Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 240(9): 1052-1059, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés, Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37666251

RESUMEN

Epidemiological studies on age-related macular degeneration (AMD) provide crucial data on the frequency of early and late forms as well as associated risk factors. The increasing number of population-based cross-sectional and longitudinal cohort studies in Germany and Europe with published data is making prevalence and incidence estimators for AMD more robust, although they show mostly method-related fluctuations. This review article brings together the latest published epidemiological measures for AMD from Germany and Central as well as Western Europe. Based on this data and population figures for Germany and Europe, prevalence is projected, and future trends are forecasted. The epidemiological evidence for AMD-associated risk factors is also improving, especially through meta-analyses within large consortia with correspondingly high case numbers. This review article summarizes the latest findings and resulting recommendations for prevention approaches. Additionally, it discusses treatment options and future challenges.


Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Longitudinales , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Degeneración Macular/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular/epidemiología , Envejecimiento
2.
BMC Med Imaging ; 21(1): 55, 2021 03 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33743613

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common form of systemic vasculitis in persons aged 50 years and older. Medium and large vessels, like the temporal and axillary arteries, are commonly affected. Typical symptoms are headache, scalp tenderness, jaw claudication and ophthalmological symptoms as loss of visual field, diplopia or amaurosis due to optic nerve ischemia. Tongue pain due to vasculitic affection of the deep lingual artery can occur and has so far not been visualized and followed up by modern ultrasound. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 78-year-old woman with typical symptoms of GCA, such as scalp tenderness, jaw claudication and loss of visual field, as well as severe tongue pain. Broad vasculitic affection of the extracranial arteries, vasculitis of the central retinal artery and the deep lingual artery could be visualized by ultrasound. Further did we observe a relevant decrease of intima-media thickness (IMT) values of all arteries assessed by ultrasound during follow-up. Especially the left common superficial temporal artery showed a relevant decrease of IMT from 0.49 mm at time of diagnosis to 0.23 mm on 6-months follow-up. This is the first GCA case described in literature, in which vasculitis of the central retinal artery and the lingual artery could be visualized at diagnosis and during follow-up using high-resolution ultrasound. CONCLUSION: High-resolution ultrasound can be a useful diagnostic imaging modality in diagnosis and follow-up of GCA, even in small arteries like the lingual artery or central retinal artery. Ultrasound of the central retinal artery could be an important imaging tool in identifying suspected vasculitic affection of the central retinal artery.


Asunto(s)
Arteritis de Células Gigantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Glosalgia/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Anciano , Arteritis/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Arteritis de Células Gigantes/complicaciones , Glosalgia/etiología , Cefalea/etiología , Humanos , Arteria Retiniana/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuero Cabelludo , Arterias Temporales/diagnóstico por imagen , Lengua/irrigación sanguínea , Túnica Íntima/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos de la Visión
3.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 236(3): 261-268, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30897645

RESUMEN

Patient-reported outcome measures have been met with increasing interest, particularly in clinical research. They are used to capture the patient-relevant impact of an intervention or a loss of function. In patients with loss of vision, vision-related quality of life is assessed in order to quantify the impact of visual impairment in everyday life. When using quality of life instruments, psychometric characteristics - such as reliability, validity and responsiveness - are of great importance to ensure that the collected data are robust. There are various questionnaires to assess health-related quality of life, vision-related quality of life or visual function, but not all of these are suitable for patients with very low vision. The IVI and NEI VFQ questionnaires are available in German and can be used to assess vision-related quality of life. However, additional studies to evaluate these instruments and refinement or development of novel tools are needed to better meet the growing interest in using patient-reported outcomes as clinical study endpoints.


Asunto(s)
Calidad de Vida , Baja Visión , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Trastornos de la Visión , Baja Visión/complicaciones , Baja Visión/fisiopatología , Visión Ocular
4.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 234(12): 1493-1501, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29232756

RESUMEN

Background The evaluation of relationships in clinical case series is complicated by statistical pitfalls, one of which is spurious correlation. In this case, one or more potential factors are actually not related to a target measure, yet it may be wrongly inferred that they are. This may be due to either coincidence or the presence of a one or more confounding unregarded factors. In randomised clinical trials, it is attempted to eliminate such confounding factors or to control them by randomisation. However, this approach is not applicable in retrospective case series, and other statistical methods must be applied, such as multivariate analyses, taking into account all known variables. Patients/Material and Methods Statistical evaluation of the impact of different variables on the change in visual acuity after year 2 in a cohort of 1300 cases of nvAMD. The investigated variables are: visual acuity (VA) at baseline, central retinal thickness at baseline, age at baseline, mean interval between visits, number of injections, initial gain in VA after upload, and a change of the anti-VEGF compound. The target outcome measure was the change in VA as letter score at the end of year 2. Results All investigated variables have a marked impact on VA outcome when only single regression analysis is performed. Initial analysis of a switch in therapy gives a seemingly large effect on VA. However, multivariate analysis to avoid spurious correlations shows that only the following variables influence VA outcome with statistical significance: VA at baseline, initial gain in VA after upload, number of injections, mean interval between visits, and central retinal thickness at baseline. A switch in therapy had no statistically significant effect on VA outcome. Conclusion A switch in anti-VEGF therapy is not causally related to better VA outcome. In the statistical evaluation of non-randomised, retrospective case series, special attention must be given to potential confounding variables. When subgroups under investigation are not well balanced for confounding factors, misleading spurious correlations can result, leading to incorrect inferences.


