period. Patient and tumor factors were collected. Clinicopathologic features were compared between the two cohorts and in a subset of women with a family history of known BRCA mutation. RESULTS: The study compared 255 women in the HRC with 9342 women in the GC. The HRC patients were slightly older and more likely to be white and have family history than the GC patients. The HRC patients also were more likely to present with DCIS (41 % vs 23 %; p < 0.001), to have smaller invasive tumors (pT1: 100 % vs 77 %; p < 0.001), and to be pN0 (95 % vs 81 %; p < 0.001). The HRC patients had more invasive triple-negative tumors (p = 0.01) and underwent less axillary surgery (p < 0.001), systemic therapy (p < 0.001), and radiotherapy (p = 0.002). Among those with a known BRCA mutation, significantly more women in the HRC underwent screening mammography (75 % vs 40 %; p < 0.001) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI: 82 % vs 9.9 %; p < 0.001) in the 12 months before diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Women followed in a high-risk screening program have disease diagnosed at an earlier stage and therefore require less-intensive breast cancer treatment than women presenting to a cancer center at the time of diagnosis. Identification of high-risk women and implementation of increased surveillance protocols are vital to improving outcomes.

Accuracy of the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Model Among Women with LCIS.

PURPOSE: The Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) model predicts risk of invasive breast cancer risk based on age, race, family history, breast density, and history of benign breast disease, including lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). However, validation studies for this model included few women with LCIS. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of the BCSC model among this cohort. METHODS: Women with LCIS diagnosed between 1983 and 2017 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The BCSC score was calculated; those with prior breast cancer, unknown breast density, age < 35 years or > 74 years, or with history of chemoprevention use were excluded. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate incidence rates. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to analyze the discriminative capacity of the model. RESULTS: 1302 women with LCIS were included. At a median follow-up of 7 years, 152 women (12%) developed invasive cancer (6 with bilateral disease). Cumulative incidences of invasive breast cancer were 7.1% (95% CI 5.6-8.7) and 13.3% (95% CI 10.9-15.6), respectively, and the median BCSC risk scores were 4.9 and 10.4, respectively, at 5 and 10 years. The median 10-year BCSC score was significantly lower than the 10-year Tyrer-Cuzick score (10.4 vs 20.8, p < 0.001). The ROC curve scores (AUC) for BCSC at 5 and 10 years were 0.59 (95% CI 0.52-0.66) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.52-0.64), respectively. CONCLUSION: The BCSC model has moderate accuracy in predicting invasive breast cancer risk among women with LCIS with fair discrimination for risk prediction between individuals.

How Often Do Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Results Affect Adjuvant Therapy Decisions Among Postmenopausal Women with Early-Stage HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer in the Post-RxPONDER Era?

BACKGROUND: The RxPONDER trial reported no benefit to chemotherapy among postmenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- tumors, one to three positive nodes, and low recurrence scores, questioning the role of axillary staging in this population. Here, we evaluate the impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) results on adjuvant therapy decisions in postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women with cT1-2N0, HR+/HER2- breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and SLNB from 2012 to 2018 were identified. Receipt of nodal irradiation, indication for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and chemotherapy, and partial breast irradiation (PBI) eligibility were reviewed with pre- and post-SLNB results. RESULTS: A total of 1786 women were identified: median age 62 years, 84% with pT1 tumors, and 16% with pT2-3 tumors. Of those, 85% (n = 1525) remained pN0, 14% (n = 244) were pN1, and 1% (n = 17) were pN2-3. A total of 20 (1%) patients had > 2 positive SLNs, necessitating ALND. Pre-SLNB, 1478 women were considered PBI eligible; post-SLNB, 227 (13%) converted to PBI ineligible. In total, 58 patients with positive nodes received nodal irradiation, representing 3% of the entire cohort and 22% of pN+ patients. Overall, 1401 patients had an Oncotype DX recurrence score available, including 1273 patients with pN0 stage and 128 with pN1, with 173 (14%) and 16 (13%), respectively, having a recurrence score > 25, warranting chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: While few cN0 postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- tumors had nodal pathology that warranted ALND, receipt of nodal irradiation, or indicated need for chemotherapy, in 13%, SLNB would have an impact on consideration for PBI. Among patients eligible for PBI, findings from SLNB may help refine selection among postmenopausal women with this tumor profile.

