Evaluation of Cardiometabolic Risk in a Large Psychiatric Cohort and Comparison With a Population-Based Sample in Switzerland.

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric patients are known to be at high risk of developing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), leading to an increased mortality rate. OBJECTIVE: To assess the CVD risk (presence of metabolic syndrome [MetS] and calculated 10-year CVD risk) in a Swiss psychiatric cohort taking weight gain-inducing psychotropic drugs, compare the findings to a Swiss population-based cohort, and evaluate the prevalence of participants treated for metabolic disruptions in both cohorts. METHODS: Data for 1,216 psychiatric patients (of whom 634 were aged 35-75 years) were obtained between 2007 and 2017 from a study with metabolic parameters monitored during psychotropic treatment and between 2003 and 2006 for 6,733 participants from the population-based CoLaus|PsyCoLaus study. RESULTS: MetS as defined by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) was identified in 33% of the psychiatric participants and 24.7% of the population-based subjects. Specifically, prevalence per the IDF definition was more than 3 times higher in the psychiatric cohort among women aged 35 to 49 years (25.6% vs 8.0%; P < 10-4). The psychiatric and population-based cohorts, respectively, had comparable predicted CVD risk (10-year risk of CVD event > 20%: 0% vs 0.1% in women and 0.3% vs 1.8% [P = .01] in men; 10-year risk of CVD death > 5%: 8.5% vs 8.4% [P = .58] in women and 13.4% vs 16.6% [P = .42] in men). No difference was observed among the proportion of participants with MetS treated for metabolic disturbances in the two cohorts, with the exception of women aged 35-49 years, for whom those in the psychiatric cohort were half as likely to receive treatment compared to participants in CoLaus|PsyCoLaus (17.8% vs 38.8% per the IDF definition; P = .0004). CONCLUSIONS: These findings emphasize the concern that psychiatric patients present an altered metabolic profile and that they do not receive adequate treatment for metabolic disruptions. Presence of metabolic disturbances should be routinely assessed, and adequate follow-up is needed to intervene early after illness onset.

Assessment of the capacity to consent to treatment in patients admitted to acute medical wards.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of capacity to consent to treatment is an important legal and ethical issue in daily medical practice. In this study we carefully evaluated the capacity to consent to treatment in patients admitted to an acute medical ward using an assessment by members of the medical team, the specific Silberfeld's score, the MMSE and an assessment by a senior psychiatrist. METHODS: Over a 3 month period, 195 consecutive patients of an internal medicine ward in a university hospital were included and their capacity to consent was evaluated within 72 hours of admission. RESULTS: Among the 195 patients, 38 were incapable of consenting to treatment (unconscious patients or severe cognitive impairment) and 14 were considered as incapable of consenting by the psychiatrist (prevalence of incapacity to consent of 26.7%). Agreement between the psychiatrist's evaluation and the Silberfeld questionnaire was poor (sensitivity 35.7%, specificity 91.6%). Experienced clinicians showed a higher agreement (sensitivity 57.1%, specificity 96.5%). A decision shared by residents, chief residents and nurses was the best predictor for agreement with the psychiatric assessment (sensitivity 78.6%, specificity 94.3%). CONCLUSION: Prevalence of incapacity to consent to treatment in patients admitted to an acute internal medicine ward is high. While the standardized Silberfeld questionnaire and the MMSE are not appropriate for the evaluation of the capacity to consent in this setting, an assessment by the multidisciplinary medical team concurs with the evaluation by a senior psychiatrist.

Efficacy of an adjunctive brief psychodynamic psychotherapy to usual inpatient treatment of depression: Results of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: For severe and chronic depression, inpatient treatment may be necessary. Current guidelines recommend combined psychological and pharmacological treatments for moderate to severe depression. Results for positive effects of combined treatment for depressed inpatients are still ambiguous. METHODS: This randomised controlled trial examined the efficacy of adding an intensive and brief psychodynamic psychotherapy (IBPP) to treatment-as-usual (TAU) for inpatients with DSM-IV major depressive episode. The primary outcomes were reduction in depression severity, and response and remission rates at post-treatment, 3-month and 12-month follow-up points. RESULTS: A linear mixed model analysis (N=149) showed a higher reduction in the observer-rated severity of depressive symptoms at each follow-up point for the IBPP condition compared with the TAU condition (post-treatment ES=0.39, 95%CI 0.06-0.71; 3-month ES=0.46, 95%CI 0.14-0.78; 12-month ES=0.32, 95%CI 0.01-0.64). Response rate was superior in the IBPP group compared with the TAU group at all follow-up points (post-treatment OR =2.69, 95%CI 1.18-6.11; 3-month OR=3.47, 95%CI 1.47-8.25; 12-month OR=2.26, 95%CI 1.02-4.97). IBPP patients were more likely to be remitted 3 months (OR=2.82, 95%CI 1.12-7.10) and 12 months (OR=2.93, 95%CI 1.12-7.68) after discharge than TAU patients. LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneous sample with different subtypes of depression and comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: IBPP decreased observer-rated depression severity up to 12 months after the end of treatment. IBPP demonstrated immediate and distant treatment responses as well as substantial remissions at follow-up. IBPP appears to be a valuable adjunct in the treatment of depressed inpatients.

Prevalence and correlates of DSM-5 major depressive and related disorders in the community.

Although the DSM-5 has suggested the two new categories of Persistent Depressive Disorders (PDD) and Other Specified Depressive Disorders (OSDD), no study so far has applied the DSM-5 criteria throughout the range of depressive disorders. The aims of the present study were to 1) establish the lifetime prevalence of specific depressive disorders according to the new DSM-5 definitions in a community sample, and 2) determine their clinical relevance in terms of socio-demographic characteristics, comorbidity, course and treatment patterns. The semi-structured Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies was administered by masters-level psychologists to a random sample of an urban area (n=3720). The lifetime prevalence was 15.2% for PDD with persistent major depressive episode (MDE), 3.3% for PDD with pure dysthymia, 28.2% for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and 9.1% for OSDD. Subjects with PDD with persistent MDE were the most severely affected, followed by those with recurrent MDD, single episode MDD, PDD with pure dysthymia and OSDD and finally those without depressive disorders. Our data provide further evidence for the clinical significance of mild depressive disorders (OSDD), but cast doubt on the pertinence of lumping together PDD with persistent MDE and the former DSM-IV dysthymic disorder within the new PDD category.

Prevalence and correlates of DSM-5 bipolar and related disorders and hyperthymic personality in the community.

BACKGROUND: To 1) establish the lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-5 bipolar and related disorders including the new algorithmically defined conditions grouped within Other Specified Bipolar and Related Disorders (OSBARD) as well as hyperthymic personality in a randomly selected community sample, and 2) determine the clinical relevance of the OSBARD category in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, course, comorbidity and treatment patterns by comparing the subjects of this category to those with bipolar-I (BP-I), bipolar-II (BP-II), major depressive disorder (MDD), and those with no history of mood disorders. METHODS: The semi-structured Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies was administered by masterslevel psychologists to a random sample of an urban area (n=3'719). RESULTS: The lifetime prevalence was 1.0% for BP-I, 0.8% for BP-II, 1.0% for OSBARD and 3% for hyperthymic personality. Subjects with OSBARD were more severely affected than subjects without a history of mood disorders regarding almost all clinical correlates. Compared to those with MDD, they also revealed an elevated risk of suicidal attempts, lower global functioning, more treatment seeking and more lifetime comorbidity including anxiety, substance use and impulse-control disorders. However, they did not differ from subjects with BP-II. LIMITATIONS: Small sample sizes for bipolar and related disorders and potential inaccurate recall of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The modifications of diagnostic criteria for manic/hypomanic episodes according to the DSM-5 only marginally affect the prevalence estimates for BP-I and BP-II. The new DSM-5 OSBARD category is associated with significant clinical burden, is hardly distinct from BP-II with respect to clinical correlates and deserves similar clinical attention.