Frequent loss of hMLH1 by promoter hypermethylation leads to microsatellite instability in adenomatous polyps of patients with a single first-degree member affected by colon cancer.

The first-degree relatives of patients affected by colorectal cancer, who do not belong to familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer families, have a doubled risk of developing tumors of the large intestine. We have previously demonstrated that subjects with a single first-degree relative (SFDR) with colon cancer have a doubled risk for developing colorectal adenomas, and in these cases, polyps recur more frequently. The mechanism underlying this predisposition has not been clarified. In this study, we evaluated the frequency of microsatellite instability (MSI) using the five markers suggested by the National Cancer Institute workshop, target gene mutations, hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression, and hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation in the adenomas of patients with and without a SFDR affected by colon cancer. Seventy polyps were obtained from 70 patients: 27 with a single FDR with colon cancer and 43 without such a history. Of the 70 polyps, 12 were MSI-H (17.1%), 20 were MSI-L (28.6%), and 30 were microsatellite stable (42.9%). Of the 27 patients with positive family history, 8 polyps (29.6%) were MSI-H compared with those with negative history in which 4 polyps (9.3%) were MSI-H (P < 0.02). Of the 12 MSI-H polyps, all of the polyps obtained from patients with positive family history had loss of hMLH1 immunostaining versus one with negative family history (P < 0.02). Of the MSI-H polyps, 2 had a somatic frameshift mutation of the MBD4 gene, 1 of MSH6, 1 of BAX, and 2 of transforming growth factor betaRII. Furthermore, 6 of 8 polyps from patients with positive family history with MSI-H and loss of MLH1 had hypermethylation of the MLH1promoter versus none of the MSI-H with negative family history (P < 0.02). All 6 polyps of the 27 from SFDR positive subjects, with hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation loss of hMLH1 and MSI, were located in the right colon (P < 0.02). Hypermethylation of the promoter of hMLH1, consequent loss of hMLH1 expression, and MSI are at the basis of approximately 25% of adenomatous polyps developed in subjects with a SFDR affected by colorectal cancer.

Expression of HLA class I antigen and proteasome subunits LMP-2 and LMP-10 in primary vs. metastatic breast carcinoma lesions.

Malignant transformation of breast epithelia is frequently associated with an altered expression of MHC products and of antigen processing molecular machinery. The consequent impairment of tumor immune recognition is thought to confer to tumor cells a selective advantage with respect to survival and metastatization. In order to understand if metastatic breast cancer lesions might be associated with a defective proteasome subunit expression that, in turn, might limit the peptide availability and prevent stable cell surface HLA class I-tumor antigen expression, we studied by immunostaining the expression of beta2-microglobulin, HLA class I antigens and proteasome subunits LMP-2 and LMP-10 in 35 matched primary and metastatic human breast carcinoma lesions. Overall, we found a downregulation of LMP-2 in 51.4% of the lesions, of LPM-10 in 45.7% of the lesions, of HLA class I heavy chain in 40.0% of the lesions, while beta2-microglobulin was downregulated in 25.7% of the lesions studied. In most primary and metastatic lesions the downmodulation of each antigen examined was coordinated. In the cases where a selective downmodulation of antigens was observed in the primary or in the metastatic lesion (with the exception of beta2-microglobulin), it was rather observed in the primary lesions. However, LMP-10 showed a significant selective downmodulation in the metastases as well. Antigen downmodulation does not appear therefore to represent a strategy for the primary tumor to metastasize successfully.

Correlation of the score for subjective pain with physical disability, clinical and radiographic scores in recent onset rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: To analyse the relationship between subjective pain score and other measures of clinical, radiographic and functional status; in particular Larsen radiographic scores and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ); in patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with a disease duration of less than 3 years. METHODS: In this cross sectional study of 105 patients with RA (76 women, 29 men: mean age 50.93; mean disease duration 15.86 months; 71% rheumatoid factor positive) subjective pain was assessed according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Correlation coefficients between pain score and disease activity measures (patients' global assessment of disease by VAS, number of tender and swollen joints, morning stiffness, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], C-reactive protein [CRP] and titre of rheumatoid factor, radiographic evaluations (Larsen-Dale scores for radiographic damage of the small joints of the hands, wrist and feet), disability measures (health assessment questionnaire [HAQ]), and demographic variables were calculated; hierarchical regression analysis was done with subjective pain score as the dependent variable. RESULTS: The Spearman's correlation coefficient comparing subjective pain and HAQ was 0.421 (p < 0.001), between subjective pain and global assessment of disease and morning stiffness was 0.573 (p < 0.001) and 0.427 (p < 0.001) respectively, and between pain and number of tender and swollen joints 0.037 and 0.050 respectively (p > 0.05). In regression analysis, global assessment of disease by patients explained 32.8% of the variation in pain intensity score, morning stiffness 10.7%, CRP 4.0%, HAQ 3.8% and Larsen-Dale scores explained 2.1%; other variables were not significant in the model. CONCLUSIONS: Pain scores of patients with early severe rheumatoid arthritis are correlated at higher levels with patients' global assessment of disease and with morning stiffness rather than with radiographic or other clinical variables such as number of tender and swollen joints.

An open, randomized comparison study of cyclosporine A, cyclosporine A + methotrexate and cyclosporine A + hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of early severe rheumatoid arthritis.

PURPOSE: To determine whether a regimen of cyclosporine (CSA) and methotrexate (MTX), or CSA and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) introduced in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can produce a significant improvement in clinical outcome and/or retard radiographic damage in comparison with standard monotherapy with CSA alone. METHODS: One hundred five patients with active RA of less than 36 months duration, who had never previously been treated with immunosuppressive agents, were included in a 12-month, multi-center, open, randomized trial. Patients who fulfilled the criteria for early severe RA were randomized to receive either combination therapy (CSA + MTX n = 34, CSA + HCQ n = 35) or CSA alone (n = 36). RESULTS: CSA + MTX was more effective than the other two treatment groups in controlling RA symptoms. CSA+MTX did not show a significant radiographic progression according to Larsen-Dale (0.90 +/- 3.89 compared to baseline values, P > 0.05); moreover, patients treated with CSA alone or CSA+HCQ showed a significant worsening of Larsen-Dale score (2.91 +/- 5.99 and 2.97 +/- 4.28 respectively vs baseline values, P < 0.05), although not significant when compared with the CSA + HCQ group (P = 0.56 and 0.39, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This trial indicated that CSA+MTX was more effective than the other two treatments in improving clinical data and inhibiting radiographic progression, although the differences were not significant in this relatively small study. However, the difference was significant in favor of CSA + MTX regarding ACR 50% response.

Long-term safety and efficacy of low-dose cyclosporin A in severe psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of long-term treatment with cyclosporin A (CsA) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Sixty patients with PsA were enrolled in a prospective, nonrandomised study of CsA. Patients with hypertension or hypercreatinemia were excluded. Disease activity was evaluated according to clinical activity measures and the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI). Assessments were made at baseline and after 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Measurements. The primary endpoints were 20% and 50% improvement in disease activity according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Other endpoints were 70% ACR responses at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months and other measures of disease activity at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients completed the 24-month of treatment with CsA. When all the clinical variables throughout the study were compared with baseline results, they all showed significant improvement after 6 months of treatment. Erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESR) reached a significant improvement after 12 months of treatment (P<0.05). The PASI scores decreased from 15.1+/-4.3 to 5.2+/-2.7 after 24 months of treatment (P<0.001). Side effects included hypertrichosis (24% of patients), gum hyperplasia (12%), gastrointestinal intolerance (9%), hypertension (21%), neurological disturbance (7%), and nephrotoxicity (17%). Three patients withdrew due to treatment failure. One patient was lost to follow-up, and seven patients withdrew due to side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporin A represents a helpful second-choice treatment for patients with active psoriatic arthritis. Administration of CsA necessitates expert and careful follow-up of patients.