RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In this phase Ib/II open-label study, tumor immune suppression was targeted in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors and patients with recurrent/refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using galunisertib with nivolumab. METHODS: Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years old, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1, and were treatment-naive for anti-programmed cell death-1, its ligand, or transforming growth factor ß receptor 1 kinase inhibitors. Phase Ib was an open-label, dose-escalation assessment of the safety and tolerability of galunisertib with nivolumab in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. Phase II evaluated the safety of galunisertib with nivolumab in NSCLC patients who had received prior platinum-based treatment but were immuno-oncology agent-naive. RESULTS: This trial was conducted between October 2015 and August 2020. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in phase I. In the phase II NSCLC cohort (n = 25), patients received 150 mg twice daily galunisertib (14 days on/14 days off dosing schedule for all phases) plus nivolumab at 3 mg/kg (intravenously every 2 weeks). In this phase, the most frequent treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were pruritus (n = 9, 36%), fatigue (n = 8, 32%), and decreased appetite (n = 7, 28%). No grade 4 or 5 treatment-related AEs were observed. Six (24%) patients had confirmed partial response (PR) and 4 (16%) had stable disease; 1 additional patient had confirmed PR after initial pseudo-progression. The median duration of response was 7.43 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.75, NR). Among the 7 responders, including the delayed responder, 1 had high PD-L1 expression (≥ 50%). The median progression-free survival was 5.26 months (95% CI: 1.77, 9.20) and the median overall survival was 11.99 months (95% CI: 8.15, NR). Interferon gamma response genes were induced post-treatment and cell adhesion genes were repressed, although the association of these observations with tumor response and clinical outcomes was not statistically powered due to limited samples available. CONCLUSIONS: The study met its primary endpoint as galunisertib combined with nivolumab was well tolerated. Preliminary efficacy was observed in a subset of patients in the Phase 2 NSCLC cohort. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02423343; 22.04.2015).
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Adolescente , Humanos , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/etiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Nivolumab/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Purpose Galunisertib, a TGF-ß inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor effects in preclinical and radiographic responses in some patients with malignant glioma. This Phase 1b/2a trial investigated the clinical benefit of combining galunisertib with temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy (TMZ/RTX) in patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma (NCT01220271). Methods This is an open-label, 2-arm Phase 1b/2a study (N = 56) of galunisertib (intermittent dosing: 14 days on/14 days off per cycle of 28 days) in combination with TMZ/RTX (n = 40), versus a control arm (TMZ/RTX, n = 16). The primary objective of Phase 1b was to determine the safe and tolerable Phase 2 dose of galunisertib. The primary objective of Phase 2a was to confirm the tolerability and pharmacodynamic profile of galunisertib with TMZ/RTX, and the secondary objectives included determining the efficacy and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of galunisertib with TMZ/RTX in patients with glioblastoma. This study also characterized the changes in the major T-cell subsets during TMZ/RTX plus galunisertib treatment. Results In the Phase 2a study, efficacy results for patients treated with galunisertib plus TMZ/RTX or TMZ/RTX were: median overall survival (18.2 vs 17.9 months), median progression-free survival (7.6 vs 11.5 months), and disease control rate (80% [32/40] vs 56% [9/16] patients) respectively. PK profile of galunisertib plus TMZ/RTX regimen was consistent with previously published PK data of galunisertib. The overall safety profile across treatment arms was comparable. Conclusion No differences in efficacy, safety or pharmacokinetic variables were observed between the two treatment arms.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Quimioradioterapia , Glioma/terapia , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Receptor Tipo I de Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta/antagonistas & inhibidores , Temozolomida/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias Encefálicas/inmunología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/metabolismo , Femenino , Glioma/inmunología , Glioma/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Subgrupos de Linfocitos T/efectos de los fármacos , Temozolomida/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Galunisertib is the first-in-class, first-in-human, oral small-molecule type I transforming growth factor-beta receptor (ALK5) serine/threonine kinase inhibitor to enter clinical development. The effect of galunisertib vs. placebo in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer was determined. METHODS: This was a two-part, multinational study: phase 1b was a non-randomised, open-label, multicentre, and dose-escalation study; phase 2 was a randomised, placebo- and Bayesian-augmented controlled, double-blind study in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma considered candidates for first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine. Patients were randomised 2:1 to galunisertib-gemcitabine (N = 104) or placebo-gemcitabine (N = 52). Gemcitabine dose was 1000 mg/m2 QW. Primary endpoints for phases 1b and 2, respectively, were phase 2 dose and overall survival. Secondary objectives included tolerability and biomarkers. RESULTS: Dose-escalation suggested a 300-mg/day dose. Primary objective was met: median survival times were 8.9 and 7.1 months for galunisertib and placebo, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.79 [95% credible interval: 0.59-1.09] and posterior probability HR < 1 = 0.93). Lower baseline biomarkers macrophage inflammatory protein-1-alpha and interferon-gamma-induced protein 10 were associated with galunisertib benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Galunisertib-gemcitabine combination improved overall survival vs. gemcitabine in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, with minimal added toxicity. Future exploration of galunisertib in pancreatic cancer is ongoing in combination with durvalumab.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/efectos adversos , Desoxicitidina/farmacocinética , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Placebos , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/farmacocinética , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/farmacocinética , Transducción de Señal , Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta/metabolismo , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
Galunisertib, a Transforming growth factor-ßRI (TGF-ßRI) kinase inhibitor, blocks TGF-ß-mediated tumor growth in glioblastoma. In a three-arm study of galunisertib (300 mg/day) monotherapy (intermittent dosing; each cycle =14 days on/14 days off), lomustine monotherapy, and galunisertib plus lomustine therapy, baseline tumor tissue was evaluated to identify markers associated with tumor stage (e.g., histopathology, Ki67, glial fibrillary acidic protein) and TGF-ß-related signaling (e.g., pSMAD2). Other pharmacodynamic assessments included chemokine, cytokine, and T cell subsets alterations. 158 patients were randomized to galunisertib plus lomustine (n = 79), galunisertib (n = 39) and placebo+lomustine (n = 40). In 127 of these patients, tissue was adequate for central pathology review and biomarker work. Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1) negative glioblastoma patients with baseline pSMAD2⺠in cytoplasm had median overall survival (OS) 9.5 months vs. 6.9 months for patients with no tumor pSMAD2 expression (p = 0.4574). Eight patients were IDH1 R132H⺠and had a median OS of 10.4 months compared to 6.9 months for patients with negative IDH1 R132H (p = 0.5452). IDH1 status was associated with numerically higher plasma macrophage-derived chemokine (MDC/CCL22), higher whole blood FOXP3, and reduced tumor CD3⺠T cell counts. Compared to the baseline, treatment with galunisertib monotherapy preserved CD4⺠T cell counts, eosinophils, lymphocytes, and the CD4/CD8 ratio. The T-regulatory cell compartment was associated with better OS with MDC/CCL22 as a prominent prognostic marker.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Lomustina/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Relación CD4-CD8 , Citocinas/sangre , Femenino , Factores de Transcripción Forkhead/sangre , Factores de Transcripción Forkhead/metabolismo , Glioblastoma/sangre , Glioblastoma/patología , Humanos , Isocitrato Deshidrogenasa/metabolismo , Lomustina/efectos adversos , Lomustina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/sangre , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Proteína Smad2/metabolismo , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Purpose Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-ß) signaling plays a key role in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of tumors, including malignant glioma. Small molecule inhibitors (SMI) blocking TGF-ß signaling reverse EMT and arrest tumor progression. Several SMIs were developed, but currently only LY2157299 monohydrate (galunisertib) was advanced to clinical investigation. Design The first-in-human dose study had three parts (Part A, dose escalation, n = 39; Part B, safety combination with lomustine, n = 26; Part C, relative bioavailability study, n = 14). Results A preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model predicted a therapeutic window up to 300 mg/day and was confirmed in Part A after continuous PK/PD. PK was not affected by co-medications such as enzyme-inducing anti-epileptic drugs or proton pump inhibitors. Changes in pSMAD2 levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were associated with exposure indicating target-related pharmacological activity of galunisertib. Twelve (12/79; 15%) patients with refractory/relapsed malignant glioma had durable stable disease (SD) for 6 or more cycles, partial responses (PR), or complete responses (CR). These patients with clinical benefit had high plasma baseline levels of MDC/CCL22 and low protein expression of pSMAD2 in their tumors. Of the 5 patients with IDH1/2 mutation, 4 patients had a clinical benefit as defined by CR/PR and SD ≥6 cycles. Galunisertib had a favorable toxicity profile and no cardiac adverse events. Conclusion Based on the PK, PD, and biomarker evaluations, the intermittent administration of galunisertib at 300 mg/day is safe for future clinical investigation.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Transformadores beta/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas ADAM , Adulto , Anciano , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacología , Área Bajo la Curva , Recuento de Células Sanguíneas , Quimiocina CCL22 , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Humanos , Leucocitos Mononucleares/metabolismo , Lomustina , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/farmacología , Pirazoles , Quinolinas , Receptor Tipo I de Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta , Proteína Smad2/biosíntesis , Proteínas Supresoras de TumorRESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222259.].
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We assessed the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of the transforming growth factor beta (TGFß) receptor inhibitor galunisertib co-administered with the anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody durvalumab in recurrent/refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer previously treated with ≤2 systemic regimens. METHODS: This was a two-part, single-arm, multinational, phase Ib study. In a dose-finding phase, escalating oral doses of galunisertib were co-administered on days 1-14 with fixed-dose intravenous durvalumab 1500 mg on day 1 every 4 weeks (Q4W), followed by an expansion cohort phase. RESULTS: The galunisertib recommended phase II dose (RP2D) when co-administered with durvalumab 1500 mg Q4W was 150 mg two times per day. No dose-limiting toxicities were recorded. Among 32 patients treated with galunisertib RP2D, 1 patient had partial response, 7 had stable disease, 15 had objective progressive disease, and 9 were not evaluable. Disease control rate was 25.0%. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 5.72 months (95% CI: 4.01 to 8.38) and 1.87 months (95% CI: 1.58 to 3.09), respectively. Pharmacokinetic profiles for combination therapy were comparable to those published for each drug. There was no association between potential biomarkers and treatment outcomes. CONCLUSION: Galunisertib 150 mg two times per day co-administered with durvalumab 1500 mg Q4W was tolerable. Clinical activity was limited. Studying this combination in patients in an earlier line of treatment or selected for predictive biomarkers of TGFß inhibition might be a more suitable approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02734160.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Antígeno B7-H1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Receptor Tipo I de Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacocinética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismo , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/farmacocinética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacocinética , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/farmacocinética , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/farmacocinética , Receptor Tipo I de Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta/metabolismo , República de Corea , Transducción de Señal , Factores de Tiempo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: A novel, selective, next-generation transforming growth factor beta (TGFß) receptor type-1 small molecule inhibitor, LY3200882, demonstrated promising preclinical data. This first-in-human trial evaluated safety, tolerability, recommended phase II dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antitumor activity of LY3200882 as monotherapy or with other anticancer agents in patients with advanced cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase I multicenter study of oral LY3200882 (NCT02937272) comprised dose escalation, monotherapy expansion in grade 4 glioma, and combination therapy in solid tumors (LY3200882 and PD-L1 inhibitor LY3300054), pancreatic cancer (LY3200882, gemcitabine, and nab-paclitaxel), and head and neck squamous cell cancer (LY3200882, cisplatin, and radiation). RESULTS: Overall, 139 patients with advanced cancer were treated. The majority (93.5%) of patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), with 39.6% LY3200882-related. Grade 3 LY3200882-related toxicities were only observed in combination therapy arms. One patient in the pancreatic cancer arm experienced cardiovascular toxicity. The LY3200882 monotherapy RP2Ds were established in two schedules: 50 mg twice a day 2-weeks-on/2-weeks-off and 35 mg twice a day 3-weeks-on/1-week-off. Four patients with grade 4 glioma had durable Revised Assessment in Neuro Oncology (RANO) partial responses (PR) with LY3200882 monotherapy (n = 3) or LY3200882-LY3300054 combination therapy (n = 1). In treatment-naïve patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, 6 of 12 patients achieved Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 PR and 3 of 12 patients demonstrated stable disease, for an overall 75% disease-control rate with the combination of LY3200882, gemcitabine, and nab-paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: LY3200882 as monotherapy and combination therapy was safe and well tolerated with preliminary antitumor activity observed in pancreatic cancer. Further studies to evaluate the efficacy of LY3200882 with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic cancer are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Humanos , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor de Crecimiento Transformador betaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-ß) signalling is involved in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We followed changes in biomarkers during treatment of patients with HCC with the TGF-ßRI/ALK5 inhibitor galunisertib. METHODS: This phase 2 study (NCT01246986) enrolled second-line patients with advanced HCC into one of two cohorts of baseline serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP): Part A (AFP ≥1.5x ULN) or Part B (AFP <1.5x ULN). Baseline and postbaseline levels of AFP, TGF-ß1, E-cadherin, selected miRNAs, and other plasma proteins were monitored. RESULTS: The study enrolled 149 patients (Part A, 109; Part B, 40). Median OS was 7.3 months in Part A and 16.8 months in Part B. Baseline AFP, TGF-ß1, E-cadherin, and an additional 16 plasma proteins (such as M-CSF, IL-6, ErbB3, ANG-2, neuropilin-1, MIP-3 alpha, KIM-1, uPA, IL-8, TIMP-1, ICAM-1, Apo A-1, CA-125, osteopontin, tetranectin, and IGFBP-1) were found to correlate with OS. In addition, a range of miRs were found to be associated with OS. In AFP responders (21% of patients in Part A with decrease of >20% from baseline) versus non-responders, median OS was 21.5 months versus 6.8 months (p = 0.0015). In TGF-ß1 responders (51% of all patients) versus non-responders, median OS was 11.2 months versus 5.3 months (p = 0.0036). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with previous findings, both baseline levels and changes from baseline of circulating AFP and TGF-ß1 function as prognostic indicators of survival. Future trials are needed to confirm and extend these results.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Pirazoles/farmacología , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/farmacología , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Receptor Tipo I de Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antígenos CD/sangre , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Cadherinas/sangre , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/sangre , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/sangre , Masculino , MicroARNs/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta1/análisis , Resultado del Tratamiento , alfa-Fetoproteínas/análisisRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: JUNIPER compared the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib, a selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, with erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutation. METHODS: JUNIPER was a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of abemaciclib versus erlotinib in patients with stage IV NSCLC and a detectable mutation in codons 12 or 13 of the KRAS oncogene, who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy and 1 additional therapy (could include immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy). Randomized patients (3:2) received either 200 mg abemaciclib twice daily or 150 mg erlotinib once daily with best supportive care until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. RESULTS: Between December 2014 and April 2017, 453 patients were randomly assigned to receive abemaciclib (N = 270) or erlotinib (N = 183). Median OS was 7.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.5, 8.8) with abemaciclib and 7.8 months (95% CI: 6.4, 9.5) with erlotinib (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.968 [95% CI: 0.768, 1.219]; p = .77). Median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI: 2.8, 3.8) with abemaciclib and 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.9, 2.0) with erlotinib (HR = 0.583 [95% CI: 0.470, 0.723]; p <.000001). ORR was 8.9% and 2.7% (p = .010), and the disease control rate was 54.4% and 31.7% (p <.001) with abemaciclib and erlotinib, respectively. Safety results reflected the known safety profiles of abemaciclib and erlotinib. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the primary endpoint of OS was not met; PFS and ORR were improved with manageable toxicity in the abemaciclib arm. The increases in response rates and PFS support further investigation of abemaciclib in other NSCLC subpopulations or in combination with other agents. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02152631.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Galunisertib, the first small molecule transforming growth factor beta (TGFß) receptor inhibitor, plus gemcitabine resulted in the improvement of survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, but markers to identify patients likely to respond are lacking. METHODS: In the Phase 1b/2 JBAJ study, 156 patients were randomized 2:1 to galunisertib + gemcitabine (N = 104) or placebo + gemcitabine (N = 52). Clinical outcome data were integrated with baseline markers and pharmacodynamic markers while patients were on treatment, including circulating proteins using a multi-analyte panel, T cell subset evaluation, and miRNA profiling. RESULTS: Baseline biomarkers associated with overall prognosis regardless of treatment included CA19-9 and TGF-ß1. In addition, IP-10, FSH, MIP-1α, and PAI-1 were potential predictive proteins. Baseline proteins that were changed during treatment included amphiregulin, CA15-3, cathepsin D, P-selectin, RAGE, sortilin, COMP, eotaxin-2, N-BNP, osteopontin, and thrombospondin-4. Plasma miRNA with potential prognostic value included miR-21-5p, miR-301a-3p, miR-210-3p, and miR-141-3p, while those with potential predictive value included miR-424-5p, miR-483-3p, and miR-10b-5p. CONCLUSIONS: Galunisertib + gemcitabine resulted in improvement of overall survival, and 4 proteins (IP-10, FSH, MIP-1α, PAI-1) were potentially predictive for this combination treatment. Future studies should also include baseline evaluation of miR-424-5p, miR-483-3p, and miR-10b-5p. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01373164.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , MicroARNs/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Transformadores beta/antagonistas & inhibidores , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico , Inflamación/patología , Masculino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Pronóstico , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Tasa de Supervivencia , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
Combining or pooling individual samples when carrying out transcript profiling using microarrays is a fairly common means to reduce both the cost and complexity of data analysis. However, pooling does not allow for statistical comparison of changes between samples and can result in a loss of information. Because a rigorous comparison of the identified expression changes from the two approaches has not been reported, we compared the results for hepatic transcript profiles from pooled vs. individual samples. Hepatic transcript profiles from a single-dose time-course rat study in response to the prototypical toxicants clofibrate, diethylhexylphthalate, and valproic acid were evaluated. Approximately 50% more transcript expression changes were observed in the individual (statistical) analysis compared with the pooled analysis. While the majority of these changes were less than twofold in magnitude ( approximately 80%), a substantial number were greater than twofold (approximately 20%). Transcript changes unique to the individual analysis were confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR, while all the changes unique to the pooled analysis did not confirm. The individual analysis identified more hits per biological pathway than the pooled approach. Many of the transcripts identified by the individual analysis were novel findings and may contribute to a better understanding of molecular mechanisms of these compounds. Furthermore, having individual animal data provided the opportunity to correlate changes in transcript expression to phenotypes (i.e., histology) observed in toxicology studies. The two approaches were similar when clustering methods were used despite the large difference in the absolute number of transcripts changed. In summary, pooling reduced resource requirements substantially, but the individual approach enabled statistical analysis that identified more gene expression changes to evaluate mechanisms of toxicity. An individual animal approach becomes more valuable when the overall expression response is subtle and/or when associating expression data to variable phenotypic responses.
Asunto(s)
Extractos Hepáticos/metabolismo , Hígado/efectos de los fármacos , Hígado/metabolismo , Análisis de Secuencia por Matrices de Oligonucleótidos/métodos , Animales , Clofibrato/toxicidad , Análisis por Conglomerados , Dietilhexil Ftalato/toxicidad , Ácidos Grasos/metabolismo , Expresión Génica , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Masculino , Mitocondrias/metabolismo , Modelos Biológicos , Modelos Estadísticos , Tamaño de los Órganos , Fenotipo , Filogenia , Análisis de Componente Principal , ARN/metabolismo , ARN Mensajero/metabolismo , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Transcripción Genética , Ácido Valproico/toxicidadRESUMEN
Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-ß) signaling regulates a wide range of biological processes. TGF-ß plays an important role in tumorigenesis and contributes to the hallmarks of cancer, including tumor proliferation, invasion and metastasis, inflammation, angiogenesis, and escape of immune surveillance. There are several pharmacological approaches to block TGF-ß signaling, such as monoclonal antibodies, vaccines, antisense oligonucleotides, and small molecule inhibitors. Galunisertib (LY2157299 monohydrate) is an oral small molecule inhibitor of the TGF-ß receptor I kinase that specifically downregulates the phosphorylation of SMAD2, abrogating activation of the canonical pathway. Furthermore, galunisertib has antitumor activity in tumor-bearing animal models such as breast, colon, lung cancers, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Continuous long-term exposure to galunisertib caused cardiac toxicities in animals requiring adoption of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-based dosing strategy to allow further development. The use of such a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model defined a therapeutic window with an appropriate safety profile that enabled the clinical investigation of galunisertib. These efforts resulted in an intermittent dosing regimen (14 days on/14 days off, on a 28-day cycle) of galunisertib for all ongoing trials. Galunisertib is being investigated either as monotherapy or in combination with standard antitumor regimens (including nivolumab) in patients with cancer with high unmet medical needs such as glioblastoma, pancreatic cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The present review summarizes the past and current experiences with different pharmacological treatments that enabled galunisertib to be investigated in patients.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Descubrimiento de Drogas , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Transformadores beta/antagonistas & inhibidores , Administración Oral , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/química , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Esquema de Medicación , Cardiopatías/inducido químicamente , Estructura Molecular , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Neoplasias/enzimología , Neoplasias/patología , Fosforilación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/química , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacocinética , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinasas/metabolismo , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/química , Pirazoles/farmacocinética , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/química , Quinolinas/farmacocinética , Receptor Tipo I de Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Transformadores beta/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Proteína Smad2/metabolismo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de XenoinjertoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: TGFß signaling plays a key role in tumor progression, including malignant glioma. Small-molecule inhibitors such as LY2157299 monohydrate (LY2157299) block TGFß signaling and reduce tumor progression in preclinical models. To use LY2157299 in the treatment of malignancies, we investigated its properties in a first-in-human dose (FHD) study in patients with cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Sixty-five patients (58 with glioma) with measurable and progressive malignancies were enrolled. Oral LY2157299 was given as a split dose morning and evening on an intermittent schedule of 14 days on and 14 days off (28-day cycle). LY2157299 monotherapy was studied in dose escalation (part A) first and then evaluated in combination with standard doses of lomustine (part B). Safety was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0, echocardiography/Doppler imaging, serum troponin I, and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. Antitumor activity was assessed by RECIST and Macdonald criteria. RESULTS: In part A, 16.6% (5/30) and in part B, 7.7% (2/26) of evaluable patients with glioma had either a complete (CR) or a partial response (PR). In both parts, 15 patients with glioma had stable disease (SD), 5 of whom had SD ≥ 6 cycles of treatment. Therefore, clinical benefit (CR+PR+SD ≥ 6 cycles) was observed in 12 of 56 patients with glioma (21.4%). LY2157299 was safe, with no cardiac adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity in patients with glioma, the intermittent administration of LY2157299 at 300 mg/day is safe for future clinical investigation.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Glioma/tratamiento farmacológico , Glioma/patología , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/patología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Pirazoles/farmacología , Quinolinas/farmacología , Receptor Tipo I de Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Transformadores beta/antagonistas & inhibidores , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
This investigation examined the effects of acute resistance exercise (RE), progressive resistance training (PRT), and age on the human skeletal muscle Transcriptome. Two cohorts of young and old adults [study A: 24 yr, 84 yr (n = 28); study B: 25 yr, 78 yr (n = 36)] were studied. Vastus lateralis biopsies were obtained pre- and 4 h post-RE in conjunction with the 1st and 36th (last) training session as part of a 12-wk PRT program in study A, whereas biopsies were obtained in the basal untrained state in study B. Additionally, the muscle fiber type specific (MHC I and MHC IIa) Transcriptome response to RE was examined in a subset of young and old women from study A. Transcriptome profiling was performed using HG U133 Plus 2.0 Arrays. The main findings were 1) there were 661 genes affected by RE during the 1st and 36th training bout that correlated with gains in muscle size and strength with PRT (termed the Transcriptome signature of resistance exercise adaptations); 2) the RE gene response was most pronounced in fast-twitch (MHC IIa) muscle fibers and provided additional insight into the skeletal muscle biology affected by RE; 3) skeletal muscle of young adults is more responsive to RE at the gene level compared with old adults and age also affected basal level skeletal muscle gene expression. These skeletal muscle Transcriptome findings provide further insight into the molecular basis of sarcopenia and the impact of resistance exercise at the mixed muscle and fiber type specific level.
Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento/genética , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Fibras Musculares Esqueléticas/metabolismo , Músculo Cuádriceps/metabolismo , Entrenamiento de Fuerza , Adaptación Fisiológica/genética , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia , Femenino , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica/métodos , Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Análisis de los Mínimos Cuadrados , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Cadenas Pesadas de Miosina/genética , Miosina Tipo I/genética , Análisis de Secuencia por Matrices de Oligonucleótidos , Factores Sexuales , Miosinas del Músculo Esquelético/genética , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We applied a comparative functional genomics approach to evaluate whether diet-induced obese (DIO) rats serve as an effective obesity model. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Gene-expression profiles of epididymal fat from DIO and lean rats were generated using microarrays and compared with the published array data of obese and non-obese human subcutaneous adipocytes. RESULTS: Caloric intake and fuel efficiency were significantly higher in DIO rats, which resulted in increased body weight and adiposity. Circulating glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride, insulin, and leptin levels in DIO rats were significantly higher than those in the lean controls. DIO rats also exhibited impaired insulin sensitivity. A direct comparison of gene-expression profiles from DIO and lean rats and those from obese and non-obese humans revealed that global gene-expression patterns in DIO rat fat resemble those of obese human adipocytes. Differentially expressed genes between obese and non-obese subjects in both human and rat studies were identified and associated with biological pathways by mapping genes to Gene Ontology (GO) categories. Immune response-related genes and angiogenesis-related genes exhibited significant upregulation in both obese humans and DIO rats when compared with non-obese controls. However, genes in fatty acid metabolism and oxidation exhibited a broad downregulation only in obese human adipocytes but not in DIO rat epididymal fat. DISCUSSION: Our study based on gene-expression profiling suggested that DIO rats in general represent an appropriate obesity model. However, the discrepancies in gene-expression alterations between DIO rats and obese humans, particularly in the metabolic pathways, may explain the limitations of using DIO rodent models in obesity research and drug discovery.