Exploring the Promise of Second-Line Chemotherapy in Biliary Tract Tumours: A Glimpse into Novel Treatment Approaches.

Biliary tract tumours, including bile duct, gallbladder, and ampulla of Vater malignancies, pose a rare but formidable oncologic challenge. Typically diagnosed at advanced stages, these tumours offer limited treatment options and dismal prognoses, with a five-year survival rate below 20%. First-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine-cisplatin has demonstrated only modest efficacy, leaving a pressing need for improved therapeutic strategies. This comprehensive review provides a detailed examination of the current landscape of second-line chemotherapy for biliary tract tumours. The pivotal ABC-06 trial established FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) as the standard second-line therapy, demonstrating improved overall survival compared to active symptom control alone. Conversely, the NIFTY trial introduced nal-IRI (nanoliposomal irinotecan) plus 5-FU/LV (5-fluorouracil and leucovorin) as an alternative option, demonstrating substantial gains in progression-free and overall survival. However, the posterior NALIRICC trial presented conflicting results, raising questions about the added benefit of nal-IRI. Challenges in delivering second-line chemotherapy include rapid patient performance deterioration post-first-line treatment and limited access to second-line therapy. Only a fraction of eligible patients receive second-line therapy, emphasising the need for more effective first-line therapies to maintain patient fitness. The role of monotherapy in the second-line setting remains uncertain, particularly in unfit patients, and the absence of biomarkers for tailored treatment underscores the need for ongoing research. While challenges persist, ongoing investigations offer hope for optimising second-line therapy for biliary tract tumours, promising improved outcomes for patients facing this disease. This review provides an overview of current facts and challenges when delivering second-line chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract tumours.

Current Landscape and Potential Challenges of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Microsatellite Stable Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent cancer and the second most common cause of cancer-related death in Europe. High microsatellite instability (MSI-H) due to a deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) system can be found in 5% of metastatic CRC (mCRC) and has been established as a biomarker of response to immunotherapy in these tumors. Therefore, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in mCRC with these characteristics were evaluated with results showing remarkable response rates and durations of response. The majority of mCRC cases have high levels of DNA mismatch repair proteins (pMMR) with consequent microsatellite stability or low instability (MSS or MSI-low), associated with an inherent resistance to ICIs. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the possible approaches to overcome the mechanisms of resistance and evaluates potential biomarkers to establish the role of ICIs in pMMR/MSS/MSI-L (MSS) mCRC.

Limited T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine among patients with cancer receiving different cancer treatments.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with cancer (PC) are at high risk of acquiring COVID-19 and can develop more serious complications. Deeper understanding of vaccines immunogenicity in this population is crucial for adequately planning vaccines programs. The ONCOVac study aimed to comprehensively assess the immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 vaccine in terms of humoral and cellular response. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-center study including patients with solid tumours treated with cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), immunotherapy (IT) or chemotherapy (CT). Patients were enrolled previously to vaccination with mRNA-1273. We also involved health care workers (HCW) to serve as a control group. We took blood samples before first dose administration (BL), after first dose (1D), and after second dose (2D). The primary objective was to compare the rate and magnitude of T cell response after second dose whereas safety and humoral response were defined as secondary objectives. We also collected patient reported outcomes after both the first and second vaccine dose and a six-month follow-up period to diagnose incident COVID-19 cases was planned. RESULTS: The rate of specific anti-S serologic positivity (anti-S IgG cut-off point at 7,14 BAU/mL) was significantly higher in HCW compared to PC after 1D (100% versus 83.8%; p = 0.04), but similar after 2D (100% versus 95.8%; p = 0.5). This difference after 1D was driven by PC treated with CT (100% versus 64.5%; p = 0.001). Cellular response after 2D was significantly lower in PC than in HCW for both CD4+ (91.7% versus 59.7%; p = 0.001) and CD8+ (94.4% versus 55.6%; p < 0.001) T cells. We found a difference on pre-existing CD4+ T cell response in HCW comparing to PC (36% and 17%, p = 0.03); without difference in pre-existing CD8+ T cell response (31% and 23%, p = 0.5). After excluding patients with pre-existing T cell response, PC achieved even lower CD4+ (50.9% versus 95.5%, p < 0.001) and CD8+ (45.5% versus 95.5%, p < 0.001) T cell response compared with HCW. Regarding safety, PC reported notably more adverse events than HCW (96.6% versus 69.2%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that PC showed a similar humoral response but a lower T cell response following two doses of mRNA-1273 vaccination. Further studies are needed to complement our results and determine the implication of low T cell response on clinical protection of PC against COVID-19.

Albumin-bound paclitaxel as new treatment for metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinomas are rare and very aggressive tumors. Most patients have advanced-stage or unresectable disease at presentation, and the systemic therapies have limited efficacy. Albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is a solvent-free taxane that has been approved for the treatment of some cancers such as breast, non-small cell lung and pancreatic cancer, however it has not been applied to treat cholangiocarcinoma. We have both preclinical and clinical evidence of the efficacy of nab-paclitaxel in cholangiocarcinoma, yet no phase 3 trials have been made. CASE SUMMARY: A 63-year-old man was diagnosed in December 2016 with stage III B intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery was performed, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy treatment with capecitabine and gemcitabine; although, the gemcitabine was suspended due to allergic reaction after two cycles. In April 2019, metastatic cholangiocarcinoma relapse was diagnosed, and a first-line treatment with FOLFOX scheme was started. Eight cycles were administered, producing an initial clinical improvement and decrease in blood tumor marker levels. Radiological and serological progression was noted in September 2019. As a second-line treatment, FOLFIRI was not recommended due to risk of worsening the patient's tumor-related diarrhea. A combination therapy with gemcitabine was not feasible, as the patient had previously suffered from an allergic reaction to this treatment. We decided to use nab-paclitaxel as a second-line treatment, and four cycles were administered. Both clinical and serological responses were observed, and a radiological mixed response was also noted. CONCLUSION: Advanced cholangiocarcinoma could be treated with nab-paclitaxel monotherapy, which should be studied in combination with other types of treatment (chemotherapy, fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors).

Watch and wait approach in rectal cancer: Current controversies and future directions.

According to the main international clinical guidelines, the recommended treatment for locally-advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. However, doubts have been raised about the appropriate definition of clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy and the role of surgery in patients who achieve a cCR. Surgical resection is associated with significant morbidity and decreased quality of life (QoL), which is especially relevant given the favourable prognosis in this patient subset. Accordingly, there has been a growing interest in alternative approaches with less morbidity, including the organ-preserving watch and wait strategy, in which surgery is omitted in patients who have achieved a cCR. These patients are managed with a specific follow-up protocol to ensure adequate cancer control, including the early identification of recurrent disease. However, there are several open questions about this strategy, including patient selection, the clinical and radiological criteria to accurately determine cCR, the duration of neoadjuvant treatment, the role of dose intensification (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy), optimal follow-up protocols, and the future perspectives of this approach. In the present review, we summarize the available evidence on the watch and wait strategy in this clinical scenario, including ongoing clinical trials, QoL in these patients, and the controversies surrounding this treatment approach.