Interleaved Propofol-Ketamine Maintains DBS Physiology and Hemodynamic Stability: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The gold standard anesthesia for deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is the "awake" approach, using local anesthesia alone. Although it offers high-quality microelectrode recordings and therapeutic-window assessment, it potentially causes patients extreme stress and might result in suboptimal surgical outcomes. General anesthesia or deep sedation is an alternative, but may reduce physiological testing reliability and lead localization accuracy. OBJECTIVES: The aim is to investigate a novel anesthesia regimen of ketamine-induced conscious sedation for the physiological testing phase of DBS surgery. METHODS: Parkinson's patients undergoing subthalamic DBS surgery were randomly divided into experimental and control groups. During physiological testing, the groups received 0.25 mg/kg/h ketamine infusion and normal saline, respectively. Both groups had moderate propofol sedation before and after physiological testing. The primary outcome was recording quality. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic stability, lead accuracy, motor and cognitive outcome, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. RESULTS: Thirty patients, 15 from each group, were included. Intraoperatively, the electrophysiological signature and lead localization were similar under ketamine and saline. Tremor amplitude was slightly lower under ketamine. Postoperatively, patients in the ketamine group reported significantly higher satisfaction with anesthesia. The improvement in Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale part-III was similar between the groups. No negative effects of ketamine on hemodynamic stability or cognition were reported perioperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine-induced conscious sedation provided high quality microelectrode recordings comparable with awake conditions. Additionally, it seems to allow superior patient satisfaction and hemodynamic stability, while maintaining similar post-operative outcomes. Therefore, it holds promise as a novel alternative anesthetic regimen for DBS. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

The relationship between resited epidural catheters after secondary epidural catheter failure and vaginal delivery: A retrospective case-control study.

BACKGROUND: There are cases where epidural analgesia is initially effective but subsequently fails and needs to be resited. We evaluated the rate of normal vaginal delivery and operative delivery among parturients who had resited epidurals compared to parturients with epidurals that were not resited. METHODS: A retrospective electronic medical review of parturients with a singleton gestation attempting normal vaginal delivery under epidural analgesia between the years 2012-2016 was conducted. Resited epidurals were defined as epidurals that were considered effective but subsequently removed and reinserted. For each resited epidural, two previous and two consecutive deliveries of parturients with normally functioning epidural catheter inserted by the same anesthesiologist were matched controls (non-resited epidurals). RESULTS: There were 35,984 attempted vaginal deliveries with 118 resited epidurals and 472 non-resited epidurals. When adjusted for nulliparity, oxytocin administration, sex and weight of the baby, and maternal BMI, labor epidural catheter replacement was not associated with need for instrumental or caesarean delivery, (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.91-2.49, P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: Need for labor epidural catheter replacement does not appear to be associated with need for operative delivery based on this single-centre cohort analysis.

[PROSPECTIVE INVESTIGATION OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING FOLLOWING DUAL PROPHYLAXIS AND LOW DOSE NEURAXIAL MORPHINE FOR CESAREAN DELIVERY].

BACKGROUND: Spinal morphine provides the optimal treatment for post-cesarean analgesia, despite frequent nausea and vomiting. We investigated the incidence of nausea and vomiting 24 hours after cesarean delivery in women receiving intrathecal morphine 100 µcg and intravenous prophylactic dexamethasone and ondansetron. METHODS: In a prospective, observational, Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved study of women undergoing cesarean delivery according to a standardized anesthetic protocol, the subjects were approached preoperatively and underwent standardized interviews regarding prior anesthesia experience and history of postoperative nausea and vomiting. In the post anesthesia care unit and 24 hours postoperatively, the women were interviewed regarding the incidence of nausea and vomiting, Women with and without nausea at 24 hours were compared for potential associated risk factors. RESULTS: Among 201 women recruited, 29 (14.5%) had nausea and 7 (3.5%) vomited in the postoperative care unit. During the first 24 hours, 36 (17.9%) had experienced nausea and 19 (9.5%) had vomited when interviewed at the 24-hours postoperatively. Women who had nausea 24 hours postoperatively were more likely to have nausea in the post anesthesia care unit than women without nausea during 24 hours after cesarean delivery (41.7% versus 1.2%, p<0.001). We did not find preoperative risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: We report that almost 20% of the women managed with prophylactic dual therapy of ondansetron and dexamethasone had nausea during the 24 hours after administration of low dose intrathecal morphine. Our findings suggested that women who experience nausea or vomiting in the immediate postoperative period are at increased risk of nausea and vomiting in the 24-hour postoperative period.

The Effect of Labor Epidural Analgesia on Breastfeeding Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study in a Mixed-Parity Cohort.

BACKGROUND: The effect of labor epidural analgesia (LEA) on successful breastfeeding has been evaluated in several studies with divergent results. We hypothesized that LEA would not influence breastfeeding status 6 weeks postpartum in women who intended to breastfeed in an environment that encourages breastfeeding. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, a total of 1204 women intending to breastfeed, delivering vaginally with or without LEA, were included; breastfeeding was recorded at 3 days and 6 weeks postpartum. Primary outcome was breastfeeding at 6 weeks, and the χ test was used for comparisons between women delivering with and without LEA, according to parity status and previous breastfeeding experience. Total epidural fentanyl dose and oxytocin use (yes/no) were recorded. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess factors affecting breastfeeding at 6 weeks. RESULTS: The overall breastfeeding rate at 6 weeks was 76.9%; it was significantly lower among women delivering with LEA (74.0%) compared with women delivering without LEA (83.4%; P < .001). Among 398 nulliparous women, 84.9% delivered with LEA, compared with 61.8% of multiparous women (P < .001). Multiparous women (N = 806) were more likely to breastfeed at 6 weeks (80.0% vs 70.6% nullipara; P < .001). Using multivariable logistic regression that accounted for 14 covariates including parity, and an interaction term between parity and LEA use, LEA was significantly associated with reduced breastfeeding at 6 weeks (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.90; P = .015). In a modified multivariable logistic regression where parity was replaced with previous breastfeeding experience, both as a covariate and in the interaction term, only previous breastfeeding experience was associated with increased breastfeeding at 6 weeks (odds ratio, 3.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-5.80; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In our mixed-parity cohort, delivering with LEA was associated with reduced likelihood of breastfeeding at 6 weeks. However, integrating women's previous breastfeeding experience, the breastfeeding rate was not different between women delivering with and without LEA among the subset of multiparous women with previous breastfeeding experience. Therefore, our findings suggest that offering lactation support to the subset of women with no previous breastfeeding experience may be a simple approach to improve breastfeeding success. This concept subscribes to the notion that women at risk for an undesired outcome be offered tailored interventions with a personalized approach.

The Relationship Between Women's Intention to Request a Labor Epidural Analgesia, Actually Delivering With Labor Epidural Analgesia, and Postpartum Depression at 6 Weeks: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Postpartum depression (PPD) is associated with pain during and after delivery, with studies showing reduced rates among women delivering with labor epidural analgesia (LEA). We hypothesized that women who intend to deliver with LEA but do not receive it are at higher risk for PPD at 6 weeks due to the combined experience of untreated labor pain and unmatched expectations during labor, and evaluated the interaction between labor plans related to LEA, satisfaction with pain control when actually delivering with LEA, and PPD at 6 weeks after delivery. METHODS: A total of 1497 women with a vaginal delivery were enrolled into this prospective longitudinal study. Women's initial intention to deliver with or without LEA, how they subsequently delivered, and satisfaction with pain relief were recorded on postpartum day 1. Primary aim was selected as PPD at 6 weeks among women intending to deliver with but subsequently delivering without LEA compared with the rest of the cohort. Primary outcome was PPD at 6 weeks using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; PPD was defined with a score ≥10 (scale from 0 to 30). Demographic and obstetric data were recorded. Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups. The interaction between intention and actual delivery with regard to LEA and PPD was tested. RESULTS: Overall, 87 of 1326 women completing the study at 6 weeks had PPD (6.6%). For the primary aim, 439 (29.3%) delivered without LEA, of which 193 (12.9%) had intended to deliver with LEA; the PPD rate among these women was 8.1%, which was not statistically different from the rest of the cohort (6.3%; odds ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-2.38; P = .41). A total of 1058 women (70.7%) delivered with LEA and 439 (29.3%) delivered without; therefore, 1169 (78.1%) delivered as intended and 328 (21.9%) did not (unmatched expectations). Evaluating the interaction between effects, there was a strong negative additive interaction between intending to deliver without LEA and actually delivering with LEA (risk difference = -8.6%, 95% CI, 16.2%-1.6%; P = .014) suggesting that unmatched intention effect is significantly associated with negative outcome. In multiple regression analysis, while intending to deliver with LEA (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.11; P = .029) and actually delivering with LEA (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.13; P = .018) both increased the odds for PPD, the multiplicative interaction was protective (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99; P = .022), after adjusting for cofactors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results did not demonstrate a significant increase in the odds for PPD at 6 weeks among women who intended to deliver with LEA but subsequently delivered without. However, we identified a protective interaction between intended LEA use and actual use on the incidence of PPD. Our data suggest an increased risk when women do not deliver as intended, particularly when not initially intending to deliver with LEA. The relationship between unplanned LEA and PPD may be mediated by a physically difficult delivery rather than or in addition to negative emotions related to unmet expectations or a sense of personal failure; therefore, counseling women after delivery to address any negative perceptions may be useful.

Electrophysiology-aided DBS targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus in an essential tremor patient with MRI-incompatible lead: A case report.

Essential tremor (ET) is a common disease in the elderly population. Severe, medication-refractory ET may require surgical intervention via ablation or deep brain stimulation (DBS). Thalamic Vim (Ventral intermediate nucleus), targeted indirectly using atlas-based coordinates, is the classical target in these procedures. We present a case of an ET patient with a non-MR-compatible cardiac orphaned leads who was a candidate for DBS surgery. Due to the lead constraints of MR use, we used a head computed tomography (CT) with contrast media as the reference exam to define the AC, PC, and midline, and to register and indirectly target the Vim. For target validation, we used intraoperative electrophysiological recordings and intraoperative CT. We implanted bilateral directional leads at the target location. We used the-essential-tremor-rating-assessment-scale (TETRAS) pre and postoperatively to clinically evaluate tremor. Intraoperative micro-electrode recordings (MERs) showed individual tremor cells and a robust increase in normalized root mean square (NRMS) indicating entry to the Vim. Postoperative visualization using lead-DBS along with dramatic clinical improvements show that we were able to accurately target the Vim. Our results show that CT-only registration and planning for thalamic Vim DBS is feasible, and that MERs and intraoperative CT are useful adjuncts for Vim target validation.

Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Patients Undergoing Major Head and Neck Surgery: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck patients are prone to malnutrition. Perioperative fluids administration in this patient group may influence nutritional status. We aimed to investigate perioperative changes in patients undergoing major head and neck surgery and to examine the impact of perioperative fluid administration on body composition and metabolic changes using bioelectrical impedance. Furthermore, we sought to correlate these metabolic changes with postoperative complication rate. In this prospective observational pilot study, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) was performed preoperatively and on postoperative days (POD) 2 and 10 on patients who underwent major head and neck surgeries. BIA was completed in 34/37 patients; mean total intraoperative and post-anesthesia fluid administration was 3682 ± 1910 mL and 1802 ± 1466 mL, respectively. Total perioperative fluid administration was associated with postoperative high extra-cellular water percentages (p = 0.038) and a low phase-angle score (p < 0.005), which indicates low nutritional status. Patients with phase angle below the 5th percentile at POD 2 had higher local complication rates (p = 0.035) and longer hospital length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.029). Multivariate analysis failed to demonstrate that high-volume fluid administration and phase angle are independent factors for postoperative complications. High-volume perioperative fluids administration impacts postoperative nutritional status with fluid shift toward the extra-cellular space and is associated with factors that increase the risk of postoperative complications and longer LOS. An adjusted, low-volume perioperative fluid regimen should be considered in patients with comorbidities in order to minimize postoperative morbidity.