Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 18(17): 4785-93, 2012 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22872575

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Sirolimus is the eponymous inhibitor of the mTOR; however, only its analogs have been approved as cancer therapies. Nevertheless, sirolimus is readily available, has been well studied in organ transplant patients, and shows efficacy in several preclinical cancer models. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Three simultaneously conducted phase I studies in advanced cancer patients used an adaptive escalation design to find the dose of oral, weekly sirolimus alone or in combination with either ketoconazole or grapefruit juice that achieves similar blood concentrations as its intravenously administered and approved prodrug, temsirolimus. In addition, the effect of sirolimus on inhibition of p70S6 kinase phosphorylation in peripheral T cells was determined. RESULTS: Collectively, the three studies enrolled 138 subjects. The most commonly observed toxicities were hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and lymphopenia in 52%, 43%, and 41% of subjects, respectively. The target sirolimus area under the concentration curve (AUC) of 3,810 ng-h/mL was achieved at sirolimus doses of 90, 16, and 25 mg in the sirolimus alone, sirolimus plus ketoconazole, and sirolimus plus grapefruit juice studies, respectively. Ketoconazole and grapefruit juice increased sirolimus AUC approximately 500% and 350%, respectively. Inhibition of p70 S6 kinase phosphorylation was observed at all doses of sirolimus and correlated with blood concentrations. One partial response was observed in a patient with epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. CONCLUSION: Sirolimus can be feasibly administered orally, once weekly with a similar toxicity and pharmacokinetic profile compared with other mTOR inhibitors and warrants further evaluation in studies of its comparative effectiveness relative to recently approved sirolimus analogs.


Asunto(s)
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias , Sirolimus , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Citrus paradisi , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hiperlipidemias/inducido químicamente , Cetoconazol/administración & dosificación , Linfopenia/inducido químicamente , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/patología , Proteínas Quinasas S6 Ribosómicas 70-kDa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas Quinasas S6 Ribosómicas 70-kDa/metabolismo , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Sirolimus/farmacocinética , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA