Application of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in open left chest aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVES: Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) is often required for patients undergoing repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (DTAA) or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm via left thoracotomy when proximal crossclamping is not feasible or when aneurysmal disease extends into the transverse aortic arch. Historical literature suggests higher complications rates due to the technical complexity of this approach; we examined outcomes with this approach at our center. METHODS: Between January 2008 and May 2018, 84 patients with DTAA or Crawford extent I thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm underwent open repair. DHCA was employed in 46 of 84 (55%) patients, of which 33 (72%) required repair of distal arch and DTAA, and 13 (28%) required repair of the distal arch and extent I thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. Patients who underwent DHCA had more chronic dissections than those in the non-DHCA group (70% vs 34%; P ≤ .05). RESULTS: Major adverse outcomes for the DHCA group versus non-DHCA group were as follows: early mortality 3 out of 46 (7%) versus 4 out of 38 (11%) (P = .70), stroke 3 out of 46 (7%) versus 1 out of 38 (3%) (P = .62), permanent spinal cord deficit 2 out of 46 (4%) versus 3 out of 38 (8%) (P = .65), permanent renal failure necessitating dialysis 1 out of 46 (2%) versus 2 out of 38 (5%) (P = .59). Freedom from major adverse outcomes was 38 out of 46 (83%) versus 31 out of 38 (82%) for DHCA versus non-DHCA (P = 1). CONCLUSIONS: DHCA can be employed via left thoracotomy for combined arch and DTAA or extent I thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm open repair.

Thoracoscopic Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion for Atrial Fibrillation Patients Intolerant to Anticoagulation.

OBJECTIVE: Outcomes associated with isolated epicardial left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with a contraindication or intolerance to anticoagulation are not clearly defined, especially in patients with prior stroke. This study evaluated the perioperative safety, medication use, and stroke outcomes for isolated thoracoscopic LAA exclusion for stroke prevention. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was performed of adults undergoing isolated thoracoscopic LAA exclusion with an epicardial exclusion device without a concomitant surgical procedure. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. The cohort was 68% male (n = 17) with a mean age of 76.4 ± 6.5 years, a mean preoperative CHA2DS2-VASc score of 4.2 ± 1.4, and a mean preoperative HAS-BLED score of 2.68 ± 1.03. Seventeen patients (68%) had nonparoxysmal AF. There were 11 patients with intolerance of anticoagulation due to intracranial hemorrhage (44%), 6 due to gastrointestinal bleeding (24%), and 4 due to genitourinary bleeding (16%). All procedures were performed thoracoscopically with 100% technical success-the mean LAA stump length was 5.5 ± 2.3 mm on intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. The median hospital length of stay was 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1, 6.5) days. The median follow-up time was 430 (IQR 125, 972) days. During follow-up, 1 patient with cerebral angiopathy had temporary neurologic deficits at an outside institution, with brain imaging showing no evidence of ischemic injury. There were no other thromboembolic events over the 38.8 postoperative patient-years examined. All patients were off anticoagulation at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the perioperative safety, technical success, freedom from anticoagulation, and stroke outcomes of isolated thoracoscopic LAA exclusion in patients with AF at high risk for thromboembolic disease.

Outcome and Cost Comparisons Between Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacements.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has been the standard of care for severe aortic stenosis. In 2019, annual transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) implantations surpassed SAVR. We compared in-hospital costs and outcomes between these two procedures. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent isolated SAVR or TAVR from October 2013 to December 2019. Baseline patient characteristics, operating room (OR) time, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), total LOS, cumulative cost, and complication rates were collected. Propensity matching was performed to identify differences in costs and outcomes between comparable groups. RESULTS: There were 515 patients who met inclusion criteria. TAVR was performed in 402 patients, while SAVR was performed in 113. Propensity matching resulted in 82 matched pairs. The SAVR cohort more frequently spent >1 day in the ICU, had longer total hospital LOS, longer OR time, and higher hospitalization cost. However, TAVR was associated with higher mean OR cost and higher valve cost. The cumulative index admission costs were not significantly different between groups. TAVR patients had less postoperative atrial fibrillation but more frequent pacemaker placement. One-year mortality was similar between SAVR (2.4%) and TAVR (3.8%), but 3-year (5.8% vs 19.2%) and 5-year (5.8% vs 37.2%) mortality favored SAVR. CONCLUSIONS: In propensity-matched groups, TAVR was associated with shorter ICU and hospital LOS and OR times but increased permanent pacemaker rates. In addition, while 1-year survival was similar between groups, SAVR had significantly improved 3-year and 5-year survival.

Monitored Anesthesia Care Versus General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVE: Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) has been increasingly used in lieu of general anesthesia (GA) for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We sought to compare outcomes and in-hospital costs between MAC and GA for TAVR at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was performed of 349 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR (MAC, n = 244 vs GA, n = 105) from January 2014 to December 2019. Baseline patient characteristics, operating room (OR) time, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and cost, total LOS, hospital cost, total cost, and complication rates were collected. Propensity matching was performed and resulted in 83 matched pairs. RESULTS: In the unmatched TAVR cohort, MAC TAVR was associated with reduced OR time (146 vs 198 min, P < 0.001), ICU LOS (1.4 vs 1.8 days, P < 0.001), total hospital LOS (3.4 vs 5.4 days, P < 0.001), and lower index total cost ($81,300 vs $85,400, P = 0.010). After propensity matching, MAC TAVR patients had reduced OR time (146 vs 196 min, P < 0.05), ICU LOS (1.2 vs 1.7 days, P = 0.006), total LOS (3.5 vs 5.1 days, P = 0.001), and 180-day mortality (2.4% vs 12%, P < 0.03). There was no difference in total hospitalization cost or total cost. CONCLUSIONS: In propensity-matched groups, TAVR utilizing MAC is associated with improved OR time efficiency, decreased LOS, and a reduction in 180-day mortality but no significant difference in cost.

Combined Hybrid Procedure and VAD Insertion in 9 High-Risk Neonates and Infants With HLHS.

BACKGROUND: This report describes 9 high-risk neonates and infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) who were stabilized with a combined hybrid approach and ventricular assist device (VAD) insertion (HYBRID+VAD) in preparation for heart transplantation. METHODS: A total of 9 patients with HLHS (7 neonates, 2 infants) presented with anatomic or physiologic features associated with an increased risk for conventional univentricular palliation with the Norwood operation (large coronary sinusoids or fistulas, severe tricuspid regurgitation, cardiogenic shock, restrictive atrial septum). These patients underwent combined VAD insertion (Berlin EXCOR, Berlin Heart, Inc, Berlin, Germany) and Stage 1 hybrid palliation (application of bilateral pulmonary bands, stent placement in the patent arterial duct, and atrial septectomy if needed). During this same era, at the Congenital Heart Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 46 neonates underwent a Norwood operation, 4 neonates underwent a hybrid approach "Stage 1" without VAD, and 3 patients with HLHS were supported with prostaglandin while awaiting heart transplantation. RESULTS: At HYBRID+VAD insertion, the median age was 20 days (range, 13 to 143 days), and median weight was 3.25 kg (range, 2.43 to 4.2 kg). Six patients survive (67%), and 3 patients died (33%). Five survivors are at home doing well after successful heart transplantation, and 1 survivor is doing well in the intensive care unit on VAD support while awaiting transplantation. Only 1 of 6 survivors (16.7%) required intubation more than 10 days after HYBRID+VAD insertion. In 8 patients no longer undergoing VAD support, the median length of VAD support was 119.5 days (range, 56 to 196 days). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk patients with HLHS who are suboptimal candidates for Norwood palliation can be successfully stabilized with pulsatile VAD insertion along with hybrid palliation while awaiting cardiac transplantation. These patients may be extubated and optimized for transplantation while undergoing VAD support.

Palliation Plus Ventricular Assist Device Insertion in 15 Neonates and Infants With Functionally Univentricular Circulation.

BACKGROUND: We report 15 high-risk neonates and infants with functionally univentricular circulation stabilized with initial surgical palliation plus ventricular assist device (VAD) insertion (PALLIATION+VAD) in preparation for transplantation. METHODS: Fifteen functionally univentricular patients with ductal-dependent systemic circulation (8 hypoplastic left heart syndrome, 1 hypoplastic left heart syndrome-related malformation: 7 neonates, 2 infants) or ductal-dependent pulmonary circulation (6 hypoplastic right heart syndrome: 5 neonates, 1 infant) presented with anatomical and/or physiological features associated with increased risk for conventional univentricular palliation (large coronary sinusoids with ventricular-dependent coronary circulation, severe systemic atrioventricular valvar regurgitation, cardiogenic shock, or restrictive atrial septum). PALLIATION+VAD for patients with ductal-dependent systemic circulation was: VAD insertion plus application of bilateral pulmonary bands, stent placement in the arterial duct, and atrial septectomy, if needed. PALLIATION+VAD for patients with ductal-dependent pulmonary circulation was: VAD insertion plus stent placement in the arterial duct or systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt with pulmonary arterioplasty, if needed. RESULTS: At PALLIATION+VAD, median age was 20 days (range, 4-143 days) and median weight was 3.47 kg (range, 2.43-4.86 kg). Ten patients (67%) survived and 5 patients (33%) died. All ten survivors are at home doing well after successful transplantation. Only 2 of 10 survivors (20%) required intubation >10 days after PALLIATION+VAD. Median length of VAD support for all 15 patients was 138 days (range, 56-226 days). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk neonates with functionally univentricular hearts who are suboptimal candidates for conventional palliation can be successfully stabilized with pulsatile VAD insertion along with initial palliation while awaiting cardiac transplantation; these patients may be extubated, enterally nourished, and optimized for transplantation while on VAD.