Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
J Virol ; 94(12)2020 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32238587

RESUMEN

Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) senses double-stranded DNA and synthesizes the second messenger cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP), which binds to mediator of IRF3 activation (MITA) and initiates MITA-mediated signaling, leading to induction of type I interferons (IFNs) and other antiviral effectors. Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), a widespread and opportunistic pathogen, antagonizes the host antiviral immune response to establish latent infection. Here, we identified HCMV tegument protein UL94 as an inhibitor of the cGAS-MITA-mediated antiviral response. Ectopic expression of UL94 impaired cytosolic double-stranded DNA (dsDNA)- and DNA virus-triggered induction of type I IFNs and enhanced viral replication. Conversely, UL94 deficiency potentiated HCMV-induced transcription of type I IFNs and downstream antiviral effectors and impaired viral replication. UL94 interacted with MITA, disrupted the dimerization and translocation of MITA, and impaired the recruitment of TBK1 to the MITA signalsome. These results suggest that UL94 plays an important role in the immune evasion of HCMV.IMPORTANCE Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), a large double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) virus, encodes more than 200 viral proteins. HCMV infection causes irreversible abnormalities of the central nervous system in newborns and severe syndromes in organ transplantation patients or AIDS patients. It has been demonstrated that HCMV has evolved multiple immune evasion strategies to establish latent infection. Previous studies pay more attention to the mechanism by which HCMV evades immune response in the early phase of infection. In this study, we identified UL94 as a negative regulator of the innate immune response, which functions in the late phase of HCMV infection.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas de la Cápside/inmunología , Citomegalovirus/inmunología , Genoma Viral , Evasión Inmune , Proteínas de la Membrana/inmunología , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinasas/inmunología , ARN Interferente Pequeño/genética , Proteínas de la Cápside/genética , Núcleo Celular/inmunología , Núcleo Celular/virología , GMP Cíclico/inmunología , GMP Cíclico/metabolismo , Citomegalovirus/genética , Citomegalovirus/crecimiento & desarrollo , Citosol/inmunología , Citosol/virología , ADN/inmunología , ADN/metabolismo , Fibroblastos/inmunología , Fibroblastos/virología , Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Células HEK293 , Humanos , Inmunidad Innata , Factor 3 Regulador del Interferón/genética , Factor 3 Regulador del Interferón/inmunología , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Cultivo Primario de Células , Unión Proteica , Multimerización de Proteína , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinasas/genética , Transporte de Proteínas , ARN Interferente Pequeño/inmunología , Transducción de Señal , Secuenciación del Exoma
2.
PLoS Pathog ; 15(5): e1007691, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31107917

RESUMEN

Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) senses viral DNA in the cytosol and then catalyzes synthesis of the second messenger cGAMP, which activates the ER-localized adaptor protein Mediator of IRF3 Activator (MITA) to initiate innate antiviral response. Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) proteins can antagonize host immune responses to promote latent infection. Here, we identified HCMV UL42 as a negative regulator of cGAS/MITA-dependent antiviral response. UL42-deficiency enhances HCMV-induced production of type I interferons (IFNs) and downstream antiviral genes. Consistently, wild-type HCMV replicates more efficiently than UL42-deficient HCMV. UL42 interacts with both cGAS and MITA. UL42 inhibits DNA binding, oligomerization and enzymatic activity of cGAS. UL42 also impairs translocation of MITA from the ER to perinuclear punctate structures, which is required for MITA activation, by facilitating p62/LC3B-mediated degradation of translocon-associated protein ß (TRAPß). These results suggest that UL42 can antagonize innate immune response to HCMV by targeting the core components of viral DNA-triggered signaling pathways.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/farmacología , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/inmunología , Citomegalovirus/inmunología , Inmunidad Innata/inmunología , Proteínas de la Membrana/metabolismo , Nucleotidiltransferasas/metabolismo , Proteínas Virales/farmacología , Citomegalovirus/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/metabolismo , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/virología , ADN Viral/genética , ADN Viral/metabolismo , Células HEK293 , Humanos , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Nucleotidiltransferasas/genética , Transducción de Señal
3.
J Virol ; 93(11)2019 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30867312

