Middle and Late Pleistocene Denisovan subsistence at Baishiya Karst Cave.

Genetic and fragmented palaeoanthropological data suggest that Denisovans were once widely distributed across eastern Eurasia1-3. Despite limited archaeological evidence, this indicates that Denisovans were capable of adapting to a highly diverse range of environments. Here we integrate zooarchaeological and proteomic analyses of the late Middle to Late Pleistocene faunal assemblage from Baishiya Karst Cave on the Tibetan Plateau, where a Denisovan mandible and Denisovan sedimentary mitochondrial DNA were found3,4. Using zooarchaeology by mass spectrometry, we identify a new hominin rib specimen that dates to approximately 48-32 thousand years ago (layer 3). Shotgun proteomic analysis taxonomically assigns this specimen to the Denisovan lineage, extending their presence at Baishiya Karst Cave well into the Late Pleistocene. Throughout the stratigraphic sequence, the faunal assemblage is dominated by Caprinae, together with megaherbivores, carnivores, small mammals and birds. The high proportion of anthropogenic modifications on the bone surfaces suggests that Denisovans were the primary agent of faunal accumulation. The chaîne opératoire of carcass processing indicates that animal taxa were exploited for their meat, marrow and hides, while bone was also used as raw material for the production of tools. Our results shed light on the behaviour of Denisovans and their adaptations to the diverse and fluctuating environments of the late Middle and Late Pleistocene of eastern Eurasia.

Digging deeper into ancient skeletal proteomes through consecutive digestion with multiple proteases.

An increasing number of studies utilise the recovery of ancient skeletal proteomes for phylogenetic and evolutionary analysis. Although these studies manage to extract and analyse ancient peptides, the recovered proteomes are generally small in size and with low protein sequence coverage. We expand on previous observations which have shown that the parallel digestion and analysis of Pleistocene skeletal proteomes increases overall proteome size and protein sequence coverage. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the consecutive digestion of a skeletal proteome using two proteases, particularly the combination of Glu-C or chymotrypsin followed by trypsin digestion, enables the recovery of alternative proteome components not reachable through trypsin digestion alone. The proteomes preserved in Pleistocene skeletal specimens are larger than previously anticipated, but unlocking this protein sequence information requires adaptation of extraction and protein digestion protocols. The sequential utilisation of several proteases is, in this regard, a promising avenue for the study of highly degraded but unique hominin proteomes for phylogenetic purposes. SIGNIFICANCE: Palaeoproteomic analysis of archaeological materials, such as hominin skeletal elements, show great promise in studying past organisms and evolutionary relationships. However, as most proteomic methods are inherently destructive, it is essential to aim to recover as much information as possible from every sample. Currently, digestion with trypsin is the standard approach in most palaeoproteomic studies. We find that parallel or consecutive digestion with multiple proteases can improve proteome size and coverage for both Holocene and Pleistocene bone specimens. This allows for recovery of more proteomic data from a sample and maximises the chance of recovering phylogenetically relevant information.

Increasing sustainability in palaeoproteomics by optimizing digestion times for large-scale archaeological bone analyses.

Palaeoproteomic analysis of skeletal proteomes is used to provide taxonomic identifications for an increasing number of archaeological specimens. The success rate depends on a range of taphonomic factors and differences in the extraction protocols employed. By analyzing 12 archaeological bone specimens from two archaeological sites, we demonstrate that reducing digestion duration from 18 to 3 hours has no measurable impact on the obtained taxonomic identifications. Peptide marker recovery, COL1 sequence coverage, or proteome complexity are also not significantly impacted. Although we observe minor differences in sequence coverage and glutamine deamidation, these are not consistent across our dataset. A 6-fold reduction in digestion time reduces electricity consumption, and therefore CO2 emission intensities. We furthermore demonstrate that working in 96-well plates further reduces electricity consumption by 60%, in comparison to individual microtubes. Reducing digestion time therefore has no impact on the taxonomic identifications, while reducing the environmental impact of palaeoproteomic projects.