The Frank Stinchfield Award: Assembly and Dissociation Forces Differ Between Commonly Used Dual Mobility Implants: A Biomechanical Study.

BACKGROUND: Intraprosthetic dissociation (IPD) is a complication unique to dual mobility (DM) implants where the outer polyethylene head dissociates from the inner femoral head. Increasing reports of IPD at the time of closed reduction of large head DM dislocations prompted this biomechanical study evaluating the assembly and dissociation forces of DM heads. METHODS: We tested 17 polyethylene DM heads from 5 vendors. Of the heads, 12 were highly cross-linked polyethylene (4 vendors) and 5 were infused with vitamin E (2 vendors). Heads were between 46 and 47 mm in diameter, accepting a 28 mm-inner ceramic head. Implants were assembled and disassembled using a servohydraulic machine that recorded the forces and torques applied during testing. Dissociation was tested via both axial pull-out and lever-out techniques, where lever-out simulated stem-on-acetabular component impingement. RESULTS: The initial maximum assembly force was significantly different between all vendors (P < .01) and decreased for all implants with subsequent assembly. Vendor 4-E (Link with vitamin E) heads required the highest assembly force (1,831.9 ± 81.95 N), followed by Vendor 3 (Smith & Nephew), Vendor 5 (DePuy Synthes), Vendor 1-E (Zimmer Biomet with vitamin E), Vendor 2 (Stryker), and Vendor 1 (Zimmer Biomet Arcom). Vendor 4-E implants showed the greatest dissociation resistance in both pull-out (2,059.89 N, n = 1) and lever-out (38.95 ± 2.79 Nm) tests. Vendor 1-E implants with vitamin E required higher assembly force, dissociation force, and energy than Vendor 1 heads without vitamin E. CONCLUSIONS: There were notable differences in DM assembly and dissociation forces between implants. Diminishing force was required for assembly with each additional trial across vendors. Vendor 4-E DM heads required the highest assembly and dissociation forces. Vitamin E appeared to increase the assembly and dissociation forces. Based on these results, DM polyethylene heads should not be reimplanted after dissociation, and there may be a role for establishing a minimum dissociation energy standard to minimize IPD risk.

Artificial intelligence-based three-dimensional templating for total joint arthroplasty planning: a scoping review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current status of research on the application of artificial intelligence (AI)-based three-dimensional (3D) templating in preoperative planning of total joint arthroplasty. METHODS: This scoping review followed the PRISMA, PRISMA-ScR guidelines, and five stage methodological framework for scoping reviews. Studies of patients undergoing primary or revision joint arthroplasty surgery that utilised AI-based 3D templating for surgical planning were included. Outcome measures included dataset and model development characteristics, AI performance metrics, and time performance. After AI-based 3D planning, the accuracy of component size and placement estimation and postoperative outcome data were collected. RESULTS: Nine studies satisfied inclusion criteria including a focus on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based AI templating for use in hip or knee arthroplasty. AI-based 3D templating systems reduced surgical planning time and improved implant size/position and imaging feature estimation compared to conventional radiographic templating. Several components of data processing and model development and testing were insufficiently covered in the studies included in this scoping review. CONCLUSIONS: AI-based 3D templating systems have the potential to improve preoperative planning for joint arthroplasty surgery. This technology offers more accurate and personalized preoperative planning, which has potential to improve functional outcomes for patients. However, deficiencies in several key areas, including data handling, model development, and testing, can potentially hinder the reproducibility and reliability of the methods proposed. As such, further research is needed to definitively evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of these systems.

Effect of Radiocapitellar Joint Over/Under Stuffing on Elbow Joint Contact Pressure.

PURPOSE: Comminuted radial head fractures are commonly treated by surgical resection or replacement with a prosthesis. A potential problem with radial head replacement is overlengthening of the radial neck ("overstuffing" of the radial head), which has been shown to affect both ulnohumeral kinematics and radiocapitellar pressures. We hypothesized that an overstuffed radial head prosthesis increases capitellar pressure and reduces coronoid pressure. METHODS: Seven human cadaveric elbows were prepared on a custom-designed apparatus simulating stabilizing muscle loads, and passively flexed from 0° to 90° under gravity valgus torque while joint contact pressures were measured. Each elbow was tested sequentially with different neck lengths, starting with the intact specimen followed by insertion of understuffed (-2 mm), standard-height (0 mm), and overstuffed (+2 mm) radial head prostheses in neutral forearm rotation, 40° pronation, and 40° supination positions, respectively. RESULTS: Capitellar mean contact pressures significantly increased after insertion of an overstuffed radial head prosthesis. In valgus position with neutral forearm rotation, capitellar mean contact pressure on the joint with an intact radial head averaged 227 ± 70 kPa. Insertion of understuffed, standard-height, and overstuffed radial head prostheses changed the mean contact pressures to 152 ± 76 kPa, 212 ± 68 kPa, and 491 ± 168 kPa, respectively. The overstuffed radial head group had significantly lower whole coronoid mean contact pressures (153 ± 56 kPa) compared with the intact (390 ± 138 kPa) and standard-height (376 ± 191 kPa) radial head groups. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in radial prosthesis height significantly increases capitellar contact pressures and reduces coronoid contact pressures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Restoration of the anatomic radial head height is critical when performing radial head arthroplasty to maintain normal joint biomechanics. Elevated capitellar contact pressures can potentially lead to pain and early degenerative changes.

The role of the lateral collateral ligament-capsule complex of the elbow under gravity varus.

BACKGROUND: The lateral collateral ligament complex along with the capsule is likely to be at risk during arthroscopic extensor carpi radialis brevis release for lateral epicondylitis. We hypothesized that disruption of the lateral collateral ligament-capsule complex (LCL-cc) would increase the mean contact pressure on the coronoid under gravity varus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight cadaveric elbows were tested via gravity varus and weighted varus (2 Nm) stress tests using a custom-made machine designed to simulate muscle loads while allowing passive flexion of the elbow. Mean articular surface contact pressure data were collected and processed using intra-articular thin-film sensors and software. Sequential testing was performed on each specimen from stage 0 to stage 3 (stage 0, intact; stage 1, release of anterior one-third of LCL-cc; stage 2; release of anterior two-thirds of LCL-cc; and stage 3, release of entire LCL-cc). The mean contact pressure on the coronoid and the mean ratio of contact pressure on the medial coronoid to that on the lateral coronoid (M/L ratio) were used for comparisons among the stages and the intact elbow. RESULTS: The overall mean contact pressure significantly increased in stage 2 (P = .0004 in gravity varus and P = .0001 in weighted varus) and stage 3 (P < .0001 in gravity varus and P < .0001 in weighted varus) compared with that in stage 0. In contrast, release of the anterior one-third of the LCL-cc (stage 1) did not significantly increase the mean contact pressure on the coronoid in any degree of flexion under gravity varus (P = .09) or weighted varus loading (P = .6). The M/L ratio difference between stage 0 and stage 1 was 1.1 ± 1.1 under gravity varus (P = .8) and 2.1 ± 1.0 under weighted varus (P = .2). The overall M/L ratios in stage 2 and stage 3 were significantly higher than those seen in stage 0 under gravity varus (P = .04 in stage 2 and P = .02 in stage 3) and weighted varus (P = .006 in stage 2 and P < .0001 in stage 3). CONCLUSIONS: Loss of the anterior two-thirds or more of the LCL-cc significantly increases the overall mean contact pressure on the coronoid, especially the medial coronoid, under both gravity varus and weighted varus. The LCL-cc also plays a role in the distribution of coronoid contact pressure against gravity varus loads.

Does proximal versus distal injury location of the medial ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow differentially impact elbow stability? An ultrasound-guided and robot-assisted biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: The location (proximal vs. distal) of elbow medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) tears impacts clinical outcomes of nonoperative treatment. The purposes of our study were to (1) determine whether selective releases of the MUCL could be performed under ultrasound (US) guidance without disrupting overlying soft tissues, (2) assess the difference in medial elbow stability for proximal and distal releases of the MUCL using stress US and a robotic testing device, and (3) elucidate the flexion angle that resulted in the greatest amount of medial elbow laxity after MUCL injury. METHODS: Sixteen paired, fresh-frozen elbow specimens were used. Valgus laxity was evaluated with both US and robotic-assisted measurements before and after selective MUCL releases. A percutaneous US-guided technique was used to perform proximal MUCL releases in 8 elbows and to perform distal MUCL releases in their matched pairs. The robot was used to determine the elbow flexion angle at which the maximum valgus displacement occurred for both proximally and distally released specimens. Open dissection was then performed to assess the accuracy of the percutaneous releases. RESULTS: Percutaneous US-guided releases were successfully performed in 15 of 16 specimens. The proximal release resulted in greater valgus angle displacement (11° ± 2°) than the distal release (8° ± 2°) between flexion angles of 30° and 70° (P < .0001 at 30°, P < .0001 at 40°, P = .001 at 50°, P = .005 at 60°, and P = .020 at 70°). Valgus displacement between release locations did not reach the level of statistical significance between 80° and 120° (P = .051 at 80°, P = .131 at 90°, P = .245 at 100°, P = .400 at 110°, and P = .532 at 120°). When we compared the values for the mean increase in US delta gap (stressed - supported state) from before to after MUCL release, the proximally released elbows had larger increases than the distally released elbows (5.0 mm proximal vs. 3.7 mm distal, P = .032). After MUCL release, maximum mean valgus displacement occurred at 49° of flexion. CONCLUSIONS: US-guided selective releases of the MUCL can be performed reliably without violating the overlying musculature. Valgus instability is not of greater magnitude for distal releases when compared with proximal releases. This findings suggests there must be alternative factors to explain the difference in clinical prognosis between distal and proximal tears. The observed flexion angle for maximum valgus laxity could have important implications for elbow positioning during US or fluoroscopic stress examination, as well as surgical repair or reconstruction of the MUCL.

Safety of Arthroscopic Versus Open or Combined Heterotopic Ossification Removal Around the Elbow.

PURPOSE: To analyze the complications of arthroscopic heterotopic ossification (HO) excision and compare them with those of open removal of HO or a combined open-arthroscopic approach. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of elbow HO removal cases performed by a single surgeon from 1997 to 2014. In all cases studied, the intention was to restore range of motion owing to the presence of HO causing functional impairment. The arthroscopic, open, and combined treatment groups were compared. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 223 surgical procedures performed on 213 elbows in 211 patients. Fifty major complications occurred in 46 cases (21%): 17 hematomas (8%) treated by irrigation and debridement, 8 cases of HO requiring reoperation (4%), 7 deep infections (3%), 4 contractures (2%), 3 cases of delayed-onset ulnar neuritis (1%), 2 cases of distal humeral avascular necrosis (1%), 2 tendon ruptures (1%), 2 cases of instability requiring reconstruction (1%), 2 postoperative fractures (1%), 1 intraoperative fracture (<0.5%), 1 case of worsening of pre-existing neuropathic pain (<0.5%), and 1 permanent partial posterior interosseous nerve injury (<0.5%). Of these 46 cases, the major complications occurred in 6 of the 41 (15%) performed arthroscopically, in 36 of the 158 (23%) performed open and in 4 of the 21 (17%) with combined (i.e. open + arthroscopic) HO removal. Preventive strategies, introduced to prevent hematomas and delayed-onset ulnar neuritis, reduced the rate of major complications from 35% during the period from 1997 to 2005 to 10% during the period from 2006 to 2014 (P < .0001). Moreover, the rate of reoperations was reduced from 34% to 10% in the same periods (P < .0001). Minor complications occurred in 36 cases (16%), including 17 cases of transient nerve palsy, 9 cases of superficial infection or delayed wound healing, 6 cases of mild instability, and 4 cases of hematoma resolved by aspiration. CONCLUSIONS: The use of arthroscopy-or a combination of arthroscopic and open techniques-to remove HO around the elbow by a surgeon skilled in both arthroscopic and open elbow surgery does not increase the risk of major complications or need for reoperation compared with traditional open surgery. Preventive strategies, such as avoiding raising skin flaps by using multiple separate incisions for open and prophylactic ulnar nerve decompression in arthroscopic cases, were developed during the study period. These strategies were monitored prospectively and found to be effective in preventing two-thirds of the major complications needing reoperation with both open and arthroscopic HO removal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study of prospectively collected data.

Stem Length and Neck Resection on Fixation Strength of Press-Fit Radial Head Prosthesis: An In Vitro Model.

PURPOSE: Various radial head prosthesis designs are currently in use. Few studies compare different prosthetic designs. We hypothesized that increasing a cementless implant stem's length would reduce stem-bone micromotion, with both short and long neck cuts. We also hypothesized that a minimum stem length might be required for the initial fixation strength of a press-fit implant. METHODS: In 16 fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows (8 pairs), the radial head and neck were cut either 10 or 21 mm below the top of the head. Modular cementless stems were inserted and sequentially lengthened in 5-mm increments. Micromotion under eccentric loading was tested after each incremental change. RESULTS: Incremental lengthening of the prosthetic stem and the amount of neck resection (10-mm cut vs 21-mm cut) both had a significant effect on micromotion. After a 10-mm radial head-neck resection, we observed a significant decrease in micromotion with stem lengths of 25 mm or greater, whereas with 21 mm of neck resection there was no further reduction in micromotion with increased stem length. These differences can be explained, at least in part, by the concept of the cantilever quotient: the ratio of the head-neck length outside the bone to the total length of the implant. CONCLUSIONS: The length of the stem affects the initial stability of press-fit radial head prostheses when the level of head and neck resection is at the minimum (ie, 10 mm) for currently available prosthetic designs. At this resection level, stems 25 mm or greater had significantly higher initial stability, but all stem lengths tested had mean micromotion values within the threshold for bone ingrowth. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The length of a radial head prosthetic stem affects the initial stability of press-fit radial head prostheses when the level of head and neck resection is at the minimum (ie, 10 mm) for currently available prosthetic designs.

Effects of axial forearm instability on force transmission across the elbow.

BACKGROUND: The interosseous membrane (IOM) and distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) provide axial stability to the forearm. Our hypothesis was that injury to these structures alters force transmission through the elbow. METHODS: A custom-designed apparatus that applies axial loads from the wrist to the elbow was used to test 10 cadaveric upper limbs under the following simulated conditions (1) intact, (2) DRUJ injury, (3) IOM injury, or (4) IOM + DRUJ injury. IOM injury was simulated by osteotomies of the IOM attachment to the radius, and DRUJ injury was simulated by distal ulnar oblique osteotomy. We applied 160 N of axial force during cyclic and functional range of forearm rotation (40o pronation/40o supination), and force, contact pressure, and contact area through the elbow joint were measured simultaneously. RESULTS: The force across the radiocapitellar joint was significantly higher in the IOM + DRUJ injury and the IOM injury groups than in the intact and DRUJ injury groups. The mean force across the radiocapitellar joint was not significantly different between the intact and DRUJ injury groups or between the IOM + DRUJ injury and the IOM injury groups. Forces across the ulnohumeral joint showed an inverse pattern to those in the radiocapitellar joint. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that injury to the IOM contributes more to the disruption of the normal distribution of axial loads across the elbow than injury to the DRUJ.

Loss of pronation-supination in patients with heterotopic ossification around the elbow.

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a well-recognized cause of limited flexion-extension, but it can also limit pronation-supination. There is a paucity of literature concerning restriction of pronation-supination due to HO. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who had undergone elbow surgery for HO removal between January 1, 2003, and September 27, 2013. Computed tomography scans were reviewed to determine the presence of HO restricting forearm rotation and were rated independently by 4 observers. Each elbow was given 1 of 4 scores according to the likelihood that HO was restricting forearm rotation. Agreement was achieved when 3 or 4 observers thought that HO definitely or probably caused a loss of pronation-supination. RESULTS: Of 132 post-traumatic patients undergoing HO excision for restricted elbow motion, 61 (46%) also lacked a functional arc of pronation and supination (50° and 50°, respectively). Of these 61 patients, 32 (53%) were considered to have lost forearm rotation because of HO. The remaining 29 patients (47%) were thought to have restricted forearm rotation for reasons unrelated to HO. DISCUSSION: In this study, loss of pronation-supination affected almost half of the patients (61 of 132 [46%]) undergoing HO excision around the elbow. Of these 61 patients, 32 (52%) had HO extending into the proximal forearm and affecting rotation. From our data, one can expect that about one-quarter (24% of patients in this study, or 32 of 132) with post-traumatic HO of the elbow will have a significant functional loss of pronation-supination due to HO extending into the forearm.

Validation of a Simple Overlay Device to Assess Radial Head Implant Length.

PURPOSE: A simple overlay device (SOD) was developed to measure radial head implant length. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy and reliability of this device for measuring experimental radial head implant length. METHODS: Five fresh frozen cadavers were implanted with sequentially longer implants, adjusted by neck length (0, 2, 4, and 8 mm). Fluoroscopic images were obtained in 4 forearm positions: anteroposterior in supination in full extension, anteroposterior in pronation in full extension, supinated in 45° of flexion, and neutral in 45° of flexion. The SOD measurements (made by 2 observers) were compared with the native original radial head (control) to assess implant length. In addition, gapping of the ulnohumeral joint space was measured for comparison purposes. RESULTS: The measured radial head and neck lengths for the specimens were 33, 39, 31, 34, and 42 mm. The difference between the actual radial head and neck lengths and those measured with the SOD template averaged less than 2 mm for all 4 collar sizes, except in 1 measurement in which the bicipital tuberosity could not be visualized. The median intraclass correlation coefficients for observer 1 compared with the SOD were 0.94 to 0.99. The median intraclass correlation coefficients between observers were 0.88 to 0.95. For both observers, elbow position, collar height, and the 2 variables combined did not significantly affect the SOD values. The other method that was evaluated, that of measurement of the ulnohumeral joint space, had higher interobserver variability versus the SOD, and allowed detection of lengthening of over 4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The SOD is a reliable method for simply assessing radial head length with radiographs and can accurately detect 2 mm or more of proximal radial lengthening. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The SOD is a simple and accurate method that can help to optimize radial head sizing.

Anthropometric Study of the Radiocapitellar Joint.

PURPOSE: There is scant knowledge about the relationship between the size of the radial head and the size of the capitellum. Also, no data exist comparing the size of the capitellum between the left and the right elbow. METHODS: Eight pairs of elbows and 12 single elbows from fresh-frozen cadavers were obtained for this study. The vertical height and anterior width of the capitellum were measured with digital calipers. Four different measurements were performed at the radial head: longest outer diameter, shortest outer diameter, the long dish diameter, and short dish diameter. The Pearson intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients were obtained for all measurements. RESULTS: For the paired elbows, the correlations ranged between 0.95 and 0.96 for the capitellar dimensions and 0.77 and 0.98 for the radial head dimensions. The correlations between the long outer diameter of the radial head with the vertical height and the anterior width of the capitellum were 0.8 and 0.9, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high correlation between the long outer diameter of the radial head and the vertical height of the capitellum as well its anterior width. There is also a high correlation between the left and the right elbow. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings are relevant to radiocapitellar arthroplasty and may be useful for radiocapitellar prosthetic design as well as in the preoperative planning of cases in which the radial head and/or the capitellum is destroyed.

Effect of radiocapitellar Achilles disc arthroplasty on coronoid and capitellar contact pressures after radial head excision.

BACKGROUND: Long-term radiographic arthritis has been commonly reported after radial head excision. Concern over radial head arthroplasty may arise in certain situations including capitellar arthritis, radiocapitellar malalignment, and in young and active patients. We hypothesized that radial head excision increases coronoid contact pressures, which may at least be partially reduced by radiocapitellar Achilles tendon disc arthroplasty. METHODS: Coronoid and capitellar contact pressure was measured on 6 human cadaveric elbows on a custom-designed gravity-valgus simulator under passive flexion from 0° to 90°. Sequential testing, starting with the intact specimen, resection of the radial head, and finally, radiocapitellar Achilles tendon disc arthroplasty were performed on each specimen. RESULTS: Mean contact pressure of the coronoid significantly increased after radial head excision (P < .0001) and significantly improved after Achilles disc arthroplasty (P < .0001). The pressure difference was most pronounced on the lateral coronoid. From 15° to 85° of elbow flexion, mean contact pressures on the lateral coronoid were 291 kPa and 476 kPa before and after radial head excision, respectively (P < .0001). Achilles disc arthroplasty significantly lowered coronoid contact pressures to 385 kPa (P = .002); however, they remained significantly higher than those in the intact radial head group (P = .0009). CONCLUSIONS: Radial head resection increases contact pressure in the coronoid, especially the lateral coronoid. This study showed that radiocapitellar Achilles disc arthroplasty significantly improves contact pressures on the coronoid after radial head resection. Achilles disc arthroplasty could be considered in patients who are not candidates for radial head arthroplasty.

The effect of a radial neck notch on press-fit stem stability: a biomechanical study on 7 cadavers.

BACKGROUND: Minimal micromotion is necessary for osteointegration of cementless radial head prostheses. When radial head fractures extend longitudinally, where the neck cut for prosthetic replacement should be made is uncertain. We hypothesized that complete resection of the notched portion of a radial neck confers no advantage in initial stability compared with not resecting the defect and inserting the implant into a notched radial neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The radii of 7 cadavers underwent radial head resection and implantation with a 25-mm-long press-fit radial head stem. Before implantation, a 5-mm-long notch that was less than 1-mm wide was made in the radial neck. After the stem-bone micromotion was recorded, the proximal 5 mm of radial neck, incorporating the entire notch, was cut away, the stem was inserted 5 mm further, and the resulting micromotion was recorded. RESULTS: The mean micromotion measured in the presence of a cortical notch was 51 ± 6 µm. After the neck was circumferentially cut and the stem was advanced, the micromotion (46 ± 9 µm) was not statistically significantly different. DISCUSSION: Initial stability of an adequately sized cementless stem in the presence of a 5-mm-long cortical notch was well within the threshold needed for bone ingrowth (<100 µm). In addition, there was no reduction of micromotion after the notch-containing portion of the radial neck was resected and the stem was advanced. Making a neck cut distal to a 5-mm-long, 1-mm-wide cortical notch does not confer added stability. Thus, surgeons can preserve bone stock and avoid an aggressive neck cut.

Axial load transmission through the elbow during forearm rotation.

BACKGROUND: Forearm rotation is closely associated with the axiorotational force transmission through the elbow joint. A technique has been developed to study the transmission of force across the radiocapitellar and ulnotrochlear joints during forearm rotation. METHODS: Ten human cadaveric upper limbs were prepared on a custom-designed apparatus that permits the application of extrinsic axial loads across an intact cadaveric elbow joint. A force-sensitive transducer was inserted into the elbow joint of each cadaver. A 160 N axial force was applied to the specimen during cyclic forearm rotation while the force, contact pressure, and contact area through the elbow joint were measured. RESULTS: The mean force across the radiocapitellar joint showed no significant difference between pronation and supination (P = .3547). The radiocapitellar joint showed significantly higher contact area (P = .0001) and lower contact pressure (P = .0001) in pronation than in supination. The mean values for contact pressure, area, and force across the ulnotrochlear joint were not significantly different between supination and pronation. CONCLUSION: The contact pressure and contact area of the radiocapitellar joint in the cadaveric model changed according to forearm rotation while the force remained constant. The mean contact pressure of the radiocapitellar joint in pronation was significantly lower than that in supination because the force across it did not change significantly and its contact area decreased significantly. These findings may suggest that the pronated elbow can play an important role in protecting the radiocapitellar joint in high-impact activities like delivering punch in martial arts or falling on an outstretched arm.

Radiocapitellar contact characteristics during prosthetic radial head subluxation.

BACKGROUND: Metallic radial head prostheses are often used in the management of comminuted radial head fractures and elbow instability. We hypothesized that during radiocapitellar subluxation, the contact pressure characteristics of an anatomic radial head prosthesis will more closely mimic those of the native radial head compared with a monopolar circular or a bipolar circular radial head design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With use of 6 fresh frozen cadaver elbows, mean radiocapitellar contact pressures, contact areas, and peak pressures of the native radial head were assessed at 0, 2, 4, and 6 mm of posterior subluxation. These assessments were repeated after the native radial head was replaced with anatomic, monopolar circular and bipolar circular prostheses. RESULTS: The joint contact pressures increased with the native and the prosthetic radial head subluxation. The mean contact pressures for the native radial head and anatomic prosthesis increased progressively and significantly from 0 to 6 mm of subluxation (native, 0.6 ± 0.0 MPa to 1.9 ± 0.2 MPa; anatomic, 0.7 ± 0.0 MPa to 2.1 ± 0.3 MPa; P < .0001). The contact pressures with the monopolar and bipolar prostheses were significantly higher at baseline and did not change significantly further with subluxation (monopolar, 2.0 ± 0.1 MPa to 2.2 ± 0.2 MPa [P = .31]; bipolar, 1.7 ± 0.1 MPa to 1.9 ± 0.1 MPa [P = .12]). The pattern of increase in contact pressures with the anatomic prosthesis mimicked that of the native radial head. Conversely, the circular prostheses started out with higher contact pressures that stayed elevated. CONCLUSION: The articular surface design of a radial head prosthesis is an important determinant of joint contact pressures.

Coronoid reconstruction using osteochondral grafts: a biomechanical study.

HYPOTHESIS: The purposes of this study were to test the hypothesis that coronoid deficiency in the setting of posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI) must be reconstructed to restore articular contact pressures to normal and to compare 3 different osteochondral grafts for this purpose. METHODS: After creation of a anteromedial fracture, six cadaveric elbows were tested under gravity varus stress using a custom-made machine designed to simulate muscle loads and to passively flex the elbow. Mean articular surface contact pressure data were collected and processed using TekScan sensors and software. After testing of the intact specimen (intact condition), a PMRI injury was created (PMRI condition). Testing was repeated after reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) (LCL-only condition), followed by reconstruction of the coronoid with 3 different osteochondral graft techniques (reconstructed conditions). RESULTS: Contact pressure was consistently significantly higher in the PMRI elbow compared with the intact, LCL-only, and reconstructed conditions (P < .006). The LCL-only elbow contact pressure was significantly higher than that of the intact and reconstructed conditions from 5° to 55° of flexion (P = .018). The contact pressure of the intact elbow was never significantly different from that of the reconstructed elbow, except at 5° of flexion (P ≤ .008). No significant difference was detected between each of the reconstructed techniques (P ≥ .15). However, the annular surface of the radial head was the only graft that yielded contact pressures not significantly different from normal at any flexion angle. CONCLUSION: Isolated reconstruction of the LCL did not restore native articular surface contact pressure, and reconstruction of the coronoid using osteochondral graft was necessary. There was no difference in contact pressures among the 3 coronoid reconstruction techniques.

Role of the lateral collateral ligament in posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow.

BACKGROUND: Posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI) of the elbow consists of an anteromedial coronoid fracture with lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (PMCL) tears. We hypothesized that the LCL tear is required for elbow subluxation/joint incongruity and that an elbow affected by an anteromedial subtype 2 coronoid fracture and a PMCL tear exhibits contact pressures different from both an intact elbow and an elbow affected by PMRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six cadaveric elbows were tested under gravity varus stress using a custom-made machine designed to simulate muscle loads and to passively flex the elbow from 0° to 90° and measure joint contact pressures. After testing of the intact specimen (INTACT-elbow), an anteromedial subtype 2 coronoid fracture with a PMCL tear (COR+PMCL-elbow) and a PMRI injury (PMRI-elbow), after adding an LCL tear, were tested. The highest values of mean contact pressure were used for the comparison among the 3 groups. RESULTS: Neither subluxation nor joint incongruity was observed in the COR+PMCL-elbow. The addition of an LCL detachment consistently caused subluxation and joint incongruity. Mean contact pressures were higher in the COR+PMCL-elbow compared with the INTACT-elbow (P < .03) but lower than in the PMRI-elbow (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The LCL lesion in PMRI is necessary for elbow subluxation and causes marked elevations in contact pressures. Even without subluxation, the COR+PMCL-elbow showed higher contact pressures compared with the INTACT-elbow. Treatment of PMRI should be directed toward prevention of joint incongruity, whether by surgical or nonsurgical means, to prevent high articular contact pressures.

The effect of capitellar impaction fractures on radiocapitellar stability.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of capitellar impaction fractures on radiocapitellar stability in a model that simulated a terrible triad injury. METHODS: Six cadaveric elbows were dissected free of skin and muscles. Tendons were preserved. The lateral collateral ligament was released and repaired (surgical control). Two sizes of capitellar impaction defects were created. After lateral collateral ligament release and repair, we then sequentially created osseous components of a terrible triad injury (partial radial head resection and coronoid fracture) through an olecranon osteotomy that was fixed with a plate. Radiocapitellar stability was recorded after the creation of each new condition. RESULTS: Significantly less force was required for radiocapitellar subluxation after the creation of 20° and 40° capitellar defects compared with the surgical control (intact capitellum). After the addition of a Mason type II radial head defect and then a coronoid defect, stability decreased significantly further. CONCLUSIONS: Impaction fractures of the distal portion of the capitellum may contribute to a loss of radiocapitellar stability, particularly in an elbow fracture-dislocation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Because these injuries may be unrecognized, consideration should be given to diagnosing and addressing them.

The effect of prosthetic radial head geometry on the distribution and magnitude of radiocapitellar joint contact pressures.

PURPOSE: To determine if radiocapitellar contact pressures would be elevated with nonanatomical (circular) prostheses over those mimicking native anatomy and if such pressures would be related to the depth and contour of the articular dish and to the pattern of prosthetic articulation against the lateral trochlear ridge. METHODS: Three commercially available circular radial head designs were compared with an anatomical radial head and 2 modified anatomical prototype radial head designs in 10 cadaveric specimens. Each prosthesis and specimen combination was loaded in neutral rotation and maximal extension with a custom testing apparatus while measuring contact areas and pressures using thin-film pressure sensors. RESULTS: Anatomical radial head prototype 2 had similar radiocapitellar contact areas and mean pressures as the native radial head; all other designs showed significant decreases in contact area and increased mean pressures. Peak contact pressures were also measured and were significantly elevated with all prostheses tested. Anatomical designs are statistically more likely to mimic normal contact with the lateral trochlear ridge and its adjacent sulcus than circular prostheses. They are also significantly less likely to have contact pressures above the 5 MPa threshold that is thought to be harmful to cartilage. The depth of the articular dish had a significant effect on contact area and pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Commercially available radial head prostheses demonstrated reduced radiocapitellar contact areas and elevated contact pressures during compressive loading. These were significantly greater with symmetrical circular prostheses than with asymmetrical elliptical designs. The prosthesis that best mimicked native contact behavior was the anatomical radial head prototype 2 owing to its design for articulating with the capitellum, the lateral trochlear ridge, and the sulcus between. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Because radial head prostheses have the potential to cause capitellar erosion or arthritic change, those with lower contact pressures may lead to fewer such complications.

Influence of radial head prosthetic design on radiocapitellar joint contact mechanics.

HYPOTHESIS: Our aim was to test whether anatomically designed metallic radial head implants could better reproduce native radiocapitellar contact pressure and areas than nonanatomic implants. METHODS: The distal humerus and proximal radius from 6 cadaveric upper extremities were serially tested in supination with 100 N of compression force at 4 angles of flexion (0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°). By use of a thin flexible pressure transducer, contact pressures and areas were measured for the native radial head, an anatomic implant, a nonanatomic circular monopolar implant, and a bipolar nonanatomic implant. The data (mean contact pressure and mean contact area) were modeled using a 2-factor repeated-measures analysis of variance with P ≤ .05 considered to be significant. RESULTS: The mean contact areas for the prosthetic radial heads were significantly less than those seen with the intact radial heads at every angle tested (P < .01). The mean contact pressures increased significantly with all prosthetic radial head types as compared with the native head. The mean contact pressures increased by 29% with the anatomic prosthesis, 230% with the monopolar prosthesis, and 220% with the bipolar prosthesis. Peak pressures of more than 5 MPa were more commonly observed with both the monopolar and bipolar prostheses than with the anatomic or native radial heads. CONCLUSIONS: The geometry of radial head implants strongly influences their contact characteristics. In a direct radius-to-capitellum axial loading experiment, an anatomically designed radial head prosthesis had lower and more evenly distributed contact pressures than the nonanatomic implants that were tested.