RESUMEN
In many developing parts of the world, evidence on advance care planning (ACP) is either lacking or fragmented. Lack of streamlined means for ACP is known to lead to inconveniences for the clinicians as well as the patients and their families. This case report focuses on a young male diagnosed with metastatic osteosarcoma, who explicitly verbalised his wishes to be managed conservatively without involving invasive life-sustaining measures. However, the patient faced cardiopulmonary resuscitation before his demise against his wishes, which also contradicted with the medical point of view. Sri Lankan doctors face moral, ethical and legal dilemmas as they deal with terminally ill patients at the verge of their death due to the deficiencies in the medical and legislative frameworks in the country.
RESUMEN
CONTEXT: One of the principle obstacles identified in suboptimal management of pain in worldwide cancer patients is inadequate assessment of pain which in turn leads to poor management. In Sri Lanka, this is heralded by the lack of medical or nursing professionals qualified in Palliative Medicine/Care to date in Sri Lanka. AIM: The aims of this clinical audit were to raise awareness and optimize the assessment of pain among resident patients of a tertiary care cancer hospital by oncology doctors. METHODS: A simple "pain and associated symptom chart" was designed for the doctors of the tertiary care cancer institution to document pain experienced by resident cancer patients in terms of intensity, both upon admission and on daily clerking. The expected standards were 100% documentation for each, regardless of the presence of pain on a visual analog scale (0-10). Documentation of the site and character of pain were expected to be 80% each. RESULTS: Despite conducting three audit cycles with staff training and clarifications in between, the pain assessment practices did not be improve significantly (P > 0.05). In the third/ultimate audit cycle, it was noted that 23.5% of the charts were marked as "0" pain intensity upon admission and have been neglected thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: Pain assessment practices of the tertiary care oncology unit concerned was suboptimal. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to explore obstacles and incorporate pain assessment as a mandatory routine practice in clinical oncology units.
RESUMEN
AIMS: Pain, a distressing symptom frequently suffered by cancer patients, is inherently associated with anxiety and depression yet often not alleviated with pharmacotherapy alone. This study was aimed at assessing the effect of an instrumental classical music listening session as an adjunct to the ongoing therapies, on pain, anxiety, and mood modulation in cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized crossover open clinical trial was designed involving adult resident patients suffering pain at a tertiary cancer care institution. The same group of patients (n = 24) were monitored for selected outcomes without (day 1) and then with administration of music (day 2). The primary (subjective) outcomes such as pain, anxiety, and mood levels measured on visual analog scale and surrogate (objective) parameters such as pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, and pupillary size monitored were compared utilizing paired-sample t-test. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements were noted in all three subjective parameters; pain and anxiety were significantly diminished until the 4th h (P = 0.007 and P = 0.0022, respectively), while low mood remained alleviated until the 12th h reading point (P = 0.007). Statistically significant reductions were present in surrogate end points such as pupillary size (P = 0.003 up to 12 h) and respiratory rate (P = 0.01 up to 8 h). Declines noted in the heart rate, and blood pressure readings were statistically insignificant. None suffered deterioration of their existing well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Hence, we conclude that culturally familiar instrumental classical music demonstrates a significant effect in alleviating pain, anxiety, and low mood as an adjunct to on-going therapies in cancer patients.
RESUMEN
Low and middle-income countries (LMIC) are increasingly affected by non-communicable diseases (NCDs), which overburden the health system. With the rising prevalence of multimorbidity, polypharmacy is inevitable. Sri Lanka too faces the burden of polypharmacy and multimorbidity, and it is a strain on the economy as Sri Lankan health care is free-of-charge to all citizens. Therefore, steps to reduce inappropriate polypharmacy are a necessity. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence and patterns of polypharmacy and its associated factors. In the medical clinics of a tertiary care hospital and a University primary care department, a descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out. Data were extracted from the clinical records of patients over the age of 20 years with a minimum of one NCD diagnosed by either a consultant physician or a consultant family physician. The sample size was 1600. Multimorbidity was present among 63.5% of patients. Polypharmacy (five or more than five drugs) was seen in 36.8% of the patients. Diabetes, hypertension, and coronary heart disease were the commonest of all diseases. Those on more than 11 drugs were found to have diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary heart disease, chronic kidney disease, and cardiac failure. 15% of the patients in the primary care setting and 59% of the patients in tertiary care experienced polypharmacy. Multiple regression analysis confirmed that polypharmacy increased with male gender, advancing age, and the degree of multimorbidity. Horizontal and vertical integration of multidisciplinary teams in all disciplines to manage patients is needed to combat inappropriate polypharmacy. This will help in optimizing the management of patients with NCDs.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The limited knowledge on aetiology, epidemiology and risk factors for multimorbidity especially evident from low and middle-income countries curtail the development and implementation of sustainable healthcare models. Sri Lanka, boasting for one of South Asia's most efficient public health systems that is accessible free-of-charge by the citizens is presently transitioning from lower-middle to upper-middle-income tier. Faced with the triple burden of disease, it is imperative for Sri Lanka to incorporate an integrated model to manage multimorbidity. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in medical clinics of a tertiary care hospital and a University primary care department. Data were extracted on to a form from the clinical records of patients over the age of 20 years with at least one non-communicable disease (NCD) and analysed. RESULTS: Multimorbidity was present among 64.1% of patients (n = 1600). Nearly 44.44% of the patients aged 20-35 years have a minimum of two disorders, and by the time they reach 50 years, nearly 64% of the patients have two or more non-communicable diseases. Nearly 7% of those aged over 65 years were diagnosed with four or more disorders. A fourth of the sample was affected by co-morbid diabetes mellitus and hypertension, whereas the combinations of coronary heart disease with hypertension and diabetes mellitus were also found to be significantly prevalent. A salient revelation of the binomial logistic regression analysis was that the number of disorders was positively correlated to the presence of mental disorders 7.25 (95% CI = 5.82-8.68). CONCLUSION: Multimorbidity is highly prevalent among this population and seemingly has a detrimental effect on the psychological wellbeing of those affected. Therefore, the need for horizontal integration of all primary to tertiary care disciplines, including mental health, to manage multimorbidity by policymakers is emphasized as a priority task.