A stochastic model for estimating sustainable limits to wildlife mortality in a changing world.

Human-caused mortality of wildlife is a pervasive threat to biodiversity. Assessing the population-level impact of fisheries bycatch and other human-caused mortality of wildlife has typically relied upon deterministic methods. However, population declines are often accelerated by stochastic factors that are not accounted for in such conventional methods. Building on the widely applied potential biological removal (PBR) equation, we devised a new population modeling approach for estimating sustainable limits to human-caused mortality and applied it in a case study of bottlenose dolphins affected by capture in an Australian demersal otter trawl fishery. Our approach, termed sustainable anthropogenic mortality in stochastic environments (SAMSE), incorporates environmental and demographic stochasticity, including the dependency of offspring on their mothers. The SAMSE limit is the maximum number of individuals that can be removed without causing negative stochastic population growth. We calculated a PBR of 16.2 dolphins per year based on the best abundance estimate available. In contrast, the SAMSE model indicated that only 2.3-8.0 dolphins could be removed annually without causing a population decline in a stochastic environment. These results suggest that reported bycatch rates are unsustainable in the long term, unless reproductive rates are consistently higher than average. The difference between the deterministic PBR calculation and the SAMSE limits showed that deterministic approaches may underestimate the true impact of human-caused mortality of wildlife. This highlights the importance of integrating stochasticity when evaluating the impact of bycatch or other human-caused mortality on wildlife, such as hunting, lethal control measures, and wind turbine collisions. Although population viability analysis (PVA) has been used to evaluate the impact of human-caused mortality, SAMSE represents a novel PVA framework that incorporates stochasticity for estimating acceptable levels of human-caused mortality. It offers a broadly applicable, stochastic addition to the demographic toolbox to evaluate the impact of human-caused mortality on wildlife.

La mortalidad de la fauna causada por humanos es una amenaza continua para la biodiversidad. El análisis del impacto a nivel poblacional de la captura pesquera incidental y otras causas humanas de la mortalidad de la fauna comúnmente ha dependido de métodos determinísticos. Sin embargo, las declinaciones poblacionales con frecuencia se aceleran por los factores estocásticos que no son considerados en dichos métodos convencionales. A partir de la ecuación de extirpación biológica potencial (EBP) de extensa aplicación diseñamos una nueva estrategia de modelación poblacional para estimar los límites sustentables de la mortalidad causada por humanos y la aplicamos en un estudio de caso de los delfines nariz de botella afectados por la captura en una pesquería australiana de arrastre demersal. Nuestra estrategia, denominada mortalidad antropogénica sustentable en ambientes estocásticos (MASAM) incorpora la estocasticidad ambiental y demográfica, incluyendo la dependencia que tienen las crías por sus madres. El límite MASAM es el número máximo de individuos que pueden extirparse sin causar un crecimiento poblacional estocástico negativo. Calculamos un EBP de 16.3 delfines por año con base en la mejor estimación de abundancia disponible. Como contraste, el modelo MASAM indicó que sólo podían extirparse entre 2.3 y 8.0 delfines anualmente sin ocasionar una declinación poblacional en un ambiente estocástico. Estos resultados sugieren que las tasas reportadas de captura incidental no son sustentables a largo plazo, a menos que las tasas reproductivas sean sistemáticamente más altas que el promedio. La diferencia entre el cálculo determinístico del EBP y los límites de MASAM mostró que los enfoques determinísticos pueden subestimar el verdadero impacto de la mortalidad de la fauna causada por humanos. Lo anterior resalta la importancia de integrar la estocasticidad al evaluar el impacto de la captura incidental y otras causas humanas de la mortalidad como la caza, las medidas letales de control y las colisiones con turbinas de viento. Aunque el análisis de viabilidad poblacional (AVP) se ha utilizado para evaluar el impacto de la mortalidad causada por humanos, MASAM representa un marco novedoso de AVP que incorpora la estocasticidad para estimar los niveles aceptables de mortalidad causada por humanos. Este enfoque ofrece una adición estocástica de aplicación generalizada para las herramientas demográficas usadas para evaluar el impacto de la mortalidad causada por humanos sobre la fauna.

Cetacean morbillivirus in coastal Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins, Western Australia.

Cetacean morbillivirus (CeMV) has caused several epizootics in multiple species of cetaceans globally and is an emerging disease among cetaceans in Australia. We detected CeMV in 2 stranded coastal Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) in Western Australia. Preliminary phylogenetic data suggest that this virus variant is divergent from known strains.

Pine as fast food: foraging ecology of an endangered cockatoo in a forestry landscape.

Pine plantations near Perth, Western Australia have provided an important food source for endangered Carnaby's Cockatoos (Calyptorhynchus latirostris) since the 1940s. Plans to harvest these plantations without re-planting will remove this food source by 2031 or earlier. To assess the impact of pine removal, we studied the ecological association between Carnaby's Cockatoos and pine using behavioural, nutritional, and phenological data. Pine plantations provided high densities of seed (158,025 seeds ha(-1)) over a large area (c. 15,000 ha). Carnaby's Cockatoos fed throughout these plantations and removed almost the entire annual crop of pine cones. Peak cockatoo abundance coincided with pine seed maturation. Pine seed had energy and protein contents equivalent to native food sources and, critically, is available in summer when breeding pairs have young offspring to feed. This strong and enduring ecological association clearly suggests that removing pine will have a significant impact on this endangered species unless restoration strategies, to establish alternative food sources, are implemented.