RESUMEN

Innate immunity is the first line of host defense against viral invasion. The induction of type I interferons (IFNs) and inflammatory cytokines is essential to host antiviral immune responses, which are also key targets of viral immune evasion. Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) can establish long-term latent infections, in which immune evasion is a pivotal step. In this study, we identified HCMV protein UL44, a DNA polymerase processivity factor, as an inhibitor of the interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3)- and NF-κB-dependent antiviral response. Ectopic expression of UL44 inhibited HCMV-triggered induction of downstream effector genes and enhanced viral replication. Conversely, knockdown of UL44 potentiated HCMV-triggered induction of downstream antiviral genes. UL44 interacted with IRF3 and p65, and it inhibited the binding of IRF3 and NF-κB to the promoters of their downstream antiviral genes. These findings reveal an important mechanism of immune evasion by HCMV at the transcriptional level.IMPORTANCE Induction of type I IFNs and inflammatory cytokines plays pivotal roles in host antiviral innate immune responses. Viruses have evolved various mechanisms to interfere with these processes. HCMV causes severe ailments in immunodeficient populations and is a major cause of birth defects. It has been shown that HCMV antagonizes host innate immune defenses, which is important for establishing immune evasion and latent infection. In this study, we identified the HCMV DNA polymerase subunit UL44 as a suppressor of antiviral innate immune responses. Overexpression of UL44 impaired HCMV-triggered induction of type I IFNs and other antiviral genes and thus potentiated viral replication, whereas UL44 deficiency showed opposite effects. Mechanistic studies indicated that UL44 acts by inhibiting the binding of IRF3 and NF-κB to the promoters of downstream antiviral genes. These findings defined an important mechanism of HCMV immune evasion at the transcriptional level, which may provide a therapeutic target for the treatment of HCMV infection.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Unión al ADN/metabolismo , Factor 3 Regulador del Interferón/metabolismo , FN-kappa B/metabolismo , Proteínas Virales/metabolismo , Antivirales/farmacología , Citomegalovirus/metabolismo , Citomegalovirus/fisiología , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/fisiología , ADN Polimerasa Dirigida por ADN/metabolismo , Células HEK293 , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Evasión Inmune/efectos de los fármacos , Inmunidad Innata/efectos de los fármacos , Factor 3 Regulador del Interferón/inmunología , Interferón Tipo I/metabolismo , FN-kappa B/inmunología , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Proteínas Virales/fisiología , Replicación Viral/efectos de los fármacos , Replicación Viral/inmunología
4.
Cell Insight ; 1(2): 100014, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37193132

RESUMEN

After herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infection, the cytosolic sensor cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) recognizes DNA and catalyzes synthesis of the second messenger 2'3'-cGAMP. cGAMP binds to the ER-localized adaptor protein MITA (also known as STING) to activate downstream antiviral responses. Conversely, HSV-1-encoded proteins evade antiviral immune responses via a wide variety of delicate mechanisms, promoting viral replication and pathogenesis. Here, we identified HSV-1 envelop protein UL56 as a negative regulator of cGAS-mediated innate immune responses. Overexpression of UL56 inhibited double-stranded DNA-triggered antiviral responses, whereas UL56-deficiency increased HSV-1-triggered induction of downstream antiviral genes. UL56-deficiency inhibited HSV-1 replication in wild-type but not MITA-deficient cells. UL56-deficient HSV-1 showed reduced replication in the brain of infected mice and was less lethal to infected mice. Mechanistically, UL56 interacted with cGAS and inhibited its DNA binding and enzymatic activity. Furthermore, we found that UL56 homologous proteins from different herpesviruses had similar roles in antagonizing cGAS-mediated innate immune responses. Our findings suggest that UL56 is a component of HSV-1 evasion of host innate immune responses by antagonizing the DNA sensor cGAS, which contributes to our understanding of the comprehensive mechanisms of immune evasion by herpesviruses.

5.
Cell Discov ; 7(1): 38, 2021 May 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34035218

RESUMEN

The newly emerging coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 causes severe lung disease and substantial mortality. How the virus evades host defense for efficient replication is not fully understood. In this report, we found that the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP) impaired stress granule (SG) formation induced by viral RNA. SARS-CoV-2 NP associated with the protein kinase PKR after dsRNA stimulation. SARS-CoV-2 NP did not affect dsRNA-induced PKR oligomerization, but impaired dsRNA-induced PKR phosphorylation (a hallmark of its activation) as well as SG formation. SARS-CoV-2 NP also targeted the SG-nucleating protein G3BP1 and impaired G3BP1-mediated SG formation. Deficiency of PKR or G3BP1 impaired dsRNA-triggered SG formation and increased SARS-CoV-2 replication. The NP of SARS-CoV also targeted both PKR and G3BP1 to impair dsRNA-induced SG formation, whereas the NP of MERS-CoV targeted PKR, but not G3BP1 for the impairment. Our findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 NP promotes viral replication by impairing formation of antiviral SGs, and reveal a conserved mechanism on evasion of host antiviral responses by highly pathogenic human betacoronaviruses.

6.
Cell Mol Immunol ; 18(3): 613-620, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33110251

RESUMEN

A novel SARS-related coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has recently emerged as a serious pathogen that causes high morbidity and substantial mortality. However, the mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 evades host immunity remain poorly understood. Here, we identified SARS-CoV-2 membrane glycoprotein M as a negative regulator of the innate immune response. We found that the M protein interacted with the central adaptor protein MAVS in the innate immune response pathways. This interaction impaired MAVS aggregation and its recruitment of downstream TRAF3, TBK1, and IRF3, leading to attenuation of the innate antiviral response. Our findings reveal a mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 evades the innate immune response and suggest that the M protein of SARS-CoV-2 is a potential target for the development of SARS-CoV-2 interventions.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/inmunología , COVID-19/inmunología , Inmunidad Innata , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Transducción de Señal/inmunología , Proteínas de la Matriz Viral/inmunología , Células HEK293 , Células HeLa , Humanos
7.
Cell Host Microbe ; 24(1): 69-80.e4, 2018 07 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29937271

RESUMEN

The cytosolic DNA sensor cGAS recognizes viral DNA and synthesizes the second messenger cGAMP upon viral infection. cGAMP binds to the adaptor protein MITA/STING to activate downstream signaling events, leading to induction of type I interferons (IFNs) and antiviral effector genes. Here we identify the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) protein UL31 as an inhibitor of cGAS. UL31 interacts directly with cGAS and disassociates DNA from cGAS, thus inhibiting cGAS enzymatic functions and reducing cGAMP production. UL31 overexpression markedly reduces antiviral responses stimulated by cytosolic DNA, while knockdown or knockout of UL31 heightens HCMV-triggered induction of type I IFNs and downstream antiviral genes. Moreover, wild-type HCMV replicates more efficiently than UL31-deficient HCMV, a phenotype that is reversed in cGAS null cells. These results highlight the importance of cGAS in the host response to HCMV as well as an important viral strategy to evade this innate immune sensor.


Asunto(s)
Citomegalovirus/fisiología , Evasión Inmune/inmunología , Proteínas Nucleares/metabolismo , Nucleotidiltransferasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas Virales/metabolismo , Citomegalovirus/genética , ADN Viral/genética , ADN Viral/metabolismo , Fibroblastos , Técnicas de Silenciamiento del Gen , Técnicas de Inactivación de Genes , Células HEK293 , Humanos , Inmunidad Innata/inmunología , Interferón Tipo I/metabolismo , Proteínas Nucleares/genética , Nucleótidos Cíclicos/metabolismo , Nucleotidiltransferasas/genética , Cultivo Primario de Células , Proteínas Virales/genética
8.
Nat Commun ; 9(1): 3349, 2018 08 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30135424

RESUMEN

Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) senses double-strand (ds) DNA in the cytosol and then catalyzes synthesis of the second messenger cGAMP, which activates the adaptor MITA/STING to initiate innate antiviral response. How cGAS activity is regulated remains enigmatic. Here, we identify ZCCHC3, a CCHC-type zinc-finger protein, as a positive regulator of cytosolic dsDNA- and DNA virus-triggered signaling. We show that ZCCHC3-deficiency inhibits dsDNA- and DNA virus-triggered induction of downstream effector genes, and that ZCCHC3-deficient mice are more susceptible to lethal herpes simplex virus type 1 or vaccinia virus infection. ZCCHC3 directly binds to dsDNA, enhances the binding of cGAS to dsDNA, and is important for cGAS activation following viral infection. Our results suggest that ZCCHC3 is a co-sensor for recognition of dsDNA by cGAS, which is important for efficient innate immune response to cytosolic dsDNA and DNA virus.


Asunto(s)
ADN/metabolismo , Inmunidad Innata/fisiología , Nucleotidiltransferasas/metabolismo , ARN Nucleotidiltransferasas/metabolismo , Animales , ADN/genética , Inmunidad Innata/genética , Ratones , Ratones Noqueados , Nucleótidos Cíclicos/metabolismo , Nucleotidiltransferasas/genética , ARN Nucleotidiltransferasas/genética , Transducción de Señal/genética , Transducción de Señal/fisiología
9.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 96(11): e6320, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28296748

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Propofol injection pain was considered as one conundrum during clinical anesthesia. The systematic review about the effect of lidocaine in reducing injection pain among children has not been established. The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of such intervention. METHODS: The literature search was performed from the inception to the May 31, 2016 in PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane database. All randomized controlled trials that using lidocaine for propofol injection pain in children were enrolled. The primary outcome included the incidence of injection pain and the incidence of propofol injection pain in different degrees. The data were combined to calculate the relative ratio and relevant 95% confidence interval. A meta-analysis was performed following the guidelines of the Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook and the PRISMA statement. RESULTS: Data from the included 11 studies indicated that the incidence of injection pain was lower in lidocaine group than the incidence in saline control group and in propofol lipuro (medium- and long-chain triglycerides) group (pain occurrence: 22.1% in lidocaine vs 66.8% in saline, RR with 95% 0.34 [0.26, 0.43], I = 38%; 30.5% in lidocaine vs 46.9% in propofol lipuro, RR with 95% 0.68 [0.46, 1.00], I = 9%). There was no difference between lidocaine and ketamine/alfentanil both in reducing pain occurrence and in reducing pain severity (pain occurrence: 29.7% in lidocaine vs 25.8% in ketamine, RR with 95% 1.47 [0.16, 13.43], I = 94%; 31.0% in lidocaine vs 30.7% in alfentanil, RR with 95% 1.01 [0.69, 1.46], I = 11%). And the reported side effects revealed that the safety of lidocaine in pediatric patients was acceptable. CONCLUSION: Compared with ketamine and alfentanil, lidocaine would be served as one more effective treatment in consideration of its well-matched efficacy, acceptable accessibility, and reasonable safety. However, more high-quality evidences in pediatric patients are necessary.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Intravenosos/efectos adversos , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Dolor/inducido químicamente , Dolor/prevención & control , Propofol/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Alfentanilo/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administración & dosificación , Niño , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Incidencia , Ketamina/efectos adversos , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
10.
Cell Host Microbe ; 21(2): 231-243, 2017 Feb 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28132838

RESUMEN

Recognition of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) DNA by the cytosolic sensor cGAS initiates STING-dependent innate antiviral responses. HCMV can antagonize host immune responses to promote latency infection. However, it is unknown whether and how HCMV targets the cGAS-STING axis for immune evasion. Here we identified the HCMV tegument protein UL82 as a negative regulator of STING-dependent antiviral responses. UL82 interacted with STING and impaired STING-mediated signaling via two mechanisms. UL82 inhibited the translocation of STING from the ER to perinuclear microsomes by disrupting the STING-iRhom2-TRAPß translocation complex. UL82 also impaired the recruitment of TBK1 and IRF3 to the STING complex. The levels of downstream antiviral genes induced by UL82-deficient HCMV were higher than those induced by wild-type HCMV. Conversely, wild-type HCMV replicated more efficiently than the UL82-deficient mutant. These findings reveal an important mechanism of immune evasion by HCMV.


Asunto(s)
Citomegalovirus/genética , Regulación Viral de la Expresión Génica , Evasión Inmune , Proteínas de la Membrana/metabolismo , Proteínas Virales/metabolismo , Citomegalovirus/fisiología , Humanos , Inmunidad Innata , Factor 3 Regulador del Interferón/genética , Factor 3 Regulador del Interferón/metabolismo , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinasas/genética , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinasas/metabolismo , Transporte de Proteínas , Transducción de Señal , Proteínas Virales/genética , Replicación Viral
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA