RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Visits for skin conditions are very common in pediatric primary care, and many of the patients seen in outpatient dermatology clinics are children or adolescents. Little, however, has been published about the true prevalence of these visits or about their characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational cross-sectional study of diagnoses made in outpatient dermatology clinics during 2 data-collection periods in the anonymous DIADERM National Random Survey of dermatologists across Spain. All entries with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code related to dermatology in the 2 periods (84 diagnoses) were collected for patients younger than 18 years and classified into 14 categories to facilitate analysis and comparison. RESULTS: In total, the search found 20 097 diagnoses made in patients younger than 18 years (12% of all coded diagnoses in the DIADERM database). Viral infections, acne, and atopic dermatitis were the most common, accounting for 43.9% of all diagnoses. No significant differences were observed in the proportions of diagnoses in the respective caseloads of specialist vs. general dermatology clinics or public vs. private clinics. Seasonal differences in diagnoses (January vs. May) were also nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric care accounts for a significant proportion of the dermatologist's caseload in Spain. Our findings are useful for identifying opportunities for improving communication and training in pediatric primary care and for designing training focused on the optimal treatment of acne and pigmented lesions (with instruction on basic dermoscopy use) in these settings.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Dermatología , Enfermedades de la Piel , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Piel/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , España/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The burden of nonvenereal infections in Spanish dermatology practice has not yet been evaluated. The aim of this study was to analyze the overall weight of these infections in outpatient dermatology caseloads. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational cross-sectional study of diagnoses made by a random selection of dermatologists from the Spanish Association of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) working in outpatient dermatology clinics. The data were obtained through the anonymous DIADERM survey. Diagnoses of infectious diseases were selected using codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision. After excluding sexually transmitted infections, the diagnoses were classified into 22 groups. RESULTS: Spanish dermatologists diagnosed an estimated 16190 (95% CI, 9338-23042) nonvenereal infections on average per week, a figure that accounted for 9.33% of the dermatology caseload. The most common diagnostic groups were nonanogenital viral warts (7475 diagnoses, 46.17% of nonvenereal infections), dermatophytosis (3336, 20.61%), and other viral infections (1592, 9.84%), which included Molluscum contagiosum infections. Nonvenereal infections were more common than noninfectious dermatologic conditions in private clinics (P<.0020) and adults (P<.00001). Patients with these infections were also more likely to be discharged than those with other conditions in both public (P<.0004) and private (P<.0002) practices. CONCLUSIONS: Nonvenereal infections are frequent in dermatology. They are the third most common reason for outpatient visits, behind actinic keratosis and nonmelanoma skin cancer. By enhancing the participation of dermatologists in the management of skin infections and encouraging interactions with other specialists, we will be able to carve out a niche in an area we have scarcely ventured into to date.
Asunto(s)
Dermatología , Queratosis Actínica , Enfermedades de la Piel , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Enfermedades de la Piel/epidemiología , Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Predominantly sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and infestations and other anogenital dermatoses are covered in the training of specialists in dermatology and venereology in Spain. This study aimed to analyze the proportion of the dermatology caseload these diseases account for within the public and private dermatological activity of the Spanish health system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational cross-sectional study of time periods describing the diagnoses made in outpatient dermatology clinics, obtained through the anonymous DIADERM survey of a representative random sample of dermatologists. Based on diagnostic codes of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, 36 related diagnoses were selected, and classified into 12 groups. RESULTS: Only 3.16% of diagnoses corresponded to STIs and other anogenital dermatoses. The most common diagnostic group was anogenital human papillomavirus infection, followed by molluscum contagiosum, and inflammatory anogenital dermatoses. Lesions with these diagnoses were usually the main reasons for first visits in the National Health Service. In private practice, the diagnoses usually came after referrals from other physicians. CONCLUSIONS: STIs and other anogenital dermatoses account for a very small proportion of the dermatology caseload in Spain, although the inclusion of molluscum contagiosum diagnoses overestimates these conditions. The fact that no STI centers or monographic STI consultations were included in the random sample of dermatology partly explains the under-representation of these areas of the specialty. A determined effort to support and promote monographic STI centres and clinics should be made.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: No simple staging system has emerged for basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), since they do not follow the TNM process, and practitioners failed to agree on simple clinical or pathological criteria as a basis for a classification. Operational classification of BCCs is required for decision-making, trials and guidelines. Unsupervised clustering of real cases of difficult-to-treat BCCs (DTT-BCCs; part 1) has demonstrated that experts could blindly agree on a five groups classification of DTT-BCCs based on five patterns of clinical situations. OBJECTIVE: Using this five patterns to generate an operational and comprehensive classification of BCCs. METHOD: Testing practitioner's agreement, when using the five patterns classification to ensure that it is robust enough to be used in the practice. Generating the first version of a staging system of BCCs based on pattern recognition. RESULTS: Sixty-two physicians, including 48 practitioners and the 14 experts who participated in the generation of the five different patterns of DTT-BCCs, agreed on 90% of cases when classifying 199 DTT-BCCs cases using the five patterns classification (part 1) attesting that this classification is understandable and usable in practice. In order to cover the whole field of BCCs, these five groups of DTT-BCCs were added a group representing the huge number of easy-to-treat BCCs, for which sub-classification has little interest, and a group of very rare metastatic cases, resulting in a four-stage and seven-substage staging system of BCCs. CONCLUSION: A practical classification adapted to the specificities of BCCs is proposed. It is the first tumour classification based on pattern recognition of clinical situations, which proves to be consistent and usable. This EADO staging system version 1 will be improved step by step and tested as a decision tool and a prognostic instrument.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Carcinoma Basocelular/diagnóstico , Análisis por Conglomerados , Humanos , Pronóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: No simple classification system has emerged for 'advanced basal cell carcinomas', and more generally for all difficult-to-treat BCCs (DTT-BCCs), due to the heterogeneity of situations, TNM inappropriateness to BCCs, and different approaches of different specialists. OBJECTIVE: To generate an operational classification, using the unconscious ability of experts to simplify the great heterogeneity of the clinical situations into a few relevant groups, which drive their treatment decisions. METHOD: Non-supervised independent and blinded clustering of real clinical cases of DTT-BCCs was used. Fourteen international experts from different specialties independently partitioned 199 patient cases considered 'difficult to treat' into as many clusters they want (≤10), choosing their own criteria for partitioning. Convergences and divergences between the individual partitions were analyzed using the similarity matrix, K-mean approach, and average silhouette method. RESULTS: There was a rather consensual clustering of cases, regardless of the specialty and nationality of the experts. Mathematical analysis showed that consensus between experts was best represented by a partition of DTT-BCCs into five clusters, easily recognized a posteriori as five clear-cut patterns of clinical situations. The concept of 'locally advanced' did not appear consistent between experts. CONCLUSION: Although convergence between experts was not granted, this experiment shows that clinicians dealing with BCCs all tend to work by a similar pattern recognition based on the overall analysis of the situation. This study thus provides the first consensual classification of DTT-BCCs. This experimental approach using mathematical analysis of independent and blinded clustering of cases by experts can probably be applied to many other situations in dermatology and oncology.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Análisis por Conglomerados , Consenso , HumanosRESUMEN
Despite decades of public health campaigns, tanning and sunburn still occur at unacceptably high rates. Skin cancer prevention campaigns predominately focus on increasing awareness of the risk of excessive sun exposure. This study sought to assess the efficacy of this approach, by interrogating correlations between risk perception and sun exposure behaviour. A 31-item questionnaire assessing skin cancer risk factors, tanning attitudes, sunburn and tanning behaviour was undertaken by individuals who attended a workplace skin check. Validated questions were included to assess cognitive and affective risk perception and to frame risk as absolute, comparative and conditional. One hundred sixty-seven respondents completed the questionnaire. No aspects of risk perception (absolute cognitive, affective or conditional) significantly correlated with protective sun exposure behaviour, with the exception of perceived comparative severity of skin cancer. Instead, positive tanning attitudes were far more significantly correlated with sun exposure behaviour. Actual risk and risk perception have very limited impact on sun exposure behaviour. Instead, sun exposure behaviour was significantly linked with positive tanning attitudes. It is suggested, therefore, that campaigns focussing solely on education regarding risk factors appear to have been ineffective in behaviour mitigation, and innovative approaches, aimed at influencing tanning norms, might complement the existing educational campaigns.
Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Promoción de la Salud/normas , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Baño de Sol/psicología , Quemadura Solar/psicología , Luz Solar/efectos adversos , Protectores Solares/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/psicología , Quemadura Solar/etiología , Quemadura Solar/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Vitiligo-like depigmentation (VLD) is a characteristic cutaneous event described in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma receiving treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. We report the onset of VLD in three patients with other cancer types (cholangiocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma) following treatment with immunotherapy (combination pembrolizumab and nivolumab for the first, and pembrolizumab for the other two cancer types). Cases of VLD have not been reported previously in patients treated for any of these cancers, to our knowledge. Pembrolizumab and nivolumab are monoclonal antibodies targeting programmed cell death (PD)-1 receptors, while ipilimumab targets cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4. Our clinical finding challenges the current understanding of VLD as a malignant melanoma-specific immunotherapy-related adverse event.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia/efectos adversos , Melanoma/secundario , Vitíligo/inducido químicamente , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Antígeno CTLA-4/antagonistas & inhibidores , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Colangiocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Colangiocarcinoma/patología , Humanos , Hipopigmentación/inducido químicamente , Infusiones Intravenosas , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Melanoma/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nivolumab/administración & dosificación , Nivolumab/efectos adversos , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Trastornos de la Pigmentación/inducido químicamente , Trastornos de la Pigmentación/patología , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Vitíligo/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A core outcomes set (COS) is an agreed minimum set of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials for a specific condition. Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has no agreed-upon COS. A central aspect in the COS development process is to identify a set of candidate outcome domains from a long list of items. Our long list had been developed from patient interviews, a systematic review of the literature and a healthcare professional survey, and initial votes had been cast in two e-Delphi surveys. In this manuscript, we describe two in-person consensus meetings of Delphi participants designed to ensure an inclusive approach to generation of domains from related items. OBJECTIVES: To consider which items from a long list of candidate items to exclude and which to cluster into outcome domains. METHODS: The study used an international and multistakeholder approach, involving patients, dermatologists, surgeons, the pharmaceutical industry and medical regulators. The study format was a combination of formal presentations, small group work based on nominal group theory and a subsequent online confirmation survey. RESULTS: Forty-one individuals from 13 countries and four continents participated. Nine items were excluded and there was consensus to propose seven domains: disease course, physical signs, HS-specific quality of life, satisfaction, symptoms, pain and global assessments. CONCLUSIONS: The HISTORIC consensus meetings I and II will be followed by further e-Delphi rounds to finalize the core domain set, building on the work of the in-person consensus meetings.
Asunto(s)
Hidradenitis Supurativa/terapia , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Consenso , Conferencias de Consenso como Asunto , Técnica Delphi , Salud Global , Humanos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic advances have made the achievement of clear/almost clear skin possible for many patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To determine patient perceptions of the impact of psoriasis and of attaining clear/almost clear skin. METHODS: Global survey of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. RESULTS: A total of 8338 patients from 31 countries participated. The majority (57%) had not achieved self-assessed clear/almost clear skin with their current therapy, and 56% of those who had not met this goal believed it would be impossible to do so. Among the patients who had clear/almost clear skin, 73% had not initiated their current treatment until >1 year after psoriasis diagnosis, and 28% had to wait >5 years. Eighty-four percent of all respondents experienced discrimination and/or humiliation due to psoriasis, and many reported negative effects on work, intimate relationships, sleep and mental health. Patients without clear/almost clear skin reported that such achievement would open new possibilities, such as swimming (58%), a wider choice of clothing (40%), and meeting new people (26%). A limitation of this study, as with any survey-based research, is that selection and recall bias may have been present. Additionally, respondent definitions of clear/almost clear skin were subjective and may have varied. CONCLUSION: Despite the importance of clear/almost clear skin to psoriasis patients, most are still not achieving it, and many are unaware it is possible.
Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Percepción , Psoriasis/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Discriminación Social , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Measures of quality of life (QOL) and patient satisfaction are of great importance in dermatology, as both impact upon treatment adherence and health outcomes. Patients' assessment of QOL often differs from their doctors' predictions and their assessments of skin disease severity do not correlate with patients' own perceptions. The development of laser technology has facilitated successful treatment of many skin conditions, but studies on patient satisfaction are lacking. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine the extent of discordance between patient and dermatologist-assessed disease severity and assess the impact of acne scarring, rosacea and photoaging on QOL. Our secondary aim was to assess patient satisfaction with laser therapy. METHODS: A prospective study of patients undergoing laser treatment for acne scarring, rosacea and photoaging was conducted over 1 year at the Skin & Cancer Foundation Australia. Subjective disease severity was determined using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Two dermatologists determined objective severity using validated grading scales to score photographs. QOL impact was measured by Skindex-16, satisfaction was measured using an amended Comprehensive Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18). RESULTS: A total of 147 individuals sought laser therapy for acne scarring, rosacea and photoaging. Dermatologists' subjective disease severity correlated weakly with patient-reported severity. All conditions negatively impacted upon QOL. Patients with rosacea had the most symptomatic impact; acne scarring was associated with the greatest self-esteem and social functioning issues; photoaging patients were the least affected. There were significant correlations between subjective severity assessment and Skindex-16 scores. There was notable discordance between dermatologist's skin severity assessment and patient's self-reported QOL impact. CONCLUSION: Skin conditions can have a profound impact on patient QOL, which is affected by patients' perception of disease severity and not fully appreciated by dermatologists' own severity assessments. Laser therapy is associated with high patient satisfaction.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar/cirugía , Cicatriz/patología , Terapia por Láser , Rosácea/cirugía , Acné Vulgar/fisiopatología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfacción del Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Rosácea/fisiopatología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Over the past decade, targeted therapies such as BRAF inhibitors, MEK inhibitors and immunotherapies such as anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 antibodies have emerged as novel treatments of advanced melanoma. Along with increased use of these therapies, a range of cutaneous adverse events have also emerged, varying from more serious and frequent cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma to mere cosmetic changes such as curly hair or rare severe toxic epidermal necrolysis. Early detection and management of these cutaneous adverse events will aid patients to receive accurate treatment, avoid unnecessary discontinuation of anti-tumour treatment and improve the patient's overall quality of life. This review will describe various cutaneous adverse events of anti-melanoma therapies and its management.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antígeno CTLA-4/antagonistas & inhibidores , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/inducido químicamente , Erupciones por Medicamentos/clasificación , Erupciones por Medicamentos/terapia , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Enfermedades del Cabello/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Queratosis/inducido químicamente , Proteínas de Neoplasias/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/inducido químicamente , Paniculitis/inducido químicamente , Trastornos por Fotosensibilidad/inducido químicamente , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias Cutáneas/inducido químicamente , Vitíligo/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: BRAF inhibitor-based therapies have been shown to induce cutaneous toxicities, with onset generally in the first 8-26 weeks of therapy. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether cutaneous toxicities persist in patients who have remained on BRAF inhibitor-based therapies for longer than 52 weeks, and therefore whether ongoing dermatology assessment is required. METHODS: All patients treated with the BRAF inhibitors vemurafenib or dabrafenib or combination BRAF inhibitor and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor therapy at Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia underwent regular dermatological assessments for the duration of therapy. All patients enrolled in a clinical trial, and 18% of patients in the compassionate access scheme underwent a baseline assessment prior to commencement of therapy and every 4-8 weeks thereafter. Patients' adverse events were recorded in a specific database. RESULTS: Patients continued to develop cutaneous adverse events after 52 weeks of continuous therapy. Patients on single-agent BRAF inhibitor therapy suffered from Grover disease (45%), plantar hyperkeratosis (45%), verrucal keratosis (18%) and even cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (16%). The most frequent adverse event seen in patients in the combination BRAF and MEK inhibitor group was an acneiform eruption (40%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients on BRAF inhibitor-based therapies need to continue to have regular dermatological follow-up independent of the duration of their therapy.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Imidazoles/efectos adversos , Indoles/efectos adversos , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Oximas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Quinasas Quinasa Quinasa PAM/antagonistas & inhibidores , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Oximas/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Piridonas/administración & dosificación , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinonas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinonas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , VemurafenibRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Psoriatic arthritis commonly develops in psoriasis patients and, if undiagnosed, can lead to potentially avoidable joint damage and an increased risk of comorbidity and mortality. Increased awareness of PsA symptoms among dermatologists provides an opportunity for earlier diagnosis, more timely therapy and prevention of disability. OBJECTIVE: To provide Australian epidemiological data on the frequency of undiagnosed PsA among psoriasis patients in dermatology practice, and to investigate the impact of psoriasis on quality of life and work productivity. METHODS: Nine tertiary centre dermatology practices enrolled patients presenting with plaque psoriasis and no prior rheumatologist-confirmed PsA diagnosis. Patients were screened using the Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation (PASE) questionnaire and were referred to a rheumatologist for assessment of PsA status using CASPAR criteria if they had a PASE score ≥44. RESULTS: Based on the composite and sequential application of PASE and CASPAR criteria, undiagnosed PsA among psoriasis patients in this study is 9% [95% CI: 6, 12]. The PPV of PASE in this setting is 26% [95% CI: 19, 34]. Nail involvement and chronic large plaque psoriasis were identified as independent positive predictors of PsA, whereas scalp psoriasis was an independent negative predictor of PsA. Patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PASI ≥15) had lower quality of life scores than patients with less severe psoriasis. CONCLUSION: In this study, the frequency of undiagnosed PsA in Australian dermatology practice was 9% among plaque psoriasis patients with no prior PsA diagnosis. Compared with psoriasis alone, the impact of undiagnosed PsA on health-related quality of life of psoriasis patients is substantial.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Psoriásica/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Absentismo , Adulto , Artritis Psoriásica/diagnóstico , Australia/epidemiología , Dermatología/estadística & datos numéricos , Eficiencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Uñas , Presentismo , Prevalencia , Psoriasis/epidemiología , Psoriasis/patología , Factores de Riesgo , Dermatosis del Cuero Cabelludo/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The treatment of metastatic melanoma has changed greatly with the development of inhibitors targeted at the mutated BRAF kinase present in up to 50% of metastatic melanoma cases. These agents, vemurafenib and dabrafenib, have been shown to increase median survival. Unfortunately, they have also been associated with the development of verrucal keratosis (VK) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cuSCC). These lesions require surgical excision, and when a large number of these lesions need to be treated, it can significantly affect the patient's quality of life. OBJECTIVES: To determine if acitretin is suitable as a chemopreventative agent against the development of verrucal keratosis and cuSCC, in patients on BRAF inhibitors. METHODS: Patients treated with a BRAF inhibitor, vemurafenib or dabrafenib, for stage IV metastatic melanoma, who had undergone more than five surgical excisions to remove lesions suggestive of cuSCC, were offered the opportunity to commence acitretin as a chemopreventative agent. Patients were evaluated every 4 weeks. Clinical and histological data were collected. RESULTS: Eight patients, who had a total of 24 cuSCC removed, were included in the study. After commencement of acitretin, only five cuSCC were excised from two patients. The most significant reduction was in a patient who had developed 13 cuSCC over 10 months and only two cuSCC 3 months after commencing acitretin. No modifications in the dose of the BRAF inhibitor were made as a result of cuSCC in any of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Acitretin should be considered as a chemopreventative agent for VK and cuSCC in patients taking BRAF inhibitors, before considering dosage reductions.
Asunto(s)
Acitretina/uso terapéutico , Anticarcinógenos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/prevención & control , Queratolíticos/uso terapéutico , Queratosis/prevención & control , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oximas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , VemurafenibRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Severity assessment of patients with psoriasis is a critical issue. Classical clinical assessment has recently been combined with quality of life (QoL) scores, but several instruments are used. Moreover, studies have focused on patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To compare the characteristics of QoL instruments in patients with the full range of psoriasis severity attending dermatology clinics. METHODS: Observational, prospective, multicentre study. Patients completed Skindex-29 (anchor) and a second instrument randomly selected from Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI) and Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 (SF-36). RESULTS: Demographic data, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and affected body surface area were not different between the three groups. Skindex-29 showed a weak but significant correlation with clinical severity; only PDI showed similar correlation. PDI, DLQI and SF-36 showed a substantial floor effect in patients with mild to severe psoriasis. Skindex-29 showed strong correlations with the other three QoL instruments. SF-36 was more sensitive than the other instruments in detecting worse QoL in male patients. CONCLUSIONS: Skindex-29 has better sensitivity to clinical severity with minimal floor effect, and covers the main domains explored by the other three QoL instruments in patients with mild to severe psoriasis.