Application of goal-directed therapy for the use of concentrated antithrombin for heparin resistance during cardiac surgery.

The maintenance of anticoagulation in adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass is dependent upon a number of factors, including heparin concentration and adequate antithrombin activity. Inadequate anticoagulation increases the risk of thrombosis and jeopardizes both vascular and extracorporeal circuit integrity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a goal-directed approach for the use of antithrombin in patients who were resistant to heparin. Following institutional review board approval, data were obtained from quality improvement records. A goal-directed protocol for antithrombin was established based upon heparin dosing (400 IU kg-1 body weight) and achieving an activated clotting time of ⩾500 seconds prior to cardiopulmonary bypass. Two groups of patients were identified as those receiving antithrombin and those not receiving antithrombin. Outcome measures included activated clotting time values and transfusion rates. Consecutive patients (n = 140) were included in the study with 10 (7.1%) in the antithrombin group. The average antithrombin dose was 1,029.0 ± 164.5 IU and all patients had restoration to the activated clotting time levels. Patients in the antithrombin group were on preoperative heparin therapy (80.0% vs. 24.6%, p = 0.001). Prior to cardiopulmonary bypass the activated clotting time values were lower in the antithrombin group (417.7 ± 56.1 seconds vs. 581.1 ± 169.8 seconds, p = 0.003). Antithrombin patients had a lower heparin sensitivity index (0.55 ± 0.17 vs. 1.05 ± 0.44 seconds heparin-1 IU kg-1, p = 0.001), received more total heparin (961.3 ± 158.5 IU kg-1 vs. 677.5 ± 199.0 IU kg-1, p = 0.001), more cardiopulmonary bypass heparin (22,500 ± 10,300 IU vs. 12,100 ± 13,200 IU, p = 0.016), and more protamine (5.4 ± 1.2 vs. 4.1 ± 1.1 mg kg-1, p = 0.003). The intraoperative transfusion rate was higher in the antithrombin group (70.0% vs. 35.4%, p = 0.035), but no differences were seen postoperatively. Utilization of a goal-directed algorithm for the administration of antithrombin for the treatment of heparin resistance is effective in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Goal-Directed Perfusion Methodology for Determining Oxygenator Performance during Clinical Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

New generation oxygenators incorporate arterial line filtration either sequential to, or directly in, the gas exchange module. This unique design may affect gas exchange performance by altering the operational characteristics of the device. The present study was designed to evaluate three oxygenators in a clinical setting using a goal-directed perfusion algorithm during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). After institutional review board approval, 60 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery for acquired heart disease were matched for disease state and body size into three groups based on oxygenator type: Terumo SX18™ (n = 20), Terumo FX15™ (n = 20), and LivaNova Inspire6F™ 6 Dual (n = 20). An external arterial line filter was used with the FX15, whereas the SX18 and Inspire6F had integrated arterial filters. All perfusion, anesthetic and postoperative care management was standardized using institutional goal-directed patient management processes. Data were collected and stored according to quality improvement guidelines. There were no differences in demographics or type of surgical procedure performed among groups. The Inspire6F patients required lower fraction of inspired oxygen values as compared to the SX18 (67.9% ± 6.2% vs. 75.4% ± 6.5%, p < .005) and FX15 (79.1% ± 8.4%, p < .0001) groups. Arterial oxygen content and oxygen delivery were slightly higher in the FX15 group as compared to SX18 (13.1 ± 1.4 mL O2/dL vs. 12.4 ± 1.1 mL O2/dL, 611.1 ± 150.4 mL O2 vs. 528.2 ± 102.3 mL O2, p < .05). The FX15 patients had significantly higher CPB hematocrits compared to SX18 patients (30.3% ± 3.9% vs. 27.7% ± 2.6%, p < .05), but were not different when compared to the Inspire6F group (28.8% ± 3.5%, p < .50). There were no differences in intraoperative transfusion rates, but a higher percent of patients received postoperative transfusions in the SX18 group as compared to either FX15 or Inspire6F groups (p < .039). There were no differences in postoperative morbidity or complications in any group. In conclusion, the use of the SX18 was comparable to newer generation oxygenators in regard to gas exchange performance and the degree of hemodilution.

Effect of Normobaric versus Hypobaric Oxygenation on Gaseous Microemboli Removal in a Diffusion Membrane Oxygenator: An In Vitro Comparison.

Gaseous microemboli (GME) are an abnormal physiological occurrence during cardiopulmonary bypass and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Several studies have correlated negative sequelae with exposure to increased amounts of GME. Hypobaric oxygenation is effective at eliminating GME in hollow-fiber microporous membrane oxygenators. However, hollow-fiber diffusion membrane oxygenators, which are commonly used for ECMO, have yet to be validated. The purpose of this study was to determine if hypobaric oxygenation, compared against normobaric oxygenation, can reduce introduced GME when used on diffusion membrane oxygenators. Comparison of a sealed Quadrox-iD with hypobaric sweep gas (.67 atm) vs. an unmodified Quadrox-iD with normal atmospheric sweep gas (1 atm) in terms of GME transmission during continuous air introduction (50 mL/min) in a recirculating in vitro circuit, over a range of flow rates (3.5, 5 L/min) and crystalloid prime temperatures (37°C, 28°C, and 18°C). GME were measured using three EDAC Doppler probes positioned pre-oxygenator, post-oxygenator, and at the arterial cannula. Hypobaric oxygenation vs. normobaric oxygenation significantly reduced hollow-fiber diffusion membrane oxygenator GME transmission at all combination of pump flows and temperatures. There was further significant reduction in GME count between the oxygenator outlet and at the arterial cannula. Hypobaric oxygenation used on hollow-fiber diffusion membrane oxygenators can further reduce GME compared to normobaric oxygenation. This technique may be a safe approach to eliminate GME during ECMO.