Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JAMA ; 330(18): 1769-1772, 2023 11 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37824710

RESUMEN

Importance: To date, only 1 statewide prevalence survey has been performed for Acinetobacter baumannii (2009) in the US, and no statewide prevalence survey has been performed for Candida auris, making the current burden of these emerging pathogens unknown. Objective: To determine the prevalence of A baumannii and C auris among patients receiving mechanical ventilation in Maryland. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Maryland Multi-Drug Resistant Organism Prevention Collaborative performed a statewide cross-sectional point prevalence of patients receiving mechanical ventilation admitted to acute care hospitals (n = 33) and long-term care facilities (n = 18) between March 7, 2023, and June 8, 2023. Surveillance cultures (sputum, perianal, arm/leg, and axilla/groin) were obtained from all patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Sputum, perianal, and arm/leg cultures were tested for A baumannii and antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed. Axilla/groin cultures were tested by polymerase chain reaction for C auris. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence of A baumannii, carbapenem-resistant A baumannii (CRAB), and C auris. Prevalence was stratified by type of facility. Results: All 51 eligible health care facilities (100%) participated in the survey. A total of 482 patients receiving mechanical ventilation were screened for A baumannii and 470 were screened for C auris. Among the 482 patients who had samples collected, 30.7% (148/482) grew A baumannii, 88 of the 148 (59.5%) of these A baumannii were CRAB, and C auris was identified in 31 of 470 (6.6%). Patients in long-term care facilities were more likely to be colonized with A baumannii (relative risk [RR], 7.66 [95% CI, 5.11-11.50], P < .001), CRAB (RR, 5.48 [95% CI, 3.38-8.91], P < .001), and C auris (RR, 1.97 [95% CI, 0.99-3.92], P = .05) compared with patients in acute care hospitals. Nine patients (29.0%) with cultures positive for C auris were previously unreported to the Maryland Department of Health. Conclusions: A baumannii, carbapenem-resistant A baumannii, and C auris were common among patients receiving mechanical ventilation in both acute care hospitals and long-term care facilities. Both pathogens were significantly more common in long-term care facilities than in acute care hospitals. Patients receiving mechanical ventilation in long-term care facilities are a high-risk population for emerging pathogens, and surveillance and prevention efforts should be targeted to these facilities.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Acinetobacter , Acinetobacter baumannii , Candida auris , Candidiasis , Instituciones de Salud , Respiración Artificial , Humanos , Acinetobacter baumannii/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/epidemiología , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/microbiología , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/prevención & control , Candida auris/aislamiento & purificación , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Prevalencia , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Candidiasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Candidiasis/epidemiología , Candidiasis/microbiología , Candidiasis/prevención & control , Maryland/epidemiología , Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Vigilancia de la Población , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(11): 1870-1872, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37138550

RESUMEN

Known concentrations of Staphylococcus aureus and Candida auris were applied on gloves and gowns then sampled with E-swabs and BBL liquid Amies swabs. The mean numbers of colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) obtained from culture of the 2 swab types were not different, suggesting that either can be used for recovery of these two pathogens from personal protective equipment.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Staphylococcus aureus , Humanos , Candida auris , Ropa de Protección , Manejo de Especímenes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA