Increasing chemical space coverage by combining empirical and computational fragment screens.

Most libraries for fragment-based drug discovery are restricted to 1,000-10,000 compounds, but over 500,000 fragments are commercially available and potentially accessible by virtual screening. Whether this larger set would increase chemotype coverage, and whether a computational screen can pragmatically prioritize them, is debated. To investigate this question, a 1281-fragment library was screened by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) against AmpC ß-lactamase, and hits were confirmed by surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Nine hits with novel chemotypes were confirmed biochemically with KI values from 0.2 to low mM. We also computationally docked 290,000 purchasable fragments with chemotypes unrepresented in the empirical library, finding 10 that had KI values from 0.03 to low mM. Though less novel than those discovered by NMR, the docking-derived fragments filled chemotype holes from the empirical library. Crystal structures of nine of the fragments in complex with AmpC ß-lactamase revealed new binding sites and explained the relatively high affinity of the docking-derived fragments. The existence of chemotype holes is likely a general feature of fragment libraries, as calculation suggests that to represent the fragment substructures of even known biogenic molecules would demand a library of minimally over 32,000 fragments. Combining computational and empirical fragment screens enables the discovery of unexpected chemotypes, here by the NMR screen, while capturing chemotypes missing from the empirical library and tailored to the target, with little extra cost in resources.

Fragment screening of stabilized G-protein-coupled receptors using biophysical methods.

Biophysical studies with G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are typically very challenging due to the poor stability of these receptors when solubilized from the cell membrane into detergent solutions. However, the stability of a GPCR can be greatly improved by introducing a number of point mutations into the protein sequence to give a stabilized receptor or StaR®. Here, we present the utility of StaRs for biophysical studies and the screening of fragment libraries. Two case studies are used to illustrate the methods: first, the screening of a library of fragments by surface plasmon resonance against the adenosine A(2A) receptor StaR, demonstrating how very small and weakly active xanthine fragments can be detected binding to the protein on chips; second, the screening and detection of fragment hits of a larger fragment library in an NMR format called TINS (target-immobilized NMR screening) against the ß(1) adrenergic StaR.

Target immobilization as a strategy for NMR-based fragment screening: comparison of TINS, STD, and SPR for fragment hit identification.

Fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD) has become a widely accepted tool that is complementary to high-throughput screening (HTS) in developing small-molecule inhibitors of pharmaceutical targets. Because a fragment campaign can only be as successful as the hit matter found, it is critical that the first stage of the process be optimized. Here the authors compare the 3 most commonly used methods for hit discovery in FBDD: high concentration screening (HCS), solution ligand-observed nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and surface plasmon resonance (SPR). They selected the commonly used saturation transfer difference (STD) NMR spectroscopy and the proprietary target immobilized NMR screening (TINS) as representative of the array of possible NMR methods. Using a target typical of FBDD campaigns, the authors find that HCS and TINS are the most sensitive to weak interactions. They also find a good correlation between TINS and STD for tighter binding ligands, but the ability of STD to detect ligands with affinity weaker than 1 mM K(D) is limited. Similarly, they find that SPR detection is most suited to ligands that bind with K(D) better than 1 mM. However, the good correlation between SPR and potency in a bioassay makes this a good method for hit validation and characterization studies.

Characterization of the DNA binding and structural properties of the BRCT region of human replication factor C p140 subunit.

BRCT domains, present in a large number of proteins that are involved in cell cycle regulation and/or DNA replication or repair, are primarily thought to be involved in protein-protein interactions. The large (p140) subunit of replication factor C contains a sequence of approximately 100 amino acids in the N-terminal region that binds DNA and is distantly related to known BRCT domains. Here we show that residues 375-480, which include 28 amino acids N-terminal to the BRCT domain, are required for 5'-phosphorylated double-stranded DNA binding. NMR chemical shift analysis indicated that the N-terminal extension includes an alpha-helix and confirmed the presence of a conserved BRCT domain. Sequence alignment of the BRCT region in the p140 subunit of replication factor C from various eukaryotes has identified very few absolutely conserved amino acid residues within the core BRCT domain, whereas none were found in sequences immediately N-terminal to the BRCT domain. However, mapping of the limited number of conserved, surface-exposed residues that were found onto a homology model of the BRCT domain, revealed a clustering on one side of the molecular surface. The cluster, as well as a number of amino acids in the N-terminal alpha-helix, were mutagenized to determine the importance for DNA binding. To ensure minimal structural changes because of the introduced mutations, proteins were checked using one-dimensional (1)H NMR and CD spectroscopy. Mutation of weakly conserved residues on one face of the N-terminal alpha-helix and of residues within the cluster disrupted DNA binding, suggesting a likely binding interface on the protein.