[Factors associated with an unfavorable evolution in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and followed up in primary care in 2020]. / Factores asociados con una evolución desfavorable en pacientes diagnosticados de COVID-19 y seguidos en atención primaria en 2020.

AIM: To know the factors associated with an unfavorable evolution (UE) of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 with total or partial follow-up in primary care. DESIGN: A case series. SETTING: Urban health center. PARTICIPANTS: By systematic sampling, patients ≥18 years, diagnosed with COVID-19, with analytical confirmation, in 2020 and followed up by their family doctors, were selected. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Dependent variable: hospital admission or death due to COVID-19. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: age, sex, medical background, clinical data and treatments related to the disease. Statistical analysis, with SPSS 25.0: descriptive analysis, comparison of proportions (chi square) and medians (Mann-Whitney U). The analysis is completed with logistic regression. RESULTS: 610 patients were included in the study. The median age was 49 years (interquartile range: 35-61); 51.8% were women; 14.9% presented UE (95% CI: 12.0-17.8). The sociodemographic variables or the variables related to medical background that showed an independent association with UE were age (OR: 1.066; 95% CI: 1.038-1.095), sex (OR for men: 3.277; 95% CI: 1.304-8.235) and being a smoker or former smoker (OR: 2.565; 95% CI: 1.135-5.800). Regarding the clinical variables of the disease, an association was found for altered consciousness (OR: 62.829; 95% CI: 9.177-430.149), dyspnea (OR: 14.339; 95% CI: 6.046-34.009), expectoration (OR: 4.764; 95% CI: 1.858-12.213)) and asthenia (OR: 3.993; 95% CI: 1.705-9.351). CONCLUSIONS: 14.9% of the patients diagnosed with COVID-19 presented an UE. Older age, male sex and being a smoker or former smoker increased the probability of it. Altered consciousness, dyspnea, expectoration, and asthenia were the clinical data that best predicted UE.

Internet health information seeking by primary care patients.

INTRODUCTION: As patients seek health information more frequently on the internet, the impact on their health status and their relationship with doctors could be a matter of concern. The objective of this study is to know how frequently rural primary care patients seek health information on the internet and the factors associated with it. METHODS: This cross-sectional study surveyed 850 patients aged over 15 years who attended two rural health centers in Cuenca (Spain). Consecutive case sampling was done. The participants were invited to answer a survey with sociodemographic and clinical aspects, and questions about possible internet searches for health information. The statistical analysis included the description of the variables and a bivariate analysis, and was completed with a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients' median age was 54 years, interquartile range 39-67 years; 60.9% were female. Of those surveyed, 49.8% (95% confidence interval 46.3-53.2) stated that they used the internet to seek health information. Statistically significant differences were apparent for gender, age, level of education, disease and attendance (p<0.0001). A logistic regression analysis showed an independent relationship with health information seeking on the internet for the variables gender, age, level of education (p<0.0001) and having a chronic disease (p=0.004). CONCLUSION: Roughly half the primary care patients in the rural area sought health information on the internet. Females, young people, those with a higher level of education and a chronic disease background did so more frequently.

[Risk of pneumococcal disease in elderly patients with and without previous vaccination]. / Riesgo de enfermedad neumocócica en pacientes ancianos con y sin vacunación previa.

OBJECTIVES: To know the pneumococcal vaccination coverage in patients≥65 years old, as well as the risk of pneumococcal disease according to whether or not they received such vaccination. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study, followed by historical cohort. LOCATION: Urban area. PARTICIPANTS: By systematic sampling, 2,805 people≥65 years from the city of Albacete were selected. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Dependent variable: diagnosis of pneumococcal disease and date. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: age, sex, chronic pathologies, medication, pneumococcal vaccination and date. The computerized medical records were reviewed, from 1-1-2009 to October-December 2015. A descriptive analysis was carried out, the relative risk of the onset of pneumococcal disease according to vaccination has been calculated, and survival analysis has been carried out, with the statistical program SPSS 17.0. RESULTS: Median age 71 years; 57.2% were women; 46% received polysaccharide vaccine (95% CI 44.1-47.8). Only 10 people received conjugated vaccine. Twenty-two people were diagnosed with invasive pneumococcal disease and 153 non-invasive. The relative risk of pneumococcal disease in vaccinated versus unvaccinated, respectively for invasive and non-invasive, was 1.59 (95% CI 0.69-3.68) and 1.84 (95% CI 1.33-2.54). Cox regression showed a higher risk of non-invasive disease for COPD (1.95; 95% CI 1.32-2.89), smoking (1.87; 95% CI 1.28-2.73), corticoid-therapy (1.73; 95% CI 1.08-2.79), polysaccharide vaccination (141.41; 95% CI 5.92-3,378.49) and age (1.11; 95% CI 1.08-1.14), with interaction between these 2 (0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased risk of pneumococcal disease in patients≥65 years vaccinated with polysaccharide, although with a protective effect in vaccinated older.