Asunto(s)
Recolección de Datos/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Multivariante , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Retina/efectos de los fármacos , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Agudeza Visual/efectos de los fármacos , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Sesgo , Estudios de Cohortes , Correlación de Datos , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oftalmoscopios , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica
5.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 234(12): 1502-1507, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29232757

RESUMEN

Background Controlled prospective clinical trials on the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME) using anti-VEGF compounds show very good results in visual acuity gain over several years. To date, only limited data are available from comparable studies under real-life settings in clinical routine. However, real-life data from other indications for anti-VEGF treatment suggest that, in clinical routine, gain in visual acuity is less pronounced and cannot be maintained over a longer period of time, which is related to the significantly lower number of injections administered in clinical routine. Here we report a case series from our clinical routine of patients treated with ranibizumab for visual significant DME. Patients/Material and Methods Retrospective case series of 335 cases with follow-up of up to 3 years. All cases in our clinic treated for visual significant DME with at least one injection of ranibizumab were evaluated for the course of visual acuity gain and number of injections received. Results A mean gain in visual acuity (VA) of + 5.6 and + 3.7 letters was found in years one and two, respectively, with a median VA of logMAR 0.52 (decimal 0.3) at baseline. The steepest increase in VA is found during the first 4 months, with a less pronounced increase up to month 16. The mean number of injections was 5.7, 3.2 and 1.1 for years one, two, and three, respectively. Conclusions Results of real life treatment in clinical routine are found to fall behind controlled, prospective trials, as found to the findings in other anti-VEGF indications: mean gain in VA is lower than in prospective trials, and the initial gain cannot be fully maintained over a prolonged time period. Similarly, the number of injections received is markedly lower than in controlled trials. This can partially be explained by differences in study populations and a negative selection bias in longer term results. However, additional barriers that hamper timely treatment tailored to disease activity requirements must be identified and circumvented where possible.


Asunto(s)
Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Anciano , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agudeza Visual/efectos de los fármacos
6.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 234(12): 1508-1514, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29232758

RESUMEN

Background Treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD) under real life conditions may differ from controlled prospective trials with respect to the number of injections and long term preservation of visual acuity. In many instances, intervals for controls and re-injection cannot be maintained as frequently as required. This case series examines actual intervals for control and re-injection visits, in order to estimate how prolonged intervals have an impact on momentary visual acuity and how long term visual outcome is affected. Patients/Material and Methods Retrospective case series of 1,324 eyes with nvAMD, treated with a total of 8,150 ranibizumab injections (according to the PRN regimen) or 1,725 aflibercept injections (according to a fixed regimen), during the observation period of up to 3 years. The evaluation covered the time interval between visits, impact of this on the course of visual acuity, as well as the number of injections throughout treatment. Results Planned intervals of 4 or 8 weeks between visits were more often exceeded in the PRN regimen than with the fixed regimen. Visual acuity does not peak after 4 weeks, but only between 6 and 8 weeks. No statistically significant difference between aflibercept and ranibizumab was found. If the mean interval for re-injection was maintained at 4 - 6 weeks, this gave the greatest gains in visual acuity at end of years 1 and 2, respectively. Any prolongation of these intervals was accompanied by worse long term visual acuity. The fixed regimen is associated with consistently briefer re-treatment intervals during years 2 and 3, than with the PRN regimen. Conclusion Our data point to the importance of frequent controls accompanied by timely retreatment, as these have a major impact on visual outcome. It therefore appears to be more important to choose a treatment plan that facilitates frequent re-injections than to select either of the two compounds.


Asunto(s)
Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Agudeza Visual/efectos de los fármacos , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 234(12): 1515-1518, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29025176

RESUMEN

Treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents has been improved since its introduction in Germany. Several observational studies have demonstrated an increased frequency of injections in parallel with improved visual outcomes during the first year of treatment over the last 7 years. These results are reflected in several case series. However, studies with a longer follow-up reported that visual function regressed to baseline vision following an initial improvement, e.g. during the first three years of treatment. A delay in treatment initiation has been reported mainly for rural areas and management models involving more than one ophthalmologist or institution. Encouragingly, recent data confirm a positive trend towards reducing treatment delay, increasing injection frequency and improving treatment outcomes. Still, further improvements are needed to attain optimal treatment outcomes achievable under routine clinical conditions in Germany.


Asunto(s)
Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Agudeza Visual/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios de Cohortes , Esquema de Medicación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tiempo de Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA