Treatment of psoriasis with different classes of biologics reduces the likelihood of peripheral and axial psoriatic arthritis development.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential role of biological treatment for psoriasis (PsO) in reducing the likelihood of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), through a detailed analysis that considered the different historical phases in the PsA management, the different biologics classes, and the different patterns of articular involvement. METHODS: A monocentric cohort of 1023 PsO patients underwent a rheumatologic assessment in which clinical and therapeutic data were recorded. Chi-squared test and multivariate logistic regression analysis (adjusted for the main PsA risk factors) were performed to compare the likelihood of PsA development in different treatment groups. RESULTS: The PsA prevalence in PsO patients treated at least once with biologics was significantly lower than in patients never treated with biologics (8.9% vs 26.1%, p< 0.001). In multivariate analysis, a significantly (p< 0.01) lower likelihood of PsA development in biologic-treated patients was confirmed in the whole cohort (adjOR 0.228), as well as in the subgroups of patients with PsO onset after 2005 (adjOR 0.264) and after 2014 (adjOR 0.179). Separately analysing the different biologics classes, both the TNF (adjOR 0.206), IL-17 (adjOR 0.051) and IL-23 or 12/23 (adjOR 0.167) inhibitors were significantly (p< 0.01) associated with a lower likelihood of PsA development. Finally, patients treated with biologics had a significantly (p< 0.04) lower prevalence of both pure peripheral PsA (adjOR 0.182) and peripheral PsA with axial involvement (adjOR 0.115). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides meaningful and concordant evidence supporting the significant role of different classes of biologics in reducing the likelihood of peripheral and axial PsA development.

Psychometric Properties of Patient Global Assessment in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: Patient global assessment (PtGA) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) that reflects a patient's judgment of their health/disease activity (DA). The objective of this systematic literature review was to assess the psychometric properties of PtGA in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Research articles reporting the assessment of psychometric properties of PtGA in PsA, listed in PubMed and extracted according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.1 and the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) terminology, were selected. Validity was assessed for comprehensiveness (content), correlation with other DA instruments (construct), and with quality of life measurements (criterion). A metaanalysis regarding construct validity was performed. Correlations between PtGA variations and other indices' variations (external responsiveness) and PtGA variations after treatment (internal responsiveness) were collected. Data on the formulation of PtGA and its discordance with physician global assessment (PGA) were also collected. METHODS: Of 60 articles analyzed (comprising 17,453 patients), 44 were observational studies and 16 were trials. PtGA was assessed through 27 different formulations. In all the retrieved studies, PtGA assessed DA, and in 3 studies, PtGA was assessed as a variable of global health status. The correlation between PtGA and PROs was strong (ρ > 0.50), whereas with other DA indices and PGA, it ranged from weak to moderate (ρ 0.20-0.50). Three studies described a positive discordance (PtGA > PGA). Responsiveness, assessed in 24 studies, showed a strong correlation with joint count index variations (ρ 0.51-0.52). CONCLUSION: PtGA is a valid and responsive tool in PsA. Correlations were higher with PROs and weaker with DA composite indices and PGA. PGA was usually scored lower than PtGA. A standardized formulation of PtGA would be useful.

Effectiveness of ixekizumab over 24 months in different clinical scenarios in psoriatic arthritis: results from the Gruppo Italiano Studio Early Arthritis multicentric prospective registry.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate ixekizumab (IXE) effectiveness, drug survival and clinical response predictors in moderate-severe psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients in different clinical scenarios. METHODS: This was a multicentre real-life observational study based on Gruppo Italiano Studio Early Arthritis (GISEA) registry of IXE treatment in PsA patients (January 2019-June 2023). Data were collected at baseline and every six months. RESULTS: 223 PsA outpatients were included. Statistically significant improvement was observed after 6 (T6), 12 (T12) and 24 (T24) months of therapy for tender and swollen joint count (TJC and SJC), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-pain and Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) score. DAPSA remission was reached at T12 in 22% and at T24 in 18.5% of patients. At baseline, higher fibromyalgia and combination therapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) in females with respect to males and higher Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) in males than in females were observed. Therapeutic effectiveness showed in males higher DAPSA and VAS-pain reduction, higher percentage of males in DAPSA remission/low disease activity (LDA) at T6, and higher ∆PASI at T6 and T12 than in female patients. At multivariate analysis, male sex was predictive for treatment response at T6 [p=0.02, odds ratio (OR) 2.49 (95% confidence interval 1.11-5.54)], while it lost significance at T12. CONCLUSIONS: IXE effectiveness was highlighted after 6 months at both joint and skin levels and lasted up to 24 months in different clinical scenarios, making IXE effective in the complexity of managing PsA in a real-life setting.

Mood Disorder Questionnaire Positivity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Other Chronic Diseases including Screen Bipolar Disorders or Rhythm and Energy Dysregulation Syndromes (DYMERS).

Introduction: This study explores the issue of paper-and-pencil screening tests for bipolar disorder, often leading to false positives. It discusses hypotheses that connect MDQ positivity with sleep disorders, a decline in health-related quality of life, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mood disorders. The study proposes that MDQ identifies a "Dysregulation of Mood, Energy, and Social Rhythms Syndrome" (DYMERS), indicating a stress-related condition. It aims to investigate the association between MDQ positivity and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in comparison to other chronic disorders. Methods: This case-control study, conducted from April 2019 to February 2020, investigated MDQ positivity in patients with SLE. Ethical approvals were obtained, and statistical analysis was used for data assessment. Results: This is a case-controlled study where MDQ positivity was significantly higher in systemic lupus erythematosus cases than controls. The analysis compared gender, age, and the presence of depressive episodes between MDQ-positive and MDQ-negative cases, revealing some differences but no significant variations. Interestingly, no association with high prednisone or biologics use was observed. The frequency of MDQ positivity in systemic lupus erythematosus was compared to other chronic pathologies, revealing varying associations with each condition. Conclusion: This study reveals a high rate of (MDQ) positivity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), associated with the risk of bipolar disorder in SLE. Notable discrepancies in MDQ positivity risk factors between SLE and bipolar disorder are observed. The study emphasizes the ability of MDQ to identify a distinct syndrome characterized by rhythm dysregulation, posing a risk for bipolar disorder and other disorders.

Quality of Life in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Other Chronic Diseases: Highlighting the Amplified Impact of Depressive Episodes.

BACKGROUND: Extensive research has explored SLE's impact on health-related quality of life (H-QoL), especially its connection with mental wellbeing. Recent evidence indicates that depressive syndromes significantly affect H-QoL in SLE. This study aims to quantify SLE's impact on H-QoL, accounting for comorbid depressive episodes through case-control studies. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted with SLE patients (meeting the ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria of age ≥ 18). The control group was chosen from a community database. H-QoL was measured with the SF-12 questionnaire, and PHQ-9 was used to assess depressive episodes. RESULTS: SLE significantly worsened H-QoL with an attributable burden of 5.37 ± 4.46. When compared to other chronic diseases, only multiple sclerosis had a worse impact on H-QoL. Major depressive episodes had a significant impact on SLE patients' H-QoL, with an attributable burden of 9.43 ± 5.10, similar to its impact on solid cancers but greater than its impact on other diseases. CONCLUSIONS: SLE has a comparable impact on QoL to serious chronic disorders. Concomitant depressive episodes notably worsened SLE patients' QoL, exceeding other conditions, similar to solid tumors. This underscores the significance of addressing mood disorders in SLE patients. Given the influence of mood disorders on SLE outcomes, early identification and treatment are crucial.