Effectiveness of a combined strategy to improve therapeutic compliance and degree of control among patients with hypercholesterolaemia: a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In subjects with hypercholesterolaemia, cholesterol values remain above guideline levels. One of the limiting factors to the achievement of goals in such patients is therapeutic non-adherence. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of an intervention designed to improve control of hypercholesterolaemic patients, consisting of a combined strategy that would include the delivery of printed information, treatment-compliance check cards and the dispatch of text messages as complementary measures in support of the intervention at the general practitioner's practice. METHODS/DESIGN: A randomised, parallel-group clinical trial will be conducted at the family medicine outpatient facilities of eight health centres in three of Spain's Autonomous Regions (Comunidades Autónomas), covering a total of 358 subjects aged 18 years or over with diagnosis of hypercholesterolaemia. Patients in the intervention group will be supplied with printed material with information on the disease and its management, mobile-telephone text messages with guideline summaries, reminders of forthcoming appointments and/or arrangements for making new appointments in the event of non-attendance, and self-report cards to check compliance with recommendations. Both groups -intervention and control- will receive routine recommendations from their physicians in accordance with current European clinical practice guidelines for hypercholesterolaemia and cardiovascular risk management. As regards the measurements to be made, the main variable is the proportion of subjects who attain the low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels set as a target across a follow-up period of 24 months. The secondary variables are as follows: adherence to recommendations on lifestyle and adherence to drug treatment; variation in lipid profiles and cardiovascular risk levels; appearance of cardiovascular events; physical activity; food consumption; smoking habit; anthropometric measures; blood pressure; health problems; use of hypolipidaemic agents; socio-demographic data; beliefs and expectations about preventive recommendations; and degree of satisfaction with the combined strategy. DISCUSSION: Should this intervention prove effective, a recommendation could be issued on the application of this combined strategy to subjects with hypercholesterolaemia. It is a simple, relatively inexpensive intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02314663.

[Screening for bipolar disorder in primary care patients with psychological symptoms]. / Cribado para el trastorno bipolar en pacientes de atención primaria que presentan síntomas psicológicos.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proportion of positive results in the screening of bipolar disorder (BD) among primary care patients presenting with psychological symptoms, and to analyze their characteristics. DESIGN: Multicenter cross-sectional study. SETTINGS: Nineteen Primary Care clinics in different Spanish regions. PATIENTS: A total of 360 consecutive primary care patients aged 18 to 70, presenting with psychological symptoms. MEASUREMENTS: Screening for BP was performed by means of the Mood Disorders Questionnaire. Data on quality of life (EuroQol-5D) and functional impairment (Sheehan Disability Inventory) were obtained. Data on psychiatric comorbidity and data on the use of psychotropic medication were acquired by review of medical records. RESULTS: Of the patients screened, 11.9% were positive (95%CI: 8.8%-15.7%). Only two patients had a diagnosis of BP in their clinical records and, although more than half received treatment with antidepressants, only two received treatment with mood stabilizers. Positive screening is associated with work, social and family dysfunction, greater perceived stress and poor quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: BD screening in primary care patients with psychological problems leads to a striking proportion of positive results, indicating that there may be a significant prevalence of BP patients, most of them undiagnosed and untreated. Further research is needed to determine the role that Primary Care can or should assume in the screening, diagnosis and management of this disorder.

[Adherence to patients antidepressant treatment and the factors associated of non-compiance]. / Seguimiento de la adherencia al tratamiento antidepresivo en pacientes que inician su consumo.

OBJECTIVE: To know the adherence to treatment in patients who initiate antidepressant drugs and to analyze the determinant factors of non-compliance, so much clinical as sociodemographic. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal observational study. LOCATION: Primary Health Care and Mental Health Surgeries of three Castilla-La Mancha Areas. PARTICIPANTS: 185 adults patients who were started in antidepressant treatment were evaluated. MEASUREMENTS: Treatment adherence (test Haynes-Sackett, test Morisky-Green, count of tablets and MEMS), adverse effects, intensity of depressive symptoms, sociodemographic characteristics and other characteristics related to antidepressants or participants. RESULTS: After 6months of beginning antidepressing treatment, 46.9% (95%IC: 36.5-57.3) showed an inadequate fulfilment by pill count method and 28.6% (95%IC: 19.1-38.0) with Morisky-Green's questionnaire. To 15 days the lack of adherence was 48.5% (95%IC: 40.6-56.4) and of 33.5% (95%IC: 26.1-41.0). The 38.4% (95%IC: 31.1-45.7) demonstrated some side effect during the follow-up. Using proportional risk model of Cox the variables related to compliance were: younger age, level of instruction lower than secondary studies, free medicines for pensioner, no psychotherapeutic treatment, consume a fewer antidepressants drugs and a frequency ≤ 3 visits to the family doctor 3 months previous to the study. CONCLUSIONS: The non-compliance of antidepressant treatment in primary care is high from the first weeks after initiating it. The conditioning factors are related to sociodemographic characteristics and other patient characteristics as type of financing of pharmaceutical benefit and frequentness at primary care.

[Knowledge of gender-based violence in the population seen in primary care]. / Conocimientos sobre violencia de género de la población que consulta en Atención Primaria.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the knowledge and attitudes towards gender-based violence in the Primary Care patient population and their relationship with sociodemographic factors and personal experience. DESIGN: A descriptive, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Urban Health Centres. PARTICIPANTS: Patients ≥18 years-old who were seen in a Primary Care clinic. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A questionnaire was used that included questions associated with knowledge, attitudes and experience of gender-based violence in the domestic environment. Variables such as, age, sex, education level, marital state were recorded, as well as the detection of personal experiences of Gender-Based Violence using the short Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST). RESULTS: A total of 673 people, from 18-86 years, responded, of which 68% were women. Only 18.2% had sufficient knowledge on who is considered to exercise gender-based violence. Half of the participants believed that gender-based violence included physical and psychological injuries, inhibition of freedom and rape. In the logistic regression analysis an independent relationship was found with the knowledge of the correct response on what is gender-based violence by marital state, being less likely in married people as regards widowers (OR: 0.28; CI 95%: 0.11-0.72), to consider that gender-based violence involves physical injury (OR: 2.55; CI 95%: 1.28-5.08), but not psychological injury (OR: 0.52; CI 95%: 0.28-0.96), and not giving the correct response on what is domestic violence (OR:0.06; CI 95%: 0.03-0.12). CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide variation in the results as regards what patients believe gender-based violence is and what aspects it covers.

At what stage in the undergraduate curriculum is it best to train in family medicine? A study from two medical schools in Spain.

BACKGROUND: A course in family medicine (FM) could dispel the possibility of negative stereotyping about this speciality, and instil in students a greater interest. However, when is it preferable: at the beginning or at the end of undergraduate training? OBJECTIVES: To determine changes in knowledge and attitudes towards FM by medical students completing a course in primary care at the beginning or the end of the undergraduate training and whether those changes anticipate the choice of speciality. METHODS: Students from Albacete and Seville medical schools (primary care course in second and sixth years, respectively) were asked to respond to the 'valuation of attitudes towards and knowledge of family medicine questionnaire' (CAMF). Students from Albacete answered before and after the course, and in Seville second-year students answered at the end of the first trimester. All students were invited to respond again at the end of their undergraduate training. Afterwards, we investigated the score on the speciality exam (order for the election from highest to lowest score) and their choice of speciality. The outcome measures were the MIR exam score, the number in the ranking, the chosen speciality and the result of the CAMF. RESULTS: In Albacete 88 and 64 and in Seville 50 and 98 students responded in their second and sixth years, respectively. In Albacete, mean CAMF scores were 15.4, 22.7 before and after the course, and 21.8 at the end while in Seville, 13.9 in the second year, and 23.5 in the sixth year. Logistic regression analysis showed an association of the choice of FM only with the score on the speciality exam (OR: 0.667; 95%CI: 0.553-0.806). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between CAMF scores at the end of undergraduate training. Only the score on the speciality exam predicts FM choice: the higher the score, the lower the probability of choosing FM.

Efficacy of a Combined Strategy to Improve Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Control Among Patients With Hypercholesterolemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Several interventions can improve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control. Our main objective was to evaluate the efficacy of a combined intervention to improve LDL-C control in patients with hypercholesterolemia. The study also assessed the efficacy of the intervention in improving adherence (pharmacological, diet, and exercise). METHODS: A multicenter, parallel group, randomized clinical trial (primary care) was conducted in 358 adults diagnosed with hypercholesterolemia, whether receiving prior drug therapy or not. We compared 178 participants who received the combined intervention (written material, self-completed registration cards, and messages to mobile telephones) with 178 controls. The main outcome variable was the proportion of participants with adequate LDL-C control (target levels of the European guidelines on dyslipidemia and cardiovascular risk) at 24 months. RESULTS: At 24 months, the mean reduction in LDL-C was significantly higher in the intervention group (23.8mg/dL [95%CI, 17.5-30.1]) than in the control group (14.6mg/dL [95%CI, 8.9-20.4]; P=.034). The mean LDL-C decrease was 13.1%±28.6%. At 1 year, the proportion of participants with adequate control was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (43.7% vs 30.1%; P=.011; RR, 1.46). Adherence was significantly higher in the intervention group, both to drug therapy (77.2% vs 64.1%; P=.029) and exercise (64.9% vs 35.8; P<.001), but not to diet. CONCLUSIONS: The combined intervention significantly reduced LDL-C (by more than 13% at 2 years) and improved the degree of LDL-C control in patients with hypercholesterolemia at 1 year.

Factores asociados con una evolución desfavorable en pacientes diagnosticados de COVID-19 y seguidos en atención primaria en 2020 / Factors associated with an unfavorable evolution in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and followed up in primary care in 2020

Objetivo: Conocer los factores asociados con una evolución desfavorable (ED) de pacientes diagnosticados de COVID-19 con seguimiento total o parcial en atención primaria. Diseño: Serie de casos. Emplazamiento: Centro de salud urbano. Participantes: Pacientes de 18 o más años diagnosticados de COVID-19, con confirmación analítica, en 2020 y seguidos por sus médicos de familia, seleccionados por muestreo sistemático. Mediciones principales: Variable dependiente: ingreso en hospital o fallecimiento por COVID-19. Variables independientes: edad, sexo, antecedentes personales, y datos clínicos y de tratamiento relacionados con la enfermedad. Análisis estadístico, con SPSS 25.0: estadística descriptiva, comparación de proporciones (X2) y medianas (U de Mann-Whitney). Se completó el análisis con regresión logística. Resultados: Se incluyeron en el estudio 610 pacientes, cuya mediana de edad era de 49 años (rango intercuartiles: 35-61); 51,8% eran mujeres. Presentaron ED 14,9% (IC 95%: 12,0-17,8). Las variables sociodemográficas o relacionadas con antecedentes personales que mostraron una asociación independiente con una ED fueron edad (OR: 1,066; IC 95%:1,038-1,095), sexo (OR para hombre: 3,277; IC 95%: 1,304-8,235) y ser fumador o exfumador (OR: 2,565; IC 95%: 1,135-5,800). En cuanto a variables clínicas propias de la enfermedad, esa asociación se encontró para alteración de la conciencia (OR: 62,829; IC 95%: 9,177-430,149), disnea (OR: 14,339; IC 95%:6,046-34,009), expectoración (OR: 4,764; IC 95%: 1,858-12,213) y astenia (OR: 3,993; IC 95%: 1,705-9,351). Conclusiones: Presentaron una ED 14,9% de los pacientes diagnosticados de COVID-19. Una mayor edad, el sexo masculino y ser fumador o exfumador aumentaban la probabilidad de ED. Los datos clínicos que mejor predecían la ED fueron alteración de la conciencia, disnea, expectoración y astenia.(AU)

Aim: To know the factors associated with an unfavorable evolution (UE) of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 with total or partial follow-up in primary care. Design: A case series. Setting: Urban health center. Participants: By systematic sampling, patients ≥18 years, diagnosed with COVID-19, with analytical confirmation, in 2020 and followed up by their family doctors, were selected. Main measurements: Dependent variable: hospital admission or death due to COVID-19. Independent variables: age, sex, medical background, clinical data and treatments related to the disease. Statistical analysis, with SPSS 25.0: descriptive analysis, comparison of proportions (chi square) and medians (Mann–Whitney U). The analysis is completed with logistic regression. Results: 610 patients were included in the study. The median age was 49 years (interquartile range: 35–61); 51.8% were women; 14.9% presented UE (95% CI: 12.0–17.8). The sociodemographic variables or the variables related to medical background that showed an independent association with UE were age (OR: 1.066; 95% CI: 1.038–1.095), sex (OR for men: 3.277; 95% CI: 1.304–8.235) and being a smoker or former smoker (OR: 2.565; 95% CI: 1.135–5.800). Regarding the clinical variables of the disease, an association was found for altered consciousness (OR: 62.829; 95% CI: 9.177–430.149), dyspnea (OR: 14.339; 95% CI: 6.046–34.009), expectoration (OR: 4.764; 95% CI: 1.858-12.213)) and asthenia (OR: 3.993; 95% CI: 1.705–9.351). Conclusions: 14.9% of the patients diagnosed with COVID-19 presented an UE. Older age, male sex and being a smoker or former smoker increased the probability of it. Altered consciousness, dyspnea, expectoration, and asthenia were the clinical data that best predicted UE.(AU)

Frequency and characteristics of Internet use by Spanish teenagers. A cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Internet has completely changed communication among people in today's world, especially among young users. The objective of this study is to establish the frequency of Internet use by teenagers, and most used apps. POPULATION AND METHODS: This was a crosssectional study. In November 2013, students attending two mandatory secondary schools in Albacete were invited to complete a self-administered questionnaire with close-ended and open questions. Questionnaires were completed in the classroom, either "online" or "with pen and paper". Answers were entered in a computer database using the SPSS 17.0 software. Statistical analysis included a comparison of proportions (χ² test) and mean/median values (Student's t test/non-parametric tests). RESULTS: Nine hundred and sixty-seven students participated; their mean age was 13.8 years old (range: 11-20); 53.5% were girls. Most students (70.9%) lived in the city. Most belonged to a middle (51.3%) and high (34.8%) socioeconomic status. Also most students went online on a daily basis (73.4%); only 0.9% indicated that they never did. The most frequently used apps included WhatsApp (77.1%), social networks (70.1%) and music apps (66.6%). Among girls, the most common Internet use was social networks (p= 0.004), WhatsApp (p < 0.0001), Instagram (p < 0.0001) and listening to music (p= 0.004). Boys most commonly used the Internet to browse the web (p < 0.0001), Skype (p=0.001), play (p < 0.0001) andwatchmovies or TV shows (p= 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Internet takes up a large part of the time in adolescents' lives, especially as a means of communications, being WhatsApp and social networks the most commonly used apps.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Internet ha transformado la comunicación entre las personas en el mundo actual, especialmente en el caso de los más jóvenes. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar la frecuencia de uso de Internet por adolescentes, así como las aplicaciones utilizadas. POBLACIÓN Y MÉTODOS: Se trata de un estudio transversal. En noviembre de 2013, los estudiantes de la escuela secundaria obligatoria de dos institutos de Albacete fueron invitados a responder un cuestionario autoadministrable, con preguntas de respuesta abierta y cerrada. Contestaron en las aulas, "on line" o con "lápiz y papel". Las respuestas fueron introducidas en una base de datos informatizada, con el programa SPSS 17.0. El análisis estadístico ha incluido comparación de proporciones (chi cuadrado) y de medias/medianas (t de Student/pruebas no paramétricas). RESULTADOS: Participaron 967 estudiantes, con media de edad de 13,8 años (rango: 11-20); 53,5% de mujeres. La mayoría (70,9%) vivían en la ciudad. La clase social era mayoritariamente media (51,3%) y alta (34,8%). La mayoría se conectaba a Internet a diario (73,4%); solo 0,9% decía no conectarse nunca. Las aplicaciones más utilizadas eran WhatsApp (77,1%), redes sociales (70,1%) y relacionadas con música (66,6%). Se ha encontrado una mayor frecuencia de utilización por las mujeres de redes sociales (p= 0,004), WhatsApp (p <0,0001), Instagram (p <0,0001) y escuchar música (p= 0,004). Los varones navegaban más (p <0,0001), utilizaban Skype (p= 0,001), jugaban (p <0,0001) y veían películas o series (p= 0,035). CONCLUSIONES: Internet ocupa una gran parte del tiempo de los adolescentes, especialmente como medio de comunicación, y WhatsApp y las redes sociales son las aplicaciones que utilizan con más frecuencia.

Predictors for choosing the specialty of Family Medicine from undergraduate knowledge and attitudes.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: A cold climate towards primary care (PC) within medical academia could form a barrier against choosing family medicine (FM) as a career option. This study was designed to determine whether medical students' knowledge of and attitudes towards FM predicted their career choice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cohort study conducted at two different medical schools. METHODS: After completing a PC course at the Albacete Medical School in 2005-2006, 81 second-year students were asked to give responses to a questionnaire. In their sixth year (2009-2010), 79 students in Albacete and 42 in Seville (taken as an unexposed cohort) were asked to give responses too. Their choice of specialty was investigated in 2011. RESULTS: In Albacete, the questionnaire was answered by 79 second-year and 76 sixth-year students; in Seville, it was answered by 26 sixth-year students. After completing the PC course, 69.3% said they would like to become a family doctor. This percentage decreased to 40.3% at the end of the undergraduate course (P < 0.0001). In the sixth year, the attitudes towards FM worsened, yet these were significantly more favorable than those in Seville. Only 12 students chose FM; they obtained significantly worse scores in their specialty selection examination than their peers (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In the Albacete Medical School, the students' opinion about FM worsened over the undergraduate course, although it was still better than the Seville students' stance. In any case, FM was seen to be a minority option.

[Design and validation of a questionnaire for the detection of major depression in elderly patients]. / Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para la detección de depresión mayor en pacientes ancianos.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to design and validate a scale to detect major depressive disorders in elderly individuals in primary care (Detection of Depression in the Elderly Scale [DDES]). METHODS: We performed an observational and cross-sectional study for the validation of a scale, administered by means of a personal interview, in 259 patients aged 65 years old or older. Available instruments were reviewed and the questions were designed. Subsequently, a first pilot study was performed. In a second pilot study the reproducibility of the instrument was analyzed. The gold standard was the result of a standardized psychiatric interview performed by psychiatrists (DSM-IV criteria and SCAN interviews). RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients corresponding to the test-retest and inter-rater reliability were 0.858 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.634-0.946) and 0.908 (95% CI, 0.726-0.969) respectively. Two hundred sixteen subjects underwent an assessment, in which primary care and psychiatric evaluations were blinded. Major depression was diagnosed in 81 patients (37.5%; 95% CI, 31.1-44.4). The internal consistency of the DDES was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79). Exploratory factorial analysis revealed an 8-component structure (55.8% of explained variance). A cutoff score of 15 or more for the DDES showed sensitivity of 90.1% (95% CI, 80.95-95.33), specificity of 74.8% (95% CI, 66.48-81.71) and a likelihood ratio (+) of 3.58 (95% CI, 2.65-4.83). CONCLUSIONS: The DDES is a clinically useful instrument for the detection of major depression in elderly patients in primary care.

[Choice of Family Medicine at the exams for Spanish resident doctors in 2011 and 2013]. / Elección de Medicina Familiar en los exámenes para médicos residentes españoles de 2011 y 2013.

BACKGROUND: Family Medicine (FM) is regarded as one of the specialities less interesting to those who choose for resident physicians (MIR) in Spain. Our objective is to know the priority given to the choice of FM in 2011 and 2013 MIR exams, and what factors might be associated with this choice. METHODS: We obtained information on the website of the Ministry of Health for the graduates who could choose a speciality (11552 y 9182). The variables analyzed were: number obtained in the opposition, sex, speciality chosen, chosen city, medical school where they studied (for 117 and 155 students of a previous cohort study). We calculated the probability of choice of FM in relation to the order number in the exam and the other variables (Kaplan-Meier). RESULTS: 1963 and 1772 chose FM, respectively in 2011 and 2013. The median of the order number to choose FM was 7894 (95%CI:7720-8068) and 6561 (95%CI:6442-6680). There were gender differences, as women chose FM with fewer number and a higher proportion (p<0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Graduates enrolled in the MIR exam have not special preference for FM. Women show a greater interest in this speciality.