Safety and efficacy of an outpatient 12-step desensitization protocol for antineoplastic agents.

OBJECTIVE: Antineoplastic agents can cause hypersensitivity reactions that may preclude further treatment, possibly compromising patient outcome if the tumor remains sensitive to such agent. Although desensitization protocols can be used to re-introduce agents after the development of a hypersensitivity reaction, these protocols vary across institutions. Our study evaluated the safety and efficacy of our desensitization protocol. METHODS: All patients who underwent desensitization to platinum, taxane, liposomal doxorubicin, or trastuzumab between November 2016 and May 2021 after a prior hypersensitivity reaction to the specific agent were included in a retrospective review. The 12-step, outpatient desensitization protocol included pretreatment with a leukotriene receptor antagonist, antihistamines, and corticosteroids, as well as extended infusion times. Successful desensitization was defined as the completion of ≥3 cycles without discontinuation of the agent due to a hypersensitivity reaction. RESULTS: A total of 186 eligible patients were included. Median age was 59.5 years (range 26-87). 155 (83%) patients were treated with platinum. 55 (30%) patients were treated for colorectal cancer and 52 (28%) for ovarian cancer. 104 (56%) patients completed ≥3 cycles of therapy during desensitization. The median infusion time was 380 min (range 325-360 min). The median number of desensitization cycles was 3, with 694 cycles completed among all patients. A total of 79 (42%) patients had a breakthrough hypersensitivity reaction during desensitization, 4 of whom required epinephrine, and 84 (45%) patients discontinued the agent undergoing desensitization due to progression of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our outpatient 12-step, institutional desensitization protocol for antineoplastic therapy proved safe and efficacious, with 56% of patients successfully completing ≥3 cycles and not requiring an inpatient admission.

Ultrasound detection rates of the placenta accreta spectrum with prior myomectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the performance of ultrasound in detecting placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in patients with history of prior myomectomy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who were referred for sonographic evaluation of the placenta and delivered at a tertiary academic center from 2012 to 2019. Demographic, obstetric, sonographic findings, and pathology information were collected and analyzed using Chi-square, t-tests, and ANOVA analysis. RESULTS: 640 patients met inclusion criteria, including 46 (7.2%) with histologically confirmed PAS. Groups for comparison included those with C-section only (CS), CS-Myomectomy, and Myomectomy-only. Those with CS-Myomectomy were older (38.7 years vs. 35.7 years or 35.5 years, p = .003) and those with CS only were more likely to have an anterior placenta (63.4% vs. 54.5% or 41.8%, p = .005). The rate of PAS was highest in those with Myomectomy only (14.5% vs. 6.1% or 11.4%, p = 0.04). Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values were lowest in the CS-Myomectomy group, with detection rate and PPV of only 40%. Accuracy, defined as the rate of clinical outcome consistent with imaging, was significantly higher in those with CS only compared to the CS with myomectomy or myomectomy-only groups. Of the histologically confirmed PAS, 11 (23.9%) did not have a placenta previa, and the majority of these occurred in women with prior myomectomy. In the cohort with CS only, the proportion of cases with PAS without placenta previa was 5 of 33 (15.2%) compared to 6 of 13 (46.2%) of PAS in those with prior myomectomy, with or without CS (p = .05). CONCLUSION: In patients with prior uterine surgery referred for sonographic evaluation of the placenta, rates of histology-confirmed PAS were highest in those with prior myomectomy, though ultrasound accuracy was lower in these patients. As ultrasound findings of PAS may be clearer in the presence of placenta previa, the absence of previa in a higher proportion of PAS with prior myomectomy may be related to the observed lower sonographic accuracy in these patients.