AOAC Official MethodSM Matrix Extension Validation Study of Assurance GDSTM for the Detection of Salmonella in Selected Spices.

Assurance GDSTM for Salmonella Tq has been validated according to the AOAC INTERNATIONAL Methods Committee Guidelines for Validation of Microbiological Methods for Food and Environmental Surfaces for the detection of selected foods and environmental surfaces (Official Method of AnalysisSM 2009.03, Performance Tested MethodSM No. 050602). The method also completed AFNOR validation (following the ISO 16140 standard) compared to the reference method EN ISO 6579. For AFNOR, GDS was given a scope covering all human food, animal feed stuff, and environmental surfaces (Certificate No. TRA02/12-01/09). Results showed that Assurance GDS for Salmonella (GDS) has high sensitivity and is equivalent to the reference culture methods for the detection of motile and non-motile Salmonella. As part of the aforementioned validations, inclusivity and exclusivity studies, stability, and ruggedness studies were also conducted. Assurance GDS has 100% inclusivity and exclusivity among the 100 Salmonella serovars and 35 non-Salmonella organisms analyzed. To add to the scope of the Assurance GDS for Salmonella method, a matrix extension study was conducted, following the AOAC guidelines, to validate the application of the method for selected spices, specifically curry powder, cumin powder, and chili powder, for the detection of Salmonella.

Comparative validation study to demonstrate the equivalence of a minor modification to AOAC official method 2005.04 assurance GdS E. coli 0157:H7 method to the reference culture method: 375 gram sample size.

The Assurance GDS Escherichia coli (E. col) O157:H7, AOAC Official Method 2005.04, has been modified to include a larger sample size of 375 g. A methods comparison study was conducted to demonstrate the equivalence of this modification to the reference culture method. Ninety samples and controls, representing three foods, were analyzed. Results show no statistically detectable difference between the Assurance GDS E. coli O157:H7 assay and the reference culture methods for the detection of E. coli O157:H7, other than the low level of inoculation for leaf lettuce, for which the GDS gave noticeably higher recovery [difference in probability of detection between candidate methods (dPODc = +0.45)]. There were also suggestions of moderate differences (dPODc = +0.15 to +0.20) for ground beef and the high level of leaf lettuce, but the study size was too small to detect differences of this size. Results showed that the Assurance GDS E. coli O157:H7 method is equivalent to reference culture methods for the detection of E. coli O157:H7.

Comparative validation study to demonstrate the equivalence of a minor modification to AOAC Official Method 2005.05 Assurance GDS shiga Toxin Genes (O157) method to the reference culture method: 375 gram sample size.

The Assurance GDS Shiga Toxin Genes (0157), AOAC Official MethodsM 2005.05, has been modified to include a larger sample size of 375 g. A methods comparison study was conducted to demonstrate the equivalence of this modification to the reference culture method. Ninety samples and controls, representing three foods, were analyzed. Results show no statistically detectable difference between the Assurance GDS Escherichia coli O157:H7 assay and the reference culture methods for the detection of E. coli O157:H7, other than the low level of inoculation for leaf lettuce for which the GDS gave noticeably higher recovery [difference in Probability of Detection between candidate methods (dPODc = +0.45)]. There were also suggestions of moderate differences (dPODc = +0.15 to +0.20) for ground beef and the high level of leaf lettuce, but the study size was too small to detect differences of this size. Results showed that the Assurance GDS Shiga Toxin Genes (0157) method is equivalent to the reference culture methods for the detection of Shiga toxigenic E. coli O157:H7.

Evaluation of the Assurance GDS for Salmonella method in foods and environmental surfaces: multilaboratory collaborative study.

A multilaboratory collaborative study was conducted to compare the detection of Salmonella by the Assurance GDS for Salmonella method and the Reference culture methods. Six foods, representing a variety of low microbial and high microbial load foods were analyzed. Seventeen laboratories in the United States and Canada participated in this study. No statistical differences (P < 0.05) were observed between the Assurance GDS for Salmonella and the Reference culture methods for any inoculation level of any food type or naturally contaminated food, except for pasta, for which the Assurance GDS method had a higher number of confirmed test portions for Salmonella compared to the Reference method.

1-2 Test.

A study was conducted to determine the efficacy of detecting low contamination levels of Salmonella in peanut butter using the 1-2 Test. This study was conducted under the AOAC Research Institute Emergency Response Validation program. A set of samples was analyzed by the 1-2 Test and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Bacteriological Analytical Manual reference method. Among the 90 total samples and controls, 32 samples were positive by the 1-2 Test and the reference method. Statistical analyses of these paired samples indicated that for all levels analyzed, the difference between the 1-2 Test and reference method results were not statistically different at the 5% level.

TRANSIA PLATE Salmonella Gold. Performance Tested Method 010602.

A study was conducted to determine the efficacy of detecting low contamination levels of Salmonella in peanut butter using TRANSIA PLATE Salmonella Gold (TPSG). This study was conducted under the AOAC Emergency Response Validation program. A set of samples was each analyzed by the TPSG method and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Bacteriological Analytical Manual reference method. Among the 45 total samples and controls, 26 were positive by the TPSG and 24 were positive by the reference method. Statistical analyses of these unpaired samples indicated that for all levels analyzed, the difference between the TPSG and reference method results were not statistically different at the 5% level.

Comparative validation study to demonstrate the equivalence of a minor modification to AOAC Method 996.09 Visual Immunoprecipitate (VIP) for E. coli O157:H7 method to the reference culture method.

The Visual Immunoprecipitate (VIP) for the Detection of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 in Foods, AOAC Official Method 996.09, has been modified to change the color of the test and control lines of the device. A methods comparison study was conducted to demonstrate the equivalence of this modification to the reference culture method. Three foods were analyzed. In total, there were valid results from 225 samples and controls. Results showed that the VIP Gold for E. coli O157:H7 is equivalent to the reference culture methods for the detection of E. coli O157:H7.

Comparative validation study to demonstrate the equivalence of a minor modification to AOAC Method 999.09 Visual Immunoprecipitate (VIP) for Salmonella method to the reference culture method.

The Visual Immunoprecipitate (VIP) for the Detection of Salmonella in Foods, AOAC Official Method 999.09, has been modified to change the color of the test and control lines of the device. A methods comparison study was conducted to demonstrate the equivalence of this modification to the reference culture method. Three foods were analyzed. In total, there were valid results from 155 samples and controls. Results showed that the modified VIP Gold for Salmonella is equivalent to the reference culture methods for the detection of Salmonella.

Comparative validation study to demonstrate the equivalence of a minor modification to AOAC Method 997.03 Visual Immunoprecipitate (VIP) for Listeria to the reference culture method.

The Visual Immunoprecipitate (VIP) for the Detection of Listeria in Foods and Environmental Surfaces, AOAC Official Method 997.03, has been modified to change the color of the test and control lines of the device. A methods comparison study was conducted to demonstrate the equivalence of this modification to the reference culture method. Two food matrixes and one environmental surface were analyzed. In total, there were valid results from 100 samples and controls. Results showed that the modified VIP Gold for Listeria spp. is equivalent to the reference culture methods for the detection of Listeria.

Evaluation of the TRANSIA® PLATE Staphylococcal Enterotoxins Kit for the Detection of Staphylococcal Enterotoxins in Selected Foods.

The TRANSIA® PLATE Staphylococcal Enterotoxins enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was validated according to AOAC INTERNATIONAL guidelines for validating qualitative binary chemistry and microbiological methods. Five food matrixes were analyzed to determine the probability of detection (POD) for staphylococcal enterotoxins (SE), including SEA, SEB, SEC1, SEC2, SEC3, SED, and SEE, by the TRANSIA ^{PLATE Staphylococcal Enterotoxins EIA. The food matrixes tested were food types implicated in staphylococcal enterotoxin outbreaks and included raw milk cheese, liquid infant formula, eclairs, ready-to-eat ham, and canned mushrooms. Cheese and infant formula were tested with and without dialysis/concentration. The infant formula was also tested by an independent laboratory. Each food matrix was inoculated with specific toxins at low levels to yield fractional recoveries (0.015-0.20 ng/g of food) for POD analysis. One hundred percent recovery was achieved at concentrations ranging from <0.10 ng/g to 0.25 ng/g of toxin in the various food matrixes. At the same time, 50 Staphylococcus aureus strains known to produce toxins and 30 non-toxin producing bacteria (including 22 Staphylococcus strains) were grown and tested. All the SE toxin-producing strains yielded positive results and all of the exclusivity strains were negative. Robustness studies showed that changes in sample volume, sample pH, and EIA assay temperature had no significant effect on performance. Stability studies showed that kits stored for 12+ months performed as well as newly made kits. This assay has been approved as a Performance Tested MethodSM.}

Comparative Validation Study to Demonstrate the Equivalence of an Alternate Next-Day Enrichment Protocol for the TRANSIA® PLATE Salmonella Gold Method to Culture Methods for the Detection of Salmonella in Selected Foods and Environmental Surfaces.

TRANSIA® PLATE Salmonella Gold is an ELISA that was validated by Association Française de Normalisation (AFNOR) in 2001 and as a Performance Tested MethodSM (PTM) by AOAC in 2006 (PTM No. 010602) as a two-step enrichment protocol requiring 48 h. A simple next-day enrichment protocol using modified Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli media was developed for the TRANSIA PLATE Salmonella Gold to improve the time-to-results and laboratory work flow. We tested 128 Salmonella strains, representing all serotypes from A though Z and 51-66. TRANSIA PLATE Salmonella Gold detected all 128 of these strains. None of the 50 non-Salmonella strains were detected by TRANSIA PLATE Salmonella Gold. Performance of TRANSIA PLATE Salmonella Gold using the new enrichment protocol was compared with U.S. Department of Agriculture Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook reference culture procedure for the detection of Salmonella in ready-to-eat poultry, ready-to-eat beef, and chicken carcass rinsate. In addition, TRANSIA PLATE Salmonella Gold performance was compared with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) for the detection of Salmonella from raw spinach, raw almonds, raw pasta, and environmental surfaces (stainless steel, rubber, and plastic). There was no statistically significant difference in the numbers of positive results TRANSIA PLATE Salmonella Gold protocol compared with the appropriate U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service or FDA-BAM reference methods for any of these matrixes. Robustness testing demonstrated that the introduction of small changes in the normal assay parameters had no impact on the method performance. This new enrichment protocol has been approved as a Third Level modification to Performance Tested Method 010602.

Comparative Validation Study to Demonstrate the Equivalence of an Alternate Next-Day Enrichment Protocol for VIP® Gold for Salmonella Method to Culture Methods for the Detection of Salmonella in Selected Foods and Environmental Surfaces.

Background: VIP® Gold for Salmonella is a lateral flow immunodetection device that was validated by AOAC in 1999 as Official Method of Analysis 999.09. It was improved upon in 2009 by introducing gold colloid as the detection method. Objective: A simple next-day enrichment protocol using modified enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli media was developed for the VIP Gold for Salmonella to improve the time-to-results and laboratory work flow. Methods: We tested 128 Salmonella strains, representing all serotypes from A to Z and 51 to 66 as well as 50 non-Salmonella strains for inclusivity/exclusivity. Performance of the VIP using the new enrichment protocol was compared with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook reference culture procedure for the detection of Salmonella in ready-to-eat poultry, roast beef, and chicken carcass rinsate. VIP performance was also compared with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) for the detection of Salmonella from raw spinach, raw almonds, raw pasta, and environmental surfaces (stainless steel, rubber, and plastic). Results: The VIP detected all 128 of Salmonella strains and none of the 50 non-Salmonella strains. There was no statistically significant difference in the numbers of positive results with VIP Gold for Salmonella protocol compared with appropriate USDA-Food Safety and Inspection Service or FDA-BAM reference methods for any of these matrixes. Conclusions: This new enrichment protocol has met all the requirements to be approved as a Performance Tested MethodSM. Highlights: The new enrichment protocol will improve the time-to-results and allow quicker decisions about the contamination of food products.

Validation study to demonstrate the equivalence of a minor modification of Assurance Enzyme Immunoassay method, Official Method 996.14, for detection of Listeria in foods and environmental surfaces to the reference culture methods.

The Assurance Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) for the Detection of Listeria in Foods and Environmental Surfaces, AOAC Official Method 996.14, has been modified to combine the separate antibody and conjugate addition steps into one. A methods comparison study was conducted to demonstrate the equivalence of this modification to the reference culture methods. Two food matrixes and one environmental surface were analyzed. In total, there were valid results from 145 samples and controls. Results showed that the Assurance EIA for Listeria spp. is equivalent to the reference culture methods for the detection of Listeria.

Comparative validation study to demonstrate the equivalence of a minor modification to AOAC Method 996.09 [Visual Immunoprecipitate (VIP) for E. coli O157:H7] to the reference culture methods.

The Visual Immunoprecipitate (VIP) for the Detection of E. coli O157:H7 in Foods, AOAC Official Method 996.09, has been modified to use a simplified plastic housing for the device. A methods comparison study was conducted to demonstrate the equivalence of this modification to the reference culture method. Three foods were analyzed. In total, valid results were obtained from 240 samples and controls. Results showed that the VIP for E. coli O157:H7 is equivalent to the reference culture methods for the detection of E. coli O157:H7.

Comparative validation study to demonstrate the equivalence of a minor modification to AOAC Method 997.03 [Visual Immunoprecipitate (VIP) for Listeria] to the reference culture methods.

The Visual Immunoprecipitate (VIP) for the Detection of Listeria in Foods and Environmental Surfaces, AOAC Official Method 997.03, has been modified to use a simplified housing for the device. A methods comparison study was conducted to demonstrate the equivalence of this modification to the reference culture methods. Two food matrixes and one environmental surface were analyzed. In total, valid results were obtained from 145 samples and controls. Results showed that the modified VIP for Listeria spp. is equivalent to the reference culture methods for the detection of Listeria.

Comparative validation study to demonstrate the equivalence of a minor modification to AOAC Method 999.09 [Visual Immunoprecipitate (VIP) for Salmonella] to the reference culture methods.

The Visual Immunoprecipitate (VIP) for the Detection of Salmonella in Foods, AOAC Official Method 999.09, has been modified to use a simplified housing for the device. A methods comparison study was conducted to demonstrate the equivalence of this modification to the reference culture method. Three foods were analyzed. In total, valid results were obtained from 125 samples and controls. Results showed that the modified VIP for Salmonella is equivalent to the reference culture methods for the detection of Salmonella.

Comparison of Assurance GDS(®) MPX ID for Top STEC with Reference Culture Methods for the Detection of E. coli Top 6 STEC; Direct Confirmation of Top 6 STEC from Isolation Plates and Determination of Equivalence of PickPen(®) and FSIS OctoMACS™ Concentration Protocols.

Assurance GDS(®) MPX ID for Top Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC; MPX ID) was validated according to the AOAC INTERNATIONAL Methods Committee Guidelines for Validation of Microbiological Methods for Foods and Environmental Surfaces as (1) a secondary screening method for specific detection of the Top 6 STEC serogroups (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145) in raw beef trim, raw ground beef, raw spinach, and on stainless steel; and (2) as a confirmatory method for the identification of pure culture isolates as Top 6 STEC. MPX ID is used in conjunction with the upfront BCS Assurance GDS MPX Top 7 STEC assay. This Performance Tested Method(SM) validation has two main parts: Method Developer studies and the Independent Laboratory study. A total of 180 samples and controls were analyzed. Results showed that MPX ID had no statistically significant differences with the reference culture methods for the detection of Top 6 STEC in the food matrixes (raw beef trim, raw ground beef, and raw spinach) and environmental sponges (stainless steel) studied. Inclusivity/exclusivity studies were also conducted. One hundred percent inclusivity among the 50 Top 6 STEC serovars tested and 100% exclusivity for the 30 non-Top 6 STEC organisms tested were demonstrated. For validation of MPX ID as a confirmatory method for isolated colonies, all inclusivity and exclusivity organisms were streaked for isolation onto five STEC plating media: modified rainbow agar, Levine's eosin-methylene blue (L-EMB) agar, rainbow agar with novobiocin and cefixime, and enterohemolysin agar with selective agents as well as trypticase soy agar with yeast extract. These isolated colonies were suspended and analyzed by Assurance GDS MPX Top 7 STEC and MPX ID. MPX ID was able to correctly confirm all inclusivity organisms from all plate types, except two STEC isolates from L-EMB agar plates only in the Independent Laboratory study. All exclusivity organisms were correctly determined by MPX ID as non-Top 6 STEC from the STEC plating media. An additional but separate part of these studies was a comparison of immunomagnetic separation (IMS) efficiency using the Assurance GDS procedure with a PickPen(®) device and the U.S. Department of Agriculture procedure using the OctoMACS™ Separator device for plating onto chromogenic agar. Results demonstrated the equivalence of the two IMS procedures for plate confirmation of Top 7 STEC.

Enumeration of total coliforms and E. coli in foods by the SimPlate coliform and E. coli color indicator method and conventional culture methods: collaborative study.

The relative effectiveness of the SimPlate Coliform and E. coli Color Indicator (CEc-CI) method was compared to the AOAC 3-tube Most Probable Number (MPN) methods for enumerating and confirming coliforms and Escherichia coli in foods (966.23 and 966.24). In this study, test portions were prepared and analyzed according to the conditions stated in both the AOAC methods and SimPlate directions for use. Six food types were artificially contaminated with coliform bacteria and E. coli: frozen burritos, frozen broccoli, fluid pasteurized milk, whole almond nut meats, cheese, and powdered cake mix. Method comparisons were conducted. Overall, the SimPlate method demonstrated <0.3 log difference for total coliform and E. coli counts compared to the AOAC reference methods for the majority of food types and levels analyzed. In all cases, the repeatability and reproducibility of the SimPlate CEc-CI method were not different from those of the reference methods and in certain cases, were statistically better than those of the AOAC 3-tube MPN methods. These results indicate that the SimPlate CEc-CI method and the reference culture methods are comparable for enumeration of both total coliforms and E. coli in foods.

Comparative validation study to demonstrate the equivalence of a minor modification to AOAC methods 996.09, Vip for EHEC and 996.10, assurance Eia EHEC with the reference culture method for the detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in beef.

The Visual Immunoprecipitate Assay (VIP) method for the detection of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 (VIP for EHEC) and Assurance Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) method for the detection of EHEC (EHEC EIA) are AOAC INTERNATIONAL Official Methods 996.09 and 996.10, respectively. A minor modification to the enrichment medium used in both methods has been developed. This modification, the BioControl modified EHEC medium (BioControl mEHEC) provides a more cost-effective procedure with performance equivalent to that of the cultural method for detection of E. coli O157:H7 in beef.

Evaluation of the assurance GDS for E. coli O157:H7 method and assurance GDS for shigatoxin genes method in selected foods: collaborative study.

A multilaboratory collaborative study was conducted to compare the Assurance GDS for E. coli 0157:H7 method and the reference culture methods for the detection of E. coli 0157:H7 in orange juice, raw ground beef, and fresh lettuce. A separate companion assay, the Assurance GDS for Shigatoxin Genes method was also evaluated with the same test portions. Fifteen laboratories participated in the study. A Chi square analysis of each of the 3 food types at the high, low, and uninoculated control levels was performed. For all foods, the Assurance GDS for E. coli O157:H7 method and the Assurance GDS for Shigatoxin Genes method were equivalent to or better than the reference methods.