Introducción: la Medicina Familiar (MF) está considerada entre las especialidades que menos interesan a quienes optan por ser médicos internos residentes (MIR) en España. Nuestro objetivo es describir la prioridad concedida a la elección de MF en las convocatorias MIR 2011 y 2013, y qué factores podrían estar asociados con esta elección. Métodos: de la web del Ministerio de Sanidad de España se obtuvo información de los opositores que optaron a plaza (11552 y 9182). Las variables analizadas han sido: número obtenido en la oposición, sexo, especialidad elegida, ciudad elegida, facultad donde estudiaron (para 117 y 155 en un estudio de cohorte previo). Se calculó la probabilidad de elección de MF en relación con el número de orden en la oposición y otras variables (Kaplan-Meier). Resultados: la MF fue elegida por 1963 y 1772, respectivamente en 2011 y 2013. La mediana del número en la oposición para elegir MF fue 7894 (IC 95 % 7720-8068) y 6561 (IC 95 % 6442-6680). Existían diferencias por sexo: las mujeres elegían MF con menor número y en mayor proporción (p < 0.00001). Conclusiones: los opositores MIR no tienen una especial preferencia por la MF. Las mujeres muestran un mayor interés por esta especialidad.

Adherencia a la vacunación antigripal de personas mayores tras participar en talleres específicos / Adherence to influenza vaccination among elderly people after participating in specific workshops

Objetivo: Conocer el seguimiento de la vacunación antigripal por ancianos que habían participado en talleres específicos. Diseño: Estudio cuasiexperimental. Emplazamiento: Atención Primaria. Participantes: Se incluyeron 76 personas participantes en talleres sobre gripe y, como controles, 116 que no lo habían hecho. Mediciones Principales: Se comparó el porcentaje de vacunación entre los años 2009 y 2013, según el registro en la historia clínica informatizada. Por análisis de supervivencia se determinó el tiempo de adherencia, considerando "falta de cumplimiento" la primera vez sin vacunar. Resultados: La proporción de vacunados era más alta en los participantes en los talleres: 68,6 % (IC 95 %: 54,9-82,3) vs 61,2 % (IC 95 %: 51,9-70,5) en los que no habían participado, pero sin diferencias estadísticamente significativas (NS). La vacunación se interrumpió en el 45,1 % (IC 95 %: 30,5-59,7) y 42,2 % (IC 95 %: 32,8-51,7), respectivamente, con un cumplimiento medio de 2 años en ambos grupos (NS). Se encontraron diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos para quienes no habiéndose vacunado el año anterior a su inclusión en el estudio, sí lo hacían al año siguiente: 14,9 % vs 5 %, respectivamente para participantes y no participantes en talleres (p < 0,05). Conclusiones: Aunque la asistencia de personas mayores a talleres específicos sobre gripe puede estimular la vacunación inicialmente, no existe una mejora significativa a largo plazo

Objective: To know the adherence to influenza vaccination in elderly people who attended specific workshops. Design: Quasi-experimental study. Location: Primary Care Teams. Participants: 76 people who participated in workshops on influenza, and 116 who did not participate in these workshops used as controls. Main measurements: We compared vaccination percentages between 2009 and 2013, according to data from computerized medical records. A survival analysis was carried out to know how long the patients maintained their vaccination adherence, considering as "non adherence" the first time they were not vaccinated. Results: The proportion of vaccinated patients was higher in those who had participated in the workshops: 68.6 % (95% CI: 54.9-82.3) vs 61.2 % (95% CI: 51.9-70.5), than in those who had not participated, but the differences were not statistically significant (NS). The vaccination was discontinued in 45.1 % (95% CI: 30.5-59.7) and in 42.2 % (95% CI: 32.8-51.7), respectively, with a mean adherence of 2 years in both groups (NS). We found significant differences between both groups in relation to those unvaccinated the year prior to their inclusion in the study who did vaccinate the year after: 14.9 % vs. 5 %, respectively in those who had participated in the workshops and in those who had not participated (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Even though older people's participation in specific workshops on influenza can stimulate influenza vaccination initially, there is no significant long-term improvement

Riesgo de enfermedad neumocócica en pacientes ancianos con y sin vacunación previa / Risk of pneumococcal disease in elderly patients with and without previous vaccination

Objetivos: Conocer la cobertura vacunal antineumocócica en pacientes ≥ 65 años, así como el riesgo de enfermedad neumocócica según hayan o no recibido dicha vacunación. Diseño: Estudio transversal, seguido de cohorte histórica. Emplazamiento: Ámbito urbano. Participantes: Se seleccionaron por muestreo sistemático 2.805 personas ≥ 65 años de la ciudad de Albacete. Mediciones principales: Variable dependiente: diagnóstico de enfermedad neumocócica y fecha. Variables independientes: edad, sexo, enfermedades crónicas, medicación, vacunación antineumocócica y fecha. Se revisaron las historias clínicas informatizadas, de 1-1-2009 a octubre-diciembre de 2015. Se ha realizado un análisis descriptivo, se ha calculado el riesgo relativo de aparición de enfermedad neumocócica según la vacunación y se ha realizado un análisis de supervivencia con el programa estadístico SPSS 17.0. Resultados: La mediana de edad era de 71 años; el 57,2% eran mujeres. Recibieron vacuna polisacárida el 46,0% (IC 95% 44,1-47,8). Solo 10 recibieron la conjugada. Fueron diagnosticadas de enfermedad neumocócica invasiva 22 personas, y de no invasiva, 153. El riesgo relativo de enfermedad neumocócica en vacunados frente a no vacunados, respectivamente para invasiva y no invasiva, era 1,59 (IC 95% 0,69-3,68) y 1,84 (IC 95% 1,33-2,54). Por regresión de Cox se demostró un mayor riesgo de enfermedad no invasiva para EPOC (1,95; IC 95% 1,32-2,89), tabaquismo (1,87; IC 95% 1,28-2,73), corticoterapia (1,73; IC 95% 1,08-2,79), vacunación polisacárida (141,41; IC 95% 5,92-3.378,49) y edad (1,11; IC 95% 1,08-1,14), con interacción entre estas 2 (0,94; IC 95% 0,91-0,98). Conclusiones: Existe un mayor riesgo de presentar enfermedad neumocócica en pacientes ≥ 65 años vacunados con la polisacárida, si bien habría que considerar un efecto protector en los vacunados de mayor edad

Objectives: To know the pneumococcal vaccination coverage in patients ≥ 65 years old, as well as the risk of pneumococcal disease according to whether or not they received such vaccination. Design: Cross-sectional study, followed by historical cohort. Location: Urban area. Participants: By systematic sampling, 2,805 people ≥ 65 years from the city of Albacete were selected. Main measurements: Dependent variable: diagnosis of pneumococcal disease and date. Independent variables: age, sex, chronic pathologies, medication, pneumococcal vaccination and date. The computerized medical records were reviewed, from 1-1-2009 to October-December 2015. A descriptive analysis was carried out, the relative risk of the onset of pneumococcal disease according to vaccination has been calculated, and survival analysis has been carried out, with the statistical program SPSS 17.0. Results: Median age 71 years; 57.2% were women; 46% received polysaccharide vaccine (95% CI 44.1-47.8). Only 10 people received conjugated vaccine. Twenty-two people were diagnosed with invasive pneumococcal disease and 153 non-invasive. The relative risk of pneumococcal disease in vaccinated versus unvaccinated, respectively for invasive and non-invasive, was 1.59 (95% CI 0.69-3.68) and 1.84 (95% CI 1.33-2.54). Cox regression showed a higher risk of non-invasive disease for COPD (1.95; 95% CI 1.32-2.89), smoking (1.87; 95% CI 1.28-2.73), corticoid-therapy (1.73; 95% CI 1.08-2.79), polysaccharide vaccination (141.41; 95% CI 5.92-3,378.49) and age (1.11; 95% CI 1.08-1.14), with interaction between these 2 (0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.98). Conclusions: There is an increased risk of pneumococcal disease in patients ≥ 65 years vaccinated with polysaccharide, although with a protective effect in vaccinated older

La inequidad en las retribuciones del SESCAM / Inequity in SESCAM remunerations

No disponible